1
0

Trump attacked Iran to show Americans that most of Washington don't give a fuck about America


 invite response                
2020 Jan 4, 10:12am   1,635 views  32 comments

by Tenpoundbass   ➕follow (7)   💰tip   ignore  

And will very vocally and publicly support Iran over America.
They don't even give a fuck about the optics it presents. Even Rand Paul will show his ass to let us all know.
That they have been in Congress for 30 years on average, and have known Iran is a dangerous regime. They have had plenty of opportunities to take out the enemies that orchestrated the Benghazi attacks, and others around the world. But they did NOT take them out, because they FEARED Iran's reprisal.
What Chicken Shit no good sorry bastard sons of bitches, they all are.

This will be the final blow, the death knell to the establishment dickwads. That their time is over. They are going to show their asses on this one.
Every last damn one of them, on both sides. Now count the fuckers sitting shiva over the death of this scumbag, and getting a kink in their neck to kiss Iran's ass and apologize.


On the upside, we can pull out of Iraq now. Even the Iraqi regime we fucking put there, is pulling their Anti Trump Anti American shit. It's a fucking win win.
We killed the Big Bad wolf, Trump took out all of the enemies, that Bush, Kerry, McShitstain, and Obama could have taken out anytime. But they left them, financed them, sent them pallets of cash, and pretty much allowed them to hit our targets. This is for Ambassador Stevens, may nothing like that ever happen again.

Thanks to the Great, Great, Great hypocrisy Trump has shown the American people.


Oh! And Death to IRAN B-b-b-b-b-itches!


Comments 1 - 32 of 32        Search these comments

1   marcus   2020 Jan 4, 1:48pm  

Tenpoundbass says
Trump attacked Iran to show Americans that most of Washington don't give a fuck about America


Yeah, that's the ticket. Real Americans understand that attacking our enemies is always the best option. That's the reason.

Of course some who know how Trump thinks can come up with other reasons for the attack. That is ancillary motivations to the strategic ones.

Such as:

7   marcus   2020 Jan 4, 1:59pm  

Tenpoundbass says
Thanks to the Great, Great, Great hypocrisy Trump has shown the American people.


I'm not going to thank him for that. Although I am surprised to hear you acknowledge it.




8   Ceffer   2020 Jan 4, 2:00pm  

TDS is reaching new pinnacles of incoherent, non-sequitur delusion held together by thin tissues of frothing madness.
9   marcus   2020 Jan 4, 2:04pm  

:
That was exactly thought when I read this.

Tenpoundbass says
Trump attacked Iran to show Americans that most of Washington don't give a fuck about America


and this:

Tenpoundbass says
On the upside, we can pull out of Iraq now. Even the Iraqi regime we fucking put there, is pulling their Anti Trump Anti American shit. It's a fucking win win.
10   Tenpoundbass   2020 Jan 4, 2:07pm  

Well Marcus was Trump supposed to let General Fuckface Salami storm the US Embassy in Iraq and kill everyone just like Benghazi? Was Trump supposed to let that go to? At what point would have you supported Trump hitting them back?
Sorry but you're on the Floor Smoocher side of this. Trump took out the leader of the Iran Embassy attack and the Benghazi Embassy attack. That hit was for Ambassador Stevens. Can't get no better than that.
11   marcus   2020 Jan 4, 2:12pm  

:
I've never said that I thought hitting him was a mistake. I'm just concerned whether Trump is the right one to weigh the pro and cons when it comes to such decisions that could conceivably escalate to a war that we do not want to have.

Maybe it can be argued that the Iranians see Trump as crazy (the President of Iran called Trump "mentally retarded" last summer), and therefore will tread carefully with their response, and that they won't escalate this in to full scale war. That would be stupid.

Hard to imagine how Trump negotiates with Iran after doing this, to get a better deal than the one Kerry brokered.

I can't relate to the convoluted fantasies of people that think they understand exactly some grand corrupt NWO strategy that Trump is disrupting. Far more likely that war with Iran would play into such a strategy, and have the full support of the M.I.C. But if I thought it was possibly for the people of Iran to be freed from their radical Islamic government, I would be all for that. Iran was on the cusp of being a secular state like Turkey, before we got overly involved with our puppet (the Shah) regime there that were forcibly removed by the Ayatollah.
13   MisdemeanorRebel   2020 Jan 4, 4:36pm  

More Leftist reax:

There is nothing new about American terrorist attacks against Black and Brown people for the expansion of American imperialism.— Colin Kaepernick (@Kaepernick7) January 4, 2020



Too bad this dumbass doesn't understand that the word Iran and Aryan are related.
14   MisdemeanorRebel   2020 Jan 4, 4:44pm  

Leftists, marching FOR Suleimani
15   marcus   2020 Jan 4, 5:21pm  

:
What does it mean when you have to resort to lies ?

That's obviously a protest about not going to war with Iran.

Maybe they're marching for photoshop ?
17   mell   2020 Jan 4, 7:45pm  

NoCoupForYou says
Leftists, marching FOR Suleimani

Classic. Easy to explain. Unmarried, unwanted way past the wall, either no kids or estranged. So she likes to get fucked by a psychotic asshole who can take charge. Sad.
18   MisdemeanorRebel   2020 Jan 4, 9:08pm  

marcus says
That's obviously a protest about not going to war with Iran.


Right, holding a sympathetic photo of a terrorist is just an anti-war protest.

Just like when the Radicals marched with North Vietnamese and Communist flags and pictures of Ho Chi Mihn and General Giap, they were just "Anti-War in General"

The gaslighting isn't working anymore, after a few decades the truth will out. It's all oikophobia.
19   marcus   2020 Jan 4, 11:34pm  

:
Try to cool off on the lying and trolling. It makes you look like a total idiot.

I don't know what that one lady is thinking. Sure maybe she's a total flake.

But in my opinion, lying about the obvious point of the protest makes you (in my view) way more out of touch than she is. Maybe she thinks that assassinating an Iranian general is an act of war, and that's her point (not honoring him). I don't know what she's thinking. But I do know you're willing to bring out the biggest lies you can to paint that protest as a negative.

It's probably not even what you think. I know you by now. You know full well that's a protest against going to war with Iran. But to you politics based on lies is really cool so awesome (Trump has you convinced that it's honorable?). Perhaps you're butthurt becasue on the honest side of things, people point out that some Trump supporters are racists. That's not a lie.

But half the stuff you post is just outright lies. Sometimes it's so over the top, like Boogers stuff, that there isn't any question that it's just a stupid troll. But you often like to argue as if you believe your own lies. I guess Trump truly is your hero.
21   marcus   2020 Jan 4, 11:40pm  

:


One trillion ? I wish !

Who knows how many good people, both Americans and Iranians would be killed if we go to war with Iran. I actually don't believe Trump wants that, but he seems willing to risk it.

:
22   FortwayeAsFuckJoeBiden   2020 Jan 5, 9:22am  

Fucking Tuna has it coming!!!

Booger says
23   MisdemeanorRebel   2020 Jan 5, 9:25am  

Lisa Page's take.

Iran is smart and strategic and all over the world. Iran isn’t an irrational actor, but they have the pride of a 5,000 year old culture. I fear they are going to hit back in a way to remind America that they are a real and independent country.

I hope I’m wrong. 2/

— Lisa Page (@NatSecLisa) January 3, 2020


I guess her lawyers decided her best bet was to be a Leftist Mouthpiece in desperation.
24   Chiromancer   2020 Jan 5, 9:35am  

NoCoupForYou says
guess her lawyers decided her best bet was to be a Leftist Mouthpiece in desperation.


What about her statement do you find incorrect?
25   Patrick   2020 Jan 5, 9:41am  

mell says
Classic. Easy to explain. Unmarried, unwanted way past the wall, either no kids or estranged. So she likes to get fucked by a psychotic asshole who can take charge. Sad.


That was exactly my impression as well. The lack of wedding ring supports this interpretation as well.
26   MisdemeanorRebel   2020 Jan 5, 10:38am  

Chiromancer says
What about her statement do you find incorrect?


Iran is certainly all over the world, using their Billions in Obamacash to further IRGC and Terrorist operations in Lebanon, Yemen, Syria, etc.
28   mell   2020 Jan 5, 2:39pm  

marcus says
That's obviously a protest about not going to war with Iran.


WTF? So holding up Hitler, Stalin, or Mao pictures is not honoring them but protesting the wars that ensued around them? Don't go off the deep end. There's no reason to hold up a picture to remember/honor a mass murderer.
29   Booger   2020 Jan 5, 3:53pm  

marcus says
:


It’s funny people think that Iran was abiding by the nuclear treaty in the 1st place.
30   Tenpoundbass   2020 Jan 5, 4:49pm  

They may end up teaming up with Russia, we double down on Iraq's security. Then Putin and Trump plays Rockem Sockem Robots with Proxy War Boxers.
Everybody gets what they want.
32   Bd6r   2020 Jan 5, 6:44pm  

Tenpoundbass says
They may end up teaming up with Russia, we double down on Iraq's security. Then Putin and Trump plays Rockem Sockem Robots with Proxy War Boxers.
Everybody gets what they want.

Iran is in cahoots with Russia already as they fight alongside each other in Syria. This is why the fact that trump droned mr. Salami makes D's claiming that trump is a russian asset look extremely idiotic.

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions