patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,189,660 comments by 13,848 users - GNL, Patrick, richwicks online now
Rin has an Islamist moniker for the next bad boy in town
invite response
2020 Jul 13, 2:44pm 613 views 6 comments
by Rin ➕follow (8) 💰tip ignore
Comments 1 - 6 of 6 Search these comments
1
Ceffer
2020 Jul 13, 2:49pm
Ceffer
2020 Jul 13, 2:49pm
Ah, for the days when nobody cared if you were a whoremaster, pedophile or a pederast, as long as you had the shining sword of God on your side to summarily dispatch and dismember the querulous VerminProls.
2
HeadSet
2020 Jul 13, 5:57pm
HeadSet
2020 Jul 13, 5:57pm
His title will be Babur Timur Abu Bakr IV
Can we call it Timur Abu Bakr Babur? That way were can use the acronym "TABB."
Can we call it Timur Abu Bakr Babur? That way were can use the acronym "TABB."
3
Rin
2020 Jul 13, 6:14pm
Rin
2020 Jul 13, 6:14pm
HeadSet says
Sure, just make certain to add the IV to the title, since Islamist Bad Boys aren't a new, modern day phenom but a bunch of dumbfuck sociopaths, playing the medieval era card.
Can we call it Timur Abu Bakr Babur?
Sure, just make certain to add the IV to the title, since Islamist Bad Boys aren't a new, modern day phenom but a bunch of dumbfuck sociopaths, playing the medieval era card.
5
Rin
2020 Jul 14, 2:07am
Rin
2020 Jul 14, 2:07am
HeadSet says
There you have it. And then, if someone succeeds him in starting again, yet another psychopathic theocracy, he'll be TABBV and then the next dynasty, TABBVI.
You see, then we have a spiritual lineage. Eventually, the modern world will catch up with this garbage and send Islam back to the sands of Arabia where it belongs with those barbarians.
Otherwise, we find ourselves in this stupid guessing game and then, the stupid apologists bring up the Crusades as if Paul or one of the prior 12 disciples knew anything about Pope Urban II and Geoffrey of Bouillon, a thousand years later. Remember, Paul was long dead even before Constantine's theocracy so there's no counterargument, putting Christianity in the same boat as Islam even if one doesn't agree with the Catholic or Orthodox churches.
On the other shoe, the aphorism (which may have existed prior to every major religion in the world) "He who controls Babylon, controls the world" was what probably motivated Abu Bakr and thus, we have a clear link between the religion of Islam and the Imperialistic aims of the greater Saudi Arabia.
So, "TABBIV" then?
There you have it. And then, if someone succeeds him in starting again, yet another psychopathic theocracy, he'll be TABBV and then the next dynasty, TABBVI.
You see, then we have a spiritual lineage. Eventually, the modern world will catch up with this garbage and send Islam back to the sands of Arabia where it belongs with those barbarians.
Otherwise, we find ourselves in this stupid guessing game and then, the stupid apologists bring up the Crusades as if Paul or one of the prior 12 disciples knew anything about Pope Urban II and Geoffrey of Bouillon, a thousand years later. Remember, Paul was long dead even before Constantine's theocracy so there's no counterargument, putting Christianity in the same boat as Islam even if one doesn't agree with the Catholic or Orthodox churches.
On the other shoe, the aphorism (which may have existed prior to every major religion in the world) "He who controls Babylon, controls the world" was what probably motivated Abu Bakr and thus, we have a clear link between the religion of Islam and the Imperialistic aims of the greater Saudi Arabia.
6
Rin
2020 Jul 14, 2:20am
Rin
2020 Jul 14, 2:20am
So once again, why don't the apologists name names?
For instance, Tomas Torquemada started the Spanish Inquisition. And thus, you have a person who can stand trial for crimes against humanity. Instead, it's some limp dick argument that "SEE! ... Christianity has the Inquisition!".
And finally, once again, there's no link between Tomas and Paul of Tarsus or any of the other 12 disciples. Please, if you want to make pro-Islam arguments, actually come up with arguments.
For instance, Tomas Torquemada started the Spanish Inquisition. And thus, you have a person who can stand trial for crimes against humanity. Instead, it's some limp dick argument that "SEE! ... Christianity has the Inquisition!".
And finally, once again, there's no link between Tomas and Paul of Tarsus or any of the other 12 disciples. Please, if you want to make pro-Islam arguments, actually come up with arguments.
In place of that, I recommend that we have an award for the next bad boy Mullah cleric, one who basically shows to the world what living under an Islamic theocracy is like.
His title will be Babur Timur Abu Bakr IV.
Some history, the original Babur was the first Moghul conqueror of the Indian subcontinent, establishing an empire there, stretching from Afghanistan, to the edge of Kerala, and ending in Bengal. His great grandfather was Timur
Timur was the faux descendant of Genghis Khan, who named himself the 'Sword of Islam' which is unoriginal as that was also used by Khalid ibn al-Walid and other Arabic scumbags before him. Timur used the religion to subdue all real cultures in what's Soviet Central Asia, Iran, and Afghanistan. He was the cleric who put the coup de grace on Buddhism and Zoroastrianism in Central Asia.
And finally, Abu Bakr, the First Caliphate of Babylon, the one man who knew Mohammed personally and gave his six year old daughter in marriage to the alleged prophet. Not coincidently, the late leader of ISIS is also known as Abu Bakr, the more things change ...