5
0

Ton of election fraud evidence


 invite response                
2020 Nov 19, 9:42am   1,741 views  56 comments

by FortWayneAsNancyPelosiHaircut   ➕follow (2)   💰tip   ignore  

Watching it now live from Rudy Juliani.

https://www.facebook.com/watch/live/?v=2774849979467215&ref=notif¬if_id=1605804969206932¬if_t=live_video

As of a minute ago video link has been removed by facebook. 1984

Amount of fraud in Michigan and Wisconsin is out of this world.
- When Republican poll watchers left in Michigan, democrats pulled in trucks of ballots and started scanning them 3 at a time, they didn't have enogh time to full fill them out so they just filled in the president bubble, not the rest of the ballot even.
- Similar situation in Wisconsin and Georgia

Hundreds of witnesses.

Democrats are turning America into a banana republic, stealing election. Started with BLM beating people down telling them they'll be burned down if they vote for Trump, but that wasn't enough, so they are stuffing ballot boxes.

Comments 1 - 40 of 56       Last »     Search these comments

1   Tenpoundbass   2020 Nov 19, 9:47am  

Democrat's actions the last 4 years is evidence enough. All they have done is lied their asses off about every fucking thing.

They are pathological liars cheats and deviant freaks.

(((Shudders))) Vile Hideous creatures!
2   Onvacation   2020 Nov 19, 10:28am  

So where is Hunter's laptop and what is the status of Epstein's murder investigation? What about that Ghizz chic? Are they ever going to release the rest of the JFK papers? Does the CIA really stay out of domestic issues?

I hate being cynical, but it was worse being ignorant, but I am still an optimist that MOST humans are decent; it's those few psychopaths, sociopaths, and assholes that mess it up for the rest of us.
3   FortWayneAsNancyPelosiHaircut   2020 Nov 19, 10:43am  

just got censored, that link above no longer works, all shares of it have been deleted by facebook. Censorship is real.
4   Tenpoundbass   2020 Nov 19, 11:28am  

TrumpingTits says
Doesn't matter as no judge will 'overturn an election that millions voted elsewhere with no problems therein'.


Are you suggesting no Judge will over turn FOX's decree?

Because that's what you are saying you know. Just because OReilley is saying that because he's been a never Trumper since the start. Doesn't make it true.

And I don't want the election over turned because that would be unfair to the 30 Republican house races that would have handily won their seats back from the Democrats, that they stole employing the same tactics they used in 2018. We need a free and clear election do over where nobody is allowed to cheat in private. If one single district pulls any shit, what so ever, even if they are suspected, that Counties votes are disqualified. And that seat should be removed from Congress until the 2022 midterm elections.

Fuck Them!

And I'm so proud Rudy called out Broward and Palm Beach in 2018 election. He hit the nail right on the head, they were manufacturing votes and got caught.

Oh and remember the email I posted form Carla Spalding two weeks ago, she was asking for money so she could rally for a Florida recount as well.

Well there's been no follow up email. She was just using the opportunity to con the Republican voters of Broward out of more campaign contributions she spends on her mortgage and house bills.
5   mell   2020 Nov 19, 1:05pm  

TrumpingTits says
https://www.facebook.com/watch/live/?v=2774849979467215&ref=notif¬if_id=1605804969206932¬if_t=live_video


I'm not so sure anymore - may go before SCOTUS. Also if Republicans can find their ballz they can simply submit their electors in all the swing states and re-elect Trump. Totally legal.
6   Bd6r   2020 Nov 19, 1:41pm  

mell says
if Republicans can find their ballz

quite difficult, they need an electron microscope.
7   Cdon2   2020 Nov 19, 2:11pm  

FortWayneAsNancyPelosiHaircut says

Amount of fraud in Michigan and Wisconsin is out of this world.


We shall see. This plays fantastically on TV and in the media where you can claim the most incredible over the top irrefutable proof of widespread fraud. Yet, nothing matters until you file in court and in cases of fraud you plead counts with particularity.

To date, for all the bombast we gobble up from media sources, when its time for Guliani et al go into court, they either (1) drop the suit (probably so they dont get sanctioned for wasting the courts time) or (2) state in open court that there is no evidence "at this time" or as Guliani said in PA "this is not a fraud case". Today I found out that one case filed last week that looked good for me, the trump lawyers STILL have not served process on the Michigan secretary of state

I agree with Ms Ellis at the end of that press conference that it takes time to build a case, but its getting a bit late here. This dog and pony show is fun but the objective of ensuring a fair vote count for POTUS is not something to jerk around with. Pick your venue, file your case, serve the state, and then deliver on the particulars of the evidence you have.
8   FortWayneAsNancyPelosiHaircut   2020 Nov 19, 2:18pm  

Cdon2 says
FortWayneAsNancyPelosiHaircut says

Amount of fraud in Michigan and Wisconsin is out of this world.


We shall see. This plays fantastically on TV and in the media where you can claim the most incredible over the top irrefutable proof of widespread fraud. Yet, nothing matters until you file in court and in cases of fraud you plead counts with particularity.

To date, for all the bombast we gobble up from media sources, when its time for Guliani et al go into court, they either (1) drop the suit (probably so they dont get sanctioned for wasting the courts time) or (2) state in open court that there is no evidence "at this time" or as Guliani said in PA "this is not a fraud case". Today I found out that one case filed last week that looked good for me, the trump lawyers STILL have not served process on the Michigan secretary of state

I agree with Ms Ellis at the end of that press conference that it takes ti...


What do you think is gonna happen? Just looking for an educated opinion, I don't expect you to predict the future perfectly.

I personally at this point have 0 faith in our election process. Biden doesn't bother campaigning, media colludes for him, they still are hiding information to this day, he literally says he built most extensive system of election fraud, looks like that fraud actually did happen based on what I'm hearing, and right now it looks like he might get away with it. I don't know what to think anymore man.
9   MisdemeanorRebel   2020 Nov 19, 2:21pm  

Cdon2 says
We shall see. This plays fantastically on TV and in the media where you can claim the most incredible over the top irrefutable proof of widespread fraud. Yet, nothing matters until you file in court and in cases of fraud you plead counts with particularity.


100s of Affidavits in the state of Michigan alone from pollworkers, clerks, etc. are Over the Top? 131 from Detroit itself.

The only thing over the top is the quantity and quality of testimony
10   mell   2020 Nov 19, 3:03pm  

Cdon2 says
FortWayneAsNancyPelosiHaircut says

Amount of fraud in Michigan and Wisconsin is out of this world.


We shall see. This plays fantastically on TV and in the media where you can claim the most incredible over the top irrefutable proof of widespread fraud. Yet, nothing matters until you file in court and in cases of fraud you plead counts with particularity.

To date, for all the bombast we gobble up from media sources, when its time for Guliani et al go into court, they either (1) drop the suit (probably so they dont get sanctioned for wasting the courts time) or (2) state in open court that there is no evidence "at this time" or as Guliani said in PA "this is not a fraud case". Today I found out that one case filed last week that looked good for me, the trump lawyers STILL have not served process on the Michigan secretary of state

I agree with Ms Ellis at the end of that press conference that it takes ti...


I disagree. If there is obvious obstruction in building the case time should not be a factor. My only objection is that they let this election happen in the first place. Any non-partisan judge truly following their conscience should at least throw out the election if they can't overturn it and set a date for a new election with reliable and auditable means. To even argue to this date that there's not enough evidence is a charade. There's more than enough evidence for a complete loss of confidence in the results. Even if this is now how it will play out in the courts , likely because they have been appointed leftoid lackeys, this is how it SHOULD play out, and time t build a case needs to be given. I have no problems accepting any of the candidates in a fair and auditable election, but not in that one of a banana republic which makes the Somalian election system look good.
11   porkchopXpress   2020 Nov 19, 3:24pm  

I believe this is why, on the night of the election, Trump tweeted "Stop counting. They're stealing the election." As military commander, he knew what was happening real time as the military was monitoring the big steal, so he had to say something instead of staying silent and having knowledge of it going on.
12   FarmersWon   2020 Nov 19, 3:35pm  

The body language of democratic politicians suggest "Trump won".
If Dem were truthful and confident, There would be lot of noise from them.

Media cries don't matter as they can't be held liable for anything as reporters.
Let the true winner win whosoever it is.
13   MisdemeanorRebel   2020 Nov 19, 3:44pm  

Trump knows where the "Central Command" was and who was there. Everything we're seeing now is negotiation, Trump is offering a surrender but they are still hoping the media control will save them somehow. Soon the trickle will be a flood and bigwig Dems, starting on the state/city/county level, are going to try to make immunity deals.

Removing Wray and replacing him with Grenell will be a major signal that the dam is about to burst.
14   Cdon2   2020 Nov 19, 3:51pm  

NoCoupForYou says

100s of Affidavits in the state of Michigan alone from pollworkers, clerks, etc. are Over the Top? 131 from Detroit itself.

The only thing over the top is the quantity and quality of testimony


No - that is all normal, legitimate baseline groundwork for a legitimate case. I am speaking of the whole Dominion/Smartmatic/vote switching funded by Venezuela, Cuba and China a/k/a Release the Cracken.
15   mell   2020 Nov 19, 3:54pm  

porkchopexpress says
I believe this is why, on the night of the election, Trump tweeted "Stop counting. They're stealing the election." As military commander, he knew what was happening real time as the military was monitoring the big steal, so he had to say something instead of staying silent and having knowledge of it going on.


Interesting observation.
16   Cdon2   2020 Nov 19, 4:03pm  

mell says
I disagree. If there is obvious obstruction in building the case time should not be a factor. My only objection is that they let this election happen in the first place. Ay non-partisan judge truly following their conscience should at least throw out the election if they can't overturn it and set a date for a new election with reliable and auditable means. To even argue to this date that there's not enough evidence is a charade. There's more than enough evidence for a complete loss of confidence in the results. Even if this is now how it will play out in the courts , likely because they have been appointed leftoid lackeys, this is how it SHOULD play out, and time t build a case needs to be given. I have no problems accepting any of the candidates in a fair and auditable election, but not in that one of a banana republic which makes the Somalian election system look good.


Its the opposite. Both parties agreed to the conditions of the election in advance. There are redress measures vis a vis observers, recounts, audits, etc. Caselaw is clear of 200 years of losing sides making similar claims and concerns you cited, and the consistent result is you deal with that in the future vis a vis the congress (just like they did with bush v. gore)

There is also the expectation of delay by the losing party hence the constitutional mandate of a swearing in "January 20 at noon in the year following the general election". That is an absolute.
17   Cdon2   2020 Nov 19, 4:09pm  

FortWayneAsNancyPelosiHaircut says

What do you think is gonna happen? Just looking for an educated opinion, I don't expect you to predict the future perfectly.


If it were anyone other than Guilani, I would give it a 20% chance. There are actually some very interesting equal protection arguments to be had but Guliani is not the guy to bring them.

As such, I truly believe the best chance is the type of vast conspiracy that Sidney Powell alludes to. Unlike Guliani, she has some serious credibility when it comes to a courtroom. If this were a normal case of hers, I would say she has a 70-75% of proving her case. However, I only give her 20% because of the near fever dream quality of the whole conspiracy. Its the type of thing which (if true) will be remembered by ever man woman and child for the rest of their lives, kinda like 9/11, Challenger Explosion, etc. You cannot reasonably expect any of such long odds types of events to occur, no matter who says they have the evidence.
18   mell   2020 Nov 19, 4:21pm  

Cdon2 says
mell says
I disagree. If there is obvious obstruction in building the case time should not be a factor. My only objection is that they let this election happen in the first place. Ay non-partisan judge truly following their conscience should at least throw out the election if they can't overturn it and set a date for a new election with reliable and auditable means. To even argue to this date that there's not enough evidence is a charade. There's more than enough evidence for a complete loss of confidence in the results. Even if this is now how it will play out in the courts , likely because they have been appointed leftoid lackeys, this is how it SHOULD play out, and time t build a case needs to be given. I have no problems accepting any of the candidates in a fair and auditable election, but not in that one of a banana republic which makes the Somalian election system look good.


Its the opposit...


The problem is it wasn't agreed upon, but rather the path was forced and forged ahead. The issues about the voting machines as well as absentee ballots have been long standing and voiced. What happened was states and counties making their own rules, even disregarding order from courts where they courts where not toying their party line. My only issue is that Trump and the Republicans really should have delayed the election, but imagine how that would have gone over with the lamestream media. It would have been a huge gamble even if they were right. So if they instead chose to monitor and expose the fraud that's not a bad avenue to go down and I expect the full time taken to clear this up, otherwise if there's a deadline for Jan 20 they should just send their state electors on the meantime, so there will be no majority or even a majority for Trump. And it doesn't matter if someone else would be the opponent or the tables were reversed, a fraudulent election cannot stand, agreed upon or not. I mean I expected issues with the voting machines but what came out so far has surpassed my mildest expectations. Before we have valid elections again we must upgrade from banana republic to certifiable, fair, auditable elections with stringent ID requirements.
19   porkchopXpress   2020 Nov 19, 4:23pm  

Watch this. Trump knows what he has. The real stuff hasn't even come out yet.
www.youtube.com/embed/HH0AvaG3SqQ

Watch Pompeo's reaction. He knows the cards that Trump has. This is a done deal. Now it's a matter of containing the civil unrest that will result and watching high level officials squeal for immunity.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KAQHXf60uRo
20   mell   2020 Nov 19, 4:30pm  

I give it a 35% chance of overturning as of now, mostly in agreement with KD. That's much more than I had previously.

https://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=240703
21   porkchopXpress   2020 Nov 19, 4:39pm  

Military aircraft flying over the US right now is 5x normal
22   clambo   2020 Nov 19, 4:48pm  

There is sufficient evidence of several kinds which prove that a significant number of votes were 1. Stolen from Trump 2. Given to Biden as a result of fraud to change the outcome of an election for President.

This will be sufficient for the Supreme Court to get involved.

There are several kinds of fraud involved; vote changing with ballots, vote counting changes, and electronic vote count manipulation using software.

There is evidence in 1. Sworn affidavits 2. Statistical evidence 3. Software evidence. 4. Physical evidence (ballots)

I would not like to be Biden and Harris if this goes to the Supreme Court.
2 justices hate Biden and Harris (Thomas and Kavanaugh)
4 justices were lawyers for Bush in Bush vs Gore in 2000 (Roberts, Gorsuch,Barrett, Kavanaugh)
Additionally, Alito is pissed at Pennsylvania ignoring his order to keep late ballots separate there.

This stinks to high heaven and it’s not going to disappear just because Facebook and its ilk want to censor it.
23   Cdon2   2020 Nov 19, 4:54pm  

mell says

The problem is it wasn't agreed upon, but rather the path was forced and forged ahead. The issues about the voting machines as well as absentee ballots have been long standing and voiced. What happened was states and counties making their own rules, even disregarding order from courts where they courts where not toying their party line. My only issue is that Trump and the Republicans really should have delayed the election, but imagine how that would have gone over with the lamestream media. It would have been a huge gamble even if they were right. So if they instead chose to monitor and expose the fraud that's not a bad avenue to go down and I expect the full time taken to clear this up, otherwise if there's a deadline for Jan 20 they should just send their state electors on the meantime, so there will be no majority or even a majority for Trump. And it doesn't matter if someone else would be the opponent or the tables were reversed, a fraudulent election cannot stand, agreed upon...


If the Rs disagreed, they should have been objecting in court (not in the media but in court) for months before this election. They need to plead with particularity the issues with the widespread mail in and objected to the safeguards that statewide electorates agreed upon. The Id's and some of the safeguards you speak of have been at issue for at least 150 years. The overarching concern of the framers was widespread disenfranchisement of having too strict an election. Its a balancing act between the two extremes the partisans may want.

If the Ds have gone too far this time, the Rs need to put serious energy and effort into voter reform - there are a number of ways this could be made more safe, but it is a enormous effort, probably involving constitutional amendments. Its a serious task but if the party takes it that seriously, take it up - make it the cornerstone of trumps 2024 run.

What you are proposing here is a complete flip in the way we have been doing things for 250 years. If the republic will survive, 100 years from now it will regard the 2020 as an anomaly. a mere blip, similar to the disputes in the elections of 1824, 1876, 1888, 1948, 2000, etc. Partisans will be upset, scholars will debate for decades, and 100 years from now we will have still have the "least worse" largescale election one can find in the world.
24   MisdemeanorRebel   2020 Nov 19, 6:08pm  

Cdon2 says
Its the opposite. Both parties agreed to the conditions of the election in advance.


Why did every Pennsylvania and Michigan county, except 2-3 of them, allow full oversight by Republican pollwatchers when they were counting the mail ballots?

Were the scores of counties that allowed Republican Pollwatchers/Observers wrong, but two or three of the solid monopoly D counties doing it right?
25   mell   2020 Nov 19, 6:12pm  

Cdon2 says
mell says

The problem is it wasn't agreed upon, but rather the path was forced and forged ahead. The issues about the voting machines as well as absentee ballots have been long standing and voiced. What happened was states and counties making their own rules, even disregarding order from courts where they courts where not toying their party line. My only issue is that Trump and the Republicans really should have delayed the election, but imagine how that would have gone over with the lamestream media. It would have been a huge gamble even if they were right. So if they instead chose to monitor and expose the fraud that's not a bad avenue to go down and I expect the full time taken to clear this up, otherwise if there's a deadline for Jan 20 they should just send their state electors on the meantime, so there will be no majority or even a majority for Trump. And it doesn't matter if someone else would be the oppo...


Technology hasn't been fast and efficient enough to run and store election results until the 90s maybe. So there's an argument that elections used to be done differently for a long time and haven't been the same for 150 years. If necessary go back to in person paper ballot votes only and stringent ID requirements. The fraud has been set up more recently by systematically eroding any checks and requirements during the last 2 decades.
26   mell   2020 Nov 19, 6:17pm  

NoCoupForYou says
Cdon2 says
Its the opposite. Both parties agreed to the conditions of the election in advance.


Why did every Pennsylvania and Michigan county, except 2-3 of them, allow full oversight by Republican pollwatchers when they were counting the mail ballots?

Were the scores of counties that allowed Republican Pollwatchers/Observers wrong, but two or three of the solid monopoly D counties doing it right?


That alone should at least make those counties revote or exclude all votes. I mean observers denied entry, harassment, boarding up the place? Cmon man what is this, Somalia?!
27   Onvacation   2020 Nov 19, 6:31pm  

mell says
the lamestream media.

APOCALYPSEFUCKisShostakovitch says
I saw the video.

INSANE DEATH_DEALING BLM NEGROES AND! MUSLIMANIACS were bayonetting white voters and beheading Trump poll watchers.

I can't believe that. I want to see the video.
APOCALYPSEFUCKisShostakovitch says
And

MICHELLE OBAMA'S IMMENSE PREHENSILE PENIS lurking around trying to be incognito wearing shades and a BLM t-shirt, FOOLING NO ONE!

I can believe that. I DON"T want to see the video.
29   Cdon2   2020 Nov 19, 6:33pm  

mell says
Technology hasn't been fast and efficient enough to run and store election results until the 90s maybe. So there's an argument that elections used to be done differently for a long time and haven't been the same for 150 years. If necessary go back to in person paper ballot votes only and stringent ID requirements. The fraud has been set up more recently by systematically eroding any checks and requirements during the last 2 decades.


Its true - they say the law is 20-40 years behind the world and this is a good example of it. In theory you could have a perfectly run nearlyfoolproof election where there were consistent ID requirements and the like.

The problem is, like so many other things, its a balancing act. In the context of an election it sounds very appealing. In the context of a national uniform system, it evokes big brother type concerns which the same people would rail against the other 3 years and 6 months between elections.
30   Cdon2   2020 Nov 19, 6:35pm  

mell says
NoCoupForYou says
Cdon2 says
Its the opposite. Both parties agreed to the conditions of the election in advance.


Why did every Pennsylvania and Michigan county, except 2-3 of them, allow full oversight by Republican pollwatchers when they were counting the mail ballots?

Were the scores of counties that allowed Republican Pollwatchers/Observers wrong, but two or three of the solid monopoly D counties doing it right?


That alone should at least make those counties revote or exclude all votes. I mean observers denied entry, harassment, boarding up the place? Cmon man what is this, Somalia?!


I wholeheartedly agree. I hate to do this again, but can I get a citation? I have not heard about this in the slightest and if it is as you say, you could blow the doors open on a number of fronts.
31   MisdemeanorRebel   2020 Nov 19, 6:40pm  

mell says
Cmon man what is this, Somalia?!


Why, if WaPo and Politfact say it is okay, then it must be okay. I agree with the wise, therefore I am wise.

DEBOONKED! Now pardon me while I attend our third session this year on not misgendering a Tranny and the 32 genders, at my Office, we respect Science.

Wait for me here - as you can see, our waiting room stocks the Economist and the Atlantic. A sure sign of Quality.
32   Onvacation   2020 Nov 19, 6:42pm  

Cdon2 says
the cornerstone of trumps 2024 run.

. Fuck That! It's Trump with a capital T and you know it.

The corrupt democrats have been running roughshod over us here in Cali for a long time. They have spread to beautiful states all over the country. A small vocal army of multi colored hair soldiers and a silent election stealing system has been spreading across our country. Through PCness and threats of violence these thugs have shut up the already silent majority of people and made them feel like they are a minority.

It stops now or we have not only lost the election to the most corrupt people I have ever seen we have lost our republic.
33   Onvacation   2020 Nov 19, 6:45pm  

Onvacation says
The corrupt democrats

Correction: The evil corrupt democratic leadership. I have a lot of friends and relatives that are democrats and as far as I can tell they are just brainwashed and not evil.
34   GlocknLoad   2020 Nov 19, 6:46pm  

porkchopexpress says
Watch this. Trump knows what he has. The real stuff hasn't even come out yet.
www.youtube.com/embed/HH0AvaG3SqQ

Watch Pompeo's reaction. He knows the cards that Trump has. This is a done deal. Now it's a matter of containing the civil unrest that will result and watching high level officials squeal for immunity.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KAQHXf60uRo

Didn't this happen a couple years ago?
35   RC2006   2020 Nov 20, 7:29am  

36   Cdon2   2020 Nov 20, 8:09am  

clambo says
There is sufficient evidence of several kinds which prove that a significant number of votes were 1. Stolen from Trump 2. Given to Biden as a result of fraud to change the outcome of an election for President.

This will be sufficient for the Supreme Court to get involved.

There are several kinds of fraud involved; vote changing with ballots, vote counting changes, and electronic vote count manipulation using software.

There is evidence in 1. Sworn affidavits 2. Statistical evidence 3. Software evidence. 4. Physical evidence (ballots)


If you believe that, you need to ask yourself, why (to my knowledge) no POTUS attorney has been willing to advance that argument in a court hearing? I have read a lot of complaints, and a lot of transcripts and I have yet to hear any POTUS attorney make that claim. Matter of fact, when pressed by the judge on a yes or no answer as to whether they are going to plead fraud, the answer has been a consistent "No/not at this time your honor".

I was hired a bit late to this and was happy to help via an amicus to pick up anything they had missed which I just assumed they were actively pressing in a court of law. I told my client we can simply attach the amicus to one of those active cases, and he can feel good about doing his part for POTUS. Plus, fraud, while rare, is wrong, and I do like the idea of remedying it, which is why I was happy to intervene if it would help the cause. The reality is the common sense notion of "fraud" is very easy to claim, in the public sphere, but very hard to prove in court. If counsel for POTUS cannot bring it soon, you really have to wonder if this is a sincere effort, or just another nothingburger which so often seems to be the case nowadays.
37   porkchopXpress   2020 Nov 20, 8:13am  

GlocknLoad says
porkchopexpress says
Watch this. Trump knows what he has. The real stuff hasn't even come out yet.
www.youtube.com/embed/HH0AvaG3SqQ

Watch Pompeo's reaction. He knows the cards that Trump has. This is a done deal. Now it's a matter of containing the civil unrest that will result and watching high level officials squeal for immunity.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KAQHXf60uRo

Didn't this happen a couple years ago?
You're totally right. My bad.
38   Cdon2   2020 Nov 20, 8:21am  

NoCoupForYou says
mell says
Cmon man what is this, Somalia?!


Why, if WaPo and Politfact say it is okay, then it must be okay. I agree with the wise, therefore I am wise.

DEBOONKED! Now pardon me while I attend our third session this year on not misgendering a Tranny and the 32 genders, at my Office, we respect Science.

Wait for me here - as you can see, our waiting room stocks the Economist and the Atlantic. A sure sign of Quality.


OK, given your response, I am guessing you are thinking of the "I wasnt allowed in the room" claim which ran for the first few media cycles, but has also has been denied by POTUS counsel when pressed at oral argument. That said, I havent read everything and as I said when I started this, the great lesson of the national enquirer reporting on John Edwards was they were right and ignored by everyone for 10 months before it became accepted as true. Note too that lawyers are not always right, so POTUS counsel may not be pressing the claim because they just assumed that the first few times they were forced to admit "yes there were R officials in the room" that was the case everywhere in all areas. Same goes with the Debunking BS claims which are sometimes just handwaiving and assuming the admission of POTUS counsel we had people in that room in that county, means they had it in every room in every county, which obviously is not the case! Dont give up. Just one nugget of reality among BS mountain which was missed by everyone to date can still blow this case wide open.
39   Onvacation   2020 Nov 20, 9:29am  

Cdon2 says
Plus, fraud, while rare, is wrong, and I do like the idea of remedying it, which is why I was happy to intervene if it would help the cause. The reality is the common sense notion of "fraud" is very easy to claim, in the public sphere, but very hard to prove in court. If counsel for POTUS cannot bring it soon, you really have to wonder if this is a sincere effort, or just another nothingburger which so often seems to be the case nowadays.

The fraud this election was so blatant it made the Russian collusion look like a made up hoax.
40   FarmersWon   2020 Nov 20, 9:32am  

This discussion is waste of time.
Below is what will decide results:
---------------------------------

1) Are the votes stored as "Floating point numbers"?
2) Can the votes be changed without feeding paper ballot?
3) Can votes be changed remotely?
4) Did they have links to Venezuela?
5) Does the software have a "multiplier/divider/add/subtract feature"?
6) Does the software catches if same ballot is scanned twice or more?

Yes to any of above is "FRAUD". NO to any of above is cross examination and if they would be found guilty of lying.
Based on maths and comments on liberal sites went full blown to defeat the "Hitler" using undemocratic methods...How convenient.
Now you can decide what is right.

I heard Dominion guys are running for hills.

Comments 1 - 40 of 56       Last »     Search these comments

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions