2020 Nov 12, 5:41pm
662 views 34 comments
Unlike Hindu, where Brahman is exclusively dedicated for religion formation).
Can you provide context and what is expected from me. I will take a look at this video when get chance.Just from topic I would say , Sikh is independent religion which took "good stuff" from lot of faiths including Hindu/Muslim and we have teachings from all members of society(Unlike Hindu, where Brahman is exclusively dedicated for religion formation).
I love cult fights. They're so interesting....
4) Sikhs, a group of Persian Buddhists who joined India in the fight against Islam-A-Badists.
I am not sure about the purpose of this thread. Sikhs have no conflict with any other religion basic thoughts, But it is separate religion.Patrick and other users on his site can go to any of Sikh Gurudwara to see that they really have no interest in converting anyone or discriminating with anyone.The Gurudwara is like red-cross to help anyone in need.All paths are correct according to Sikhs as long as not messing with our affairs and encroaching on our or anyone's freedom(Sikhs protected Hindus,Muslims and Christians freedom at different times).http://www.sanjosegurdwara.org/ Hindus and Abrahmics at each other throats is none of our interest. In spite of independent, we can find commonalities with both as long as they are not oppressive to us or anyone else.
WookieMan saysI love cult fights. They're so interesting....A cult says we are different. I am talking about similarities between the dharmic people. I don't think abhrahamic's will understand it.
You both believe in words, ideas and language made up by humans to collect you together as a group. Let me know how I'm incorrect? I'll wait.
indc saysWookieMan saysI love cult fights. They're so interesting....A cult says we are different. I am talking about similarities between the dharmic people. I don't think abhrahamic's will understand it.You both believe in words, ideas and language made up by humans to collect you together as a group. Let me know how I'm incorrect? I'll wait.
WookieMan saysYou both believe in words, ideas and language made up by humans to collect you together as a group. Let me know how I'm incorrect? I'll wait.Hey, I'm trying to get to him the concept that white people weren't an invention of the British Empire and its Cecil Rhodes style proselytizers.Since the following people live directly across the border between British India and the Soviet Union/Imperial Russia ...I believe whites have been around for quite some time.The idea that the British brainwashed Bollywood into recruiting fair skinned ppl is not true. As the British and Russian empires grew, easy transit between areas went down and thus, you don't see so many whites in Kashmir (plus many left durin...
Patrick and other users on his site can go to any of Sikh Gurudwara to see that they really have no interest in converting anyone or discriminating with anyone.
the guy Rin is on some very different tangent. I am not aware of any connections he is trying to make.
You still did not show any proof that the buddhists were actual sikhi. I dont mind your blind belief of AIT without any proof. But 200yrs rule doesn't change the characteristic of the region.
culture that is 5000yrs old and thriving.
The work Sikh in Punjabi means a "learner" as Sikh is suppose to learn throughout his life. Maintain the core values of religion but not reject any other religion.
indc saysYou still did not show any proof that the buddhists were actual sikhi. I dont mind your blind belief of AIT without any proof. But 200yrs rule doesn't change the characteristic of the region.My Tamil friend can't find any records of anything in India, past the last century. And he spent a lot of time there looking. In contrast, we have all of Abraham Lincoln's letters in our archives.So if you want proof than perhaps, you need to work on your own national archives for that.Otherwise, you'll have Iranian anthropologists (read: Not UK nor US imperialists) dictate your history since Persians tend to be worldly and know that there's a world beyond their recent or ancient boundaries.indc saysculture that is 5000yrs old and thriving.Are you talking about the Harappa kingdom wh...
First I don't either hate or like Hinduism as whole.I don't have enough knowledge except that Sikh is independent religion and Hindu Indian govt should stop interfering.But I do find Hindu caste system abhorrent and Indian Hindu government also discriminates with people as It is OK to discriminate based on Hindu philosophy.Khalistan is a movement to separate Sikhs from India. I don't have much knowledge about its current state, But I do feel Sikhs should have state like Jews.
I am not sure what Sikh people were before 500 years and also not really care as in Sikhi everyone is equal and welcome.
Everybody knows caste system even europens. I don't need complex Hindu explanation to understand that it sucks.Discriminating with people based on birth is pure evil.Pakistan got major chunk of Punjab why dont you ask them to give you land to start a separate land for Sikhs.>Typically I don't call people stupid, But this is most idiotic statement I heard in long time. May be we can ask "Patrick" to give separate country to Sikhs in US.
I have already shown that Khalistanis(openly declared) frequent white house very often. They have many US congressman and senators in their caucus.These are the same people declared "terrorists" by India.. Why not just blame US?They won't blame US, As Hindu religion is based on oppressing the weak and licking shoes of powerful.They will bark against weak Pakistan as it has no retaliatory force but will beg in front of China and pretend it has not occupied their land.Sikhs fight the oppressor to protect the weak, Hindu oppress the weak to get award from oppressor.