« prev   random   next »

4
0

"Hate speech" doesn’t exist. Stop legitimizing it. Don't even say it.

By Patrick follow Patrick   2020 Jun 16, 9:14pm 440 views   19 comments   watch   nsfw   quote   share    


We need our own terms that they have to use to even talk about the concepts, they way they try to make us use their terms.

"Free speech" is good. They can't talk about free speech without mentioning it.

"Patriotism" is good as well. How can they diss patriotism without mentioning it?

But what about novel phrases? They have to be respectable enough to get into the news so that they can then spread on their own.

google is watching you
black crime matters
democracy, not mobs!
rule of law, not mob rule
victimization olympics
grievance studies
panic porn
wear your fear mask
google is watching you!
western civilization
deep state
diversity of opinion
thoughtcrime
wrongthink
freedom to offend
virtue signaling
los ilegales roban trabajo (correct me if you know a better translation, also need "illegals go home!")
illegals steal jobs
illegals go home!
the censor's wedge
the religion without a name
violent leftists
the red pill
sterile feminist
barren feminist
American Stalinists
the soft bigotry of low expectations
clown world
NPC
islam is right about women
blacks are right about gays
black violence, media silence
feels before reals (leftist denial of reality)
e pluribus unum
白左 baizuo
五毛 50 Cent Party
共匪 communist bandit
cancel cancel culture
resist the violent left
resist the intolerant left
protect our history
statues can't fight back, but we can
the rainbow flag promotes sodomy

From an email sent by https://gab.com

In 2016 when Big Tech started to crack down on “hate speech” I along with many others were quick to point out the “hateful” speech directed at white people, men, Christians, and minorities who dared to step outside the orthodoxy of the “woke” progressive cult.

This was admittedly a mistake. Adopting the enemy’s weaponized language is futile and foolish. By embracing the language of the cult, we legitimatize it. The reality is: “hate speech” doesn’t exist. In fact, before the late 1980’s the term didn’t appear in any books or in our national discourse at all.



“Hate speech” is any speech that uncovers taboo truths that everyone is thinking, but no one dares to say out loud. It’s speech that counters the programming narratives of the oligarchic elite. “Hate speech” is weaponized language. It’s a tool used by those in power to silence dissent at all costs. I refuse to acknowledge and thereby legitimize it, because it’s not real. The Supreme Court of the United States unanimously agrees with me on this fact.

It’s common for many people to say “I support free speech, but not hate speech.” This sentence is nonsensical and contradictory. Either you support free speech, or you do not. If you believe “hate speech” is real then you do not support free speech and do not understand its importance. The correct response when someone asks you what you think of “hate speech” is to laugh in their face.

Gab has no hate speech policy for the same reason we don’t have a policy on Bigfoot. We are not going to pretend to enforce arbitrary rules on made up weaponized language that has no real meaning.

Recently we’ve seen other made up words and phrases being used as a weapon by the oligarchs and their media elite pawns. “Systemic racism” is one of these terms. This phrase is yet another example of weaponized language that did not exist in our lexicon prior to the 1980’s.



Conservatives are falling for the oligarch’s trap and buying into their weaponized language. This isn’t very bright. As @At4V1SM noted on Twitter, “Conservatives think appropriating progressive terminology is clever; in reality, they are ceding cultural ground and allowing things to drift even further to the left.”

This is why conservatives have lost the culture war for decades. They use the language of progressives, play into the narrative of progressives, and have these conversations on progressive-controlled platforms like Facebook and Twitter. You can’t win a battle on a battlefield that the enemy controls and with weapons that the enemy designed and built.

This weaponized language is created to be “attack proof.” Who would dare say “I agree with hate speech?” Who would dare say “systemic racism” isn’t bad? This is word wizardry. It’s specifically crafted to cripple any form of dissent and to only hold power when used by the left. Projecting their own weapons back at them has no effect. In fact, it only makes those weapons stronger when used against you.

Hate speech doesn’t exist. Stop legitimizing it.
1   Patrick   ignore (1)   2020 Jun 16, 9:18pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

I think he's right.

Not going to complain about anti-white racism anymore.

But we should talk about black crime, because nothing will get better until black crime is acknowledged to be the biggest problem holding black people back.
2   Fortwaynemobile   ignore (2)   2020 Jun 16, 9:30pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

Left can enforce speech control now. Because google and sjw groups wield enormous power.
3   Patrick   ignore (1)   2020 Jun 16, 9:45pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

Social media created the feedback loop that drove everyone mad with social justice. Just like in the Chinese camp, the subtle but constant pressure to make cheap moralistic statements resulted in mass conversions. I believe this is the true cause of the "great awokening"

Most people want to appear compassionate. A political slogan, a bleeding heart story, these things that you spread virally, they change your self-image. And they leave you with evidence, public evidence, that you are the kind of person who speaks out about "systemic oppression"
4   Patrick   ignore (1)   2020 Jun 16, 10:00pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

Brownshirt

The term brownshirt is sometimes used to refer to white members of the left, with the implication being that they, like Hitler's paramilitary Brownshirts (Sturmabteilung), will be disposed of by the rest of the left when they are no longer "useful".
5   WookieMan   ignore (5)   2020 Jun 17, 5:46am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

Patrick says
But we should talk about black crime, because nothing will get better until black crime is acknowledged to be the biggest problem holding black people back.

Crime is derived from the complete destruction of the family in black neighborhoods. Nocoup brings it up all the time. Until they fix family and hold these men and women accountable, nothing will change. You can't just keep giving people free food, free housing, free phones and expect them to produce. They fuck, smoke, drink and do nothing. This happens in white trash areas too before someone gets offended. It's more prevalent in black areas in proportion to their overall population numbers though.

As an added layer, they don't want real jobs, so they get into illicit one's to keep their government benefit and get added cash income. Criminal jobs. They pop out babies, get a massive tax return, tax free mind you after not paying a dime into the system. The incentive is completely gone for women to want a "real" family in black neighborhoods. Really think about it. Women like sex just as much as men. The government basically is feeding, housing and paying them to fuck and produce even more non-productive people. Hence why I think police departments are just going to say fuck it at some point. Let them kill each other.
6   Patrick   ignore (1)   2020 Jun 17, 7:16am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

WookieMan says
Hence why I think police departments are just going to say fuck it at some point. Let them kill each other.


We're pretty much already there.

Liberals have demanded the removal of police.
7   Patrick   ignore (1)   2020 Jun 17, 7:24am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

Ah, all of the 1984 terms are perfect for today: thoughtcrime, wrongthink.
8   Patrick   ignore (1)   2020 Jun 18, 8:07am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

https://spectator.us/anti-racism-really-means-debate-white-fragility/

Robin DiAngelo, a New York Times bestselling scholar of the ‘critical whiteness’ aspect of Critical Race Theory, sees racism in everything. She explains what she calls ‘racism’ this way: ‘the question is not “did racism take place?” but instead “how did racism manifest in this situation?”’ In other words, all situations contain racism, and it is up to the anti-racist activist to uncover it. To do anything else is described as — you guessed it — being a ‘racist’ by upholding ‘racism’.

Second, understand how these ideas are used unfairly against you. The ‘anti-racism’ program offered by Critical Race Theory offers no neutrality. Everyone is either an ‘anti-racist’ or they are ‘racists’ by default. The lines of literature in which DiAngelo situates her claims clearly state that there is no such thing as being not-racist, and she repeatedly asserts that neutrality on this issue means favoring ‘racism’. Not even progressives are safe. DiAngelo writes, ‘white progressives cause the most daily damage to people of color. I define a white progressive as any white person who thinks he or she is not racist, or is less racist.’


So you can't win no matter what you say or do. You are automatically convicted of the "original sin" of racism just by being born with a low ranking in the Victimization Olympics.

The right answer, as Morgan Freeman pointed out, is to stop talking about it.

Just literally never talk about racism at all. Racism in the US is 99% imaginary, and kind of modern-day witchcraft assumed to exist to legitimate the witch-hunts. Don't perpetuate "racism" by letting them make you even use the word. This comment has to use it to make the point, but from now on, I'm going to make an effort to not even mention it, but instead to immediately switch to terms they have to use to continue the discussion:

the red pill
black crime matters
victimization olympics
western civilization
deep state
diversity of opinion
thoughtcrime
wrongthink
freedom to offend
virtue signaling
the censor's wedge
the religion without a name
violent leftists
the soft bigotry of low expectations
clown world
NPC
islam is right about women
blacks are right about gays
feels before reals (leftist denial of reality)
e pluribus unum
baizuo
9   Patrick   ignore (1)   2020 Jun 20, 6:51pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

Gab has now been banned by Visa.

https://reclaimthenet.org/payment-processor-visa-deplatforms-free-speech-software-company-gab/

This is perhaps a good thing. I wouldn't want Visa having records who who paid or donated to Gab.
10   BayArea   ignore (1)   2020 Jun 21, 6:02am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

Racism is absolutely blown out of proportion by the mainstream media.

What’s actually happening is that society is simply appalled (and scared and shocked) by black crime statistics. Black males commit violent crimes at multiples higher than any other demographic out there.

That will drive society’s behavior, no question. And the media makes no distinction between racism vs a concern for ones safety and well being...

That’s it in a nutshell.

Go F yourself with your racism accusations.
11   Patrick   ignore (1)   2020 Jun 21, 1:13pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

BayArea says
the media makes no distinction between racism vs a concern for ones safety and well being


Thanks, here's another good slogan I'll add to the OP:

"Black violence, media silence"
12   Patrick   ignore (1)   2020 Jun 22, 12:26pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

Added a few:

panic porn
wear your fear mask
google is watching you
13   Patrick   ignore (1)   2020 Jun 23, 5:29pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

Added more:

cancel cancel culture
resist the violent left
resist the intolerant left
protect our history
statues can't fight back, but we can
14   Patrick   ignore (1)   2020 Jun 24, 9:01am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

Adding:

democracy not mobs!
rule of law, not mob rule
15   Tenpoundbass   ignore (14)   2020 Jun 24, 9:33am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

People who say Hate Speech, just hate the people talking.
16   Patrick   ignore (1)   2020 Jun 24, 9:44am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

Tenpoundbass says
People who say Hate Speech, just hate the people talking.


Yup, it's just an excuse for censorship.

*Don't ever even use the false term "hate speech* because there is no such thing.*

Make them use truthful terms.

victimization olympics
grievance studies
diversity of opinion
thoughtcrime
wrongthink
freedom to offend
the censor's wedge
baizuo
cancel cancel culture
resist the violent left
resist the intolerant left
17   Patrick   ignore (1)   2020 Jun 24, 2:12pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

sterile feminist
barren feminist
18   Patrick   ignore (1)   2020 Jun 24, 4:05pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

the rainbow flag promotes sodomy
19   FortWayneIndiana   ignore (3)   2020 Jun 24, 9:12pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

Patrick says
the rainbow flag promotes sodomy


rainbow flag promotes pedophilia

about   best comments   contact   one year ago   suggestions