Please log in to view images

« prev   random   next »

0
1

"Supreme Court leaves Kentucky’s ultrasound law in place"

By HEYYOU follow HEYYOU   2019 Dec 9, 10:03am 158 views   11 comments   watch   nsfw   quote   share    


This is what pro-abortion Democratic women deserve for not calling for a boycott of all Republican businesses,family & friends.

https://apnews.com/d36c289f1d5692fea014e5996f19de7a
1   socal2   ignore (2)   2019 Dec 9, 10:30am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

The horror!

Women will be forced to view what they are choosing to destroy.

Why are Democrats against Science and wanting to keep people ignorant of basic biology?
2   APOCALYPSEFUCKisShostikovitch   ignore (49)   2019 Dec 9, 10:35am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

BABY KILLERS SHOULD BE FORCED TO EAT THE BABY!, TOO!, AND PAY FOR THE GUNS THE DOCTORS WILL USE TO COMPEL COMPLIANCE!

EAT THE BABY STATUTES ARE THE ONLY HOPE OF AMERICA! TO BE RIGHT WITH JESUS! AND WITH TRUMP!
3   socal2   ignore (2)   2019 Dec 9, 10:44am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

The Bonkers Donkey party is already advocating the eating of the babies.

4   HEYYOU   ignore (46)   2019 Dec 9, 10:52am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

@2 - Fetus fricassee!

Republicans should be forced to view the kike fetus children that Blaspheming Jews abort each year.
Republicans are stupid & love abortion.
5   Chiromancer   ignore (0)   2019 Dec 9, 5:51pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

socal2 says
Why are Democrats against Science and wanting to keep people ignorant of basic biology?


Are they? Seems like its evangelical Republicans that are opposed to birth control and sex ed. Yeah I know in the 5000 or so years since the earth was formed perhaps when the dinosaurs were cavorting with our ancestors their Jesus advised them to make women observe the fruits of their uncle's incest or uber driver's rape. Seems reasonable, Jesus thinks they be great scientists,
6   EBGuy   ignore (1)   2019 Dec 9, 6:16pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

In a response to a question about reproductive rights, Democratic candidate Tulsi Gabbard told the audience she believed that abortion should be “safe, legal, and rare”—a phrase that Democrats once used to show their support for abortion, but has fallen out of vogue with activists who say it stigmatizes the procedure.
Gabbard even got the agreement of the former head of Planned Parenthood, Dr. Leana Wen, who tweeted:
“I don’t agree with @TulsiGabbard on a lot, but do appreciate that she brought up the third rail for Democrats: that abortion should be ‘safe, legal, and rare,’” she wrote. “We should reduce the need for abortions by investing in prevention.”
Left wing extremists responded in the only way they could:
Amelia Bonow, the creator of the viral #shoutyourabortion hashtag, was more explicit.
“HOW DID YOU GET THAT JOB AND WHY IN THE FUCK DID YOU WANT IT,” she tweeted at the former Planned Parenthood head.

For more read: Ousted Planned Parenthood Boss Leana Wen Endorses Tulsi’s Abortion Spin
7   HeadSet   ignore (3)   2019 Dec 9, 7:50pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Chiromancer says
socal2 says
Why are Democrats against Science and wanting to keep people ignorant of basic biology?


Are they? Seems like its evangelical Republicans that are opposed to birth control and sex ed.


Birth control (actually conception control) methods like condoms and the pill are opposed only by a very few. To put condoms and the pill on the same category as late term and post-partum surgical abortion is disingenuous.
8   Chiromancer   ignore (0)   2019 Dec 9, 10:07pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

HeadSet says
To put condoms and the pill on the same category as late term and post-partum surgical abortion is disingenuous.


Who did that? Other than some evangelicals and conservative Catholics, maybe salafist Muslims.
Personally against abortion, but the government has no business forcing unnecessary medical procedures on women.
9   socal2   ignore (2)   2019 Dec 10, 8:52am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Chiromancer says
Personally against abortion, but the government has no business forcing unnecessary medical procedures on women.


I would say ripping a baby limb from limb and crushing their skulls is considered an "unnecessary medical procedure".

But because you are super sciency and have been trained to think that a 6 pound fully formed baby a few weeks from delivery is nothing but a tumor or a clump of cells - the thought of the other life never crosses your mind.

It is perfectly legal to abort this baby in many states in the United States for any reason. America has the most barbaric and permissive abortion laws next to fucking China. God forbid we put some mild restrictions on this vile procedure and try to increase people's education and awareness of what they are "choosing" to do out of convenience.

10   FortWayneIndiana   ignore (3)   2019 Dec 10, 9:05am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Conservatives save lifes.
Liberals sell death.

end of story.
11   OccasionalCortex   ignore (4)   2019 Dec 10, 2:08pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

If an abortion is a positive good, why wouldn't a woman want to watch one happen on an ultrasound?

It's just a clump of cells/mess on a napkin is all, right?

about   best comments   contact   one year ago   suggestions