11
0

Trump set up for stunning KO in 2020


 invite response                
2019 Nov 1, 9:01pm   818 views  46 comments

by Patrick   ➕follow (55)   💰tip   ignore  

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7640195/PIERS-MORGAN-Trump-look-like-hes-ropes-set-stunning-KO-2020.html

The impeachment attempt is the best thing that could have happened to Trump.

It will fail, and Trump will easily sail into office again.

Comments 1 - 40 of 46       Last »     Search these comments

1   steverbeaver   2019 Nov 1, 9:31pm  

Like I've stated before, it's not a sure thing. Donks are all uppity after their successes with ballot harvesting. I expect to see more of that. Much, much more of that.
2   komputodo   2019 Nov 1, 10:07pm  

Patrick says
It will fail, and Trump will easily sail into office again.

Tim told me that impeachment was a sure thing this time.
3   WookieMan   2019 Nov 2, 6:02am  

komputodo says
Patrick says
It will fail, and Trump will easily sail into office again.

Tim told me that impeachment was a sure thing this time.

There's still this gem.
Tim Aurora says
Midterm election - live updates: As exit polls come in, Democrats snatch Guam governorship from Republicans in first flip

He actually was correct though that the Dems would take the house. So kudos to him. I think this impeachment quest is going to be a colossal failure as nothing remotely illegal was done.
4   marcus   2019 Nov 2, 6:21am  

:
I disagree. If Trump Wins in 2020, it will not be becasue the impeachment helps him. Trump will probably be impeached, much as Clinton was. And then acquitted by the Senate.

AS with Clinton, it won't have any impact on whether people think Trump is guilty of what he was accused of. Everyone understands that Senate republicans will be more than willing to defend actions that are much worse than lying about sex. Or to say, "what, that's no big deal."

It's true, we knew what kind of person Trump was before he was elected in 2016. And there are people out there that just don't care, or who have come up with a somewhat bizarre story as to why it doesn't matter.

I say that people are damn tired of having a dishonorable President, and ready to move on. But Trump can win if the democrats put forward a candidate that too many people are afraid to elect becasue they are too left wing. Trump has an uncanny understanding of this, hence his willingness to commit the high misdemeanors he has.
5   WookieMan   2019 Nov 2, 7:09am  

marcus says
Trump will probably be impeached, much as Clinton was. And then acquitted by the Senate.

Not a gambler, but I don't think the house actually impeaches. It will be a parade of bull shit, that's easily identifiable. If one witness says X happened and then another witness say Y happened, you can't impeach based on conflicting testimonies. Who's telling the truth?

If the democrats impeach based on clearly identifiable, partisan witnesses it will be their ultimate undoing. So far only 2 of them know this. More, I believe many more will flip as this plays out. This is all over an unrecorded call, so you're never going to have a consensus or belief something illegal was done. Account for a sitting Vice President potentially shaking down a foreign government to make his son a bunch of money for doing nothing, and you have a recipe for disaster for the Dems.

marcus says
And there are people out there that just don't care, or who have come up with a somewhat bizarre story as to why it doesn't matter.

Bizarre story???? Every single person defending ANY politician is coming up with a bizarre story why they support them. This is fact. Hillary was a war mongering piece of shit, yet people swallowed the obvious bull shit for tons of different reasons. First woman President (which is utterly one of the most retarded reasons). She's experienced (at killing, bribing and stealing). You have to take the bad with the good if you intend to be a part of the election process by voting. They're all shitty in many ways. You don't get to the top by playing nice and doing everything by the book.

marcus says
I say that people are damn tired of having a dishonorable President, and ready to move on.

No. If that was the case the last 3 Presidents would have NEVER gotten a 2nd term.
6   clambo   2019 Nov 2, 9:41am  

I'm going to drown myself in Bollinger or Pol Roger when Trump wins again.

The bullshit impeachment nonsense makes the Democrats look crazier than they are which is pretty amazing.

I predict that the person who finally is the nominee will be unpopular and so many liberal lefty Democrats simply won't vote for anyone in Nov 2020.

