« First « Previous Comments 249 - 288 of 359 Next » Last »
mell saysNo more Mr. Nice guy, throw fraudci in prison, lifelong. Or take him to the gallowsRand Paul has the power to do that?
No more Mr. Nice guy, throw fraudci in prison, lifelong. Or take him to the gallows
U.S.—According to a poll conducted by the Pew Research Center, Americans' attitudes toward Dr. Fauci are changing. In a sample of 50,000 respondents, 5% of Americans believe Fauci to be a hero of science, 3% see him as an essential voice for COVID preparedness, and 90% support loading him into a medieval-style catapult and tossing him into an active volcano."We are surprised by these results, as 'tossing Fauci in a volcano' wasn't even one of the options on the survey," said a spokesperson for Pew. "Thousands of people just wrote that in."Health experts say the trends in public opinion are "very concerning" and may point to decreased trust in lying political hacks who dress up in lab coats and claim to speak for science."It's alarming to see so many people losing their faith in SCIENCE, and falling into apostasy," said a spokesperson for Dr. Fauci to the press. "We need to remember that in these difficult times, SCIENCE tests our faith, to see if our hearts are truly loyal."Pew Researchers also confirmed that most poll respondents are willing to consider not throwing Fauci into a volcano if they can launch him into the sun instead.
Fauci: “We had a collaboration with some Chinese Com… uh, Chinese scientists” 👀
Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-TX) went on FOX News this morning and dropped some truth bombs on Saturday.Louis Gohmert went on to discuss the border crisis in Texas. He immediately shifted his attention to Fauci’s failures and lies to the American people.Rep. Louie Gohmert: “Fauci needs to be held responsible for the deaths that are being created by the things he’s foisting on the American people.”Rep. Gohmert is right.Fauci is the greatest killer of this new century.
Emails Cast Doubt on Safety Protocols at Wuhan Lab Where U.S. Researchers Conducted Coronavirus ExperimentsBiosafety experts privately harbored questions about risks taken with coronavirus research at biosafety level-3 labs, including those in Wuhan, according to emails obtained by U.S. Right to Know.
Fauci Created The Virus To Sell The Murderous "Vaccine"
Peter Daszak Wanted to Keep COVID Sequencing Data Hidden From PublicEcoHealth Alliance President Peter Daszak opposed the public release of COVID-19-related virus sequence data gathered from China as part of the U.S. Agency for International Development’s PREDICT program, according to emails obtained by U.S. Right to Know. ...EcoHealth Alliance President Peter Daszak opposed the public release of COVID-19-related virus sequence data gathered from China as part of the U.S. Agency for International Development’s (USAID) PREDICT program, according to emails obtained by U.S. Right to Know.The conversation in late April 2020 involved employees of EcoHealth Alliance, a nonprofit that has received millions of dollars of U.S. taxpayer funding to genetically manipulate coronaviruses, including with scientists at the Wuhan Institute of Virology — and Metabiota, a San Francisco-based biotechnology company backed by Google that works with PREDICT, a “virus hunting” program that tracks unknown viruses.Tammie O’Rourke of Metabiota emailed Hongying Li, who coordinates EcoHealth programs in China and Southeast Asia, an attachment with virus sequences detected in China that had been submitted to the public genetic sequence database GenBank. They then discussed whether the genetic sequences should be uploaded into the public database. ...Daszak then wrote:“It’s extremely important we don’t have these sequences as part of our PREDICT release to Genbank at this point. As you may have heard, these were part of a grant just terminated by NIH.”He referred to an article in Politico, “Trump cuts U.S. research on bat-human virus transmission over China ties,” and urged holding off on public sharing of Chinese viral genomic data, even though the generation of the data was funded by U.S. taxpayers.“Having them as part of PREDICT will being [sic] very unwelcome attention to UC Davis, PREDICT and USAID,” Daszak wrote.
peter daszak: well, yes, this is exactly what we did...here’s a charming little piece of video.get to about 35 seconds when fauci funded peter daszak starts speaking in his own words about working to make SARS like viruses in animals infect humans by hotwiring their spike proteins.this is what he says(my transcription, may have a couple minor errors, but i think it’s pretty much accurate.)“you get a virus that looks like a relative of a known, nasty pathogen, just like we did with SARS and other coronaviruses in bats, a whole host of them, some of them looked very similar to SARS so we sequenced the spike protein, the protein that attaches to cells.then we, well, i didn’t do this work but my colleagues in china did (he’s speaking here of wuhan institute of virology) you create pseudo-particles, you insert the spike proteins from those viruses to see if they bind to human cells.each step of this you move closer and closer to “this virus could really become pathogenic in people.” so, you narrow down the field, you reduce the costs and you end up with a small number of viruses that really do look like killers….”this is EXACTLY what i have long said and suspected.the work in wuhan was absolutely gain of function work. it was NOT work on weaponization. it was the mad scientist lunacy that daszak submitted to DARPA and they rejected but that fauci then funded through the NIAID.they were making “killers” to see if they could find cures.
It’s not public what Dr. Fauci’s salary was last year or this year. (The latest published salary is from FY2020.)It’s not public what stocks and bonds Dr. Fauci bought and sold in 2020 or 2021, as he influenced Covid policies.It’s not public what Fauci received – or didn’t receive – in royalties. (There are up to 1,000 current and former NIH scientists receiving royalties.) Each payment could be a potential conflict of interest.Yes, all of this information resides with the National Institutes of Health (NIH), but isn’t “public knowledge,” despite Dr. Fauci’s claims otherwise in his sworn U.S. Senate testimony yesterday.We know this because our organization at OpenTheBooks.com is suing NIH for production of these records. In fact, NIH admits it holds approximately 1,200 pages relating to Fauci’s financial information and conflict of interest disclosures.NIH should post these documents online immediately.
The nonprofit that funneled United States grant money to a high-level laboratory in China committed a slew of violations, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) revealed this week.EcoHealth Alliance was non-compliant with eight different portions of a written agreement it entered into with the U.S. government, NIH informed the group in a letter sent last week that was made public recently by Republicans on the House Oversight Committee.EcoHealth failed to allow access to the Wuhan lab’s records and financial statements, report inventions created at the lab, or certify that the requirements imposed by it on the lab to make sure the funds were used in accordance with U.S. laws and regulations, among other failures, said Dr. Michael Lauer, an NIH deputy director.“EcoHealth has demonstrated a history of failure to comply with several elements of the terms and conditions of grant awards not only for these active awards, but also for the suspended award, R0AI110964,” Lauer informed Drs. Aleksei Chmura and Peter Daszak, EcoHealth’s chief of staff and president.NIH had previously suspended a single grant to EcoHealth but allowed the agency to continue to receive funds through other awards despite its links to the Wuhan lab, which is located near where the first COVID-19 cases were first identified in late 2019. ...COVID-19 is the disease caused by the CCP (Chinese Communist Party) virus. The CCP has refused to cooperate with many investigators attempting to probe the virus’ origins throughout the COVID-19 pandemic.EcoHealth has not responded to requests for comment.Republicans on the House Oversight Committee said the new letter “confirms EcoHealth hid the truth about their risky coronavirus experiments in Wuhan.”In October of last year, Republicans successfully obtained information from the NIH that showed, according to many experts, that the U.S.-funded experiments at the lab included gain-of-function research on modified bat coronaviruses.Scientists there used a modified virus strain that ended up making mice sicker when compared to mice infected with the original strain, Lawrence Tabak, now the NIH’s director, previously told lawmakers in a letter.
The vaxx was already in development, which is how they got it out so quickly.
Senator publishes Fauci's unredacted financial disclosures, accuses him of being misleadingFauci previously made headlines for calling Sen. Marshall a 'moron' during a hearing
GOP senator who was called a 'moron' by Fauci leaks top doc's unredacted financial disclosures, proposes 'FAUCI Act' ...On Friday, Marshall obtained Fauci's previously unpublished financial disclosures from the National Institutes of Health."While Fauci's financial disclosure documents can be requested from the National Institute of Health, they aren't listed in the same searchable database as many other federal officials," Fox News noted.The records show that Fauci — who is the top bioethicist at the National Institutes of Health — and his wife have a combined net worth of $10.4 million.Fauci will reportedly make approximately $2.5 million as President Joe Biden's chief medical advisor between 2020 and 2024 if he stays on through Biden's current term.Fauci, 80, has been in charge of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases since 1984, and he is currently making $434,312 a year as head of the NIAID."Fauci's records show that he and his wife were paid $13,298 to attend four galas and ceremonies - three of them virtual," the Daily Mail reported. "The disclosures show Fauci was paid $5,000 to attend a 'RFK Ripple of Hope' virtual awards ceremony in December 2020; $1,600 to attend 'An Evening of Hope' virtual event in April 2020; and $1,500 to attend a 'Prepared for Life' virtual gala in October 2020. He was also reimbursed $5,198 for costs associated with his being awarded federal employee of the year and being given the Service to America medal, in October 2020."A report that surfaced last month stated that Fauci is set to make a $350,000 annual pension, the largest retirement package in U.S. government history.Marshall released a statement that reads, "Since the disclosures were not public, on Wednesday, Senator Marshall sent a letter to Dr. Fauci formally requesting his un-redacted financial disclosures by 5:00 p.m. Friday, January 14th. In response, Dr. Fauci produced these previously unpublished documents."Marshall accused Fauci of lying about his financial disclosures being available to the public, and announced that he plans on introducing legislation named after the White House's chief medical adviser.Dr. Fauci lied to the American people. He is more concerned with being a media star and posing for the cover of magazines than he is being honest with the American people and holding China accountable for the COVID pandemic that has taken the lives of almost 850 thousand Americans. Just like he has misled the American people about sending taxpayers dollars to Wuhan, China to fund gain-of-function research, about masks, testing, and more, Dr. Fauci was completely dishonest about his financial disclosures being open to the public – it’s no wonder he is the least trusted bureaucrat in America. At the end of the day, Dr. Fauci must be held accountable to all Americans who have been suing and requesting for this information but don’t have the power of a Senate office to ask for it. For these reasons, I will be introducing the FAUCI Act so financial disclosures like these are made public and are easily accessible online to every American.Marshall's bill is named the "Financial Accountability for Uniquely Compensated Individuals Act." The bill claims that records of government officials like Dr. Anthony Fauci are not easily accessible to the public.The FAUCI Act would require administration officials to provide public access to their financial disclosures on the official Office of Government Ethics website. The bill would also list all confidential filers within the government whose financial disclosures are not public.Others have previously attempted to obtain Fauci's financial information. ...Forbes reported that the "NIH is holding 1,200 pages of Fauci disclosure information," and that the "agency will only produce 300 pages per month and not even begin to produce documents until February 1st."
What would the world do if it were proven that the USA funded the creation of a gain-of-function COVID19? How much financial liability alone would there be?
6 Pack: Pfizer, Fauci press forward on 3 additional Omicron-specific mRNA shots
The NIH is funding a new animal experiment center in Texas to develop vaccines for EBOLA… when will the next “lab leak” go down?
Fresh questions are being raised about what American scientists and federal health officials knew about the origins of the coronavirus and whether conflicting evidence was suppressed and hidden from the public.On Tuesday night’s episode of Special Report with Bret Baier, Fox News dove into the early days of the coronavirus pandemic and explored documents obtained showing that Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, was warned early on that the virus may have originated in a Wuhan, China lab.
A summary of primary open hypotheses explored:Hypothesis 1: Omicron has been circulating widely for at least several months.Hypothesis 2: Omicron was genetically engineered—most likely by somebody in the same working group who engineered an mRNA vaccine to stop SARS-CoV-2.Hypothesis 3: Omicron did not emerge from the phylogenetic tree whose root is the first-sequenced Wuhan SARS-CoV-2 strain.Hypothesis 4: Omicron is already endemic among a broad array of mammalian species.Hypothesis 5: A large portion of previously recorded CLI, if not all, were actually cases of omicron infection.Hypothesis 6: The "Pandemic of the Unvaccinated" story was pure fabrication and there is no need for unsurveilled omicron to fill in the gaps. The CDC data reports are simply fraudulent.Hypothesis 7: The Greatest Crime Hypothesis. Omicron, SARS-CoV-2, and the COVID-19 vaccines were designed together as a toolset for establishing control. ...This is one more major piece of confirmatory evidence that the COVID-19 vaccines somehow paint the target for omicron. ...I suspect that the authors make this statement under the assumption that Omicron is a recent descendant of SARS-CoV-2, which seems highly unlikely. And also because they simply cannot imagine the possibility that the vaccines were built for omicron. ...Most of the western world have vaccinated their military with mRNA. Omicron targets the mRNA vaccinated. Omicron is the bio weapon. ...If two coronaviruses and an experimental mass vaccination campaign were designed by the same group of people, and released to this effect, then this is truly the crime of the millennium. Moriarty would blush.
Fauci’s Suppression of ChiCom Lab Leak EvidenceEmails indicate virologists believed the scientific evidence pointed to the lab leak explanation for COVID’s origin.A new batch of emails released by the House Oversight and Reform Committee makes clear that not only did medical researchers at the National Institutes of Health almost immediately suspect that the Wuhan lab in China was the most likely origin point for COVID-19, they also depict a politically motivated conspiracy to suppress the lab leak theory in favor of a natural origin narrative.As far back as late January 2020, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Director Dr. Anthony Fauci received an email from four virologists from the Scripps Research Institute. In the email, the four virologists indicated they had reviewed the SARS-CoV-2 genome sequence and concluded that it was “inconsistent with expectations from evolutionary theory.” The four virologists were unanimous in their opinion that the novel virus was not of natural origin but more likely a product that escaped a lab.To be clear, in January 2020, virologists who had viewed the novel virus’s structural makeup had communicated to Dr. Fauci that a lab leak was the more probable explanation for COVID’s origin.However, just days later, these same virologists had an apparent sudden change of heart. ...