« prev   random   next »

7
0

Who Wants To Bet That This Comment Will Get Censored?

By HunterTits follow HunterTits   2021 Mar 20, 5:45pm 249 views   10 comments   watch   nsfw   quote   share    


Seriously, as of this writing I do not know yet.

I give it a 70%/30% chance as they tend to censor any comment with a meme in it:

1   Fortwaynemobile   ignore (3)   2021 Mar 20, 5:47pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

That’s funny
2   mell   ignore (6)   2021 Mar 20, 7:28pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

Funny! Though the username alone increases the censorship probability dramatically. How about auntjemima or grandpabob instead.
3   Ceffer   ignore (6)   2021 Mar 20, 7:49pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

A drunk appealing to our sympathies for a senile, criminal fraud. I think Texas needs more of this creative thought process.
4   HunterTits   ignore (4)   2021 Mar 20, 8:37pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

mell says
Funny! Though the username alone increases the censorship probability dramatically. How about auntjemima or grandpabob instead.


Some dude attacks the username when I nail him on Gavin fuckups he doesn't want to address. Similar tactics like those employed by a certain Bitcoin troll here on PatNet I won't directly mention.
5   richwicks   ignore (4)   2021 Mar 21, 9:39am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

HunterTits says
I give it a 70%/30% chance as they tend to censor any comment with a meme in it:


Oh I see you must be new at this game.

It's got a 99% chance of being censored. You are not allowed to criticize our shitty "representatives", ever. This is The White House's youtube channel:

https://www.youtube.com/c/WhiteHouse/videos

All videos have comments turned off and they have extremely low view counts which is surprising with "the most popular presidential candidate in history". On occasion, they forget to turn off comments initially, and ALL COMMENTS during that time are negative, and frequently question if Biden was elected. All comments are summary deleted after a point.

They don't want input from the public.
6   HeadSet   ignore (2)   2021 Mar 21, 12:46pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

richwicks says
They don't want input from the public.

Aw, do not sell them short. They want plenty of input as long as it accompanied by some grease money. How else did career politicians like Nancy get a $200 million net worth? The absolute Sultans of Sleaze has got to be the Clintons, though. The managed to go from "flat broke" to $90 million in 8 years based on just the potential of Hillary being President.
7   HunterTits   ignore (4)   2021 Mar 21, 1:27pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

And it got censored:

8   Patrick   ignore (1)   2021 Mar 21, 2:40pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

Of course.
9   clambo   ignore (5)   2021 Mar 21, 2:57pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

I was banned from SFGate soon after they accepted comments.
10   HunterTits   ignore (4)   2021 Mar 22, 10:37am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

And they have blocked me from making any more comments on that article.

about   best comments   contact   one year ago   suggestions