Why would Biden the frontrunner become suddenly popular? Is he likely to get the votes that would have gone to Beto or some other loser?
7   🎂 Tenpoundbass   2019 Nov 2, 9:47am  

I suspect Trump is waiting until the last moment to make sweeping changes to the voting process. That will prevent Ballot Harvesting, erroneous Voters on the rolls, and will streamline the electronic process so that the results are due within an hour of polls closing. Waiting will give Liberals too little time to game the new changes or get an Obama Judge to undo it.
8   Onvacation   2019 Nov 2, 10:27am  

marcus says
be becasue

She can spell.
C'mon Marcus. It's be Cause.
9   Ceffer   2019 Nov 2, 3:36pm  

Patrick says
Trump set up for stunning KO in 2020


Yeah, but it is so much fun giving the Progressives and hysterical LibbyFucks more rope to hang themselves. People are starting to feel embarrassed for voting for IHLlary.
10   MisdemeanorRebel   2019 Nov 2, 9:31pm  

marcus says
I say that people are damn tired of having a dishonorable President, and ready to move on. But Trump can win if the democrats put forward a candidate that too many people are afraid to elect becasue they are too left wing. Trump has an uncanny understanding of this, hence his willingness to commit the high misdemeanors he has.


Unlike Previous Presidents, Trump did exactly as promised. He bombed the hell out of ISIS, then got our troops out.

He promised a tax cut, and despite libby propaganda to gaslight people he didn't, he did.

When he couldn't, he still took steps in the direction, asked for funding, and even moved over some funds over trying to use various obscure Presidential Powers (ie the Wall).
11   FuckTheMainstreamMedia   2019 Nov 2, 10:06pm  

LOL @ all the dislikes on this thread! Looks like one person logged on, clicked dislike, logged off. Logged on their other account X5 and we are where we are.

Seems like a lot of effort for....
12   marcus   2019 Nov 2, 10:23pm  

WookieMan says
If one witness says X happened and then another witness say Y happened, you can't impeach based on conflicting testimonies. Who's telling the truth?


Maybe I'm naive to think that facts still exist. There is a factual recording of Trumps phone call to Zelensky.

It will be known what he said. Period.

Now partisan interpretation may come in as to whether what was said was wrong or whether it was impeachable. But it will be known and considered factual , what Trump said, and probably to a great degree what he meant.

THe disagreement will be about whether it was wrong.

What looks bad is for a man (Trump) who treats truth as something that is only about what you believe to be true (or want to believe to be true) to be asking another PResident to come up with dirt on a political opponent that presumably is is worse than what we already know, about Bidens son having a job he doesn't deserve other than because of who his father is.

Was Trump more or less asking for lies about Biden in exchange for millions in aid ?

After all, Trump throws around lies constantly as if that's just something that Presidents just get to do. Why would the same not be the case for Zelensky ?
13   HeadSet   2019 Nov 3, 8:00am  

what we already know, about Bidens son having a job he doesn't deserve other than because of who his father is.

And the fact that Biden threatened to withhold over a billion in aid until the man investigating his son's company was removed. The huge sums of money that company invested in Biden's son had the payoff. It takes a real hyper partisan to ignore this and consider it a bigger crime to ask to look into Crowdstrike or even into the Biden payoff.
14   Onvacation   2019 Nov 3, 9:30am  

marcus says
Was Trump more or less asking for lies about Biden in exchange for millions in aid ?


No.
15   marcus   2019 Nov 3, 12:44pm  

:
HeadSet says
And the fact that Biden threatened to withhold over a billion in aid until the man investigating his son's company was removed


Except that is speculative and possibly totally untrue. Seems very unlikely. The guy Biden wanted removed was known to be corrupt.

Also, I don't believe Biden would do that. Btw, I'm not a big Biden supporter.
16   Patrick   2019 Nov 3, 12:46pm  

Jazz, all I really care about is shared peace and prosperity, and Trump is delivering that, whatever his personal faults might be. Those faults are insignificant compared to how he has benefited all of us, including you and all Democrats.

Record low unemployment, rising wages, record high stock market, getting us out of the eternal quagmire of the Mideast.

Unlike Democrats, Trump also has the guts to talk about how outsourcing US manufacturing to China and insourcing scab labor from Mexico has devastated the US middle class.

Trump has been an absolutely fantastic president because he's not part of the corrupt machine. That machine desperately wants to get rid of him because he is messing with their scams.

Remember that people didn't vote for Trump because they particularly like him. The did it because they really didn't want Hillary. But we got these yuge bonuses because he is president.

Democrats can turn it around in an instant if they start picking up on his themes of bring manufacturing back to the US and keeping illegals out.

I do have a couple of criticisms of Trump:

1. Way too chummy with the Saudi fucks who massacred thousands of Americans on 9/11.
2. Focuses on the wall instead of imprisoning everyone who employs illegals, which would be way more effective.
17   marcus   2019 Nov 3, 12:47pm  

Patrick says
Those faults are insignificant compared to how he has benefited all of us


You're seeing the world through a very different lens than most of us.

