« First « Previous Comments 241 - 280 of 494 Next » Last » Search these comments
Musk will be suing.
I don't see how such a suit can be successful. Reporting public information doesn't make the one who reports it liable for actions of the third party. It's no different from suing S&W because some deranged fuck shots up a movie theater with an M&P AR.
December 23, 2022Major Blow to Newsom: Court Upholds Block Against Diversity Quotas for California Corporate Boards
On Tuesday, the California Court of Appeals upheld two injunctions against the state of California that forced corporate boards to establish diversity quotas for board members.
In recent years California has passed legislation that has mandated that company boards establish diversity quotas. In 2018, the California legislature declared that they want to see “more women directors serving on boards of directors of publicly held corporations.” ...
The legislation, however, has now been struck down thanks to the effort of the conservative legal group Judicial Watch.
Journalist Threatens to Sue ‘Adam Schiff Personally for Defamation’
Independent journalist Paul Sperry threatened to sue Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) personally for defamation over the Democrat congressman’s efforts to smear and censor him.
Sperry fired back after the “Twitter Files” released by Elon Musk showed Schiff trying to get Sperry banned from Twitter.
As many have noted, the move by Schiff, an elected official, is considered a violation of the U.S. Constitution.
Sperry wrote:
“Back from holiday vacation, I found an interesting email waiting for me in my inbox from Matt Taibbi, the independent journo Elon Musk tasked with reviewing and releasing internal Twitter documents about decisions to censor content and ban users from the platform.
“Paul,” Taibbi wrote, “just found a crazy email on Twitter — did you know Adam Schiff’s staff . . . asked Twitter to have you banned?”
“I was gobsmacked.
“This would explain why Twitter could never give me a reason for suspending my account, even though I had broken none of its rules.
“In his list of demands, Schiff tried to justify banning me by claiming I was promoting ‘false QAnon conspiracies,’ which I have never done and I challenge Schiff to produce evidence to back up his defamatory remarks.
“Schiff knew better,” Sperry notes.
“He knew ‘QAnon’ was a trigger for Twitter censors, who were suppressing QAnon posts.
“Yet even Twitter’s liberal gatekeepers appeared skeptical of Schiff’s claims: ‘If it is related to QAnon it should already be deamplified.’
“Schiff knows something about promoting false conspiracies.
“In 2017, he took to the microphone in a televised House Intelligence Committee hearing and read into the congressional record a screed of wild conspiracy theories about Trump and Russia from the Hillary Clinton campaign-funded dossier.
“He trumpeted them as if they were fact,” Sperry asserts.
“But they were false — every one of them — as Special Counsel John Durham has proven in court documents, expanding on what Justice Department watchdog Michael Horowitz found in his earlier report.
“We now know most of the preposterous rumors Schiff dramatically read into the public record came from a source who was invented by the dossier’s authors.
“In his hyping of the dossier, Schiff smeared and defamed not only Trump but also Carter Page, a low-level Trump campaign adviser, whom Schiff falsely painted as a Russian agent.
“The next year, Schiff would be caught lying about the so-called Nunes Memo exposing FBI abuse of the FISA wiretap process to spy on Page.
“Schiff claimed then-House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes misled the public when he said the FBI heavily relied on the debunked dossier to swear out the warrants.
“In his own memo, Schiff, as ranking member, insisted the FBI’s warrants were based on other evidence and were above-board.
Sperry added: “We are exploring all legal options, including suing Adam Schiff personally for defamation.”
Legal scholar Jonathan Turley also weighed in on the case, saying:
“We now know Schiff was actively seeking to censor specific critics on social media.
“These likely were viewed as more than ‘requests’ since Schiff was sending public letters threatening possible legislative action against these same companies.
“He wanted his critics silenced on social media.
“After all, criticizing his investigations or staff must, by definition, be misinformation — right?
“Not only does it show how dishonest some politicians have been in denying censorship while secretly demanding it, it also shows the insatiable appetite created by censorship. ...
Academia will never account for its misguided COVID policies, and it will never back out of its commitment to consensus explanations or opportunities. Indeed, these people will help accelerate the entire COVID complex. COVID is a new social engineering program, and universities will make biosecurity, including molecular engineering and tracking technology, into a permanent research activity that is worth billions per year in funding and commercialization. The link connecting business, government, and higher education has never been stronger, while China-style social credit scoring, based in part on medical and ideological compliance, is considered by the current White House administration a necessary part of the political agenda.
