patrick.net

I want to hear more details about the fraud. Where did they get the numbers?

Patrick says

I want to hear more details about the fraud. Where did they get the numbers?

Same

Tracing back, at least some of the claim comes from a guy on thedonald.win who ran the NY Times' own data on results through a script he wrote, showing large blocks of votes which were first credited to Trump disappearing later, or the same number subsequently appearing for Biden, and a small number going the other way, from Biden to Trump.

See https://thedonald.win/p/11Q8O2wesk/happening-calling-every-pede-to-/

And here is some of the NY Times data:

https://static01.nyt.com/elections-assets/2020/data/api/2020-11-03/race-page/pennsylvania/president.json

But where did the NY Times get this data?

https://noqreport.com/2020/11/11/data-deep-dive-on-dominion-voting-systems-offers-incontrovertible-proof-of-election-hack/

I saw the video on The Gateway Pundit [ https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/11/breaking-huge-another-system-glitch-captured-live-cnn-election-night-20000-votes-swapped-trump-biden-video/ ] and I decided to do some digging of my own, into a more reputable source that can verify that the glitch was indeed real, and that it affected the votes, instead of it being just a display glitch on that news channel. So I went digging into the Edison data [ https://static01.nyt.com/elections-assets/2020/data/api/2020-11-03/race-page/pennsylvania/president.json] and I found this damning evidence [
]. As can be seen in the image, only 54 votes were added, but the ratio changed in Biden’s favor by a whole 0.6%! This is proof that not only did the glitch happen, but it doesn’t seem to have been reverted at all.

Wow, yes, suddenly with only 54 votes added, Biden's favor shifted up by 0.6%, which is impossible. It should have taken about 179,000 votes to move the race that much:

2984486 * 0.06 = 179069.16

Massive national security issues. Massive. I'm told Dirty Venezuelan & Cuba money behind dominion. The software also has components from china. This is about to explode.
https://parler.com/post/622fa2bae44e4cf49e9c495cc021cb95

Guiliani says that the vote counting machines by Dominion run software written by three Venezuelans who were close to Chavez, and who wrote it specifically in order to be able to swing elections.

Smartmatic owns Dominion.

https://twitter.com/LouDobbs/status/1327024215887851521

https://heavy.com/news/dominion-voting-systems-glitch-clinton-pelosi-michigan-georgia/

Since the 2016 election especially, Dominion and other large voting firms have faced increasing Congressional scrutiny. It’s not unusual for big firms under the Congressional microscope to hire people or firms with ties to other power players; Dominion has ties to the Clinton Foundation. The company has used lobbying firms that employ lobbyists with ties to major figures like Georgia’s Republican governor and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, as well as a lobbyist who donated money to Republican Majority Leader Mitch McConnell. Increasing the scrutiny, it has also worked with firms tied to George Soros and Robert Mueller and gets some components from China. A former ambassador named by former President Barack Obama sits on the board of a company that acquired it in 2018.

The company’s equipment is used in North Carolina, Nevada, Georgia, Michigan, Arizona and Pennsylvania – key states where President Donald Trump’s campaign has raised concerns or that are still being counted. ...

Dominion’s Technology Serves 40% of American Voters; the Company Gave Money to the Clinton Foundation & Uses Some Parts From China

According to Bloomberg, Dominion Voting Systems “hired … a high-powered firm that includes a longtime aide to Speaker Nancy Pelosi. … Dominion’s first-ever lobbying firm is Brownstein Farber Hyatt and Schreck. Nadeam Elshami, Pelosi’s former chief of staff, is one of the lobbyists on the account.” ...

The State of Texas Rejected the Company’s Machines & Problems Arose With a Contracted Company in the Philippines That Has Ties to George Soros ...

Dominion Voting Systems Denied Rumors That Sharpies Invalidated People’s Votes in Arizona, but There Were Problems With Sharpies in Pennsylvania in 2019

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/sidney-powell-people-with-links-to-powerful-democrats-using-dominion-voting-machines-to-steal-votes

Powell, the lead attorney for retired Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn, who is helping Trump's legal effort in the 2020 election, said on Sunday that people with links to top Democrats are using Dominion Voting Systems to commit "fraud" on elections. She did not present any evidence to support her claims.

Mentioned during a Fox News interview by host Maria Bartiromo were Nadeam Elshami, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s former chief of staff who last year became a lobbyist for Dominion, and Richard Blum, California Sen. Dianne Feinstein’s husband, who she said is a significant shareholder in the company.

Oh, Feinstein's husband is a significant shareholder in Dominion. What a coincidence.

patnet just went down for a few secs a few secs ago. I could refresh other browsers but patnet hung.

Thanks for telling me @just_passing_through

I also just had problems getting to https://gab.com/realdonaldtrump but not to other sites.

Someone may be spraying bad IP packets to slow down sites they don't like.

Wow, I also just had a weird hang when trying to get to patrick.net, but could get to the NY Times just fine during it.

Spectrum ISP shut me down last night. I battled them on the phone about it, them claiming it was an outage in my area when none of my neighbors were down.

I can ssh into the server and it seems fine from there. So I'm pretty sure it's a network thing, maybe deliberate.

Did you scroll down in that thread to where they located the “irregularity” in Antrim where they switched the 3000 votes from Trump to Biden?

It has a lot of important ramifications:
1. This validates the data. If we can see the flip that we know happened at the time we expect, then it’s reasonable to assume other flips, if they happen will also appear in the data.
2. Given #1, we at least deserve a reasonable explanation for the other flips that appear in the data that are identical to the flip we know happen.

It’s been two days since Trump tweeted about this. Edison needs to produce an expert that can explain why the data is doing this. Since they won’t, you have to go with the obvious explanation that somehow votes were being flipped and dropped after they were initially recorded.

Please someone post a reasonable explanation. I don’t want this to be true.