1
0

Troubled about income inequality? Globalization fuels it


 invite response                
2021 Feb 19, 5:10pm   285 views  2 comments

by null   ➕follow (4)   💰tip   ignore  

https://thehill.com/opinion/finance/538581-troubled-about-income-inequality-globalization-fuels-it?rl=1

Guilluy persuasively asserts that the old dichotomy of liberal v. conservative is no longer relevant. Instead, he sees a new chasm in society dividing those who are winners in globalization’s “New Economic Order” and those who are losers. The elites are not just the traditional upper classes but also the professional classes that support them, without whom this social and economic transformation could not have occurred. The elites “capture most of the benefits of offshore production and free trade” while the working classes are excluded and “condemned to live out their lives as second-class citizens,” Guilluy contends.

Comments 1 - 2 of 2        Search these comments

1   Patrick   2021 Feb 20, 9:15am  

Rodrik conclusively demonstrated that globalization essentially allowed multinational corporations to create a worldwide system for the express purpose of escaping the constraints of taxation, regulation, unions, environmental laws — and most especially, accountability to democratically elected governments.


There is almost nothing you can manufacture competitively in America now, because you'd be competing with goods imported from countries with lower wages and weaker regulations, so your product would cost much more and people would not buy it.

Worse, we have literally lost the ability to manufacture a lot of things because our factories have closed. We are completely dependent on China for things like antibiotics. This gives China a lot of power over us.

We should be learning the dangers of centralized dependencies after seeing what big tech did to free speech. Starting to think we should not even have centralized power and water after seeing what happened in Texas. A lot of small utilities and even per-house reservoirs and local electricity generation from gas would require more up-front cost, but would give a lot more freedom and security.
2   Rin   2021 Feb 20, 2:32pm  

Patrick says
A lot of small utilities and even per-house reservoirs and local electricity generation from gas would require more up-front cost


Eventually, the M&A world gets involved and you have huge oligopolies.

It's not called Consolidated Edison (ED ticker) without a reason.

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions