0
0

Why did Ghandi hate Sikhs?


 invite response                
2020 Nov 15, 7:47pm   1,302 views  52 comments

by MisdemeanorRebel   ➕follow (12)   💰tip   ignore  

Comments 1 - 40 of 52       Last »     Search these comments

1   Ceffer   2020 Nov 15, 10:33pm  

The statue sounds like Netflix pandering anyway.
2   Rin   2020 Nov 16, 6:19am  

It's because Mohandas Gandhi, not related to Nehru's daughter Indira Gandhi, was an ordinary guru/would-be cult leader, and not a founder of a nation.

Since M. Gandhi was a media darling, ppl from around the world made all kinds of comparisons to Jesus, St Francis, etc.

Well, regardless, St Francis started a monastery not a nation-state.

And when the Royal Indian Navy, a.k.a RIN (not related to my moniker, which is actually a powerful symbol in Ninjutsu), mutinied in 1943, the naval head, Lord Mountbatten, decided that it was over and left partitioned India at the hands of a Nehru and Pakistan, at the hands of a Jinnah.

Hence, it was a false independence.

You see, when the USA didn't back up the UK during the Suez canal crisis in '56, much of the British colonies gained independence within the following two decades including those in Africa, Bahrain, Malaysia/Singapore, and the Caribbean. Those were real independences and that's why India is just catching up today, because the Nehru line ended with Rajiv Gandhi's assassination (again, Indira's son, not a descendant of Mohandas) in '91.

"Mahatma" Gandhi needs to be forgotten or at best, be remembered as a media star.
3   indc   2020 Nov 16, 8:11am  

@Rin, check out final 20mins of this video. To clarify your questions of indian civilization.

www.youtube.com/embed/qnNJr_0TxuI
4   Shaman   2020 Nov 16, 8:24am  

So it’s a stable form of civilization. Big deal. What’s it given the world? 40,000 years and we got some numbers and letters out of it. Give the Europeans 1,000 years and we have supercomputers. Indian fail.
5   Rin   2020 Nov 16, 10:54am  

Shaman says
So it’s a stable form of civilization.


I think his argument is more centered on India being the progenitor of world civilization, using a cross product of folklore, astrology, literature, etc which encompasses all of central Asia (eastern Persian Empire) and South Asia (Indian subcontinent), which I believe is a fantasy of ancient era world dominance.

Shaman says
Big deal. What’s it given the world? 40,000 years and we got some numbers and letters out of it. Give the Europeans 1,000 years and we have supercomputers. Indian fail.


You're correct, as for global impact, India's ancient neighbor, the pre-Islamic Persian Empire (of Zoroaster's people) via Cyrus the Great & beyond was
actually the modern-looking world but in terms of ancient times.

Here are some highlights ...

https://www.ancient.eu/article/1505/inventions--innovations-of-ancient-persia/

-First Declaration of Human Rights
-Irrigation and Refrigeration
-Landscaped Gardens and the Word 'Paradise'
-Birthday Celebrations, Animation, the Guitar, and Dessert
-Monotheism
-Elite Military Units and Uniforms
-Windmills and Air Conditioning
-Postal System and the Highway
-The Teaching Hospital
-Heavily Armored Cavalry

If anything, the Persian Empire did advance the globe in a way which is analogous to Europe or America during modern times. This is why I have a hard time buying into this guy's ideas of India being the center of the ancient world.

If Rome and Persia both survived the barbaric attacks and the Islamic Caliphates, then the middle ages may have ended by the year 700.

And if that were to have occurred then it would be obvious to this guy that his neighbor was the United States of the Near East and not some Islamic backwater so that he can't fabricate these tales of ancient glory.
6   MisdemeanorRebel   2020 Nov 16, 10:57am  

@indc Why did Ghandi hate Sikhs.
7   Rin   2020 Nov 16, 11:10am  

Rin says
And if that were to have occurred then it would be obvious to this guy that his neighbor was the United States of the Near East and not some Islamic backwater so that he can't fabricate these tales of ancient glory.


If this alternative version of history occurred, Persia to India would be like the United States to Mexico. The former would be the country which invents and makes things while the latter, a source of cheap labor & tequila.
8   indc   2020 Nov 16, 11:34am  

NoCoupForYou says
@indc Why did Ghandi hate Sikhs.


I did not know that Gandhi hated Sikhs. When India was partitioned Sikhs were asked if they wanted separate state just like muslims. Sikhs said they have no problem living in India. Because they considered themselves part of Hindu-civilization.

Sikhs in US/UK/Canada are cowards they get funding from Pakistan-ISI and talk shit about anything India or Hindu because they are brainwashed. Many in India think Gandhi became ultra-secular in his final years(maybe even mohamadian) and started supporting muslims and pakistan. UK wants statue of Gandhi because of his support British Kingdom.
9   Rin   2020 Nov 16, 11:34am  

Hey NoCoup,

Let me give you another type of delusion, using the year 4000 AD as an analogy.

Someone discovers a 'book' or a 'disc' in a time vault. It's all about the Pilates exercises and how Joseph Pilates invented them by mixing gymnastics, isometric training, and Hatha Yoga back around the World War I time frame (~1915).

Since modern medicine will have all of that in its physical therapy program, some 4000 AD version of indc will say that Pilates was Indian or perhaps an Indian ex-pat in Germany or America because he brought Hatha Yoga into the modern world.

Well guess what? Pilates is the Zoroaster (Hint: Persian metaphor) of physical therapy who knew about Hatha Yoga, just like Zoroaster knew about Agni Yoga, but wasn't Indian.
10   indc   2020 Nov 16, 11:41am  

Rin says
Hey NoCoup,

Let me give you another type of delusion, using the year 4000 AD as an analogy.

Someone discovers a 'book' or a 'disc' in a time vault. It's all about the Pilates exercises and how Joseph Pilates invented them by mixing gymnastics, isometric training, and Hatha Yoga back around the World War I time frame (~1915).

Since modern medicine will have all of that in its physical therapy program, some 4000 AD version of indc will say that Pilates was Indian or perhaps an Indian ex-pat in Germany or America because he brought Hatha Yoga into the modern world.

Well guess what? Pilates is the Zoroaster (Hint: Persian metaphor) of physical therapy who knew about Hatha Yoga, just like Zoroaster knew about Agni Yoga, but wasn't Indian.


Do you even know how archeology works? From my understanding they find some small thing and make up a story around it. Every archeological find narrative can be questioned. You want to believe the persia which has 1 major river fell to muslim invasion in 15 yrs is source of all culture. India bent but not break since it had 12 major rivers. I would rather believe a culture's centrally based on 12 rivers than on 1 river.
11   FarmersWon   2020 Nov 16, 11:57am  

Sikhs unlike Hindus were not sending their daughters to Gandhi to sleep with them naked to practice abstinence.
https://www.theweek.in/news/india/2020/09/27/which-was-the-correct-path-gandhi-bhagat-singh.html
Sikhs heroes are always upright people who fight the oppression and give up their Life.
Hindus are always 'corrupt people like colonial agent Gandhi".

www.youtube.com/embed/9RuCbh-hw3c
12   indc   2020 Nov 16, 12:03pm  

Shaman says
So it’s a stable form of civilization. Big deal. What’s it given the world? 40,000 years and we got some numbers and letters out of it. Give the Europeans 1,000 years and we have supercomputers. Indian fail.


Just because Europe had looted technology, money and sciences. which they used in their development does not make them superior. Why do you think muslims were more willing to loot India than europe. Not because christian-europe was superior. India was much rich. Why do you think europe is being overrun by muslim-dogs now. Because all of that loot is in europe now. Dont worry your ancestor's land will go back to living in trees once muslims will have their full run and civilizations development will go back to land where it all started.
13   Ceffer   2020 Nov 16, 12:34pm  

Rin says
a source of cheap labor & tequila.

Don't forget cheap and abundant pay per screw. Also willing to drop numerous quivering gelatinous breeding eggs for half of your genetic jewelry.
14   MisdemeanorRebel   2020 Nov 16, 12:37pm  

indc says
Just because Europe had looted technology, money and sciences. which they used in their development does not make them superior.


Who did we loot the steam engine, vacuum pump, rocket engines, automobiles, planes, computers, from? The card machine operated loom? The cotton gin?

"Oh, well, India came up with the 0 so everything in engineering/science after that was actually stolen from India"
15   Shaman   2020 Nov 16, 1:41pm  

indc says
Just because Europe had looted technology, money and sciences. which they used in their development does not make them superior. Why do you think muslims were more willing to loot India than europe. Not because christian-europe was superior. India was much rich. Why do you think europe is being overrun by muslim-dogs now. Because all of that loot is in europe now. Dont worry your ancestor's land will go back to living in trees once muslims will have their full run and civilizations development will go back to land where it all started.


Let’s take this point by pointy head.
1)Europe looted technology: sure! Europe took tech like writing and algebra from Persia and gunpowder from China. But then Europe invented many other things with that tech! Gunpowder was just used for fireworks in backwards China, but Europeans saw that explosive force and harnessed it for canons and firearms. Algebra was an academic curiosity in Persia, but Europe harnessed it to build cathedrals and solve mechanical puzzles that brought us innovations in agriculture and architecture.

2)Muslims were more willing to loot India because it was backwards and easy to conquer. The weapons tech was sub par and their warriors were spindly and weak. Plus it had a lot of gold and riches. It was a fat goose sitting unguarded on a nest of eggs. Of course India took it in the ass!

3)Now you ask why Muslims are invading Europe. It’s simple, stupid. European overlords wish to subjugate their free peoples by dividing them against an invader. So they mandate Muslim immigration to ensure a foreign occupying force. This will make their people demand strong government to push out the invader. And strong government can reduce all resistance foreign and domestic to zero. Muslims are the cat’s paw for European oligarchs.
16   Rin   2020 Nov 16, 2:52pm  

Shaman says
Muslims were more willing to loot India because it was backwards and easy to conquer.


And this was Timur's great grandson, Babur, who wasn't even wily enough as his more infamous ancestor, to hold onto his family's lands at Samarkand. His expedition into India, to conquer 'em and build the Mughal Empire, was because he couldn't reestablish Timur's former territorial influences so he sought out an easier target.

Which leads to the following ...

indc says
You want to believe the persia which has 1 major river fell to muslim invasion in 15 yrs is source of all culture. India bent but not break since it had 12 major rivers. I would rather believe a culture's centrally based on 12 rivers than on 1 river.


Wow! So all those waterways were natural defenses?

The last Zoroastrian Persian Empire fought the Eastern Roman/Byzantine Empire for nearly a decade to a stalemate. India has never faced an opponent of that magnitude ever. A way to simulate that is to put the entire Chinese army in Assam and see how long Bengal holds out.

In engaging in the longest border war with Byzantine, the Persian Empire lost all of its resources and that's when Abu Bakr, the First Caliphate, launched the great strike from the sands of Arabia.
17   Rin   2020 Nov 16, 3:00pm  

Last but not least, after Rajiv Gandhi's assassination (hint: real independence), corporate America threw billions of dollars at India, so that Bangalore could built a Silicon Valley, to replace the one in California.

Instead, it turned into a body shop, producing shoddy work and in the end, the whole Bangalore Inc became a joke in outsourcing. No Microsofts nor Oracles grew from that environment. At best, it was bug fixing spots for those US based corporations which today, is being challenged by eastern Europe and other Asian countries.

What reigning global empire tosses money like that, to make someone else an IT empire? If Rome did that with Egypt, they would have handed Cleopatra over to Octavian without raising a sword.

In contrast to modern India, after the Meiji Restoration, Japan went from medieval to industrial/modern, in one generation. Same for South Korea, which was devastated from the 1950-53 conflict.
18   Rin   2020 Nov 16, 3:06pm  

Shaman says
Europe took tech like writing and algebra from Persia


Wait, did you say Persia?

I thought there was only India in the ancient world?
19   Shaman   2020 Nov 16, 4:31pm  

India was so weak, the British Empire conquered it with a few shiploads of marines. They kept it because of the discovery of Chilean bark producing quinine that kept malaria at bay. India’s greatest defense has always been festering disease. Alexander of Macedonia conquered parts of it but fell ill and died. After that, the western world left it alone.
20   FarmersWon   2020 Nov 16, 5:58pm  

The India was conquered by anyone who wanted because of "stupid Hindu religion".
The morons don't let people consume protein to become fighters.

1) You can't fight in war eating "carrots" while your enemy can have a loaf of meat and don't need anything for day.
2) They discriminates with own people and these same people are willing to aid enemy.
3) In general Hindu philosophy is really stupid and incoherent. They keep people busy in superstitions.
4) Hindu hate delegating power to people, They used to kill anyone except Brahman trying to educate themselves.
5) They will discriminate by birth, They feel only certain section can fight and otehr trying they will kill for crime of leaning how to use weapons.
...
21   indc   2020 Nov 16, 6:12pm  

Shaman says
indc says
Just because Europe had looted technology, money and sciences. which they used in their development does not make them superior. Why do you think muslims were more willing to loot India than europe. Not because christian-europe was superior. India was much rich. Why do you think europe is being overrun by muslim-dogs now. Because all of that loot is in europe now. Dont worry your ancestor's land will go back to living in trees once muslims will have their full run and civilizations development will go back to land where it all started.


Let’s take this point by pointy head.
1)Europe looted technology: sure! Europe took tech like writing and algebra from Persia and gunpowder from China. But then Europe invented many other things with that tech! Gunpowder was just used for fireworks in backwards China, but Europeans saw that explosive force and harnessed it for canons and firearms. ...


1) Algebra from Persia. That is funny. Gun-powder from China that is even more funny. There is a discussion happening on twitter about it.
https://twitter.com/TIinExile/status/1327477391787114497

Your point 2 and 3 are counter-intuitive. When Indians kings did not understand the muslim brutality then they are weak. When european rulers now dont understand the muslim brutality then governments are weak.
22   indc   2020 Nov 16, 6:17pm  

NoCoupForYou says
indc says
Just because Europe had looted technology, money and sciences. which they used in their development does not make them superior.


Who did we loot the steam engine, vacuum pump, rocket engines, automobiles, planes, computers, from? The card machine operated loom? The cotton gin?

"Oh, well, India came up with the 0 so everything in engineering/science after that was actually stolen from India"


India just not invent '0'. It gave whole number system to world.
Check this video:
www.youtube.com/embed/l3-1pO4uGGE
23   Shaman   2020 Nov 16, 6:22pm  

indc says
Your point 2 and 3 are counter-intuitive. When Indians kings did not understand the muslim brutality then they are weak. When european rulers now dont understand the muslim brutality then governments are weak.


You might say that Europeans have been infected by weak Indian philosophy that will end with them becoming the subjects of stronger minded invaders.

India is a place to loot.
It’s not a place to emulate.
24   indc   2020 Nov 16, 6:24pm  

Rin says
Shaman says
Muslims were more willing to loot India because it was backwards and easy to conquer.


And this was Timur's great grandson, Babur, who wasn't even wily enough as his more infamous ancestor, to hold onto his family's lands at Samarkand. His expedition into India, to conquer 'em and build the Mughal Empire, was because he couldn't reestablish Timur's former territorial influences so he sought out an easier target.

Which leads to the following ...

indc says
You want to believe the persia which has 1 major river fell to muslim invasion in 15 yrs is source of all culture. India bent but not break since it had 12 major rivers. I would rather believe a culture's centrally based on 12 rivers than on 1 river.


Wow! So all those waterways were natural defenses?

The last Zoroastrian Per...


Rivers are not just fro defenses but for trade and civilization development. Even my 8 yr knows that. You need to read about ahom dynasty in assam. They stopped muslim invasion for 600yrs. And there was no china invasion from India's north-east for ever until the 1962 war.
25   indc   2020 Nov 16, 6:26pm  

Shaman says
indc says
Your point 2 and 3 are counter-intuitive. When Indians kings did not understand the muslim brutality then they are weak. When european rulers now dont understand the muslim brutality then governments are weak.


You might say that Europeans have been infected by weak Indian philosophy that will end with them becoming the subjects of stronger minded invaders.

India is a place to loot.
It’s not a place to emulate.


Is that the reason all the countries are trying to be in good books of hindus. You can see how many are wishing on Indian festival diwali.
26   indc   2020 Nov 16, 6:38pm  

Rin says
Last but not least, after Rajiv Gandhi's assassination (hint: real independence), corporate America threw billions of dollars at India, so that Bangalore could built a Silicon Valley, to replace the one in California.

Instead, it turned into a body shop, producing shoddy work and in the end, the whole Bangalore Inc became a joke in outsourcing. No Microsofts nor Oracles grew from that environment. At best, it was bug fixing spots for those US based corporations which today, is being challenged by eastern Europe and other Asian countries.

What reigning global empire tosses money like that, to make someone else an IT empire? If Rome did that with Egypt, they would have handed Cleopatra over to Octavian without raising a sword.

In contrast to modern India, after the Meiji Restoration, Japan went from medieval to industrial/modern, in one generation. Same for South Korea, which was devastated from the 1950-53 conflict.


You are right about indian IT. The education system must change. India still follows british system of making drones. Even India's biggest IT company CEOs think the British gave the number system to India and we should be its slave. Once that mentality changes you can see more innovative things from India. I explained the same to you before but you still brought it up so you really want to shit about it than learn from this discussion.
27   Shaman   2020 Nov 16, 6:50pm  

indc says
Is that the reason all the countries are trying to be in good books of hindus


yes.
Trade is the new form of looting, but more mutually beneficial.
28   Shaman   2020 Nov 16, 6:53pm  

indc says
India just not invent '0'. It gave whole number system to world


that's the most basic sort of invention. Every people has some concept of numbers, even the most stupid. I'm not saying that Indians are the most stupid, just that most of the smart Indians were born after the Muslims subjugated them.
29   Rin   2020 Nov 16, 7:03pm  

indc says

Rivers are not just fro defenses but for trade and civilization development. Even my 8 yr knows that. You need to read about ahom dynasty in assam. They stopped muslim invasion for 600yrs. And there was no china invasion from India's north-east for ever until the 1962 war.


Looks like you've missed the point about the China metaphor.

Yes, Assam held off the Mughals. My Assamese friends told me about that and at the same time, they don't see themselves as members of modern independent India as it shit upon their land for decades thanks to an Indira Gandhi. Not everyone believes in this 'united' India view of the world.

Now, my comparison was the Byzantine/Eastern Roman Empire fighting the Zoroastrian/Sassanid Persian Empire. That would be as if ALL of the Chinese army was ALREADY in Assam, not across the Himalayas, which is a mountain barrier. And then from Assam, they attack Bengal. How long would Bengal last? You see ... that's what I'm getting at. That's a true rival.

And the founding Mughal, Babur, was a mediocre invader whereas Timur (his great grandfather) was the butcher of Central Asia, another 'Sword of Islam' type like Khalid Ibn Walid from Arabia.

In contrast, India was actually protected by a mountainous land barrier from China since antiquity and despite that land protection from the north, it was invaded by a far inferior force than that which the Zoroastrian/Sassanid Persians faced from the Byzantine/Eastern Roman Empire, followed by Abu Bakr & Khalid Ibn Walid from Arabia.

A one-two punch and yes, Persia fell.

And likewise, Byzantine/Eastern Roman lost all of the Levant region & Egypt.

The end result ... a Caliphate Empire and the beginning of the dark ages.
30   Blue   2020 Nov 16, 7:15pm  

Rin says
Last but not least, after Rajiv Gandhi's assassination (hint: real independence)


Yes, for some extent. India is still under "congress party" which is started by British folks but now ONLY represent Muslims and their lawlessness under "secularism".
Playboy Muhammadan Gandhi is heavenly influenced by Islam supported all Hindu genocides from 1921 and he played a great roll for British people in silencing natives to obey the law and never participate in resistance for freedom. He called it none-violence.
He allowed Indira Khan (became a Muslim after marriage) to barrow his last name to become Indira 'Gandhi'.
Interestingly her Italian d-in-law former waitress Sonia Khan/Gandhi and her son Rahul Khan/Gandhi acts like a real Muslims. Of course the corrupt media glorify these Muslims including pedophile Muhammadan Gandhi.
31   Rin   2020 Nov 16, 7:24pm  

sikhguy says
1) You can't fight in war eating "carrots" while your enemy can have a loaf of meat and don't need anything for day.
2) They discriminates with own people and these same people are willing to aid enemy.
3) In general Hindu philosophy is really stupid and incoherent. They keep people busy in superstitions.
4) Hindu hate delegating power to people, They used to kill anyone except Brahman trying to educate themselves.
5) They will discriminate by birth, They feel only certain section can fight and otehr trying they will kill for crime of leaning how to use weapons.


To loop back to my post above ...

Rin says
A one-two punch and yes, Persia fell.

And likewise, Byzantine/Eastern Roman lost all of the Levant region & Egypt.


If India was the shining light of those dark ages then why didn't it lead the charge against the Caliphate, even as a second comer?

During the war, the Sassanid family members fled to China (and not India) where they had good relations with the Emperor of China. But as expected, it wasn't a war which China wanted so at best, they were given safe haven and not resources to fight back. This is congruent with China's long standing principle of only tending to their own sphere of influence which is east Asia.

Ultimately, it took another barbarian army, the Mongolians, to wipe out the Caliphate many centuries later, even though the scourge of Islam was already abound and it was too little, too late.

All and all, at every pivot point in history, India's influence is minimal and I suspect that the Sikh guy is right and it has something to do with Hindu culture being limited and not able to get out of its own way to make something happen.
32   indc   2020 Nov 16, 11:27pm  

Shaman says
indc says
India just not invent '0'. It gave whole number system to world


that's the most basic sort of invention. Every people has some concept of numbers, even the most stupid. I'm not saying that Indians are the most stupid, just that most of the smart Indians were born after the Muslims subjugated them.


Yes every civilization had number system. But which system has been accepted by the world and used in their progress. You did not check the video I shared. Fibbonachi number I shared was an life altering invention for europe in 12th century. But India has been using it for millenia before that. I know basic logic is difficult for some people but when someone is sharing the information atleast try to understand why they are sharing that.
33   indc   2020 Nov 16, 11:38pm  

Rin says
indc says

Rivers are not just fro defenses but for trade and civilization development. Even my 8 yr knows that. You need to read about ahom dynasty in assam. They stopped muslim invasion for 600yrs. And there was no china invasion from India's north-east for ever until the 1962 war.


Looks like you've missed the point about the China metaphor.

Yes, Assam held off the Mughals. My Assamese friends told me about that and at the same time, they don't see themselves as members of modern independent India as it shit upon their land for decades thanks to an Indira Gandhi. Not everyone believes in this 'united' India view of the world.

Now, my comparison was the Byzantine/Eastern Roman Empire fighting the Zoroastrian/Sassanid Persian Empire. That would be as if ALL of the Chinese army was ALREADY in Assam, not across the Himalayas, which is a mountain barrier. And then from Assam, they a...


You dont know indian history so you have to make up stories of what India did not do. In 8th century after persia fell same forces tried to attack India. The kingdoms in India united and gave such beating to caliphate that they collapsed and never bothered to attack india for another 300yrs. You know same age as these USA. Again they started attacking India in 11th century from afghanistan. in 12th century again a king killed so many afghans and he went all the way to kabul and killed everyone there. Then babur came to india when its norher rulers were weak. His son lost and escaped from india and his grandson akbar became strong and with some politics was able to formhis kingdom. Akbars son shah-jhan had taj-mahal for his credit and then aurangazeb. So there were only 3 mughal kings who ruled India. That really doesn't make a difference dont you think for a region with atleast 3000yrs of strong history.
34   Blue   2020 Nov 17, 11:33am  

indc says
taj-mahal

Taj Mahal is Tejo Mahalaya a structure built in 11th century. World was fooled to believe that it was built by a Muslim. Muslims never built anything in the world. They only occupy, loot and destroy.
35   FarmersWon   2020 Nov 17, 11:40am  

Blue says
indc says
taj-mahal

Taj Mahal is Tejo Mahalaya a structure built in 11th century. World was fooled to believe that it was built by a Muslim. Muslims never built anything in the world. They only occupy, loot and destroy.


I am not sure why people are arguing with Hindus.
Hindus have average IQ of ~70 and the ones with higher IQ are just manipulative.
Even the elite Hindus after centuries of manipulation and not delivering justice have "defective brain cells".

You can't argue with people who believes "Cow urine can cure cancer" & "Cow dung can protect you from nuclear attack".
Eventually it boils down to providing proper nutrition to kids, But Hindu mafia would not allow that as first thing brainy Indians will do is reject the Hindu stupidity.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Periyar_E._V._Ramasamy
36   Robert Sproul   2020 Nov 17, 11:48am  

Most of the developing world:
37   Rin   2020 Nov 17, 11:54am  

indc says

You dont know indian history so you have to make up stories of what India did not do. In 8th century after persia fell same forces tried to attack India.


They were not the same forces.

First Caliphate Abu Bakr's immediate successor, Umar (since Abu Bakr died only two years after conquering Babylon), restricted his armies to only Central Asian campaigns, to establish the boundaries of his Empire, meaning the one established by the Big Three of Abu Bakr, Umar, and general Khalid Ibn Walid.

Afterwards, latter Caliphates in the 700s and beyond, tried to invade into both India and Anatolia (Byzantine Empire) with much less success because what would you expect from inbred imbeciles. The first wave, Mohamed's sociopathic A-team, got its job done. The followup successors were losers in comparison. It took the Turks to finish the job with the Byzantine Empire which is why today, both Greeks and Armenians hate Turks, more than they hate either Arabs or Persians.

Blue says
World was fooled to believe that it was built by a Muslim. Muslims never built anything in the world. They only occupy, loot and destroy.


I completely concur with this statement.

The following is a picture of the main city of former Soviet Bukhara ...



Muslims take credit for this when it was already there, built by Zoroastrians and Buddhists during ancient times.
38   MisdemeanorRebel   2020 Nov 17, 2:55pm  

Not to mention the Dome of the Rock built on top of the Great Temple Mount.

Or the Hagia Sofia - which Sultan Erdogan is reconverting back into an operational Mosque.
39   Blue   2020 Nov 17, 4:37pm  

sikhguy says

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Periyar_E._V._Ramasamy

He was a commie for all his life for looting and spreading hatred including all his followers. Since you liked this mega leach, you're a commie too. Why don't you start working hard for living.
40   FarmersWon   2020 Nov 17, 6:15pm  

Commie untouchable Vs Brahman fascist, Whats not to like.
Bring the popcorn.

He took all the clothes of brahman establishment off like Trump is doing in US.

Comments 1 - 40 of 52       Last »     Search these comments

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions