Please log in to view images

« prev   random   next »
1   SunnyvaleCA   ignore (1)   2019 Dec 9, 5:19pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

Across 17 metro areas analyzed, allowing 10% of single-family lots to house two units instead of one could yield almost 3.3 million additional housing units to the existing housing stock.

If only we could remove 20 to 40 million people from the country. We might find that there is already more than enough housing. Hmmm...
2   APOCALYPSEFUCKisShostakovitch   ignore (52)   2019 Dec 9, 5:37pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

SHOOT ALL ILLEGALS! AS LEGAL CULLS OF VERMIN!

FUCKING! A!

FREEDOM!
3   Tenpoundbass   ignore (15)   2019 Dec 9, 5:40pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

Just turn San Francisco in Kowloon already, so we can put this notion to bed.
4   Fortwaynemobile   ignore (3)   2019 Dec 9, 5:52pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

Land should be free to build on. Densification is just forcing people to live in an anthill.
5   TrumpingTits   ignore (3)   2019 Dec 9, 8:16pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

Across 17 metro areas analyzed, allowing 10% of single-family lots to house two units instead of one could yield almost 3.3 million additional housing units to the existing housing stock.


IF the original houses on those lots get torn down and the de facto duplexes are built in their place, yeah.

But not many will do that. So it is a disingenous stat.
6   HeadSet   ignore (3)   2019 Dec 10, 6:50am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

Affordable housing requires Densification

Don't be dense.

about   best comments   contact   one year ago   suggestions