patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,190,006 comments by 13,851 users - goofus, RWSGFY online now
invite responseComments 1 - 23 of 23 Search these comments
2
RWSGFY
2020 Nov 22, 10:24am
RWSGFY
2020 Nov 22, 10:24am
Kraken Holds Press Conference To Distance Itself From Trump Campaign
WASHINGTON, D.C.—Amid urgent calls for Trump's legal team to "release the Kraken" and show the country their irrefutable proof of voter fraud, the legendary Nordic cephalopod made a rare media appearance this week to clear things up and distance himself from the Trump campaign.
"Let me be perfectly clear," gargled the Kraken in its horrifying eldritch voice. "I am not, nor have I ever been, a member of the Trump campaign. No one has contacted me from the campaign or legal team. These rumors of me being 'released' are just rumors."
Reporters then began to shout questions and offer buckets of dead fish in hopes that the Kraken would call on them.
"Have you ever been to Mar-a-Lago? Did you help the Russians meddle in the 2016 elections? Are you a racist?" yelled Jim Acosta before being devoured whole by the terrible creature.
The cranky monster then slithered back into the briny depths from whence it came. Trump responded on Twitter, calling the Kraken "a total loser who he never liked anyway."
https://babylonbee.com/news/kraken-holds-press-conference-to-distance-itself-from-trump-campaign
WASHINGTON, D.C.—Amid urgent calls for Trump's legal team to "release the Kraken" and show the country their irrefutable proof of voter fraud, the legendary Nordic cephalopod made a rare media appearance this week to clear things up and distance himself from the Trump campaign.
"Let me be perfectly clear," gargled the Kraken in its horrifying eldritch voice. "I am not, nor have I ever been, a member of the Trump campaign. No one has contacted me from the campaign or legal team. These rumors of me being 'released' are just rumors."
Reporters then began to shout questions and offer buckets of dead fish in hopes that the Kraken would call on them.
"Have you ever been to Mar-a-Lago? Did you help the Russians meddle in the 2016 elections? Are you a racist?" yelled Jim Acosta before being devoured whole by the terrible creature.
The cranky monster then slithered back into the briny depths from whence it came. Trump responded on Twitter, calling the Kraken "a total loser who he never liked anyway."
https://babylonbee.com/news/kraken-holds-press-conference-to-distance-itself-from-trump-campaign
6
Ceffer
2020 Nov 28, 10:17pm
Ceffer
2020 Nov 28, 10:17pm
Kraken is a real thing. It's the code name for the military intelligence apparatus that was following election for Trump. It would be a cozy feeling that they will, indeed, flush them all out, but who knows. It sounds like he has near infallible mathematical proof.
There must not be a lot of confidence that Biden will prevail, especially with Dominion taking a powder. Dominion is afraid of something rather big to just vacate like that.
He mentioned the inertness of Durham and the DOJ, too.
There must not be a lot of confidence that Biden will prevail, especially with Dominion taking a powder. Dominion is afraid of something rather big to just vacate like that.
He mentioned the inertness of Durham and the DOJ, too.
7
MisdemeanorRebel
2020 Nov 28, 11:02pm
MisdemeanorRebel
2020 Nov 28, 11:02pm
I dunno Ceffer. Biden sure isn't filling the big posts. I think some people are standing aloof. It works both ways: RINOs who want to go back to normal where they campaign big and deliver nothing at all, and the smarter Dems who think Trump really does have some shit on them, which I have no doubt he does.
Most of these are relatively minor, with the exception of Chief of Staff and Sec of State, but Klain is a long time Biden crony.
https://www.npr.org/2020/11/17/933848488/biden-administration-heres-who-has-been-nominated
The Econ picks are totally missing (because they'll be totally neoliberal, but his handlers are unwilling to unveil them until all election controversy is done, they feel they need the BLM base)
Most of these are relatively minor, with the exception of Chief of Staff and Sec of State, but Klain is a long time Biden crony.
https://www.npr.org/2020/11/17/933848488/biden-administration-heres-who-has-been-nominated
The Econ picks are totally missing (because they'll be totally neoliberal, but his handlers are unwilling to unveil them until all election controversy is done, they feel they need the BLM base)
8
just_passing_through
2020 Nov 28, 11:37pm
just_passing_through
2020 Nov 28, 11:37pm
Always good to review the contrarians, in particular if you've found them credible in the past as I have with these two lawyers (Viva Frei and Robert Barnes):
www.youtube.com/embed/zV67tiwMZlQ
www.youtube.com/embed/zV67tiwMZlQ
10
CBOEtrader
2020 Nov 29, 6:39am
CBOEtrader
2020 Nov 29, 6:39am
Ceffer says
Source?
