« First « Previous Comments 41 - 75 of 75 Search these comments
“Vaccines, for Bill Gates, are a strategic philanthropy that feed his many vaccine-related businesses (including Microsoft’s ambition to control a global vac ID enterprise) and give him dictatorial control over global health policy—the spear tip of corporate neo-imperialism.
Gates’ obsession with vaccines seems fueled by a messianic conviction that he is ordained to save the world with technology and a god-like willingness to experiment with the lives of lesser humans.
Promising to eradicate Polio with $1.2 billion, Gates took control of India ‘s National Advisory Board (NAB) and mandated 50 polio vaccines (up from 5) to every child before age 5. Indian doctors blame the Gates campaign for a devastating vaccine-strain polio epidemic that paralyzed 496,000 children between 2000 and 2017. In 2017, the Indian Government dialed back Gates’ vaccine regimen and evicted Gates and his cronies from the NAB. Polio paralysis rates dropped precipitously. In 2017, the World Health Organization reluctantly admitted that the global polio explosion is predominantly vaccine strain, meaning it is coming from Gates’ Vaccine Program. The most frightening epidemics in Congo, the Philippines, and Afghanistan are all linked to Gates’ vaccines. By 2018, ¾ of global polio cases were from Gates’ vaccines.
Nelson Mandela’s former Senior Economist, Professor Patrick Bond, describes Gates’ philantropic practises as “ruthless” and immoral”.
In 2010, Gates committed $ 10 billion to the WHO promising to reduce population, in part, through new vaccines. A month later Gates told a Ted Talk that new vaccines “could reduce population”. In 2014, Kenya’s Catholic Doctors Association accused the WHO of chemically sterilizing millions of unwilling Kenyan women with a phony “tetanus” vaccine campaign.
Independent labs found the sterility formula in every vaccine tested.
After denying the charges, WHO finally admitted it had been developing the sterility vaccines for over a decade.
Similar accusations came from Tanzania, Nicaragua, Mexico and the Philippines.
A 2017 study (Morgensen et.Al.2017) showed that WHO’s popular DTP is killing more Africans than the disease it pretends to prevent. Vaccinated girls suffered 10x the death rate of unvaccinated children.
Gates and the WHO refused to recall the lethal vaccine which WHO forces upon millions of African children annually.
Global public health advocates around the world accuse Gates of – hijacking WHO’s agenda away from the projects that are proven to curb infectious diseases; clean water, hygiene, nutrition and economic development.
They say he has diverted agency resources to serve his personal fetish – that good health only comes in a syringe.
In addition to using his philantropy to control WHO, UNICEF, GAVI and PATH, Gates funds private pharmaceutical companies that manifacture vaccines, and a massive network of pharmaceutical -industry front groups that broadcast deceptive propaganda, develop fraudulent studies, conduct surveillance and psychological operations against vaccine hesitancy and use Gates’ power and money to silence dissent and coerce compliance.
In this recent nonstop Pharmedia appearances, Gates appears gleeful that the Covid-19 crisis will give him the opportunity to force his third-world vaccine programs on American children.”
I still don't get why it's looked down upon having more than few girlfriends or wives when u r rich. If u hit billion u should be openly allowed to have few gfs. Rest of the world does no issues.
Regardless, I never saw people talk about John D Rockefeller as a genius, tech visionary, nor humanitarian.
In contrast, people are saying that Gates is one of the greatest men, for giving away his wealth for the betterment of humanity but I say, he's just an egotist who's using his foundation as both, a tax sheltered hedge fund (as his billions of dollars of equity then don't go through the probate system), as well as a platform for people to speak highly of him, giving himself a title of nobility of sorts.
To those ppl who've argued against me ... have you noticed that I didn't post any criticism towards Larry Ellison, another software billionaire worth some $58 billion?
Gates' mom's sleazing and grifting on behalf of her son's cheezy, broken operating system will allow Melinda to retire to Taratupa with her own hockey team to service her on a three-shift basis.
People I know were hurt by Ellison's anti-competitive steamroller.
Instead of the above, Gates bought DOS from another Seattle company & afterwards, basically had his staff reverse engineer the Mac UI to put Windows on top of DOS and won the lawsuit against Jobs by not using any of the actual libraries from the Mac but only 'the features'.
The public image of Bill Gates is a complete sham.
Anyhow, Microsoft certainly deserved to win that lawsuit and X11 predated Windows 1.0. Amiga did as well.
richwicks saysAnyhow, Microsoft certainly deserved to win that lawsuit and X11 predated Windows 1.0. Amiga did as well.
As did GEOS.
richwicks saysAnyhow, Microsoft certainly deserved to win that lawsuit and X11 predated Windows 1.0. Amiga did as well.
As did GEOS.
Rin saysThe public image of Bill Gates is a complete sham.
Like JD Rockefeller back in the day. Give it time.
RC2006 saysGEOS, that was running on my 386 forgot about that one.
GEOS also ran on a Commodore 64.
In other words, Gates was similar to Ellison in terms of partying
Rin saysIn other words, Gates was similar to Ellison in terms of partying
I'm disappointed.
« First « Previous Comments 41 - 75 of 75 Search these comments
Seriously, I don't get all the adulation.
Certainly, Gates made a lot of money and sure, his first thousand Microsoft employees all became millionaires but that's being a shrewd businessman, making the starting 1K have a full stake in the outcome.
Regardless, I never saw people talk about John D Rockefeller as a genius, tech visionary, nor humanitarian.
In contrast, people are saying that Gates is one of the greatest men, for giving away his wealth for the betterment of humanity but I say, he's just an egotist who's using his foundation as both, a tax sheltered hedge fund (as his billions of dollars of equity then don't go through the probate system), as well as a platform for people to speak highly of him, giving himself a title of nobility of sorts.
The Czar of International Health Care (plus Vaccinations).
----
So what's the Real Politik of William Gates III?
The story of Microsoft is that his mother helped him broker the deal with IBM, which got MS-DOS onto every shipped PC. And MS-DOS, itself, was bought from some Seattle firm for $50K.
Let's contrast that to an actual software (not re-packaging) billionaire, one that I model myself after.
Larry Ellison, clearly a playboy/party animal (and not the stereotype of an engineering nerd), did more programming than Gates, on both the mainframe and minicomputers, during his IT career prior to starting Relational Software (changed to Oracle) and afterwards, up until version 2 where he transitioned into a CEO type, selling his vision while letting others do the work.