patrick.net

Yeah Dan!

It would be awesome to have a one-eyed pirate for president next!

Devin Nunes? Spanish surname should bring in the Native American from former Spanish colonies vote.

Dan has voted with almost every creepy legislation that the Democrats have put forth.

He's sided with the Dems on illegal aliens, dreamers, HB1 visas, and Government funding that was chocked full of Democrat give aways.

I can't believe you don't have Matt Gaetz, Jim Jordan, Kevin McCarthy, Tom Fitton, Doug Collins, or Scaliese in that list.

But to be clear, nobody is better than Donald Trump. Donald Trump is not the best at what he does, he's just the only one that is doing it, or even capable of doing what he is doing.

To match Trump, you would have to be a billionaire willing to put your money where your mouth is.

Patrick says

sham impeachment

A lot of objective people didn't think it was a sham. Your question kind of falls apart with that. History won't show it was a sham. It will show that the republicans in senate chose not to remove him for what he did, which they understood to be wrong. They weren't even going to fully consider it.

Prediction: "B-b-b-but what Biden did was far worse, having a son that was paid big bucks by a Ukrainian natural gas company."

Dan Crenshaw is pretty okay, but he was born Scottish so he’s out for POTUS.

Texas Chainsaw Man Daniel Peña

https://www.valleycentral.com/news/local-news/mcallen-man-seen-waiving-chainsaw-at-protesters-facing-two-additional-charges/

seriously tho is R's grow a single brain cell they should put a Hispanic candidate for President

Ron Paul

Chuck Norris.

rd6B says

seriously tho is R's grow a single brain cell they should put a Hispanic candidate for President

Like little Marco? Like lying Ted?
I’m all for a good candidate regardless of race or gender. But who is capable of putting Americans first better than Trump?

Maybe only Ron Paul

Not even Ron Paul.

To be a Pro-American, non-Globalist President today, you have to have the ability to consistently outmaneuver the Far Left Press, Academia, and Fortune 500 Companies that will relentlessly attack 24/7/365, cover up your achievements, and claim everything you do is "Evil, Unprecedented".

Ron Paul doesn't have it. It would have to be somebody with no Fucks To Give.

Dan Crenshaw
Candice Owens for VP

NoCoupForYou says

Not even Ron Paul.

To be a Pro-American, non-Globalist President today, you have to have the ability to consistently outmaneuver the Far Left Press, Academia, and Fortune 500 Companies that will relentlessly attack 24/7/365, cover up your achievements, and claim everything you do is "Evil, Unprecedented".

Ron Paul doesn't have it. It would have to be somebody with no Fucks To Give.

I’m somewhat inclined to believe this, but if Ron Paul gave an F about the press, Academia or Fortune 500 companies he would not be constantly banging the drum to end the Military Industrial Complex and close our foreign bases and eliminate foreign entanglements (treaties and military commitments abroad).

And if he gave an F he certainly would not be calling to End the Fed!

APOCALYPSEFUCKisShostakovitch says

Jeffrey Dahmer.

I'd agree but you probably forgot he's dead.

zzyzzx says

Chuck Norris.

Bruce Lee.

PeopleUnited says

I’m somewhat inclined to believe this, but if Ron Paul gave an F about the press, Academia or Fortune 500 companies he would not be constantly banging the drum to end the Military Industrial Complex and close our foreign bases and eliminate foreign entanglements (treaties and military commitments abroad).

It's about handling them, not just ignoring them. It's about baiting them to take ridiculous stances and overplay their hand, and smacking them down occasionally.

Ron Paul certainly wouldn't put a stop to outsourcing, for example. And he'd cut the military severely while celebrating the tech transfer and manufacturing base increase of China as "Free Trade in Action".

NoCoupForYou says

baiting them to take ridiculous stances and overplay their hand, and smacking them down occasionally.

The left doesn’t need to be baited into taking ridiculous stances or overplaying their hand. Don’t confuse TDS with Trump strategy.

NoCoupForYou says

Ron Paul certainly wouldn't put a stop to outsourcing, for example. And he'd cut the military severely while celebrating the tech transfer and manufacturing base increase of China as "Free Trade in Action".

“Outsourcing is a reflection of a bad economic environment domestically. If you fix that, you fix outsourcing. Our primary export is paper money, and that should change if you change the monetary policy“
Ron Paul 2007

Why just men? The post title implies lack of diversity.

I'll vote for Ivanka Trump in 2024. She's being groomed as we speak.

The Left get's their First Female Jewish President!

Just not from their party....

PeopleUnited says

“Outsourcing is a reflection of a bad economic environment domestically. If you fix that, you fix outsourcing. Our primary export is paper money, and that should change if you change the monetary policy“

Don't agree, it's a function of a modern decent society trying to compete with 19th century conditions, which it can never prevail, unless to return to those conditions itself, at least for basic goods.

That being said, Ron Paul isn't feisty enough; he's good at communicating beliefs, but in the current environment they'd make mincemeat of him.

marcus says

the republicans in senate chose not to remove him for what he did

Be Cause he did not do anything impeachable.

marcus says

Biden did was far worse, having a son that was paid big bucks by a Ukrainian natural gas company."