Tax cuts for the wealthy. Massive deficits. Idiotic trade deals. Distractions and lies.

Oh yeah, it's party time !
19   Patrick   2019 Nov 3, 12:51pm  

marcus says
You're seeing the world through a very different lens than most of us.


How are you investments doing?

How is the job situation for ordinary people?

Any new wars in the Mideast under Trump?

It's kind of a pity that it took Trump to deliver these things, but it's only because the Democratic Party has been infiltrated and corrupted by global capital, which just wants to divide us all using race, gender, sex, or whatever else it takes so we cannot unify.

Let's work together. We want the same things, more or less.
20   marcus   2019 Nov 3, 12:59pm  

:
Patrick says
It's kind of a pity that it took Trump to deliver these things


You've been around long enough to know that what the stock market does is largely independent of who the President is at the time.

Same is true for the continuation of the low interest rate environment and employment trends that were in place since 2011 (and before that in the case of the "carry trade.")
21   marcus   2019 Nov 3, 1:02pm  

:

Patrick says
infiltrated and corrupted by global capital, which just wants to divide us all using race, gender, sex, or whatever else it takes so we cannot unify.


Patrick says
Let's work together. We want the same things, more or less.


Yeah, I'm not far left, but I'm not down for all the hate.

Hate and fear is the sickest recipe for bringing people together.

Fuck that !!
22   marcus   2019 Nov 3, 1:04pm  

:
Btw, file this under transparent

Patrick says
infiltrated and corrupted by global capital, which just wants to divide us all using race, gender, sex, or whatever else it takes so we cannot unify.


Right.

Globohomo ? Really ?

Dude, you really could be more honest with yourself.
23   Patrick   2019 Nov 3, 1:05pm  

Agreed!

Remember that the head of Facebook advertising said that Russian ads on Facebook were designed not to elect Trump, but only to divide us and therefore weaken us.

China's doing the same thing, in my experience with running this site.

They can't win militarily, but they can win by dividing us. Let's not let them.

I know you don't like Trump, and I can see why people wouldn't like him in general. But until the Democrats recover from their corruption and support for anti-US policies, we don't have a lot of other choice.

Tulsi, maybe. But no way are the globalists going to let he name appear on the ballot. She's already told way too much truth about Saudi Arabia, for instance.
24   marcus   2019 Nov 3, 1:06pm  

:

Re: GloboHomo

Maybe you need to get out of San Fran. They really aren't taking over the world.
25   Patrick   2019 Nov 3, 1:07pm  

Why get out of San Fran? I'm nearly the sole human in the whole Bay Area who is not bleeding from the eyes with insane levels of HATE for Trump.
27   rocketjoe79   2019 Nov 3, 1:48pm  

Oddsmakers have Trump 2.5 times more likely to win than Warren, the most likely contender. Biden is 5x less likely, others worse.
I gave up on looking at Polls after the last election. If they can be that far off, they're useless.
28   Booger   2019 Nov 3, 1:58pm  

marcus says
Globohomo ? Really ?


29   rdm   2019 Nov 3, 8:16pm  

rocketjoe79 says
Oddsmakers have Trump 2.5 times more likely to win than Warren, the most likely contender. Biden is 5x less likely, others worse


I assume you understand why these are what they are? Any individual Dem also has to first get the Democratic nomination (which is wide open right now) where as Trump probably has a 95%+ chance at getting the Republican nomination. So these are not head to head odds, but rather two step process for Dem and essentially a one step for Trump.
30   Onvacation   2019 Nov 4, 5:48am  

rdm says
Any individual Dem also has to first get the Democratic nomination

Who's your dog in the fight? As a registered Democrat, I'm voting for Tulsi!
32   rdm   2019 Nov 4, 7:44am  

Onvacation says
Who's your dog in the fight? As a registered Democrat, I'm voting for Tulsi!

As you may be aware not a fan of cults, No party affiliation.
33   mell   2019 Nov 4, 8:29am  

rdm says
Onvacation says
Who's your dog in the fight? As a registered Democrat, I'm voting for Tulsi!

As you may be aware not a fan of cults, No party affiliation.


I get that. And it's a fair stance. However I don't think it's about voting for Trump, it's about voting against the modern Dems/left who are hell bent on destroying the future of every Caucasian/Asian, straight male, Christian and nuclear family.
34   WookieMan   2019 Nov 4, 9:09am  

Tim Aurora says
Onvacation says
Who's your dog in the fight? As a registered Democrat, I'm voting for Tulsi!


