« prev   random   next »

4
0

At least Justice Clarence Thomas has integrity, unlike most of the others

By Patrick follow Patrick   2021 Feb 23, 5:03pm 223 views  5 comments           share      

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2021/02/22/three-supreme-court-justices-believe-pennsylvania-election-case-should-be-review-n2585115


In his dissent Justice Thomas argued mass mail-in voting, which was conducted in Pennsylvania for the first time ahead of the 2020 presidential election in November, combined with election rules being rewritten last minute, makes the process prone to fraud and mistrust.

"The Constitution gives to each state legislature authority to determine the 'Manner' of federal elections...Yet both before and after the 2020 election, nonlegislative officials in various States took it upon themselves to set the rules instead. As a result, we received an unusually high number of petitions and emer- gency applications contesting those changes. The petitions here present a clear example. The Pennsylvania Legislature established an unambiguous deadline for receiving mail-in ballots: 8 p.m. on election day," Thomas wrote. "Dissatisfied, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court extended that deadline by three days. The court also ordered officials to count ballots received by the new deadline even if there was no evi- dence—such as a postmark—that the ballots were mailed by election day. That decision to rewrite the rules seems to have affected too few ballots to change the outcome of any federal election. But that may not be the case in the future. These cases provide us with an ideal opportunity to address just what authority nonlegislative officials have to set elec- tion rules, and to do so well before the next election cycle. The refusal to do so is inexplicable."

"One wonders what this Court waits for. We failed to settle this dispute before the election, and thus provide clear rules. Now we again fail to provide clear rules for future elections. The decision to leave election law hidden beneath a shroud of doubt is baffling. By doing nothing, we invite further confusion and erosion of voter confidence. Our fellow citizens deserve better and expect more of us," he continued.
1   Ceffer   2021 Feb 23, 5:20pm  

SCOTUS endorses and suborns election fraud, case closed.
2   clambo   2021 Feb 24, 7:38am  

Thomas rocks.
He’s unafraid of political correctness and media bullshit.

The law of the USA was broken to get mail in voting. The Supreme Court has jurisdiction because it’s a Federal election. The states where governors and others broke the law were swing states and had Democrat control of the election.

This mail in voting was unnecessary for the public health according to 1. CDC 2. Topogigio Fauci
The only reason for mail in voting was to commit fraud.

I hate wishy washy assholes; you are either for American workers or against them; for American borders and sovereignty or not; for private property rights or not; for the Constitution or not; for people keeping their own money or not.

I’m wish they could have cloned Antonin Scalia, he was great.

All those who are in favor of the foreigners invading the USA 1. Profit from them 2. Are foreigners living here 3. Are anti-American racist 4. Are nutty liberals.
5   Patrick   2022 Jun 23, 12:02pm  

https://nypost.com/2022/06/22/how-liberal-policies-have-killed-black-communities-clarence-thomas/


How liberal policies have killed black communities: Clarence Thomas
By Clarence Thomas
June 22, 2022

Please register to comment:

about   best comments   contact   latest images   one year ago   suggestions