Now that is impeachable.

Donald Trump Jr.

NoCoupForYou says

Don't agree, it's a function of a modern decent society trying to compete with 19th century conditions, which it can never prevail, unless to return to those conditions itself, at least for basic goods.

What? A modern decent society cannot find a way to provide basic goods with 21st century tech? No, the problem is oligarchs offshore everything to increase profits because they don’t need America, they are globalists. But if they had to compete with everyone else because we eliminate their blood supply ( the Federal Reserve) they would quickly lose control.

Ron Paul will never be president because he is too nice to play dirty. But that is one of the reasons why he would be a better president than anyone we have had probably since John Kennedy.

PeopleUnited says

What? A modern decent society cannot find a way to provide basic goods with 21st century tech? No the problem is oligarchs offshore everything to increase profits because they don’t need America, they are globalists. But if they had to compete with everyone else because we eliminate their blood supply ( the Federal Reserve) they would quickly lose control.

It can find a way to make it, but it can't compete economically with an authoritarian state with no labor or environmental law enforcement, rock bottom shipping costs, and little if any entry tariffs.

APOCALYPSEFUCKisShostakovitch says

Why is that a bad thing?

Good point.

NoCoupForYou says

PeopleUnited says

What? A modern decent society cannot find a way to provide basic goods with 21st century tech? No the problem is oligarchs offshore everything to increase profits because they don’t need America, they are globalists. But if they had to compete with everyone else because we eliminate their blood supply ( the Federal Reserve) they would quickly lose control.

It can find a way to make it, but it can't compete economically with an authoritarian state with no labor or environmental law enforcement, rock bottom shipping costs, and little if any entry tariffs.

BS. USA beat Soviet Union with economics. USA can do the same to China if we quit printing funny munny and focus on manufacturing and building our own infrastructure.

PeopleUnited says

BS. USA beat Soviet Union with economics. USA can do the same to China if we quit printing funny munny and focus on manufacturing and building our own infrastructure.

Why did US industry leave for China in the first place? Cheaper labor, almost no enforced enviro or labor laws. And then they can export to the US with "Free Trade" little or no tariff.

USSR never attempted to lure away US companies or become a huge maker of consumer goods.

Ron Paul is great on many issues, but he would further derail america by pursuing so called free trade with a nation that cheats the marketplace.

I don't think you, meaning the Trump supporters, will ever find anybody "better" than Trump. There will never be anyone, that could get elected, that panders to your psychological wants and needs like Trump.

Tenpoundbass says

I can't believe you don't have Matt Gaetz, Jim Jordan, Kevin McCarthy, Tom Fitton, Doug Collins, or Scaliese in that list.

Would these people be effective even if their ideas are well founded? Seems to me that none of them, despite involvement, where effective in bringing the coup instigators to justice. All talk and rhetoric without anything actually doing anything for 3 years during the Weissmann fishing expedition.

rdm says

I don't think you, meaning the Trump supporters, will ever find anybody "better" than Trump. There will never be anyone, that could get elected, that panders to your psychological wants and needs like Trump.

It's just the beginning, you ain't seen nothing yet.

"Rommel Alinsky, I read your Damn Book." (It was actually Guderian)

Part of me notices that the deathdate of Patton and the birthdate of Trump were very close, and in appearance, eerily close.

NoCoupForYou says

Why did US industry leave for China in the first place?

It was a deliberate attempt by the globalists to simultaneously impoverish the American working/middle class and to expand their own wealth and control. Do you see all those modern cities in China? They were built with Federal reserve notes created out of thin air and exported to China. That is what Ron Paul said above. The Chinese are actually being actively exploited by the globalists as well. The CCP is addicted to western funny munny, but the moment we turn off the spigot of Federal Reserve notes and Euros, China becomes the USSR without the oil, with an aging population and a significant number of citizens who have realized that communism is killing them.

theoakman says

he would further derail america by pursuing so called free trade with

No, sound money would not allow our country to export more dollars than we bring in. That is the part that is missing from most people’s understanding of free trade. When a government can print money out of thin air and people are forced to accept it as payment under penalty of death (the real reason we killed Saddam Hussein) there is no such thing as free trade.

On the Gold Standard, Banks hold on to physical gold and give you paper. Only the choicest VIP clients are allowed to withdraw actual gold specie, and only fractional to their holdings at the bank. They distribute more paper than Gold. Then those banknotes are discounted by other banks, as during the 19th Century Wildcat Banking era. Your $100 Banknote from First Illinois will only pay $80 if you try to cash it at First Boston Bank. That's the real world Gold Standard.

I posted a newspaper image that showed the discount rates banks were offering on banknotes from other banks from the 19th Century.

NoCoupForYou says

That's the real world Gold Standard

Nope that is just more examples of fiat money creation and fraud.

This guy: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8426949/Enraged-Texas-man-opens-fire-car-shouts-youre-gonna-end-f-g-dead.html