For universities to admit that they were wrong would not only undermine their authority and risk their research funding, but also, most of all, put their senior administration in legal jeopardy. University directors, trustees, regents, and other governance bodies are keen to avoid liability, and university legal and communications departments are working overtime to shield their institutions from blowback, including vicarious liability.
Plaintiff litigation, including class action, appears to be gaining momentum, as the evidence necessary to make durable causes of action against university administration is coalescing from widespread sources (serious health complications due to vaccines, for example). Legal theories are being formed to seek damages that could easily reach in the billions of dollars. Some universities could face bankruptcy.
COVID-related damages may be the next large-scale, long-term litigation project that rivals tobacco and asbestos.
Aformer Virginia Tech soccer player who accused her coach of benching her for expressing political views at a game will receive $100,000 from a settlement of her lawsuit.
The money will go to Kiersten Hening as part of an agreement to dismiss a federal lawsuit in which she claimed she was punished for exercising her First Amendment rights, according to her attorney, Cameron Norris of Arlington.
Norris said the terms of the settlement included no admission of wrongdoing by either his client or Charles “Chugger” Adair, head coach of the women’s soccer team.
Hening had claimed that she lost her starting position after Adair became angry when she refused to kneel during a unity ceremony at the beginning of a 2020 game. The event was held, in part, to show support for the Black Lives Matter movement, after the killing of George Floyd by Minneapolis police officers sparked a national outcry.
COVID-related damages may be the next large-scale, long-term litigation project that rivals tobacco and asbestos.
https://returntonow.net/2022/12/20/amish-farmer-amos-miller-wins-battle-in-war-for-food-freedom-in-us-appeals-court/
“[B]y establishing a likelihood that [the challenged
law] violates the U.S. Constitution, [p]laintiffs have also
established that both the public interest and the balance of the
equities favor a preliminary injunction.” Ariz. Dream Act Coal.
v. Brewer, 757 F.3d 1053, 1069 (9th Cir. 2014). The plaintiffs
have thus established the elements necessary to obtain a
preliminary injunction.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that plaintiffs’ motions for
preliminary injunction (Høeg Docket No. 5; Hoang Docket No. 4)
be, and the same hereby are, GRANTED. Pending final resolution
of this action, defendants, their agents and employees, all
persons or entities in privity with them, and anyone acting in
concert with them are hereby ENJOINED from enforcing Cal. Bus. &
Prof. Code § 2270 as against plaintiffs, plaintiffs’ members, and
all persons represented by plaintiffs.
Judge questions clarity of new California law targeting doctors who share COVID-19 misinformation
Judge questions clarity of new California law targeting doctors who share COVID-19 misinformation
BOOM! First Lawsuit Filed Against FDA for Withholding Dreadful Vaccine Safety Data
By Jim Hoft
Published January 29, 2023 at 8:00am
540 Comments
The nonprofit Children’s Health Defense sued the US Food and Drug Administration for withholding the results of key COVID-19 vaccine safety analyses.
Since the start of the COVID pandemic, the FDA has acted like a proxy for Big Pharma and blocked effective treatments for the virus while at the same time approving dangerous and ineffective COVID vaccines.
On harboring and financing contract terrorists.
And opportunities for People, state governments and True Congress to shut the death machine down.
South Carolina, Virginia and Delaware are harboring contract terrorist organizations ANSER, ATI and Pfizer.
Infiltrators within the US Department of Defense are financing contract terrorists ANSER, ATI and Pfizer, through Congressional appropriations — and are using the pharmaceutical-weapons produced by those contractors to intentionally kill people.
Together, DOD and DOD contractors are “exceeding or abusing” the authority conferred upon them by law.
There’s plenty of evidence to support these assertions.
State governments (legislators, attorneys general, state treasurers and corporation commissioners) can revoke the corporate charters, through state-level legal procedures called “involuntary dissolution,” revocation or forfeiture of charter. ...
Federal Terrorism Laws - harboring and providing material support
18 USC 2339 - Harboring or concealing terrorists
(a) Whoever harbors or conceals any person who he knows, or has reasonable grounds to believe, has committed, or is about to commit, an offense under section 32 (relating to destruction of aircraft or aircraft facilities), section 175 (relating to biological weapons), section 229 (relating to chemical weapons), section 831 (relating to nuclear materials), paragraph (2) or (3) of section 844(f) (relating to arson and bombing of government property risking or causing injury or death), section 1366(a) (relating to the destruction of an energy facility), section 2280 (relating to violence against maritime navigation), section 2332a (relating to weapons of mass destruction), or section 2332b (relating to acts of terrorism transcending national boundaries) of this title…shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.
Devout born-again Christian mother sues her four-year-old son's school in first case of its kind in UK for 'making him take part in LGBT parade'
Headteacher of Heavers Farm Primary told Izzy Montague her son must attend
We Are Seeking College Student Plaintiffs
No College Mandates
7 hr ago
We are seeking college students who attend private colleges, who have been injured by COVID-19 vaccines and who are willing to be plaintiffs in lawsuits against their colleges.
We understand how difficult this decision can be and that it will take a tremendous amount of courage to come forward to challenge your college for implementing vaccine mandates that caused you harm.
We are an activist community of parents, students, professors, doctors and lawyers who value and believe in your well-being and so do our benefactors who have enabled us to make this generous offer to cover your legal costs and other support costs that you might need.
Your information and your story will be held in the strictest confidence until you are ready to share it and take the action necessary to help end unethical, unscientific and dangerous college COVID-19 vaccine mandates.
Please reach out to: Lucia Sinatra, Co-founder of No College Mandates at info@nocollegemandates.com
professor emeritus fukushima (an infectious disease expert) of kyoto university is suing the japanese government/health agencies over the covid vaccines.
his points are bang on and the similarities to the shenanigans of western health agencies are more than passing:
it is a matter if fundamental importance for the government to collect and disclose accurate data
“witnessed fraud scandal committed by the health ministry”
this is a historically serious problem that threatens the very existence of the nation of japan.
“as a medical doctor and a scientist, i had no choice but to dare to take legal action”
it is of absolute importance to disclose the real world efficacy and safety of vaccination against covid. it is linked to people’s healthcare, livelihood, and the economy.
“The New York Times is taking the European Commission to court over the executive institution’s failure to release text messages between its president Ursula von der Leyen and Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla.”
and i’m no expert on government procurement or anything, but does anyone else think that maybe “oh, sorry, we used disappearing messages on signal to buy billions of dollars of drugs with public money” is probably not quite as much accountability as is generally expected?
In response, the EU’s Values and Transparency Commissioner Věra Jourová claimed that the text messages may have been deleted, due to their “short-lived, ephemeral nature.”
those europeans, huh?
i mean, can you imagine if they did stuff like this is the US?
mean, can you imagine if they did stuff like this is the US?
Would be nice!
Does it fall under the False Claims Act if the government knew it was bogus????? ----- I think they keep the coin ! ! ! ! !
Would be nice!
Robert Barnes says you did not read the contracts. According to him, the contracts stipulate that the products (whatever you call them) were to stop getting and transmitting covid19. They did not do that and on that basis Pfizer committed fraud.
Idaho lawmakers introduce legislation to criminalize those who administer COVID vaccines
The bill would make administering an mRNA vaccine -- a COVID vaccine -- a misdemeanor.
IDAHO, USA — Two Idaho lawmakers have introduced a bill to charge those who administer mRNA vaccines with a misdemeanor.
Sen. Tammy Nichols, R-Middleton, and Rep. Judy Boyle, R-Midvale, sponsored HB 154. It was introduced in the House Health & Welfare Committee on Feb. 15 by Nichols. According to the bill text, "A person may not provide or administer a vaccine developed using messenger ribonucleic acid technology for use in an individual or any other mammal in this state."
That person would then be charged with a misdemeanor.
Nichols said during her presentation to the committee, "We have issues (the vaccine) was fast tracked."
Nichols said there is no liability, informed consent or data on mRNA vaccines. She later clarified she was referring to the two COVID-19 vaccines, Pfizer and Moderna.
"I think there is a lot of information that comes out with concerns to blood clots and heart issues," Nichols said.
Rep. Ilana Rubel, D-Boise, questioned Nichols' statement that the vaccines were fast-tracked. She said her understanding was that the vaccines were approved and survived the testing, later approved by the FDA.
Nichols said she is finding it "may not have been done like we thought it should've been done."
"There are other shots we could utilize that don't have mRNA in it," Nichols said.
MRNA is a molecule that assists in making proteins. The COVID-19 vaccines, which are known as mRNA vaccines, help your body make proteins that mimic the COVID virus to help bodies fight off the infection, according to John Hopkins Medicine.
MRNA was discovered in the early 1960's, John Hopkins states. Some were used to fight the Ebola virus. Researchers are also currently working to use mRNA to prevent other respiratory viruses.
According to the National Cancer Institute, mRNA vaccines are being studied to treat people with various types of cancer. The research that was done to treat people with cancer before the pandemic struck helped spearhead the COVID vaccine, the NCI says.
The bill requires a hearing and future vote in the committee to pass onto the House floor for debate.
If literally 1/2 of the population dies from the vaccines, the government won't do anything. They'll say "how unfortunate, nobody could have known though".
Covid Litigation Conference
Saturday, March 25 & Sunday, March 26
Starling Atlanta Midtown Hilton
Atlanta, Georgia
The Covid Litigation Conference 2023 (CLC 2023) is a unique gathering of trial lawyers advancing Covid-19-related litigation. Over the next 10 years, Covid lawsuits are projected to experience tremendous growth. The conference will offer networking opportunities and panel discussions led by attorneys engaged in Covid-19 litigation. The conference is designed for an attorney audience; however, the public is also welcome to purchase tickets.
New York’s Unified Court System has been ordered to rehire workers who were fired for being unvaccinated.
The New York State Public Employment Relations Board ruled that the fired court workers must also receive back pay plus interest.
The board’s February 24 decision requires the Unified Court System to “cease and desist” from enforcing vaccination policies.
https://slaynews.com/news/ny-courts-ordered-rehire-fired-unvaxxed-workers-give-backpay-plus-interest/
New York’s Unified Court System has been ordered to rehire workers who were fired for being unvaccinated.
The New York State Public Employment Relations Board ruled that the fired court workers must also receive back pay plus interest.
The board’s February 24 decision requires the Unified Court System to “cease and desist” from enforcing vaccination policies.
In the scenario I'm exploring, executives at Pfizer, Moderna, ATI, ANSER and other DOD biomunitions contractors would have an opportunity to flip on the criminal contract counterparties who have placed them under economic and likely also physical duress.
Historically, this process would be called "turning State's evidence" because — until the Covid-19 biowarfare criminal enterprise began — in most cases the criminal contract counterparty was not identical to the State, or at least not as obviously and with as widespread, deadly effect.
Until January 2020, the State, represented by the public prosecutor, (federal or state Attorney General or county District Attorney) could accept reports and then investigate organized crime, criminal enterprises, and criminal contracts on behalf of the People, to protect the People from the predations of the criminals.
After evidence collection, the State prosecutor could then file charges against one or more criminal defendants, some of whom could choose to admit guilt — admit participation in the criminal activity — and then reveal valuable evidence to the prosecutor.
Men and women who “flipped” could testify at trial as witnesses to support conviction of other criminals in the network (accomplices or co-conspirators), higher up the chain of command, in exchange for lessened charges.
And this is another way in which we’re in uncharted legal waters.
During the ongoing Covid-19 fraud, theft, and mass murder criminal enterprise, infiltrators control the power levers of the State — including the prosecutorial and judicial offices — are simultaneously serving as the supervising accomplices and contract counterparties to the private bioweapons manufacturers and criminal frontline aggressors: militarized nurses and pharmacists injecting targets with poisons.
To whom do People have recourse when almost every State worldwide has been captured by criminals and the capture is rendered almost invisible by perversions of language and law?
Lawsuits Pile Up Alleging Remdesivir Killed COVID Patients
Despite research showing remdesivir is ineffective against COVID-19 and can cause high rates of organ failure, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration authorized the experimental antiviral drug for use against COVID-19 — and it's still being used.
In Majority Ruling, Federal Appeals Court Again Blocks Biden’s COVID Vaccine Mandate for Federal Workers
A federal appeals court on Thursday blocked President Biden’s executive order mandating federal workers nationwide get vaccinated against COVID-19 in a majority ruling that said the president does not have the authority to mandate the vaccines.
Why was it amazing? As I told Steve Kirsch, I did not want to go. A legal conference seemed too far out of my lane. And why hold it next door to the evil CDC? Would anyone even show up? There had been so few COVID issues litigated, I feared the conference would be a bust, without attendees. Boy was I wrong.
It was well attended and there were plenty of young people as well as gray heads like me. In fact it sold out.
Every speaker was interesting and very competent. None of the talks were boring, and some were thrilling. There were short keynotes by Jeff Childers, Sujata Gibson, Robert Barnes, Steve Kirsch, Mary Holland, Robert Malone and Warner Mendenhall.
The arrangement of the talks was by areas of potential litigation, with a group of panelists giving their views and then time for a Q and A. Panelists told any hungry lawyers in the audience how much they might earn taking the different kinds of cases, how long it would take to be paid, how complex or easy the litigation might be, and Jeff Childers highlighted that many of the experts were right there and willing to help. Hopefully this will be the beginning of the end of the attempted world coup perpetrated by bored billionaires looking for their next Mount Everest.
Breaking: RFK, Jr. and CHD sue Biden, Fauci for Alleged Censorship
Meryl Nass
3 hr ago
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/lawsuit-rfk-jr-chd-biden-free-speech/
Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and Children’s Health Defense on Friday filed a class action lawsuit against President Biden, Dr. Anthony Fauci and other top administration officials and federal agencies, alleging they “waged a systematic, concerted campaign” to compel the nation’s three largest social media companies to censor constitutionally protected speech. ...
The plaintiffs allege top-ranking government officials, along with an “ever-growing army of federal officers, at every level of the government” from the White House to the FBI, the CIA and the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to lesser-well-known federal agencies of inducing those companies:
“to stifle viewpoints that the government disfavors, to suppress facts that the government does not want the public to hear, and to silence specific speakers — in every case critics of federal policy — whom the government has targeted by name.”
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/lawsuits-remdesivir-covid-cola/
Lawsuits Pile Up Alleging Remdesivir Killed COVID Patients
Despite research showing remdesivir is ineffective against COVID-19 and can cause high rates of organ failure, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration authorized the experimental antiviral drug for use against COVID-19 — and it's still being used.
Now, remember when the airline mask mandate was struck down last year? Remember the videos of people singing and dancing and celebrating being able to fly mask-free?
For that, we can thank Leslie and her victorious lawsuit—one of many lawsuits that her organization had filed since 2020. Even the hit piece that Bloomberg Magazine did on Leslie in 2022 acknowledged that.
HFDF asserts that no person, business, institution, organization, or government has the right to force a person to put something into their body against their will. If any of those entities have or claim that power, we are not free and we do not live in a decent, moral, or just society. As has been agreed by all free nations for decades, the practice of ethical medicine requires prior, voluntary, and informed consent. Period.
Published March 29, 2023
A Manitoba family has launched a lawsuit alleging their 23-year-old son had a stroke days after receiving a dose of a COVID-19 vaccine, leaving him legally blind.
Jackson Troy Reimer and his parents are listed as the plaintiffs in a statement of claim filed earlier in March in the Court of King's Bench in Steinbach, the city where the Reimer family lives.
The claim says Reimer, 23 at the time the claim was filed, had been working at Vail Resorts in Whistler, B.C. in March 2021, when he received an email from his employer. The email, according to the claim, recommended employees living in staff housing take the AstraZeneca Vaccine at their first opportunity. ...
"The Plaintiffs claim that the stroke, the craniotomy and all symptoms and damages arising from them were caused as a result of Jackson having been administered the AstraZeneca Vaccine or COVISHIELD," the claim reads.
The claim says Reimer is now legally blind, has memory loss, brain seizures, excessive weight gain, loss of athletic ability, and obsessive-compulsive disorder tendencies, along with several other mental impairments and mental focus and concentration symptoms.
"Jackson's Symptoms continue to be so severe that he is unable to live alone, and requires ongoing assistance with daily activities," the claim reads, adding his symptoms are expected to continue indefinitely.
A doctor has been hit with a lawsuit over allegations the Washington, D.C. physician forcibly vaccinated two teenagers for Covid.
The mother of the teens, NaToya McNeil, is suing the doctor, accusing her of forcing them to take the shots by locking them in a room and not allowing them to leave until they cooperated.
The case was highlighted by investigative reporter Sharyl Attkisson and published by Vaccination Reaction.
The report explains the case that has been filed against Dr. Janine Rethy of MedStar Georgetown University Hospital.
The lawsuit accuses Rethy of isolating McNeil’s two teens “in a room in a mobile clinic.”
She then “refused to let them leave until they were forcibly vaccinated for COVID.”
The teens, 14 and 16, had gone to the mobile clinic for a routine annual checkup, the report said.
Chicago Workers Fired for Refusing Vax Must Be Reinstated, Compensated for Lost Wages, Judge Rules
« First « Previous Comments 241 - 280 of 494 Next » Last » Search these comments
Corporations in particular are afraid of lawsuits because they have a lot of money. Sue them first.
But it's also useful to sue the government when they are violating our rights.
A nice suit started by https://www.americasfrontlinedoctors.org/ :