patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,191,513 comments by 13,863 users - GNL, GreaterNYCDude, RWSGFY, stereotomy online now
invite responseComments 1 - 2 of 2 Search these comments
1
Ceffer
2020 Dec 14, 10:29am
Ceffer
2020 Dec 14, 10:29am
Karofsky showed her hand to be both partisan and innately extra-legally prejudiced with her rant. She needs to recuse herself and should be subject to discipline.
2
Tenpoundbass
2020 Dec 14, 10:33am
Tenpoundbass
2020 Dec 14, 10:33am
Ceffer says
All I know, if She's trying to play Checkers, she's picked the wrong opponent. Elections are all about wanting their candidate in power. If she wants to anoint him, then that's on her.
She needs to recuse herself and should be subject to discipline.
All I know, if She's trying to play Checkers, she's picked the wrong opponent. Elections are all about wanting their candidate in power. If she wants to anoint him, then that's on her.
Crazy Liberal Wisconsin Supreme Court Justice, Jill Karofsky, Claims Trump Case Is “Racist” and Is Filed to “Overturn the Election So Your King Can Stay In Power”
But then today...
The Wisconsin Supreme Court has ruled in favor of Mark Jefferson and the Republican Party of Wisconsin.
But the court noted that a determination must be make in every case before tossing a ballot, as President Trump has sought in a separate lawsuit.
Under Wisconsin law, a voter may receive a ballot by mail and bypass Wisconsin’s voter ID law, if the voter, by his own determination, concludes he “confined” based on age, physical illness, or infirmity. This fall, roughly 215,000 voters in Wisconsin said they were indefinitely confined, nearly a four-fold increase from the 2016 election.
The court said the government’s interpretation of Wisconsin’s indefinitely confined was erroneous. “A county clerk may not “declare” that any elector is indefinitely confined due to a pandemic,” the court said. The court further stated that, “…the presence of a communicable disease such as COVID-19, in and of itself, does not entitle all electors [voters] in Wisconsin to obtain an absentee ballot…”
Moreover, the court stated that lockdown orders do not meet the requirements under Wisconsin law to allow a voter to claim the status of “indefinitely confined” either.