patrick.net

Gay men like to show their clothes on long, skinny things.

I like girls with uneven titties and what's supposed to be pink, purple. So there!

NoCoupForYou says

skinny things.

Nothing wrong with skinny gals with breast implants.

They're called hooters-on-a-stick

My pole would be happy above ^^^^

I prefer some meat on the bones, but I could work with that.

Poor gal must have backpain.

On to imp issue. Yes I would enjoy motorboating

NoCoupForYou says

but I could work with that.

Rin says

For the life of me, I can't understand how these ordinary looking women, I mean really, they're at best, some study group at a Wellesley College (and not even in the top tier at let's say Montreal University up north or in Uncle Sam, Arizona State), get to be deemed as gorgeous?

Expensive publicists that spend lots of money with the media.That would explain the fame of the kardashians and that skillet faced ho tiegen

It's pretty easy, they slept with guys like Harvey Weinstein and they are instantly propelled to the top.

theoakman says

they slept with guys like Harvey Weinstein

That's ok, they can sleep with Harvey Weinstein, Bill Cosby, Jeffrey Epstein, or even Bill Clinton, but that doesn't explain the average person, believing these women to be beautiful and amazing actresses, etc.

I mean let's look at Raquel Welch ...

or even my favorite Quebecoise lingerie model (whom I'd seen up in Montreal) ...

Do you even need any arguments as to why a Julia Roberts is lame and overrated in terms of looks, nevermind her acting?

komputodo says

Rin says

For the life of me, I can't understand how these ordinary looking women, I mean really, they're at best, some study group at a Wellesley College (and not even in the top tier at let's say Montreal University up north or in Uncle Sam, Arizona State), get to be deemed as gorgeous?

Expensive publicists that spend lots of money with the media.That would explain the fame of the kardashians and that skillet faced ho tiegen

Seriously, who wants to see photo shopped pics of old played out actresses in bikinis and plus size "models"? But the media promotes them....$$$ from publicists

Huuuuuuge Rack o' teeth. Suposed to be pretty.

She's not hot?

Robert Mitchum said to be an actor you need to do three things: Remember your lines, hit your mark, and don't trip over the cables. Maybe that's too much to ask of most pretty girls.

I think even Gwyneth blew Harvey, and she came from Hollywood generational connections.

WineHorror1 says

She's not hot?

Only if you're hot to trot.

I agree with Paltrow and Roberts being average and honestly I find Paltrow unattractive entirely. Aniston not so much. She's starting to age obviously, but she was pretty smoking 10-15 years ago. I know you're in it for the banging, but Aniston is wife material that ages well. The huge tit chicks are going to look awful in most cases by the time they hit 50 even if they keep in shape. Gravity has a pretty consistent record as well and titty reduction likely happens or they end up looking like shit as the skin stretches.

Guys, here's the point of the matter ...

Yesteryear's Hollywood hotties:

Liz Taylor, Grace Kelly, Audrey Hepburn, Sophia Loren, Raquel Welch

Today's:

Gwenyth Paltrow, Jen Aniston, Julia Roberts, Anne Hathaway

I'll guarantee that with the help of a time machine (yes, you are allowed to hit Richard Burton over the head on the 'Cleopatra' set & boink Liz), over 90% of men out there will prefer yesteryear to the current A-list crop.

Rin says

Guys, here's the point of the matter ...

Yesteryear's Hollywood hotties:

Liz Taylor, Grace Kelly, Audrey Hepburn, Sophia Loren, Raquel Welch

Today's:

Gwenyth Paltrow, Jen Aniston, Julia Roberts, Anne Hathaway

I'll guarantee that with the help of a time machine (yes, you are allowed to hit Richard Burton over the head on the 'Cleopatra' set & boink Liz), over 90% of men out there will prefer yesteryear to the current A-list crop.

Wookieman is right about Aniston. Classy. Raquel Welch...hubba hubba. Sweet lord, she was top shelf fo sho.

Rin says

theoakman says

they slept with guys like Harvey Weinstein

That's ok, they can sleep with Harvey Weinstein, Bill Cosby, Jeffrey Epstein, or even Bill Clinton, but that doesn't explain the average person, believing these women to be beautiful and amazing actresses, etc.

I mean let's look at Raquel Welch ...

or even my favorite Quebecoise lingerie model (whom I'd seen up in Montreal) ...

Do you even need any arguments as to why a Julia Roberts is lame and overrated in terms of looks, nevermind her acting?

You show us a photo of a girl you say is hotter than xy and z but cover her face? We're supposed to agree? Come on man.

She's not hotter than Trump's wife.

WineHorror1 says

You show us a photo of a girl you say is hotter than xy and z but cover her face? We're supposed to agree? Come on man.

It's called privacy, as she's a real Quebecoise, not a photoshop of a person. So no, I ain't posting her face for everyone to ID her on the 'Net.

WineHorror1 says

She's not hotter than Trump's wife.

My arguments were against Paltrow, Aniston, Roberts, and add in Hathaway.

Where did I mention Trump's wife?

Stop trolling and act like a man of The Law ... Rin Wah Law!

"[H]onestly I find Paltrow unattractive entirely."
Seriously any b&^%8 that has a candle she thinks smells like her p&**y is a filthy skank.

georgeliberte says

"[H]onestly I find Paltrow unattractive entirely."
Seriously any b&^%8 that has a candle she thinks smells like her p&**y is a filthy skank.

Here's the thing, Hollywood already has the 'everyday', ordinary looking gal in Sandra Bullock.

Sandra's never been hyped as some 'beauty queen' or anything special because she's suppose to represent you-guessed-it, the regular woman you run into at the bus stop, hospital, supermarket, etc. And for the most part, she's played that role rather well, getting herself into situations and so forth.

But what doesn't make sense is the Axis of Ordinary-Looking-Mediocrity: Paltrow, Aniston, Roberts, & Hathaway.

If you recall the romantic comedy 'Notting Hill', Julia Roberts was playing cloak n dagger with the paparazzi, dating an ordinary Brit, Hugh Grant. The problem was that the audience already knew who Grant was, so in effect, it wasn't working. Roberts in terms of on-the-street recognition was in the same tier as Grant but allegedly, she was beautiful and he was ordinary looking. What Bollocks!

He looked like a distinguished and perhaps ... a "famous" Brit and her, a regular American, who for some reason, got big roles for mysterious Weinstein-ian reasons.

Seriously, and Roberts was on the A-list for ~30 years since 'Pretty Woman'? She should have been forgotten, even before 'Erin Brockovich' went global!

Rin says

But what doesn't make sense is the Axis of Ordinary-Looking-Mediocrity: Paltrow, Aniston, Roberts, & Hathaway.

I mildly find Hathaway cute. Roberts actually looks okay in Brockovich, but padded push up bras can do wonders. Never liked her face, though if you have a monster dick her mouth can handle it. Paltrow is pure trash. I'm lost with Aniston though. She's not swinging out DDD's, but she's pretty hot. Above average worst case if you want to be picky. Would you not fuck her if given the opportunity?

WookieMan says

Roberts actually looks okay in Brockovich, but padded push up bras can do wonders.

The movie, 'Erin Brockovich', tried to rocket Robert's brand into the Ingrid Bergman space; whereas Julia's not even close to her predecessor in terms of looks, screen presence, nor acting. Really, who was fooled?

WookieMan says

Would you not fuck her if given the opportunity?

One of the reasons why I repeatedly post the edited pic of the Quebecoise lingerie model is that I've already done a hottie, 5.5 hours north of Boston.

And thus, when I see guys like Justin Theroux and other successful actors perusing Aniston, as if she was the 2nd coming of { Liz Taylor, Joan Collins, Brigitte Bardot, etc }, I'm at a loss of words, aside from WTF!