patrick.net

That’s when you countersue for harassment and mental anguish. Insist on a jury trial and collect big from a sympathetic jury! Assholes like the Costas need to pay for the right to exist in the same universe.

Probably California transplants.

The issue is solely about whether or not the Play Structure was approved by the ARC, provided that HOA Bylaws say any such structure must be approved first. This is part of what you get when you buy into a HOA.

We tried to get a privacy fence several times and it got denied. (Wrought iron fences only). It’s on OUR property.

Ramblings about how you cannot build a wooden privacy fence on "YOUR PROPERTY" when the bylaws only allow wrought iron fencing are irrelevant. Also, I would suspect there is no provision in the by-laws that exempt one from compliance on play structures because one has a disabled child.

The remedy here though is not a lawsuit, but a petition to the HOA to have the structure taken down, provided the structure is indeed against HOA rules.

Wouldn't the HOA paying for the child's euthanasia resolve this conflict?

So good news. Due to so much support for the home owners to keep the playscape, it was approved by the HOA and the plaintiffs Dropped their lawsuit!

But most homeowners still don’t know that if they are sued by a neighbor over some property related issue, their homeowners insurance will probably provide a legal defense and even pay for a settlement. This can save homeowners thousands of dollars in legal fees.