« prev   random   next »


Democrats' anti-science hysteria could gurantee Trump's re-election

By Patrick follow Patrick   2020 Jun 27, 2:34pm 99 views   6 comments   watch   nsfw   quote   share    


Among the many weird and disquieting moments in Donald Trump’s rally in Tulsa on the weekend, the one that has really driven his opponents wild was his little riff on Covid-19.

“Testing is a double-edged sword,” he began, “we’ve done more testing than anybody else. Here’s the bad part. When you do testing to that extent, you’re going to find more people, you’re going to find more cases. So I said to my people, slow the testing down please! They test and they test… we’ve got another one over here! The young man’s ten years old, he’s got the sniffles, he’ll recover in about 15 minutes. It’s a case!”

...it seems distinctly like, having already shattered any remaining reputation he had for competence, Covid-19 will finally consign Donald Trump to electoral oblivion.

Except… what if it doesn’t? Is there a way that Covid-19 could become a net positive for Donald Trump — one that could even help carry him to re-election in November?

To find out, let’s go back four years ago to Philadelphia, when Hillary Clinton formally accepted the Democratic nomination. One line of her speech, part of a central credo section setting out what she believed, was received with a particularly rapturous cheer, both in the hall and online, for days afterwards: “I believe in science,” she declared...

Those four words encapsulate what many Democrats passionately believe is their mission in 2020, even more so than in 2016: to keep alive the flame of Enlightenment rationality and science against the threat of fake news and a dangerous post-truth President. It is a core part of what they will be campaigning for in this election.

In 2016, of course, this framing back-fired. ... as the eventual defeat made painfully evident, that account of truth, and the world-order that went along with it, fell short on issues like culture and identity and meaning that are just as real to many voters as economics or science. In his intuitive, brazen way, Trump targeted this weakness and gleefully promised to bring the whole tilting edifice crashing down.

In the four years since that crash, the Democrats’ claim to be the sole keepers of the flame of Enlightenment rationality has got weaker, not stronger. The intersectional identity politics that animates their activist wing — gender pronouns, cancel culture, statue-toppling — seems even less rational than in 2016. The foot-washing and genuflection accompanying the recent BLM protests (not to mention the free pass given to protestors ignoring social distancing) has only added to the atmosphere of religious fervour surrounding the progressive movement.

If anything, the language of Enlightenment rationality is now more commonly invoked by those fighting on the other side of the culture wars — in 2018 Jordan Peterson and his ‘Intellectual Dark Web’ group famously claimed it as a defence against progressive tendencies towards humbug and censorship. Last week, Peterson’s friend and fellow IDW thinker the evolutionary psychologist Gad Saad made the argument in an interview with me that in a choice between Trump and Biden, he considers Trump to be the rational choice, on the grounds of resisting the fundamentalism of social justice warriors with something like low common sense. Whether or not you like his argument, the fact that he has arrived at that point is notable.

(Trump's qualities) include Scepticism: a tendency to question things that orthodoxy holds to be unquestionably true. This is itself a key strand of Enlightenment thought, and represents an allegiance to doubt that progressive idealists are distinctly less interested in, with their righteous certainties and plans to remake the world from first principles. ... the progressive side of recent culture wars is vulnerable to that charge. (of too little scepticism) Trump’s Scepticism has been politically effective.

So we entered this weird election cycle with both sides, if not necessarily the candidates themselves, already making different claims to be the defenders of common sense, keepers of the flame of Enlightenment rationality in a world gone mad.

Against this background, Covid-19 erupted. The different attitudes quickly started aligning with the political parties: Democratic governors were much more activist in response, issuing blanket stay at home orders (although it was primarily Democratic states that were initially hit), while Republican governors ... generally tried to minimise restrictions.

... the progressives have been guilty of the same didacticism and lack of humility that put voters off last time. The official IHME models and forecasts, produced with all the spurious precision and data-richness that graduate progressives find so enthralling, have been woefully wide of the mark; arguments in favour of a more moderate policy response have been dismissed as irresponsible anti-science (with censorship duly enforced by the tech platforms); and states have rushed to close schools and other parts of society before evidence has proved them to be vectors of the disease (even the Norwegian prime minister now says she regrets closing schools). On these points and many more, while claiming the language of science, progressives have shown a shortage of, even hostility to, scientific scepticism.

(Trump) is right that the emphasis on case numbers is misleading, as they are entirely contingent on testing (Oxford’s Prof Sunetra Gupta made the same complaint to us) so while many states have seen surges in case numbers, we have not generally seen surges in numbers of deaths (and the overall daily deaths continue to fall nationwide). He’s also right that for children Covid-19 is a very minor disease and often symptomless — and that the relative safety of anyone under retirement age has been bizarrely downplayed by the liberal media which sees its responsibility as only reinforcing the risks. This is fertile territory for Trump, even more so for its capability to outrage everybody.

If (and, yes, it’s a big if) the apparent second surges of Covid-19 turn out to be not too bad and overall deaths continue to decline over the summer, and if there is no big second spike in October, then Donald Trump’s scepticism would likely become more acceptable — and popular — as the months go by. Right now, only 13% of Americans are ‘not worried at all’ by the virus. But, equally, only 21% are ‘very worried’: that’s a lot of people in between, and they would surely become more relaxed if the pandemic dwindles.

An election campaign culminating in September and October in which Democrat voices are endlessly finger-wagging and calling for further restrictions, six months after the peak and with deaths right down, while Trump is promising freedom and a return to the ‘old normal’, sounds like a fight he is aching to have. Not even Make America Great Again – just Make America Normal Again.

... it’s worth bearing in mind that if the pandemic goes his way, Covid-19 could just about turn from being the thing that killed off his presidency into a re-animating mission that goes to the heart of Democrat epistemological overreach and puts him squarely back in the game.
1   TrumpingTits   ignore (2)   2020 Jun 29, 2:33pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

Hate to say this but extending those $600/week add-ons to unemployment will only exacerbate the economic recovery. But ending that program will be very unpopular politically.

Pple LOVE their free shit. Even Trump voters, I am ashamed to say.

So if the economy is to recover, we need to put pple back to work. The program has to end. Especially for small to medium businesses that can't compete against $600/week Free Shit.

The only thing I can think of that would would be somewhat politically palpable would be to extend the program another month to those WHO GO BACK TO WORK or find new jobs. That will get them off their asses and back into Starbucks. In reality, that would be difficult to administer.
2   WineHorror1   ignore (1)   2020 Jun 29, 2:54pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

Double the $600 and extend it till July 2021. Who you going to vote for? The debt is FUBAR already anyway.
3   Shaman   ignore (2)   2020 Jun 29, 3:08pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

Half the benefit and keep it going. Then issue another round of TrumpChecks.

Trump needs to double down on the idea that we need herd immunity not lockdowns. That we need to get back to NORMAL not some sort of progressively twisted “new normal.”
People are tired of this Covid shit and they’re increasingly willing to rebel against the Covidians who promote the gospel of social distancing and masks and shutting down gatherings and businesses. Parents, especially working parents, are completely exasperated with this crap and want their children OUT of the house and back into school as soon as humanly possible. Declaring that yet another semester is FUBAR because of a common cold is going to be VASTLY unpopular with parents, and many if not most will yank their kids from such programs.
I’m seeing people who have never loved the Republicans getting radicalized about their hatred of the Democrats and pledging to vote GOP this November.

And the economy is teetering on the edge of a cliff. If Democrats push it over with their relentless quest to evict Trump from the White House, the populist movement will be against them.

Trump needs to not fear losing the oldsters over Covid policy. He needs to just tell the young people that he’s got their backs, and he needs to reign in Democrat Governor overreaction.

He needs to show some goddam leadership.
4   SunnyvaleCA   ignore (1)   2020 Jun 29, 3:09pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

This election is going to come down to trickery, treachery, and outright fraud.

• Facebook/Twitter/etc shadow-banning and outright banning
• Google searches compromised by both Google and by armies of people juicing the search algorithms (like Santorum's Google Problem)
• more fake news than ever before
• sure, there will be some interference from other countries; that happens all the time
• deep-state manipulation
• mail-in-ballot fraud galore. If the fraud there doesn't actually tip the balance one way or the other, nobody will know for sure, so there is bound to be grumbling on the losing side. More looting if Trump wins. (Yes, the left will actually claim Trump used mail-in voter fraud to swing the elections in his direction.)
• I doubt Barr is going to do anything but drag his feet, but that could be quite a wildcard.
• Mayers and governors keeping their jurisdictions shut down until November 4th (well, except not shut down for purposes of looting).
5   SunnyvaleCA   ignore (1)   2020 Jun 29, 3:11pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

Shaman says
Parents, especially working parents, are completely exasperated with this crap and want their children OUT of the house and back into school
And that goes 3x for parents who are paying for college or private grade school and getting far less than Khan Academy.
6   rocketjoe79   ignore (1)   2020 Jun 29, 9:05pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

The one nugget out of this mound of Word Salad was that Trump's gut calls, his innate skepticism, his common sense, his ability to sense BS, are almost always right on. Trump has a way of ferreting out BS like no one else. His supporters already know this. The hard left simply refuse to believe. The undecided aren't paying attention.

about   best comments   contact   one year ago   suggestions