You are trolling, aren't you. As a Trump supporter , you are trying to create a rift in the Democratic Primary

How is he trolling? He and many here have said they would vote for Tulsi over Trump. Since the Republican party is shit in CA, he can register and vote for a Democrat during the primaries.

Unfortunately by the time CA goes to the ballot, Tulsi is likely to be all but out if she isn't already. Either way, he'd be voting for the best actual candidate attempting to get the nomination that would stand a chance to beat Trump with regards to Dems. You should be rooting for that and not asking if he's trolling.
35   Shaman   2019 Nov 4, 9:40am  

If Tulsi switched parties i would vote for her, but as it stands I am not comfortable with giving any power like that to the Democrats. They’ve shown nothing but contempt for conservatives and a complete dedication to abusing the power they have to oppress their political opponents. They even sicced the IRS on people who were political rivals. They’ve overstepped as a party and now are just a safe space for Marxists and haters. I can’t vote for any Democrat no matter how much I might personally like them.
36   rocketjoe79   2019 Nov 4, 9:49am  

rocketjoe79 says
Oddsmakers have Trump 2.5 times more likely to win than Warren, the most likely contender. Biden is 5x less likely, others worse.
I gave up on looking at Polls after the last election. If they can be that far off, they're useless.


Also, look at the fundraising:
Trump $245MM
Bernie $74MM
Warren $60MM
Buttigieg $51MM
Steyer $50MM
Biden $37MM
Harris $36MM
The rest are under $20MM each

I realize the dems haven't "Cranked up" their fundraising machine, and the heavy hitters will wait until after the final candidate is chosen. But money can win elections, and it doesn't look good for Dems.

And this: https://www.cnbc.com/2019/11/04/wall-street-shuns-chuck-schumer-donation-requests-as-elizabeth-warren-surges.html
37   🎂 Tenpoundbass   2019 Nov 4, 9:50am  

TrumpingTits says
Only Congress can do anything like you mention, unfortunately.


I think he can EO Poll watchers, with full access anywhere the ballots goes, they have access to follow along. Don't forget Trump is a wonderful disrupter.

If I were him, I would ban people convicted of a Federal Crime from voting in the election. That would eliminate the illegal aliens that came here illegally before they got their papers.
38   socal2   2019 Nov 4, 10:00am  

Quigley says
If Tulsi switched parties i would vote for her, but as it stands I am not comfortable with giving any power like that to the Democrats.


I get why some people like Tulsi for taking it to Clinton and not being ugly like the rest of the Democrat females. But beyond her foreign policy, she is a pretty extremist Left-Winger on most issues.

- Open borders
- Pro DACA
- Medicare for all
- Abortion on demand
- Ending Electoral College
- Supports Reparations
- Free College
- Banning Nuclear power
39   WookieMan   2019 Nov 4, 10:28am  

socal2 says
not being ugly like the rest of the Democrat females

This I fear is one of the things blinding some (her hotness for a politician at least - much hotter women out there though) and the fact she seems to spit out a relatively coherent thoughts without a teleprompter or speech writer. That doesn't make a good leader though and some of your bullet points are cringe worthy.

Trump having 3 years on the inside now, she'd get her ass handed to her in a debate. He's already defeated a female opponent and wasn't exactly nice in the process. So it's pretty clear that women don't mind his personality as much as the media likes to portray how "mean" he is. I think Tulsi would end up stuttering and stammering when Trump keeps throwing bomb after bomb.

Honestly, the Democrats should really start focusing on 2024 as crazy as that sounds. I've voted D before and would/will in the future likely. The Democrats pipeline seems absolutely dried up. They don't seem well run. There really is little hope in 2020 and at some point it might be best to cut your losses and restructure the whole god damn thing. Trump forced the Republicans to do it, but I don't see even one Democrat that can do anything in the next 5 years. They might want to play the long game. Besides Bush Sr. we're in an era of 2 term POTUS. I don't see 2020 bucking the trend like Bush Sr.
40   MisdemeanorRebel   2019 Nov 4, 10:43am  

The Democrats are basically a Political Machine at this point.

As far as I can tell, their platform is basically "Let us continue to receive lobbyist money, go back to one-sided trade, let in all the illegals, and more foreign wars just like the good old days of Clinton-Bush-Obama!"

Comments 1 - 40 of 46       Last »     Search these comments

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions