patrick.net

https://slaynews.com/news/doctor-sued-forcing-healthy-teens-get-vaxxed/

A doctor has been hit with a lawsuit over allegations the Washington, D.C. physician forcibly vaccinated two teenagers for Covid.

The mother of the teens, NaToya McNeil, is suing the doctor, accusing her of forcing them to take the shots by locking them in a room and not allowing them to leave until they cooperated.

The case was highlighted by investigative reporter Sharyl Attkisson and published by Vaccination Reaction.

The report explains the case that has been filed against Dr. Janine Rethy of MedStar Georgetown University Hospital.

The lawsuit accuses Rethy of isolating McNeil’s two teens “in a room in a mobile clinic.”

She then “refused to let them leave until they were forcibly vaccinated for COVID.”

The teens, 14 and 16, had gone to the mobile clinic for a routine annual checkup, the report said.

https://slaynews.com/news/chicago-workers-fired-refusing-vax-reinstated-compensated-lost-wages-judge-rules/

Chicago Workers Fired for Refusing Vax Must Be Reinstated, Compensated for Lost Wages, Judge Rules

https://www.covidlawcast.com/p/australian-government-sued-over-vaccine?publication_id=519603&post_id=117546264&isFreemail=true

Australian Government Sued over "vaccine" mandate.
This will be a case to watch. ...

The Pfizer Clinical Trial by the numbers starts on page 152 and goes as follows:

There in fact were 43,448 participants wherein:

21,720 were in the Pfizer Vaccine group;

21,728 were in the placebo group;

Of that number only 170 subjects tested positive for Covid and developed mild or greater Covid symptoms during the trial period, being the defined confirmed cases endpoint for the study determined by Pfizer and known to the Respondents;

Of the “confirmed Covid cases”:

8 were reported in the Pfizer Vaccine group;

162 were reported in the placebo group;

Clinical efficacy of 95% was erroneously concluded and determined by applying these two relative numbers to each other as follows:

comparing 8/170 for the Pfizer Vaccine group and 162/170 in the

placebo group;

inferring from that the Pfizer Vaccine was shown to be 95% effective;

Wherein in fact:

99.07% of the unvaccinated group in the Pfizer Clinical Trial did not

develop symptomatic Covid infection;

99.95% the Pfizer Vaccine group in the Pfizer Clinical Trial did not develop symptomatic Covid infection;

there was scientifically demonstrated and disclosed: (1) an absolute risk reduction of symptomatic Covid infection of only 0.71% in the Pfizer Vaccine group; (2) the number of doses of Pfizer Vaccine needed to treat, being the number of doses needed to prevent a single case of symptomatic Covid infection, of 141 doses.

https://notthebee.com/article/it-begins-500-australians-have-filed-the-worlds-first-covid-vaccine-class-action-lawsuit

It Begins: 500 Australians have filed the world's first Covid vaccine class-action lawsuit

Australia basically morphed into a full-blown, unrepentant, no-holds-barred insanity state during the pandemic. They used the virus to justify all manner of draconian restrictions on basic life; the government also threw its weight behind the untested, experimental Covid vaccine as part of that fear campaign.

So it really warms the cockles to see this sort of thing finally coming to pass...

... as the suit puts it, they greenlit the jab with "no proper or reasonable evidentiary or logical basis to reasonably determine the Vaccines to be safe, effective and possessing a positive risk-benefit profile."

The lead solicitor in charge of the suit puts it bluntly:

The action will argue that the Therapeutic Goods Administration did not fulfil their duty to properly regulate the Covid-19 vaccines, resulting in considerable harm and damage to Australians.

Among the plaintiffs is a "previously healthy father of two" who less than a week after getting the jab developed "sudden-onset chest pain, shortness of breath, fever, chills, sweats." He was diagnosed with "vaccine-induced pericarditis" that required open-heart surgery to fix.

"There was a large, intentional withholding of information," the father said. "That doesn't give people informed consent."

https://nocollegemandates.substack.com/p/call-to-action-emailcall-these-colleges

Some principles and laws being routinely violated by the ghouls who demand injection with toxic slime:

Nuremberg Code (1947)

https://research.unc.edu/human-research-ethics/resources/ccm3_019064/

The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, over-reaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved, as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision.

Code 6 also states: The risks should never exceed the benefits

The UNESCO Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights

https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000212116

According to Article 6 of the Unesco 2005 statement on Bioethics and Human Rights.

Article 6, section 1: Any preventive, diagnostic and therapeutic medical intervention is only to be carried out with the prior, free and informed consent of the person concerned, based on adequate information. The consent should, where appropriate, be expressed and may be withdrawn by the person concerned and at any time and for any reason WITHOUT DISADVANTAGE or prejudice. (caps mine)

Article 6, section 3: In no case should a collective community agreement or the consent of a community leader or other authority substitute for an individual's informed consent.

Federal Laws

Title 42 1983. 42 U.S. Code § 1983 - Civil action for deprivation of rights

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/1983

Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress, except that in any action brought against a judicial officer for an act or omission taken in such officer’s judicial capacity, injunctive relief shall not be granted unless a declaratory decree was violated or declaratory relief was unavailable. For the purposes of this section, any Act of Congress applicable exclusively to the District of Columbia shall be considered to be a statute of the District of Columbia.

(R.S. § 1979; Pub. L. 96–170, § 1, Dec. 29, 1979, 93 Stat. 1284; Pub. L. 104–317, title III, § 309(c), Oct. 19, 1996, 110 Stat. 3853.)

18 USC 241 Conspiracy Against Rights

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/241

If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same they shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, they shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.

18 USC 242 – Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law

https://www.justice.gov/crt/deprivation-rights-under-color-law

Commentary:

Section 242 of Title 18 makes it a crime for a person acting under color of any law to willfully deprive a person of a right or privilege protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States. For the purpose of Section 242, acts under “color of law” include acts not only done by federal, state, or local officials within their lawful authority, but also acts done beyond the bounds of that official’s lawful authority, if the acts are done while the official is purporting to or pretending to act in the performance of his/her official duties. Persons acting under color of law within the meaning of this statute include police officers, prisons guards and other law enforcement officials, as well as judges, care providers in public health facilities, and others who are acting as public officials. It is not necessary that the crime be motivated by animus toward the race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status or national origin of the victim. The offense is punishable by a range of imprisonment up to a life term, or the death penalty, depending upon the circumstances of the crime, and the resulting injury, if any.

Federal law Title 21 U.S.C. § 360bbb-3(e)(1)(A)(ii)(I-III):

Authorization for Medical products for Use in Emergencies

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/21/360bbb-3

No Emergency Use Authorized medical devices can be mandated, this includes, but is not limited to, all COVID-19 shots, all masks and other forms of face covering, and PCR testing. Instead, the option to accept or refuse all products is required.

“Federal law Title 21 U.S.C. Section 360bbb-3(e)(1)(A)(ii)(I-III) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act: Individuals to whom the product is administered are informed-(III) Have the option to accept or refuse administration of the product.”

18 U.S. Code § 1001 - Statements or entries generally

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1001

(a) Except as otherwise provided in this section, whoever, in any matter within the jurisdiction of the executive, legislative, or judicial branch of the Government of the United States, knowingly and willfully—

(1) falsifies, conceals, or covers up by any trick, scheme, or device a material fact;

(2) makes any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation; or

(3) makes or uses any false writing or document knowing the same to contain any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry;

shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 5 years or, if the offense involves international or domestic terrorism (as defined in section 2331), imprisoned not more than 8 years, or both. If the matter relates to an offense under chapter 109A, 109B, 110, or 117, or section 1591, then the term of imprisonment imposed under this section shall be not more than 8 years.

Section 802 Of The Usa Patriot Act

SECTION 802 OF THE USA PATRIOT ACT (Pub. L. No. 107-52) expanded the definition of terrorism to cover “domestic,” as opposed to international, terrorism. A person engages in domestic terrorism if they do an act “dangerous to human life” that is a violation of the criminal laws of a state or the United States, if the act appears to be intended to: (i) intimidate or coerce a civilian population; (ii) influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion.

Title IX, Title VI of the Civil Rights Act (1964)

https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/IF/IF11705

https://d1lexza0zk46za.cloudfront.net/history/am-docs/civil-rights-1964.pdf

Title IX, Title VI of the Civil Rights Act (1964), is labor law legislation that outlawed discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.

https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/news/releases/paxton-launches-investigation-gain-function-research-and-misrepresentations-covid-19-vaccine

Pax­ton Launch­es Inves­ti­ga­tion into Gain-of-Func­tion Research and Mis­rep­re­sen­ta­tions by Covid-19 Vac­cine Manufacturers

Probably just more political posturing with no results in the end.

There is truly no justice in America, only power in service to the profits of the elite.

I'll believe there is justice when I see the hanging of Fauci, Collins, Bourla, and Bancel for mass murder.

"All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void" leaves lots to interpretation. For example, a lib could argue that any restrictions on abortion are "repugnant to the Constitution."

No it doesn't. The Constitution clearly states powers not granted in it's original writing are forbidden to the feds. It also clearly defines in multiple locations the right to live our lives as free men. The thing is, scamdemic was never official, no laws were written. That's where they slip out.

I'm sure you could also refer to the case cited for context...

NuttBoxer says

The Constitution clearly states powers not granted in it's original writing are forbidden to the feds.

Correct. That is why the Federal Government must leave abortion laws up to the States.

HeadSet says

"All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void" leaves lots to interpretation. For example, a lib could argue that any restrictions on abortion are "repugnant to the Constitution."

How? Abortion isn't in the Constitution. It's not even mentioned.

If life begins at contraception, then no person can be deprived of life, liberty, or property without a trial. You going to try a fetus?

Yeah, murder is strictly forbidden in every culture, including ours. But I do agree we don't need abortion laws, we already have a penalty for murder.

richwicks says

How? Abortion isn't in the Constitution. It's not even mentioned.

10th Amendment. Anything not specifically mentioned is up to the States. In my opinion, abortion is murder, since the unborn is actively killed. I do not like the death penalty either, but that is up to the States as well.

The death penalty is for committing a crime. You aren't seriously comparing being born with crime right?

NuttBoxer says

The death penalty is for committing a crime. You aren't seriously comparing being born with crime right?

No, just 2 independent items that should be left up to the States.

https://palexander.substack.com/p/boom-huge-victory-bishop-unified

Bishop, California – May 11, 2023. With the help of retired U.S. Federal Judge Stephen G. Larson, Bishop Unified School District (BUSD) and a group of Parents who filed claims for damages for violation of their children’s civil rights finalized a settlement on April 27, 2023. Not only is the school district required to pay $400,000 because of the harm suffered by the children, BUSD must also provide counseling and tutoring for the students, and training for all BUSD faculty and staff on “public health, response to public health emergencies, informed consent, and bullying/harassment/retaliation issues.”

Armed with vital information on Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) and informed consent laws from Health Freedom Defense Fund (HFDF) and its founder, Leslie Manookian, Bishop parents and residents began expressing concerns about BUSD’s handling of the COVID-19 pandemic at its August 2021 school board meeting. They urged BUSD to follow Title 21 U.S.C., the federal law for the use of EUA products, such as COVID-19 masks, testing, and vaccines. This law requires voluntary informed consent and the option to accept or refuse EUA products. The Parents also sought protection for students’ civil liberties and pleaded with board members to consider the negative outcomes of potentially punitive enforcement of what was merely state health guidance. BUSD instead implemented a medically nonsensical policy of handling school-based exposures, discriminatory COVID-19 testing based on vaccination status, and illegally excluding students from extracurriculars and sports.

“I was absolutely shocked when my daughter came home from middle school and reported how a staff member made her raise her hand in front of the whole class when asked about her vaccination status, and then she was escorted outside to be tested for COVID against her will – and without parental consent! My shock turned to anger when I saw how sad, embarrassed and violated she was by this incident. The very people entrusted with my daughter’s wellbeing and education were the ones causing her harm!” said Parent Ron Gladding.

BUSD ignored federal informed consent laws and committed many civil rights violations, including discrimination, segregation, bullying, harassment, retaliation and denial of a Free Appropriate Public Education (FAPE). At one school, many healthy students were forced to remain outside in cold winter weather because they did not consent to wearing masks. Some unmasked students were segregated outside of classrooms while other children, also not wearing masks, were allowed to fully participate in normal classroom activities depending on the teacher. Some teachers even took steps to humiliate those kids they labeled as “protestors.” Healthy children were forced into independent study which is voluntary by statute. Students were denied schoolwork, notes, tests, and academic help from teachers and suffered significant learning loss, and were harmed emotionally. One student with disabilities was not allowed to remain in the classroom and was denied access to their Individualized Education Program (IEP) in violation of FAPE.

“My daughter was on the field for practice and her coach told her to put on a face mask even though there was no outdoor masking requirement. When she declined, she was told to keep her distance and stay away from the team or leave. She was made to stand alone by herself. She was completely embarrassed, but she stood up for herself. This humiliation went on for days.” Parent Abby Veenker said.

“This should have never happened. Had BUSD listened to parents’ requests and respected everyone’s right to accept OR refuse EUA products as required by law, our children would not have been harmed.” Parent Todd Thornburg said.

Searching for a way to hold BUSD accountable for what was happening to their kids, a parent found one of the many legal rights webinars presented by Tracy L. Henderson, Esq., founder of California Parents Union (CPU) aimed at empowering parents, grandparents and educators. After watching CPU’s webinar on how to file tort claims against the school district, the Parents marched down the path of filing claims. In California, filing a tort claim, or damage claim form you obtain from your school district, is the first step required for an injured party to receive compensation from the government for damages or personal injury. Unsurprisingly, BUSD rejected the claims and referred the matter to its liability coverage provider, Self-Insured Schools of California (SISC).

“This is an important victory for all of the children in California who were emotionally and physically traumatized for their parents’ decision to decline to mask, test or vaccinate their children with the experimental COVID injections. Many parents and educators, who knew what was happening was wrong, stood up. Some succeeded in stopping the harm and others did not. Now, all parents, grandparents and educators are vindicated.” Tracy L. Henderson, Esq., California Parents Union Founder, said.

Helena Sunny Wise, Esq., counsel for Freedom To Choose USA generously offered her services and legal expertise to the Parents when she heard of their battle with BUSD, and efforts to settle the claims began in May 2022. The Parents and Ms. Wise repeatedly presented the relevant facts, law, and California Education Code to SISC. They were relentless and obtained copies of “smoking gun” emails between BUSD faculty and staff which corroborated the claims of civil rights violations. SISC was unresponsive during the process and ultimately, Ms. Wise had to request mediation so that a resolution could be reached. SISC hired Judge Larson to mediate the dispute and a meeting took place in January of 2023. Shortly thereafter, Judge Larson proposed a settlement, both parties accepted, and the matter was concluded. BUSD must pay $400,000 and the district has twelve months to implement the mandatory training for its employees.

“Although retired Federal Judge Larson was told by SISC that nothing had happened except for a few days out of the entire school year when a mask protest took place, persistence and the importance of telling the truth proved otherwise. These are not irrational parents as claimed by SISC. The damages began in August of 2021 and continued into the following school year.” Helena S. Wise, Esq., legal counsel for the Parents, said.

“The training required by Judge Larson should be implemented by every school district in California and across the nation as civil rights violations were not limited to BUSD. All Americans should be educated about informed consent laws so children’s and parents’ rights are never trampled again. HFDF and CPU are honored to have been asked by BUSD parents to conduct community trainings on these issues and plans are underway.” Leslie Manookian, Health Freedom Defense Fund Founder, said.

Helena S. Wise, Esq. graduated from Burroughs High School in Ridgecrest, California. Thereafter, she attended UCLA and Loyola Law School. Ms. Wise is legal counsel for Freedom To Choose USA (www.freedomtochooseusa.com), as well as Firefighters 4 Freedom (www.firefightersforfreedom.org), and has in the past represented employees and their unions, including at one point the United Teachers of Los Angeles.

Leslie Manookian is the president of Health Freedom Defense Fund, the organization responsible for successfully challenging the Biden Administration’s federal travel mask mandate that removed masks on airplanes because the CDC had no authority to mandate them. (www.healthfreedomdefense.org)

Tracy L. Henderson, Esq. is a mom, licensed California Attorney and the founder of California Parents United and the new 501(c)(4) California Parents Union. (CPU) (www.californiaparentsunion.com) (www.californiaparentsunited.org)

Bishop Parent Group includes Todd Thornburg, Erin and Ron Gladding, Lisa Johnston, Alisa and Dan Morley, Tanya Kimbrel, Jamie and Chris Sexton, Amber Olson, and Abby and Steven Veenker.

HeadSet says

No, just 2 independent items that should be left up to the States.

I'll agree with part of this. All laws should be at a decentralized level, not even state, community. But do you know anyone in your community ok with murdering babies? I don't.

A law firm in California will be filing a suit against the state in the coming weeks. Grounds are California has a law that mandates additional testing be performed on any experimental treatment before it can be used by citizens. That testing, was never done...

In March, Morrison wore a shirt reading "There are only two genders" to the school and was told to change. The school said that he was violating its dress code, and the principal told Morrison other students had complained about it.

"In a school like Liam's, the opposite view about sex and gender and the way that relates to human identity is expressed all the time, whether it's through flags in the hallways or posters or pride events," attorney Logan Spena said. "The school is permeated with one particular viewpoint on this subject, and Liam perceives that there's pressure not to be able to express a different view."

Transgender rights activist Mason Dunn says you cannot compare a pride flag with a shirt denying gender identity — which he said could incite violence.

"Messages of pride are messages of support, messages of affirmation, not messages of hate or bias," Dunn said.

Morrison addressed the Middleboro School Committee on April 13, after the first time he was told to remove the shirt.

"I know that I have a right to wear a shirt with those five words. Even at 12 years old, I have my own political opinions, and I have a right to express those opinions. Even at school. This right is called the First Amendment to the Constitution," he said. "My hope in being here tonight is to bring the school committee's attention to this issue. I hope that you will speak up for the rest of us so we can express ourselves without being pulled out of class. Next time it might not only be me — it might be more students who decide to speak out."

Neither the school district nor the attorney representing the town would comment to NBC10 Boston about the case.

The next hearing was set for June 13. Attorneys representing Morrison wanted to get approval from the judge on that date for Morrison to wear his shirt before the school year ends on June 26.
https://www.nbcboston.com/news/local/lawyers-for-12-year-old-sue-middleboro-over-schools-refusal-to-let-him-wear-controversial-shirt/3057959/

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/george-watts-jr-pfizer-covid-vaccine-injury/

Breaking: Family of 24-Year-Old Who Died From COVID Vaccine Sues DOD in ‘Groundbreaking Case’

The family of a 24-year-old man who died from complications of COVID-19 vaccine-induced myocarditis alleges the U.S. Department of Defense engaged in “willful misconduct” when it claimed Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine authorized for emergency use was “safe and effective.”

The family of a 24-year-old man who died from complications of COVID-19 vaccine-induced myocarditis today filed a lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD), which oversaw the development and distribution of the drug under Operation Warp Speed.

Ray Flores, the attorney representing the estate of George Watts Jr. filed the lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia against the DOD and Lloyd Austin III in his official capacity as defense secretary.

The lawsuit alleges the DOD engaged in “willful misconduct” by continuing to exclusively allow distribution of the stockpiled version of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine that had been authorized for emergency use even after the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) granted full approval to a different vaccine, Comirnaty.

According to the complaint, the DOD “capitalized on a quintessential ‘bait and switch’ fraud,” using the fact that Comirnaty was FDA-approved to bolster its claims that the vaccine authorized for emergency use was “safe and effective,” in a move that intentionally misled millions of Americans.

The DOD did this despite being fully aware that drugs granted Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) cannot legally be marketed as “safe and effective” because the FDA standard for EUA is only that drugs “may be effective.”

That means the DOD intentionally, without justification and with disregard for the risks, misrepresented an experimental vaccine as “safe and effective” when it could not legally use that terminology, the lawsuit states.

As a result, the lawsuit alleges, George Watts Jr. was misled into taking the investigational vaccine and he died as a result. ...

Despite experiencing side effects from the first dose, Watts understood the vaccine to be “safe and effective,” so he took a second dose at the same location on Sept. 17, 2021.

Following the second dose, Watts experienced more severe side effects, including numbness in his extremities, difficulty grasping and holding objects, a sinus infection, cough and sensitivity to light. He visited the ER at the Guthrie hospital on Oct. 12, 2021, also complaining of a lump on the left side of his neck.

The hospital diagnosed him with sinusitis and prescribed an antibiotic. Watts returned to the ER on October 19, 2021, concerned that he was not improving.

After that, his health continued to decline.

On Oct. 27, 2021, at home with his mother, Watts began coughing up blood and then became unresponsive. His mother called 911 and administered CPR.

Watts was taken to the ER where he was found to be in cardiac arrest and subsequently died. He had no previous medical history that could explain his sudden death. Watts also tested negative for COVID-19 in a post-mortem test. ...

https://twitter.com/Riley_Gaines/status/1664920492598349824?ref_src=patrick.net

@Riley_Gaines_
So happy for volleyball player and friend, Blake Allen. For feeling uneasy undressing next to a boy in her locker room, she was suspended from school and her dad lost his job. They told her she would only be let back in if she publicly apologized for her feelings of discomfort.

https://slaynews.com/news/elon-musk-issues-warning-to-bud-light-and-target-wont-be-long-before-there-are-class-action-lawsuits-by-shareholders-for-destruction-of-shareholder-value/

Elon Musk Issues Warning to Bud Light & Target: ‘Won’t Be Long Before There Are Class-Action Lawsuits from Shareholders’

Good idea. Companies are obligated to act in the best interests of shareholders, but they are not. They are acting in the interests of pedophiles and groomers.

Patrick says

The family of a 24-year-old man who died from complications of COVID-19 vaccine-induced myocarditis alleges the U.S. Department of Defense engaged in “willful misconduct” when it claimed Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine authorized for emergency use was “safe and effective.”

Another article about this particular murder:

https://slaynews.com/news/biden-admin-sued-family-college-student-killed-covid-shot/

https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p/modernas-false-claims-to-phyicians

By Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH

The Emergency Use Authorization does not give immunity to pharmaceutical companies for making false claims or wrongfully advertising their products. The email notice of a product promotional program from Moderna caught my attention because it violated multiple laws and codes of conduct with this program advertisement sent to physicians by e-mail.

(paywall)

Patrick says

The Emergency Use Authorization does not give immunity to pharmaceutical companies for making false claim

Is your fractional Heeb and wiseass Gael ancestral argumentativeness telling you what mine are?

Loophole for Lawsuit!

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/software-vp-fired-using-assigned-god-preferred-pronoun-sues-employer

Software VP Fired For Using 'Assigned By God' As Preferred Pronoun Sues Employer

A software engineer fired for putting “Assigned By God” as the preferred pronoun on his employee profile has filed a civil rights lawsuit against his company.

Chard Scharf was fired by the software company Bitwarden, an online storage service for sensitive information. Scharf served as Vice President of Software Engineering at the Jacksonville, Florida, location.

The lawsuit alleges that Bitwarden violated Scharf’s Title VII rights against religious discrimination by allowing other employees to post preferred pronouns on their employee profiles, but prohibiting Scharf from using his preferred pronoun based on his religious beliefs.

“Had Chad set aside his religious beliefs and acquiesced to Bitwarden’s promotion of gender ideology, he would not have been fired,” Scharf’s attorney Jennifer Vasquez told The Epoch Times, “which means his religious beliefs were the cause of his termination.” Vasquez is with the Florida law firm Campbell, Trohn, Tamayo & Aranda.

https://slaynews.com/news/starbucks-ordered-to-pay-25m-to-white-manager-they-fired-for-being-white/

A U.S. District Court jury in Camden, New Jersey, awarded $25.6 million to a white former Starbucks manager who claimed the company engaged in reverse discrimination when it fired her amid protests over the arrests of two Black customers.

Jurors heard Shannon Phillips’ claims that she was fired because the company needed a scapegoat as it faced a public relations crisis over the racially charged incident.

Starbucks came under heavy criticism after a manager at a Philadelphia location called police to report that the two men were sitting down at the cafe without ordering anything.

Following a six-day trial, the jury awarded $300,000 in compensatory damages and $12.5 million in punitive damages on Phillips’ federal civil rights claim and another $300,000 in compensatory and $12.5 million in punitives for violations of New Jersey’s Law Against Discrimination.

https://www.gbnews.com/health/covid-vaccine-germany-biontech-lawsuits-latest-news

Pharmaceuticals producer BioNTech is facing compensation claims in Germany after two law firms claimed clients suffered lasting health problems as a result of the company’s coronavirus jab.

BioNTech, which is based in Mainz, entered court this week in its first German hearing.

The case has been brought against the German biotechnology company on behalf of a middle-aged medical worker.

A woman is seeking €150,000 in damages after suffering from heart arrhythmia and brain fog following her vaccination.

Not nearly enough money.

https://www.theepochtimes.com/girl-sues-hospital-for-removing-her-breasts-at-age-13-post_5335492.html?utm_source=share-btn-copylink

A hospital and doctors in California are facing a new lawsuit for removing the breasts of a 13-year-old girl after she claimed she was a boy.

The defendants carried out “ideological and profit-driven medical abuse” when they prescribed her puberty blockers and hormones and, later, performed a double mastectomy, Charles LiMandri, one of the lawyers representing the plaintiff, Layla Jane, said in a statement.

Jane, now 18, was influenced by people online when she was just 11 and told her parents that she was a boy, prompting them to ask for guidance from doctors.

While three doctors said Jane was too young for cross-sex hormones, she was eventually referred to several other doctors who prescribed her puberty blockers and hormones. Within six months, they removed her breasts.

The hormones and puberty blockers were given based on a single, 75-minute session with Susanne Watson, a psychologist, according to the suit. Dr. Winnie Tong, a plastic surgeon, concluded after a 30-minute session that Jane could have her breasts removed.

How much money did they get to mutilate that girl?

Patrick says

How much money did they get to mutilate that girl?

Like the parents aren't to blame as well.

You can't just blame the government and profit driven corporations.

richwicks says

Like the parents aren't to blame as well.

The parents were told that if they do not do the surgery, their kid would likely commit suicide. They had faith in the doctors and were fearful for their child. Remember, a whole team of medical pros worked to convince the parents. I doubt it was a case of wanting to brag about having a transitioned kid.

https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/media-meltdown-tuesday-june-27-2023?publication_id=463409&post_id=131401181&isFreemail=true

💉 The Epoch Times ran an exclusive on the 23rd headlined, “Over 300 [Canadian Armed Forces] Members Launch $500 Million Lawsuit Against Military for COVID Vaccine Mandates.”

More signs of life in Canada! On June 21st, 330 active or former members of the Canadian Armed Forces (CAF) who allege they were harmed by jab mandates have filed a class-action lawsuit against high-ranking members of the Canadian military, seeking $500 million in damages.

The statement of claim from the service members’ complaint explained:

The CAF shirked its own purpose and rushed an untested product onto its members, mislabeled this experimental gene therapy a ‘vaccine,’ knowingly made false statements of safety and efficacy, and facilitated its mandate with no option to refuse except for mandatory permanent removal from service.
Alberta-based lawyer Catherine Christensen of Valour Law, which specializes in military law, filed the class-action lawsuit on behalf of the CAF members. She said the lawsuit amounts to approximately $1,000,000 for each of the plaintiffs, plus “extensive other damages; Essentially, a lawsuit for about $500,000,000.”

As far as I can tell, with my limited knowledge of Canadian military law, the complaint appears to be well and professionally drafted. Let’s see what the Canadian federal court will do with it. But it may have some legs. On June 15th, a Canadian independent military tribunal found that the military mandate violated the charter rights of service members who refused the jabs.

In particular, the tribunal concluded the vaccine policy was “arbitrary” and “overly broad.” Its report stated, “No room was left for consideration of any other factors, such as the member’s representations or the member’s service record. This process was fundamentally unfair towards the members.”

The tribunal’s findings are advisory in nature and non-binding, but are considered persuasive.

This tribunal’s recommendation might be the very first successful official proceeding with a favorable result against mandates. Presumably Ms. Christenson’s new lawsuit will use the tribunal’s findings to add weight to the lawsuit’s claims.

Progress.

HeadSet says

The parents were told that if they do not do the surgery, their kid would likely commit suicide. They had faith in the doctors and were fearful for their child. Remember, a whole team of medical pros worked to convince the parents. I doubt it was a case of wanting to brag about having a transitioned kid.

FUCK the parents! I would never, ever give up my role as a parent to a anyone else, and I don't give a shit how many fucking degrees they hang on their wall. That child is mine, no one else's, and at that age I am the MOST responsible person, and the most to blame if I ever did something that fucking cowardly.

I don't armchair QB this shit either. I have three daughters, and several schools where my wife claims the office staff is afraid of me. If I allow my daughter out of my site, whoever she's with knows very clearly the limits to their authority in her life.

Their daughter will rightly blame them for most of her life, and they fucking deserve it.

https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p/complaint-filed-against-department

Scott, myself, and Steve Kirsch, President of the Vaccine Safety Research Council, are formally complaining that the DoEd NACIQI has failed to conduct proper past pandemic reviews of the Council on Education of Public Health ("CEPH") which has resulted in serious conflicts of interest by graduates of the schools its accredits in the promotion of vaccines without proper evaluation standards because of monetary incentives and research grants provided by the US government and Big Pharma to the schools of public health. We have requested a public hearing and denial of the renewal application for accreditation authority of CEPH because it has failed to adopt proper criteria to accredit the schools, particularly they neglected to teach that conflicts of interest must be eliminated. Promotion of COVID-19 vaccines has been influenced by the favor of acceptance of bonuses, bribes, grants, and employment, and as a result, has caused death and injury to patients as a result of CEPH failure to properly enforce public health education standards.”

Complaints are good too.

richwicks says

You can't just blame the government and profit driven corporations.

Now that California is getting ready to pass a law CPS'ing kids from parents who won't affirm Gender Claims... I think Washington State already has it in law.

https://thetexan.news/houston-doctor-files-federal-lawsuit-against-fda-over-ivermectin-statements/

Houston Doctor Files Federal Lawsuit Against FDA Over Ivermectin Statements
Houston’s Dr. Mary Talley Bowden and two other doctors say the FDA is illegally interfering with their ability to practice medicine.
HOLLY HANSEN
JUNE 2, 2022

A group of doctors has filed a federal lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) over the FDA’s attempts to block the use of ivermectin to treat COVID-19.
Filed in the U.S. Southern District of Texas in Galveston, the complaint notes that the FDA has approved ivermectin for human use since 1996 for a multitude of diseases. But after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, the agency began publishing documents and social media posts to give the impression that the anti-viral drug was dangerous for human consumption.

The plaintiffs, Drs. Mary Talley Bowden, Paul E. Marik, and Robert L. Apter, argue the FDA acted outside of its authority and illegally interfered in their ability to practice medicine by publicly directing health professionals and patients to not use ivermectin.

Bowden, a Houston-area Ear, Nose, and Throat specialist, asserted during a virtual press conference Wednesday that she had kept 3,900 COVID patients out of the hospital by using ivermectin and other medications, but that FDA statements interfered with her work.

“The FDA smear campaign against ivermectin is a daily hurdle I must overcome,” Bowden said. “Still two and a half years into this, this is still a hurdle. Pharmacists won’t dispense it, insurance companies won’t pay for it, and I have patients who want reassurance that it is safe to take. I tell them it’s actually the safest medication I’ve ever prescribed.”

FDA publications and actions cited by plaintiffs include a 2021 social media post with pictures of a horse captioned “You are not a horse. You are not a cow. Seriously, y’all. Stop it,” and a link to an agency article entitled, “Why You Should Not Take Ivermectin to Treat or Prevent COVID-19.” According to the plaintiffs, the original article stated the FDA’s official position against using ivermectin without acknowledging that doctors could legally prescribe the drug.

The complaint cites U.S. code stating the FDA “may not interfere with the authority of a health care provider to prescribe or administer any legally marked device to a patient for any condition or disease within a legitimate health care practitioner-patient relationship.”

Marik, an internist and critical care doctor certified by boards in the U.S., Britain, Canada, and South Africa, told reporters that ivermectin is a highly effective drug for the prevention and treatment of COVID-19 and one of the “safest [drugs] on this planet.”

Saying there were more deaths associated with the use of Tylenol than ivermectin, Marik said the FDA’s “illegal” attempts to block the use of ivermectin could be responsible for between 400,000 and 600,000 COVID deaths. He added that there have been “a thousand times more deaths” related to COVID-19 vaccinations over the past year and a half than ivermectin-related deaths over the last 25 years. ...

“The FDA’s illegal pressuring of doctors to not prescribe, and the pharmacists to not fill prescriptions of ivermectin for COVID-19 is a direct cause of the threats to my medical license,” Apter told reporters. “I am being investigated by three state medical boards, each threatening my medical license based on complaints from pharmacists that I have prescribed ivermectin for COVID-19.”

“In all these cases the patients did very well.”

Apter said in each investigation, the pharmacists cited FDA statements and publications on ivermectin use for COVID-19.

Plaintiffs are asking the federal courts to declare the FDA actions or opinions regarding off-label use of ivermectin unlawful and to enjoin the agencies from further interference.

That's not enough.

The people at the FDA who lied about ivermectin over and over must be prosecuted.

Apr. 27—A federal judge has ruled that a defamation suit filed by a Marietta-based immigration activist against the Southern Poverty Law Center can proceed.

D.A. King, the founder and leader of the Dustin Inman Society, is suing the Southern Poverty Law Center over its designation of his organization as an "anti-immigrant hate group."

The Dustin Inman Society advocates for tougher enforcement of immigration laws and on its website states that it "believe(s) the fundamental duty of the federal government is to enforce federal laws, to secure American borders and protect the American people from unauthorized and uninspected border crossings."

The group is named for Dustin Inman, a Georgia teenager killed in a car crash — law enforcement said the crash was caused by an immigrant living in the country illegally. (the illegal driver was drunk, which of course Yahoo! took out of the story)

The group says it does not oppose legal immigration and that its board includes legal immigrants.

The SPLC, meanwhile, alleges on its website that the Dustin Inman Society "poses as an organization concerned about immigration issues, yet focuses on vilifying all immigrants."

According to the suit, the SPLC first designated the Dustin Inman Society as a hate group in 2018. In 2011, an SPLC representative told the Associated Press they had not labeled it a hate group since its tactics have "generally not been to get up in the face of actual immigrants and threaten them," and has rather been "working on ... legislation through the political process."
https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/marietta-immigration-activist-suing-splc-223700751.html

Suing the SPLC should be reflexive. If anybody knows a credible org dedicated to suing the SPLC, let me know.

AmericanKulak says

richwicks says

You can't just blame the government and profit driven corporations.

Now that California is getting ready to pass a law CPS'ing kids from parents who won't affirm Gender Claims... I think Washington State already has it in law.

I would have killed for my dog, any parents should be ready to kill for their kid.