Comments 1 - 9 of 9 Search these comments
I have to agree with him. There has probably already been widespread transmission in the United States, and throughout the world. Social distancing might not have slowed transmission significantly for this virus, in which case it will follow a typical pattern for other respiratory virus epidemic/pandemics. The virus will spread throughout the population until there is sufficient immunity to slow it’s spread and then it will slowly fade out. His number of deaths may be off, possibly by a factor of two, but that wouldn’t invalidate his argument, he may just be underestimating the fatality rate.
The infection curves for all the different countries seem to be following a very similar trajectory, despite differences in the countries reaction to the virus and treatment of their patients. This indicates that the infections and virus transmission is following a typical pattern leading to suppression through herd immunity.
If people want to break the distancing they find a way.
He talks about his ability to do research. Let's see the research then, science means publishing your findings not being a scientist and stating opinions with a political slant.u
Bio-statistician yes, but this guy is not an epidemiologist even if his department has that in the name. You can look at his published papers. His work is around drugs for epilepsy, which is not a contagious disease.
He can be educated and demented at the same time. So many holes in what he says.
www.youtube.com/embed/lGC5sGdz4kg
So, "flattening the curve" just prolongs the epidemic. Respiratory epidemics always burn out after a month or two by themselves in the course of generating herd immunity. Mortality is generally 2 percent of those who show symptoms, irregardless.
Hmm, Schumer made a comment that the Dems needed to keep this going with the economic shutdown as long as possible for the election year.
Who would want to purposely prolong a pandemic under color of preventing it (impossible), exaggerate it, put the population on maximum panic by means of the press, apply a blunderbuss to the economy in an election year, stage faked deaths and hospital scenes, and use said generated panic to exert authoritarianism as an excuse to sequester a terrified populace?
Hmm, I can't even guess.