Comments 1 - 40 of 56 Next » Last » Search these comments
Doesn't matter as no judge will 'overturn an election that millions voted elsewhere with no problems therein'.
https://www.facebook.com/watch/live/?v=2774849979467215&ref=notif¬if_id=1605804969206932¬if_t=live_video
Amount of fraud in Michigan and Wisconsin is out of this world.
FortWayneAsNancyPelosiHaircut says
Amount of fraud in Michigan and Wisconsin is out of this world.
We shall see. This plays fantastically on TV and in the media where you can claim the most incredible over the top irrefutable proof of widespread fraud. Yet, nothing matters until you file in court and in cases of fraud you plead counts with particularity.
To date, for all the bombast we gobble up from media sources, when its time for Guliani et al go into court, they either (1) drop the suit (probably so they dont get sanctioned for wasting the courts time) or (2) state in open court that there is no evidence "at this time" or as Guliani said in PA "this is not a fraud case". Today I found out that one case filed last week that looked good for me, the trump lawyers STILL have not served process on the Michigan secretary of state
I agree with Ms Ellis at the end of that press conference that it takes ti...
We shall see. This plays fantastically on TV and in the media where you can claim the most incredible over the top irrefutable proof of widespread fraud. Yet, nothing matters until you file in court and in cases of fraud you plead counts with particularity.
FortWayneAsNancyPelosiHaircut says
Amount of fraud in Michigan and Wisconsin is out of this world.
We shall see. This plays fantastically on TV and in the media where you can claim the most incredible over the top irrefutable proof of widespread fraud. Yet, nothing matters until you file in court and in cases of fraud you plead counts with particularity.
To date, for all the bombast we gobble up from media sources, when its time for Guliani et al go into court, they either (1) drop the suit (probably so they dont get sanctioned for wasting the courts time) or (2) state in open court that there is no evidence "at this time" or as Guliani said in PA "this is not a fraud case". Today I found out that one case filed last week that looked good for me, the trump lawyers STILL have not served process on the Michigan secretary of state
I agree with Ms Ellis at the end of that press conference that it takes ti...
100s of Affidavits in the state of Michigan alone from pollworkers, clerks, etc. are Over the Top? 131 from Detroit itself.
The only thing over the top is the quantity and quality of testimony
I believe this is why, on the night of the election, Trump tweeted "Stop counting. They're stealing the election." As military commander, he knew what was happening real time as the military was monitoring the big steal, so he had to say something instead of staying silent and having knowledge of it going on.
I disagree. If there is obvious obstruction in building the case time should not be a factor. My only objection is that they let this election happen in the first place. Ay non-partisan judge truly following their conscience should at least throw out the election if they can't overturn it and set a date for a new election with reliable and auditable means. To even argue to this date that there's not enough evidence is a charade. There's more than enough evidence for a complete loss of confidence in the results. Even if this is now how it will play out in the courts , likely because they have been appointed leftoid lackeys, this is how it SHOULD play out, and time t build a case needs to be given. I have no problems accepting any of the candidates in a fair and auditable election, but not in that one of a banana republic which makes the Somalian election system look good.
What do you think is gonna happen? Just looking for an educated opinion, I don't expect you to predict the future perfectly.
mell saysI disagree. If there is obvious obstruction in building the case time should not be a factor. My only objection is that they let this election happen in the first place. Ay non-partisan judge truly following their conscience should at least throw out the election if they can't overturn it and set a date for a new election with reliable and auditable means. To even argue to this date that there's not enough evidence is a charade. There's more than enough evidence for a complete loss of confidence in the results. Even if this is now how it will play out in the courts , likely because they have been appointed leftoid lackeys, this is how it SHOULD play out, and time t build a case needs to be given. I have no problems accepting any of the candidates in a fair and auditable election, but not in that one of a banana republic which makes the Somalian election system look good.
Its the opposit...
The problem is it wasn't agreed upon, but rather the path was forced and forged ahead. The issues about the voting machines as well as absentee ballots have been long standing and voiced. What happened was states and counties making their own rules, even disregarding order from courts where they courts where not toying their party line. My only issue is that Trump and the Republicans really should have delayed the election, but imagine how that would have gone over with the lamestream media. It would have been a huge gamble even if they were right. So if they instead chose to monitor and expose the fraud that's not a bad avenue to go down and I expect the full time taken to clear this up, otherwise if there's a deadline for Jan 20 they should just send their state electors on the meantime, so there will be no majority or even a majority for Trump. And it doesn't matter if someone else would be the opponent or the tables were reversed, a fraudulent election cannot stand, agreed upon...