Kraken is a real thing. It's the code name for the military intelligence apparatus that was following election for Trump.
Source?
11
CBOEtrader
2020 Nov 29, 6:42am
CBOEtrader
2020 Nov 29, 6:42am
Ceffer says
Wouldn't a court need some level of hard evidence to convict? Maybe preponderance of evidence is different, and there is a mountain of the statistical aberrations.
I'm not making a statement here I'm asking a question. How could a court overturn a vote based on statistical anomalies?
It sounds like he has near infallible mathematical proof.
Wouldn't a court need some level of hard evidence to convict? Maybe preponderance of evidence is different, and there is a mountain of the statistical aberrations.
I'm not making a statement here I'm asking a question. How could a court overturn a vote based on statistical anomalies?
12
porkchopXpress
2020 Nov 29, 6:48am
porkchopXpress
2020 Nov 29, 6:48am
Patrick Byrne's website that goes through the massive irregularities that support a preponderance of evidence, at least in my opinion, but of course a judge will have to determine that. If the voting machines are proven to be vulnerable and were accessed by foreign countries, that fulfills that standard of proof.
https://www.deepcapture.com/2020/11/election-2020-was-rigged-the-evidence/
https://www.deepcapture.com/2020/11/election-2020-was-rigged-the-evidence/
13
Booger
2020 Nov 29, 7:14am
Booger
2020 Nov 29, 7:14am
Kraken looking into VA election:
https://mobile.twitter.com/SidneyPowell1/status/1333053408392196100
https://mobile.twitter.com/SidneyPowell1/status/1333053408392196100
14
porkchopXpress
2020 Nov 29, 7:38am
porkchopXpress
2020 Nov 29, 7:38am
https://twitter.com/MattBraynard/status/1333042159981912067?s=20
FBI on the scene!
- The @FBI
has proactively and directly requested from me the VIP findings that indicates illegal ballots.
- By Tuesday, we will have delivered to the agency all of our data, including names, addresses, phone numbers, etc.
FBI on the scene!
- The @FBI
has proactively and directly requested from me the VIP findings that indicates illegal ballots.
- By Tuesday, we will have delivered to the agency all of our data, including names, addresses, phone numbers, etc.
16
mell
2020 Nov 29, 8:34am
CBOEtrader says
That's a valid question, my answer to that is that it is a scandal if courts wouldn't overturn since math is the most exact science and mathematical proof should actually weigh more than any other evidence. You can't convict somebody of an in person crime if they're 100 miles away from the crime scene at that time. That's math. Statistics is no different. If someone told you they did 500000 coinflips and each iteration yielded the same result you don't believe them, neither would a jury or judge. That's why you can't claim the jackpot for a lottery without your ticket. Math is the hardest evidence there is.Without a single ID and matching signature for each ballot received ON election day any election is questionable, with such massive statistical aberrations on top of it it is null and void.
Ceffer saysIt sounds like he has near infallible mathematical proof.
Wouldn't a court need some level of hard evidence to convict? Maybe preponderance of evidence is different, and there is a mountain of the statistical aberrations.
I'm not making a statement here I'm asking a question. How could a court overturn a vote based on statistical anomalies?
That's a valid question, my answer to that is that it is a scandal if courts wouldn't overturn since math is the most exact science and mathematical proof should actually weigh more than any other evidence. You can't convict somebody of an in person crime if they're 100 miles away from the crime scene at that time. That's math. Statistics is no different. If someone told you they did 500000 coinflips and each iteration yielded the same result you don't believe them, neither would a jury or judge. That's why you can't claim the jackpot for a lottery without your ticket. Math is the hardest evidence there is.Without a single ID and matching signature for each ballot received ON election day any election is questionable, with such massive statistical aberrations on top of it it is null and void.
17
Ceffer
2020 Nov 29, 9:35am
Ceffer
2020 Nov 29, 9:35am
LOL! Never give original copies of proof to the FBI. They got Hunter's laptop, too. They just suppress it, or use it for their own blackmail purposes.
19
Ceffer
2020 Nov 29, 10:25am
Ceffer
2020 Nov 29, 10:25am
CBOEtrader says
SCOTUS has allowed statistical analysis as the basis for decisions. Roberts apparently is blackmailed through Epstein, and is now just taking dictation from the Deep (Shallow) State, but he has used statistical analysis already as the basis for decisions. SCOTUS does not 'prove' evidence, it is presumed the evidentiary aspects of the case are resolved by lower courts and the appeals process is supposed to be only for the purpose of establishing 'law'.
Since the courts are mainly set up to fleece and delay forever, trying to prove multiple instances of fraud would take forever in lower courts with all the rules of evidence etc. "Legal Time" is thousands of time slower and thousands of time more expensive than 'Real Time' by design, so the courts aren't set up for much in the way of rapid action. These election fraud decisions are about as fast as they ever move. If something is statistically impossible, accepting it can bypass years of multiple courtroom proceedings based on case by case establishment of 'evidence' and 'intent'.
This is one of the YouTube videos that goes over the Sidney Powell actions, including expert analysis of how the voting machine fraud was done:
www.youtube.com/embed/G-Aa3D7tIFQ
I'm not making a statement here I'm asking a question. How could a court overturn a vote based on statistical anomalies?
SCOTUS has allowed statistical analysis as the basis for decisions. Roberts apparently is blackmailed through Epstein, and is now just taking dictation from the Deep (Shallow) State, but he has used statistical analysis already as the basis for decisions. SCOTUS does not 'prove' evidence, it is presumed the evidentiary aspects of the case are resolved by lower courts and the appeals process is supposed to be only for the purpose of establishing 'law'.
Since the courts are mainly set up to fleece and delay forever, trying to prove multiple instances of fraud would take forever in lower courts with all the rules of evidence etc. "Legal Time" is thousands of time slower and thousands of time more expensive than 'Real Time' by design, so the courts aren't set up for much in the way of rapid action. These election fraud decisions are about as fast as they ever move. If something is statistically impossible, accepting it can bypass years of multiple courtroom proceedings based on case by case establishment of 'evidence' and 'intent'.
This is one of the YouTube videos that goes over the Sidney Powell actions, including expert analysis of how the voting machine fraud was done:
www.youtube.com/embed/G-Aa3D7tIFQ
20
BoomAndBustCycle
2020 Nov 29, 2:41pm
NoCoupForYou says
Sydney Powell using Bible verses now? She’s really good at pandering to her gullible evangelical
base.
NSA/NRO. Get ready for some delicious tasty intercepts that simply can't be refuted.
Sydney Powell using Bible verses now? She’s really good at pandering to her gullible evangelical
base.
21
MisdemeanorRebel
2020 Nov 29, 5:54pm
MisdemeanorRebel
2020 Nov 29, 5:54pm
BoomAndBustCycle says
Generally better informed than the poststructuralist base, those middle brows whose only use for Shakespeare or the Psalms (pronounced "Salms" not "Palms", Joe, C'mon Devout Man, c'mon) is to go through with a little red pen and find all the oppression/othering going on.
Did you know Foucault was into BDSM? Hence his obsession with Power Relationships.
Sydney Powell using Bible verses now? She’s really good at pandering to her gullible evangelical
base.
Generally better informed than the poststructuralist base, those middle brows whose only use for Shakespeare or the Psalms (pronounced "Salms" not "Palms", Joe, C'mon Devout Man, c'mon) is to go through with a little red pen and find all the oppression/othering going on.
Did you know Foucault was into BDSM? Hence his obsession with Power Relationships.
Is the NSA/NRO. Get ready for some delicious tasty intercepts that simply can't be refuted.