« prev   random   next »

1
0

Dr Zelenko's treatment protocol for Wuhan virus disease

By Patrick follow Patrick   2020 Aug 3, 5:22pm 360 views   10 comments   watch   nsfw   quote   share    


Dr. Vladimir (Zev) Zelenko
Board Certified Family Practitioner
501 Rt 208, Monroe, NY 10950
845-238-0000


March 23, 2020

To all medical professionals around the world:

My name is Dr. Zev Zelenko and I practice medicine in Monroe, NY. For the last 16 years, I have cared for approximately 75% of the adult population of Kiryas Joel, which is a very close knit community of approximately 35,000 people in which the infection spread rapidly and unchecked prior to the imposition of social distancing.

As of today my team has tested approximately 200 people from this community for Covid-19, and 65% of the results have been positive. If extrapolated to the entire community, that means more than 20,000 people are infected at the present time. Of this group, I estimate that there are 1500 patients who are in the high-risk category (i.e. >60, immunocompromised, comorbidities, etc).

Given the urgency of the situation, I developed the following treatment protocol in the pre-hospital setting and have seen only positive results:

1. Any patient with shortness of breath regardless of age is treated.
2. Any patient in the high-risk category even with just mild symptoms is treated.
3. Young, healthy and low risk patients even with symptoms are not treated (unless their circumstances change and they fall into category 1 or 2).

My out-patient treatment regimen is as follows:

1. Hydroxychloroquine 200mg twice a day for 5 days
2. Azithromycin 500mg once a day for 5 days
3. Zinc sulfate 220mg once a day for 5 days

The rationale for my treatment plan is as follows. I combined the data available from China and South Korea with the recent study published from France (sites available on request). We know that hydroxychloroquine helps Zinc enter the cell. We know that Zinc slows viral replication within the cell. Regarding the use of azithromycin, I postulate it prevents secondary bacterial infections. These three drugs are well known and usually well tolerated, hence the risk to the patient is low.

Since last Thursday, my team has treated approximately 350 patients in Kiryas Joel and another 150 patients in other areas of New York with the above regimen.

Of this group and the information provided to me by affiliated medical teams, we have had ZERO deaths, ZERO hospitalizations, and ZERO intubations. In addition, I have not heard of any negative side effects other than approximately 10% of patients with temporary nausea and diarrhea.

In sum, my urgent recommendation is to initiate treatment in the outpatient setting as soon as possible in accordance with the above. Based on my direct experience, it prevents acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), prevents the need for hospitalization and saves lives.

With much respect,

Dr. Zev Zelenko


cc: President Donald J. Trump; Mr. Mark Meadows, Chief of Staff
1   Patrick   ignore (1)   2020 Aug 3, 5:26pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

He said he has now treated 669 patients that way without losing any.
2   Onvacation   ignore (5)   2020 Aug 3, 5:34pm     ↓ dislike (1)   quote   flag      

Patrick says
approximately 10% of patients with temporary nausea and diarrhea.

You can die from that!

I'm a wait for the vaccine.

And then not take it because that can kill too.

But seriously, the pandemic is over everyone back to work.
3   Patrick   ignore (1)   2020 Aug 9, 12:00pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

The fraudulent (and now retracted) article in The Lancet purporting to show that HCQ is dangerous did incalculable damage to public health and public trust in scientists.

Now millions of people know about the supposed "danger", but not that the article was fraudulent and retracted.

They don't even think to themselves "Wait, it's been used for 75 years without problems, one of the most common medicines on earth, still used 100 million times a day for malaria, rheumatism, and lupus, but suddenly dangerous as soon as Trump mentions it?"

They just think "OMG, the press says I should avoid this because of a study in a prestigious journal." They never hear about the retraction.

And this was peer reviewed, which proves that peer review is also corrupt. A terrible thing for trust in science, all because of TDS.
4   tanked   ignore (0)   2020 Aug 9, 12:23pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

5 days if you know you have it. But unlimited days as a preventative?
5   Karloff   ignore (0)   2020 Aug 9, 12:32pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

By this point it should be beyond a shadow of a doubt that the MSM, WHO, CDC, and politicians have lied to the people of the world about everything regarding Covid-19 other than the fact that it exists and what some of its symptoms are.

There need to be mass arrests and trials for those involved in this gross violation of human rights.
6   tanked   ignore (0)   2020 Aug 9, 1:02pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

Karloff says
By this point it should be beyond a shadow of a doubt that the MSM, WHO, CDC, and politicians have lied to the people of the world about everything regarding Covid-19 other than the fact that it exists and what some of its symptoms are.

There need to be mass arrests and trials for those involved in this gross violation of human rights.


fraudci
7   WookieMan   ignore (6)   2020 Aug 9, 1:40pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

Karloff says
There need to be mass arrests and trials for those involved in this gross violation of human rights.

Bingo. Won't happen though. We've been knowingly lied to and basic data backs that assertion up. If you can do basic division, all the data is there for anyone to understand this has been orchestrated and hyped for whatever reason. Likely political and it's unraveling now. Ceffer posted a great video about the whole mask wearing BS. Everything is there for even high school educated people, yet we all just trust the media for information. It's scary.
8   Shaman   ignore (2)   2020 Aug 9, 1:44pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

Patrick says
And this was peer reviewed, which proves that peer review is also corrupt. A terrible thing for trust in science, all because of TDS.


Thing was, that article in the Lancet was NOT peer reviewed. It was in pre-print, which is where they stick articles prior to peer review. After cursory peer review led to questions the authors could not answer, and fraudulent methods were exposed, the article was formally retracted.

Most people outside the research community have no idea that there’s a difference between pre-print and peer reviewed published studies. But there is and it’s vital. I know only because my wife is doing her PhD right now and she told me about the difference.
9   Patrick   ignore (1)   2020 Aug 9, 3:03pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

Shaman says
that article in the Lancet was NOT peer reviewed


This article implies that it was:

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-06-05/hydroxychloroquine-study-the-lancet-peer-review-coronavirus/12324118

But many scientists voiced concern about the study following its publication. Nearly 150 doctors signed an open letter to The Lancet questioning the article's conclusions, and calling for the peer review comments that preceded publication to be released.
10   theoakman   ignore (0)   2020 Aug 9, 3:56pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

The peer review process is a joke. When my research group would submit studies, if we got a pain in the ass we disagreed with, we just sent it somewhere else or my boss made a few phone calls. It is politics just like anything else under the guise of integrity. The ugly secret of science is that bad science is ignored rather than dealt with.

about   best comments   contact   one year ago   suggestions