Its the opposite. Both parties agreed to the conditions of the election in advance.
mell says
The problem is it wasn't agreed upon, but rather the path was forced and forged ahead. The issues about the voting machines as well as absentee ballots have been long standing and voiced. What happened was states and counties making their own rules, even disregarding order from courts where they courts where not toying their party line. My only issue is that Trump and the Republicans really should have delayed the election, but imagine how that would have gone over with the lamestream media. It would have been a huge gamble even if they were right. So if they instead chose to monitor and expose the fraud that's not a bad avenue to go down and I expect the full time taken to clear this up, otherwise if there's a deadline for Jan 20 they should just send their state electors on the meantime, so there will be no majority or even a majority for Trump. And it doesn't matter if someone else would be the oppo...
Cdon2 saysIts the opposite. Both parties agreed to the conditions of the election in advance.
Why did every Pennsylvania and Michigan county, except 2-3 of them, allow full oversight by Republican pollwatchers when they were counting the mail ballots?
Were the scores of counties that allowed Republican Pollwatchers/Observers wrong, but two or three of the solid monopoly D counties doing it right?
the lamestream media.
I saw the video.
INSANE DEATH_DEALING BLM NEGROES AND! MUSLIMANIACS were bayonetting white voters and beheading Trump poll watchers.
And
MICHELLE OBAMA'S IMMENSE PREHENSILE PENIS lurking around trying to be incognito wearing shades and a BLM t-shirt, FOOLING NO ONE!
Technology hasn't been fast and efficient enough to run and store election results until the 90s maybe. So there's an argument that elections used to be done differently for a long time and haven't been the same for 150 years. If necessary go back to in person paper ballot votes only and stringent ID requirements. The fraud has been set up more recently by systematically eroding any checks and requirements during the last 2 decades.
NoCoupForYou saysCdon2 saysIts the opposite. Both parties agreed to the conditions of the election in advance.
Why did every Pennsylvania and Michigan county, except 2-3 of them, allow full oversight by Republican pollwatchers when they were counting the mail ballots?
Were the scores of counties that allowed Republican Pollwatchers/Observers wrong, but two or three of the solid monopoly D counties doing it right?
That alone should at least make those counties revote or exclude all votes. I mean observers denied entry, harassment, boarding up the place? Cmon man what is this, Somalia?!
Cmon man what is this, Somalia?!
the cornerstone of trumps 2024 run.
The corrupt democrats
Watch this. Trump knows what he has. The real stuff hasn't even come out yet.
www.youtube.com/embed/HH0AvaG3SqQ
Watch Pompeo's reaction. He knows the cards that Trump has. This is a done deal. Now it's a matter of containing the civil unrest that will result and watching high level officials squeal for immunity.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KAQHXf60uRo
There is sufficient evidence of several kinds which prove that a significant number of votes were 1. Stolen from Trump 2. Given to Biden as a result of fraud to change the outcome of an election for President.
This will be sufficient for the Supreme Court to get involved.
There are several kinds of fraud involved; vote changing with ballots, vote counting changes, and electronic vote count manipulation using software.
There is evidence in 1. Sworn affidavits 2. Statistical evidence 3. Software evidence. 4. Physical evidence (ballots)
porkchopexpress saysYou're totally right. My bad.Watch this. Trump knows what he has. The real stuff hasn't even come out yet.
www.youtube.com/embed/HH0AvaG3SqQ
Watch Pompeo's reaction. He knows the cards that Trump has. This is a done deal. Now it's a matter of containing the civil unrest that will result and watching high level officials squeal for immunity.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KAQHXf60uRo
Didn't this happen a couple years ago?
mell saysCmon man what is this, Somalia?!
Why, if WaPo and Politfact say it is okay, then it must be okay. I agree with the wise, therefore I am wise.
DEBOONKED! Now pardon me while I attend our third session this year on not misgendering a Tranny and the 32 genders, at my Office, we respect Science.
Wait for me here - as you can see, our waiting room stocks the Economist and the Atlantic. A sure sign of Quality.
Plus, fraud, while rare, is wrong, and I do like the idea of remedying it, which is why I was happy to intervene if it would help the cause. The reality is the common sense notion of "fraud" is very easy to claim, in the public sphere, but very hard to prove in court. If counsel for POTUS cannot bring it soon, you really have to wonder if this is a sincere effort, or just another nothingburger which so often seems to be the case nowadays.
Comments 1 - 40 of 56 Next » Last » Search these comments
https://www.facebook.com/watch/live/?v=2774849979467215&ref=notif¬if_id=1605804969206932¬if_t=live_video
As of a minute ago video link has been removed by facebook. 1984
Amount of fraud in Michigan and Wisconsin is out of this world.
- When Republican poll watchers left in Michigan, democrats pulled in trucks of ballots and started scanning them 3 at a time, they didn't have enogh time to full fill them out so they just filled in the president bubble, not the rest of the ballot even.
- Similar situation in Wisconsin and Georgia
Hundreds of witnesses.
Democrats are turning America into a banana republic, stealing election. Started with BLM beating people down telling them they'll be burned down if they vote for Trump, but that wasn't enough, so they are stuffing ballot boxes.