2
0

Fun idea for a bit of energy independence


 invite response                
2020 May 28, 12:37pm   661 views  9 comments

by Patrick   ➕follow (55)   💰tip   ignore  

https://sunboxlabs.com/solar-kit/

The problem

Apartment renters need the landlord’s permission to install anything on their rooftops. This makes installing solar difficult for people who rent. Because most of the world lives in urbanized areas where renting is common, I think this is a problem standing in the way of solar adoption.

An additional speed bump is the complexity of installing solar: regulation around net-metering. Grid-tied systems. Installation permits (even if you do own your property). Getting quotes from different installers. Solar financing. All complex processes inherited from the construction industry which slow down mass private adoption of renewables.

We attempt to bypass both these problems by building a standalone solar power plant on for windowsill, rooftop or garden with off-the-shelf parts, and discuss the pros and cons of this approach to solar.
A possible solution

A windowsill solar system bought we install ourselves solves both problems at once: Renters don’t need permission from their landlords to place things on their windowsill and rooftops if it’s not altering the building, and it’s a one-click, direct purchase with no regulation as long as it’s not tied to the grid (which this one is designed not to be). Two birds with one stone. This makes the solar buying process more like buying a consumer electronic. ...

2) Will this system save me a money?

What’s the payback period for our solar battery system? Will it save me money?

Payback period for 200W, 500Wh system
System cost: $499

Yearly energy creation: 365d 4.26hsun/d 200W = 311kWh/y

Yearly value creation: 311kWh/y * 15c/kWh = $48/y energy created

200W system payback period: $500 / $48 = 10 years until payback

Energy prices are just too (unsustainably?) low. This system will not save you money. It will however be more valuable in the event of backup generator needs, at camping/outdoors, and of course it’s just generally cool to be independent from the grid.


OK, at $500 it's not really economical, but this is a solid start to solar everywhere. Maybe they will one day get down to $50 per unit.

Comments 1 - 9 of 9        Search these comments

1   Patrick   2020 May 28, 12:38pm  

From the photos, it looks like this guy is in San Francisco.

2   RWSGFY   2020 May 28, 12:50pm  

Patrick says
...200W, 500Wh system... valuable in the event of backup generator needs


"Backup generator needs" == powering the fridge for the most part.

200W doesn't even start to cut it.
3   EBGuy   2020 May 28, 1:16pm  

Yearly value creation: 311kWh/y * 15c/kWh = $48/y energy created
PG&E's baseline rate (E-1 residential) is now $0.24373 / kWhr! Instantly increase your return by two thirds.

I just got Sonic.net Fiber installed, so I'm looking at some sort of small solar system for running the ONT if power goes out. I've got an extra car battery and have been considering this kit from Renogy that also has USB charging.
4   SunnyvaleCA   2020 May 28, 1:21pm  

The electricity cost to the homeowner does not have a fixed part for the infrastructure. That 24¢/kWhr covers both the infrastructure and generation of power. If someone installs solar panels, they drop their payments to PG&E to $0, and so aren't paying anything for the infrastructure costs still incurred by their being hooked to the grid. Unless the cost scheme changes, expect a "positive" feedback loop where kWhr costs increase, forcing more people onto solar cells, which causes the kWhr costs to increase further, etc.

For me, I only run 8 kWhr per day, so it's still hard to justify the fixed cost aspect of a solar cell system. As that fixed cost comes down, though, the numbers keep improving. I'd like to see a setup where I pay some fixed costs (let's say maybe $4k) for the inverter and other hookup-related initial expenses. Then I can add more and more solar panels myself as my needs change. If, for example, I put in air conditioning, I'd just buy a few more panels and hoist them up to the roof myself. If I bought an electric car ... a few more solar panels.
5   EBGuy   2020 May 28, 1:31pm  

covid_shmovid says

"Backup generator needs" == powering the fridge for the most part.
200W doesn't even start to cut it.

The kit the Patrick showcased has a 500W inverter for max output (A/C). As this site notes a fridge uses about 6 or 7 amps, but triple that for the start-up surge, so a dedicated power outlet with 15 to 20 amps is required for a fridge. You'd probably want a 2000W inverter to safe.
6   EBGuy   2020 May 28, 1:37pm  

SunnyvaleCA says
. If someone installs solar panels, they drop their payments to PG&E to $0

Minimum daily charge courtesy of PG&E is $0.32854 (a little more than $10/ month), so you'll want to undersize your system by about 10% or more.
7   ForcedTQ   2020 May 28, 3:23pm  

EBGuy says
SunnyvaleCA says
. If someone installs solar panels, they drop their payments to PG&E to $0

Minimum daily charge courtesy of PG&E is $0.32854 (a little more than $10/ month), so you'll want to undersize your system by about 10% or more.


Don’t forget, NEM 2.0 has non bypassable charges as well. Any kWh you use that comes from the grid will not be able to be offset 100% by credits in your true-up year that you build up from solar producing more than you consume at any given time.
8   ForcedTQ   2020 May 28, 3:27pm  

SunnyvaleCA says
The electricity cost to the homeowner does not have a fixed part for the infrastructure. That 24¢/kWhr covers both the infrastructure and generation of power. If someone installs solar panels, they drop their payments to PG&E to $0, and so aren't paying anything for the infrastructure costs still incurred by their being hooked to the grid. Unless the cost scheme changes, expect a "positive" feedback loop where kWhr costs increase, forcing more people onto solar cells, which causes the kWhr costs to increase further, etc.

For me, I only run 8 kWhr per day, so it's still hard to justify the fixed cost aspect of a solar cell system. As that fixed cost comes down, though, the numbers keep improving. I'd like to see a setup where I pay some fixed costs (let's say maybe $4k) for the inverter and other hookup-related initial expenses. Then I can add more and more solar panels myself as my needs change. If, for example, I put in air conditioning, I'd just buy a few more panel...


This has already occurred and was the problem with NEM 1.0 tarriffs. PV customers could essentially get an almost free ride hookup for their grid tied inverters that require the grid for a 60 hz sine wave to even operate. That’s also why any new NEM agreements for the last few years have been NEM 2.0
9   Hircus   2020 May 28, 6:55pm  

They've been selling these plug-in solar kits for maybe 5-10 yrs now.

These plug right into your wall socket, so you can use it grid tied. The charge controller will shut the solar power off if your grid power goes down, which prevents you from backfeeding into the grid and electrocuting the utility line man if he shuts power off to work on the lines.

https://pluggedsolar.com/grid-tie-solar-power/320-watt-plug-and-play-solar-panel-power-simply-plug-into-wall/
https://plugandplaysolarkits.com/collections/plug-and-play-solar-panels

The economics are actually decent (current sale price is $500, they usually go for 750-800), especially if the govt is still offering that 30% federal solar rebate. Especially when you think about this: each additional 100 watts of solar you add has diminishing returns because you're probably billed using a tiered rate system, where you pay more and more per KWH as you monthly usage goes up. So the first few hundred watts of solar will help reduce the expensive tier 2 or 3 portion of your bill, and you can add more solar until your monthly bills are reduced to being mostly at the low tier 1 rate. At that point, adding additional solar has greatly diminished returns, and may not be worth it for many households. But, that first 300 watts of solar that this kit provides has great bang for the buck if you pay tiered rates.



Bad things im aware of:
- legality is a grey area for grid tied use
- im worried if my house ever burned down, insurance might try to weasel out of payment due to "illegal electrical modifications" or some crap like that.
- electricians would probably scream bloody murder if they saw you using a reg power plug to FEED into an OUTLET, although it of course works ok.
- you need to limit how many watts you plug into each home electrical circuit, because you're kinda defeating your circuit breaker by installing an electrical feed after the breaker in the circuit. if you went really far and plugged lots of panels in, you might overload your wiring - potential fire hazard. But, I think 300-600 watts additional shouldn't be a problem at all unless your circuit is already out of spec for some reason. Know your circuit and limit max power usage, and youll be ok.

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions