Comments 1 - 18 of 18 Search these comments
30 jurists don't interrogate and dismiss claims because they hate freedom.
One jurist, presumably of a cohort with the freedom hating ones, in PA found for Trump because they had proven fact to buttress their arguments.
Even a TV dinner heiress can read a ruling - or 30 of them - and make up its own mind.
Stories like these are planted deliberately, so that when or if they are able to prove fraud, They can get maximum benefit for Trump. At that point our cast ballots will be not determining factor..Such a shame for our democracy.
sikhguy saysStories like these are planted deliberately, so that when or if they are able to prove fraud, They can get maximum benefit for Trump. At that point our cast ballots will be not determining factor..Such a shame for our democracy.
I agree to split hairs over who got the most votes in a corrupt election that nothing short of a complete do over will resolve. Is a complete waste of time, and means nothing.
And the Hoft brothers over at TGP, will post several brilliant bunker busting real news stories that no other news outlet is posting. Then they totally ruin it by posting personal opinions as news stories for the rest of the day. Or dragging up older news stories to tie into it, by prefacing it "Like we told you (amount of time) ago" and try to tie the two stories together. But in danger of conflating the two and at the risk of the reader assuming it's just an old story being re...
It is obvious that Trump won by 300 million votes since any other votes are ILLEGAL!, exactly as the Constitution Commands!
It is obvious that Trump won by 300 million votes since any other votes are ILLEGAL!, exactly as the Constitution Commands!
Could not have happened after Biden said 240 million died from Covid. Not enough people left.
Don't you know dead people can vote? C,mon, man!
If you listened to Giuliani and Powell they explained several ways fraud was committed and several ways they will prove it.
He can't be serious and expect Trump's legal team to give every bit of evidence they will present to the courts, and present it to FOX news are they?
https://www.breitbart.com/clips/2020/11/19/fncs-carlson-if-trump-lawyer-sidney-powell-has-proof-votes-were-changed-we-want-to-see-the-details/
Thursday on Fox News Channel’s “Tucker Carlson Tonight,” host Tucker Carlson raised a lot of eyebrows around the media world by calling on Trump campaign lawyer Sidney Powell to offer proof of a claim she made at a press conference earlier in the day that votes were on some electronic voting machines, which may have cost President Donald Trump millions of votes in his reelection bid.
Carlson, a staunch Trump ally, noted the seriousness of Powell’s claim and even touted his forum’s open-mindedness on all matters.