please check out the anti-mandate news »

« prev   random   next »

2
0

No evidence, they say?

By Patrick follow Patrick   2020 Dec 16, 9:38pm 1,004 views   37 comments   watch   nsfw   quote   share      


John Henry
@fake_news_u_r
It’s impossible to get away with rigging an election. If this election was rigged by way of rigging 3-4 key swing state cities, as Republicans claim, then this election would’ve produced a ton of data anomalies and irregularities. We would expect to see things like:
9:25 AM · Dec 16, 2020·Twitter for iPhone
6.8K
Retweets
1.8K
Quote Tweets
18K
Likes
John Henry
@fake_news_u_r
·
12h
Replying to
@fake_news_u_r
• bellwether counties would suddenly stop being bellwether counties despite decades of near 100% consistency

• the rigged cities would produce implausibly high urban turnout but demographically identical cities in neighboring battleground states would have normal urban turnout
John Henry
@fake_news_u_r
·
12h
• you would have an implausibly high number of Biden-only ballots (no down ballot selections) but the same phenomenon would not be seen with Trump ballots
John Henry
@fake_news_u_r
·
12h
• a forensic audit of the voting machines used in these rigged cities would produce unexplainably high error rates and the edit logs would be nowhere to be found. They would be wiped.
John Henry
@fake_news_u_r
·
12h
• You would expect to see weird things like Trump winning key bellwether battleground states like Ohio and Florida and win them easily but would lose just enough battleground states (where the rigged cities are located) to put him under 270
John Henry
@fake_news_u_r
·
12h
• you would expect to see suspicious activity going on in these “rigged” cities... such as; blocking poll watchers... stopping the count late on election night with Trump in the lead but then resume counting hours later with huge statistically impossible spikes for Biden
John Henry
@fake_news_u_r
·
12h
• If Trump really did win in a landslide but due to vote flipping & corrupted machines ended up losing, you would expect to see a red wave, such as Rs flipping 12 seats & winning all 27 toss ups, while Ds have a dismal election night performance despite Biden shattering records
John Henry
@fake_news_u_r
·
11h
So obviously, since none of the above was observed in this election, there is no reason to suspect fraud. No reason to suspect that Biden isn’t the legitimate winner of 80 million votes and thus the most inspiring politician of our time. A once in a century politician.

https://twitter.com/fake_news_u_r/status/1339260413096161290
1   DonewithDebate   ignore (15)   2020 Dec 16, 9:49pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

@patrick
The problem is not proving fraud.. It is letting goons win like in Venuzuela etc. where hungry population and kids eating from garbage can produce 99.99% votes for dear leader.
Are we getting there?
If we are not getting there, System will not let Joe Biden sit in oval house.
If system fails people will get the work done.
If people also fail then you know which countries we resemble to.
3   FuckCCP89   ignore (6)   2020 Dec 17, 10:28am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

election2020 says
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/12/theft-thousand-cuts-assistant-president-trump-peter-navarro-produces-report-fraud-2020-election/
Evidence.


Donkeys in the House won't allow contesting the election on Jan 6th no matter what evidence there is. With electoral college votes already cast what path to overturning this shit is there?
4   DonewithDebate   ignore (15)   2020 Dec 17, 10:43am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

FuckCCP89 says
election2020 says
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/12/theft-thousand-cuts-assistant-president-trump-peter-navarro-produces-report-fraud-2020-election/
Evidence.


Donkeys in the House won't allow contesting the election on Jan 6th no matter what evidence there is. With electoral college votes already cast what path to overturning this shit is there?


If you are elected by fraud and forcefully enter white house against laws of land, What would stop future "dictator"?
Is the republic dead?
7   DonewithDebate   ignore (15)   2020 Dec 17, 12:21pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Don't give them ideas
If Dominion can add fake ballots, Twitter adding followers would be cakewalk.

May be after you wake up tomorrow the shuffle-shuffle during night should this:
Trump : 50M
Traitor Joe : 100 M ( All CCP members are mandated to follow him)
8   FuckCCP89   ignore (6)   2020 Dec 17, 1:48pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

election2020 says
Don't give them ideas
If Dominion can add fake ballots, Twitter adding followers would be cakewalk.

May be after you wake up tomorrow the shuffle-shuffle during night should this:
Trump : 50M
Traitor Joe : 100 M ( All CCP members are mandated to follow him)


Even 21M number feels fake AF. It's off by at least two zeroes methinks.
11   richwicks   ignore (3)   2020 Dec 17, 4:37pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

election2020 says
Is the republic dead?


We will know in about a month.

The Republic honestly has been dead for a long time. There's not been a penny's worth of difference between Al Gore, George W. Bush, John Kerry, John McCain, Barack Obama, Mitt Romney or Hillary Clinton. They are the same in any important way. Open borders, endless wars, puppets of an unknown master that is vaguely referred to as "the deep state". Real actual policy doesn't change as a result of a vote normally. Trump MIGHT have changed that, he might be just false hope to get the population believe he at least attempted real, salient change.

The real government doesn't care about gay marriage, school prayer, abortion, transgendered bathrooms, actual education, any of that.

They are puppets. They are used to make war, support multinational business, and keep wallstreet afloat. The so-called "deep state" is often ultimately thought of as our banking system, the puppet's only job seems to keep that running and solvent and to explain anything they are ordered to do as reasonable and moral.

We've been in this system for at least 2 decades. This is why TARP happened, why QE happened - multiple times. This is why widespread financial fraud is tolerated and not prosecuted. It very well may be that the people that own the Federal Reserve run the nation, but they may be in turn subservient to another group. It is a credible hypothesis in my opinion.

Trump is just a hope, not a promise. Should he be removed, we're right back to Obozo and George Duh's "policies" - policies dictated to them.

Had Gore been declared "president" in 2000, I'm certain we would have gone to war with Iraq anyhow, but not over weapons of mass destruction. The war would have been over humanitarian grounds. "Saddam bad man - US supported bad made from 1980 to 1988 - must remove!" - same catastrophe would have resulted, but the dipshit democratic faithful would have fanatically supported it and the conservative faithful would have cried about nation building but it would have resulted in the same outcome.

People believe in parties, not principles. Most people are too weak to assert their principles.
12   HunterTits   ignore (4)   2020 Dec 17, 4:47pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

FuckCCP89 says

Donkeys in the House won't allow contesting the election on Jan 6th no matter what evidence there is. With electoral college votes already cast what path to overturning this shit is there?


And even then, won't go anywhere but a Biden victory.

Why? Because of PROCEDURE.

Unless the rules have changed, this is how I learned the process goes down.

1) Both chambers of Congress convene in a special Joint Session chaired by Pence.
2) Each set of EC ballots from each state get voted on for confirmation.
IF at least one member of the House and one of the Senate vote down the confirmation, then the Joint Session is temporarily suspended. Each chamber then convenes separately to vote on the issue.

IF BOTH chambers voted to dismiss the ballots, then those ballots get junked. The EC ballot count of the candidate who 'won' those ballots in the EC is then reduced.

If no candidate gets the 270 number after all this, Contingent Election Time.

If one chamber doesn't vote to trash the ballots, then Congress reconvenes in the Joint Session and the ballots are considered valid.

Appying those rules, the actual outcome is thus easy to predict:

Dem House of Reps won't vote to trash any of Biden's and GOP controlled Senate won't vote (or so I'd like to assume...many are fucking Trump-hating RINOs tho) to trash any of Trump's in the separate sessions. So, stalemate. Biden wins.

This happened in 2017's Joint Session. Some Dems in both chambers wanted to make a name for themselves with the Libtard ranks by voting against certain Pro-Trump EC ballots. They knew it would not go anywhere. Just for show. Expect Reps to do the same this time around. Joint Session Masturbation, I call it.
13   HunterTits   ignore (4)   2020 Dec 18, 6:14pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

TrumpingTits says

This happened in 2017's Joint Session. Some Dems in both chambers wanted to make a name for themselves with the Libtard ranks by voting against certain Pro-Trump EC ballots. They knew it would not go anywhere. Just for show. Expect Reps to do the same this time around. Joint Session Masturbation, I call it.


...and it looks I called it again!

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/12/18/why-congressional-gops-flirtation-with-overturning-2020-election-is-unprecedented/
14   Onvacation   ignore (7)   2020 Dec 18, 6:29pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

TrumpingTits says
and it looks I called it again!

https://www.washingtonpost

Doesn't that really rich guy that hates Trump run that rag?

Do you honestly believe Biden honestly won?
18   zzyzzx   ignore (2)   2020 Dec 30, 5:11am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Media covering for Stalin, again!

https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/2020/12/what-stalin-quote-about-rigging-elections-reveals-daniel-greenfield/

As Republicans began pushing back against the rigged election, a quote about voting from Joseph Stalin began circulating on social media. "The people who cast the votes decide nothing. The people who count the votes decide everything," is how variations of it went.

As soon as the quote went viral, the media’s fact checkers tried to suppress it.

USA Today's fact checker rated it as false, claiming that Stalin had never said it based on speaking with two history professors at Vanderbilt University who vowed that they never heard of it. One of the professors, who serves as the Director of Undergraduate Russian and East European Studies, ranted that it was, "an example of American right-wing paranoia, active manipulation of public opinion, or outright and fascism". Truly a quote worthy of Stalin.

But had the ‘fact checker’ and the professors just checked Oxford's Essential Quotations, they would have found it. You don’t need a PhD or a fact checker title: just a modicum of integrity.
20   Booger   ignore (6)   2021 Jan 1, 1:19pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Anyone else notice a trend here? As Democrats win fewer and fewer counties, they "win" more and more popular vote. Either Democrats are moving into few counties (they aren't, they're spreading like a disease) or something else is happening.
21   astronut97   ignore (2)   2021 Jan 2, 6:22pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

If there was widespread voter fraud then Trump and his lawyers would have presented evidence to such fraud in the 60+ court cases that were brought, but they didn't! I guess there wasn't any fraud then? Put up or shut up you Trumpets!
22   astronut97   ignore (2)   2021 Jan 2, 6:30pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

porkchopexpress says
Damning evidence:
https://twitter.com/Rothbard1776/status/1344374207979913216
Seriously, a Twitter feed is a damning evidence?! LOL! Come back when you have actual evidence as Twitter is just gossip garbage.
24   porkchopexpress   ignore (0)   2021 Jan 2, 6:40pm     ↓ dislike (1)   quote   flag        

astronut97 says
porkchopexpress says
Damning evidence:
https://twitter.com/Rothbard1776/status/1344374207979913216
Seriously, a Twitter feed is a damning evidence?! LOL! Come back when you have actual evidence as Twitter is just gossip garbage.
Did you actually read the Tweet? That's like saying "seriously, a youtube video is evidence? Come back when you have something that isn't YouTube garbage."

Answer me these two things:
- How do you explain the vote data, which was sent from Dominion servers to the news sources, was in fractions vs whole numbers?
- How do you explain Trump's vote tallies going down after already reported to the news sources? Votes, once counted, should NEVER go down.
25   porkchopexpress   ignore (0)   2021 Jan 2, 6:41pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Booger says
Anyone else notice a trend here? As Democrats win fewer and fewer counties, they "win" more and more popular vote. Either Democrats are moving into few counties (they aren't, they're spreading like a disease) or something else is happening.
It is a disease. However, when more and more sheeple concentrated in fewer cities, it's easier to brainwash them and easier to commit fraud through fewer locales.
26   richwicks   ignore (3)   2021 Jan 2, 10:23pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

porkchopexpress says
it's easier to brainwash them and easier to commit fraud through fewer locales.


It's fraud. If there wasn't fraud it would be trivial to verify the votes and poll watchers would be welcome enthusiastically to see they were wrong.

Our elections are not transparent and verifiable for ONE reason only. Fraud, dare to accept it.
27   zzyzzx   ignore (2)   2021 Jan 4, 5:37am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-01-03-probe-arizona-citizens-group-turns-thousands-fake-voters.html

Probe in Arizona by citizens group turns up thousands of fake voters revealing that as much as 30% of addresses were fake
28   astronut97   ignore (2)   2021 Jan 4, 4:52pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

porkchopexpress says
astronut97 says
porkchopexpress says
Damning evidence:
https://twitter.com/Rothbard1776/status/1344374207979913216
Seriously, a Twitter feed is a damning evidence?! LOL! Come back when you have actual evidence as Twitter is just gossip garbage.
Did you actually read the Tweet? That's like saying "seriously, a youtube video is evidence? Come back when you have something that isn't YouTube garbage."

Answer me these two things:
- How do you explain the vote data, which was sent from Dominion servers to the news sources, was in fractions vs whole numbers?
- How do you explain Trump's vote tallies going down after already reported to the news sources? Votes, once counted, should NEVER go down.

What's your point, Twitter isn't a verified news source and neither is Youtube? As to Trump's tallies going down, were they the final tallies or just the interim tallies? Interim tallies can go up or down as they are interim. Final tallies are after the vote is certified. Trump lost the election and there was no mass voter fraud (Republican State Attorneys agree). If you think differently then present the evidence.
29   WookieMan   ignore (6)   2021 Jan 4, 5:47pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

astronut97 says
What's your point, Twitter isn't a verified news source and neither is Youtube?

Oh boy. What is a verified news source to you? The one that has the most money$$$? YouTube is a platform. There are valid independent news sources there that cite their information in great detail. Why would YouTube try to censor some of them? It happens.

Also, the likes of NBC, CNN, CBS, FOX all post on Youtube. Are those valid news sources? Sounds like no.
30   porkchopexpress   ignore (0)   2021 Jan 4, 5:57pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

astronut97 says
Interim tallies can go up or down as they are interim. Final tallies are after the vote is certified.
Where's your evidence of this? When vote tallies are completed and sent to news sources, why would those numbers go down? How would that happen? You got nothing because your arguments are complete bullshit.

Why were votes sent in fractions and not whole numbers?
31   Onvacation   ignore (7)   2021 Jan 5, 1:42pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        


D.I.G
The Data Integrity Group
Monday, January 4, 2021
For Immediate Release

The Data Integrity Group, is a group of scientists, engineers, and machine learning experts who
are working together to expose the manipulation of data in the 2020 general election.
We have presented, and are continuing to present, data sets taken from the Edison raw feed,
and cross referenced with the Secretary of State's site's feed, as well as, Scytl in those states
where applicable. We have found hundreds of thousands of errors in these feeds, where data
manipulation is present.

We are not here to talk about who did it, why they did it or how it was done, but more to
confirm and prove that it did in fact happen. Our data is irrefutable, and we have been
producing videos to explain how the data's errors, swaps and switches are happening in a time
series display. You can find those videos here.

In GA there were over 150k data anomalies in just Fulton County, and errors in Putnam, Dodge,
and Dougherty counties resulting in the disappearance of over 30k votes. In Bibb County there
was a swap between Biden and Trump, where over 12k votes were taken from Trump and given
to Biden.

In PA there are 400k errors across the state completely unaccounted for, and there was a live
vote swapping between 9:11 and 9:32pm ET on network television, election night, where
unexplainable negative vote swings across candidates occurred. This received no response from
the networks, explaining why this was happening. Edison gave an answer regarding one on
screen correction, but has yet to address the over 600 additional examples of data 'corrections'
or 'errors' on election night in the state of Pennsylvania.

Voting is an additive process, and at no point in the process should we see thousands of votes
being decremented from a candidate; further those votes should not then be allocated to
another candidate or simply dissolve.
We also have critical data on the adjudication process in GA, and how voter’s intent can be
shown with a new ballot, erasing the original cast by the voter.
We have videos, graphs, and information available and we are willing to explain this in great
detail to members of Congress in an effort to give them the evidence they seek. This data is
accessible to the public and has been broken down and explained, step by step, by our data
scientists in our videos; all of which can be found here.

D.I.G. has also been written up in the Epoch Times here and here, on CharlieKirk.com here and
featured on the Sean Hannity Show to describe and explain what we have uncovered thus far.
The data we analyzed showed clear, irrefutable indications of fraud in the Georgia, Arizona, and
Pennsylvania elections, among other swing states. When looking at a vote total that is a result
of a fraudulent process, it's impossible to go backwards from data that contains fraudulent
entries to the original data without an auditable chain of custody. Because every state broke
the chain of custody at various points (from deleting administrator audit logs, removing or
omitting the metadata associated with the adjudication process, etc.), the vote totals that are
in the certified results from the states don't reflect the actual results of all ballots cast and voter
intent in the respective state's election.

A second review and forensic audit are needed to examine and explain the manipulation of the
data.

We are able to present this data on Tuesday 1/5/21 at the Capitol Hilton, Address: 1001 16th St
NW, Washington, DC 20036. We welcome the opportunity to speak to as many elected officials
as possible to arm them with this data, and will make ourselves available throughout the day on
1/5/21.

Thank you,
Lynda McLaughlin
The Data Integrity Group
lyndamick@protonmail.com


https://kraken-wood.com/images/dig_pr.pdf
32   Onvacation   ignore (7)   2021 Jan 5, 1:43pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Kraken wood!

I like the sound of that.
33   Booger   ignore (6)   2021 Jan 5, 2:19pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Notice that the voter signature is the same as the witness signature:
34   Misc   ignore (0)   2021 Jan 5, 2:38pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Booger says
Notice that the voter signature is the same as the witness signature:


Hate to say this, but I've signed on the wrong line before, and then signed in the correct space. I don't think this is voter fraud.
35   Eric Holder   ignore (0)   2021 Jan 5, 2:40pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Booger says
Notice that the voter signature is the same as the witness signature:


"But this is not enough to overturn the election. And you have no standing anyway. Dismissed!"
36   richwicks   ignore (3)   2021 Jan 5, 2:49pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

WookieMan says
Also, the likes of NBC, CNN, CBS, FOX all post on Youtube. Are those valid news sources? Sounds like no.


No, they aren't. I can produce proof for any one of them where they clearly were lying. Fox used to be the easiest, but NBC and CNN have taken the mantle.
37   richwicks   ignore (3)   2021 Jan 5, 2:50pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

astronut97 says
If there was widespread voter fraud then Trump and his lawyers would have presented evidence to such fraud in the 60+ court cases that were brought, but they didn't! I guess there wasn't any fraud then? Put up or shut up you Trumpets!


For the millionth time, no court has allowed anything to be heard in court. Our judicial system is systemically corrupt.

about   best comments   contact   one year ago   suggestions