patrick.net

Prisons are nothing more than dungeons. It's TRIVIAL to record everything in a prison, to eliminate violence, and just have incarceration. This is easy to do, trivial to do.

We could eliminate rape in prison, murder, any sort of violence, trivially. It can ALL be recorded, we can see who the perpetrator is, it's trivial. Rape a prisoner in prison? Well, it's solitary confinement for you then, and 10 more years to your prison sentence. That will stop that shit real quick. Oh you want to deny you raped a fellow inmate? Here's the video of you raping your fellow inmate.

Prisons are designed to MAKE criminals, not to reform them. We have the fucking technology to do this, it's trivial, it's easy, but they won't do it, because they are INTENTIONALLY creating criminals. People need to be reformed, not radicalized. I think, and this is leftist thinking, that most criminals, just need help. They had a shitty education system, shitty parents, and a shitty government and they are like "fuck it, fuck the whole system" - not realizing that their victims aren't part of the system.

HunterTits says

Patrick says

This needs to stop.

No. It doesn't.

VAST majority of voters who voted for this gender identity crap because of 'Trump's Mean Tweets' are women. So let them eat their own shit sandwich, I say.

Agreed. This is the only way to have a revolution, and you can't make an omelet without breaking some eggs.

porkchopexpress says

you can't make an omelet without breaking some eggs.

Or in this case, possibly fertilizing some eggs. With she-sperm of course. That’s a girl-Dick she’s raping her cell mate with after all!

Good!

HunterTits says

I predict a lot of male offenders will have their defense lawyers register them as 'female identified gender' in order to avoid being raped by other male prisoners in the all male prisons.

Lol, then they might get raped by a tranny in the women's prison anyway.

It would be so ironic that it's bound to happen.

It used to be that the criminal tranny hookers were all segregated from both the male and the female populations, at least at Santa Rita County Jail in Pleasanton. They wouldn't even transport them within reach of the male populations. There need to be three jails: male, female and tranny, because the trannies cause major problems and riots in the other two. Of course, that's what the subversives want.

Gesh WTF!

What do women expect, when they support homo/tranny/madchenuberalles policies?

They effectively killed the boy scouts (although the closet homo rapists contributed mightily).
They killed men's only clubs.

Now they're complaining about (boo hoo) penises among vags in bathrooms, trannies utterly dominating women's sports. WTF bitches - isn't this what you wanted? Enjoy the consequences of your profoundly ill-considered actions.

A properly governed republic depends on RATIONAL decisions by the electorate; anything else (contra-hint: natural sex distribution is ~ 51/49 F/M) leads ultimately to anarchy.

HunterTits says

I predict a new wave of prisonploitation flicks coming to a VOD or DVD online store in our spam boxes soon!

"Ten Years Hard Time In A Tranny Chain Gang!"

https://notthebee.com/article/female-california-inmates-now-forced-to-live-with-males-who-identify-as-females-complain-they-are-being-abused-by-the-newcomers-so-what-does-california-do-they-send-condoms-and-plan-b

In a piece for the Santa Monica Observer, Amber Jackson, an inmate at CCWF, revealed that multiple trans women transferred to the prison still had penises and were HIV positive. The biological males, Jackson said, were abusing and having sex with many of the female inmates. This, according to Jackson, led to the prison's new condom policy.

In subsequent item for the Observer, Jackson wrote that the women at the prison are "now prey for men."

"Call yourself a 'woman' all you want," Jackson said. "But when you have man, with a penis, that works as it was designed to do, that's a problem in a women's prison group shower room. That's a problem."

stereotomy says

What do women expect, when they support homo/tranny/madchenuberalles policies?

They effectively killed the boy scouts (although the closet homo rapists contributed mightily).
They killed men's only clubs.

Now they're complaining about (boo hoo) penises among vags in bathrooms, trannies utterly dominating women's sports. WTF bitches - isn't this what you wanted? Enjoy the consequences of your profoundly ill-considered actions.

A properly governed republic depends on RATIONAL decisions by the electorate; anything else (contra-hint: natural sex distribution is ~ 51/49 F/M) leads ultimately to anarchy.

A lot of this crap started when soccer moms wanted their daughters to train/play in male sports teams...because not allowing everything you want is discrimination. Now mediocre male sportspersons are just repaying in kind.

Most women have wanted to be men, at least at some point.

Most men have not wanted to be women, ever.

This is just how things have always been, human nature. The difference is that once women got a little power, they used it poorly.

They can have all-women's prisons and women's sports back when men can have men's clubs and Boy Scouts back. (With the rule that no boy must ever be alone with an adult man.)

LIKE THIS???

stereotomy says

They effectively killed the boy scouts (although the closet homo rapists contributed mightily).
They killed men's only clubs.

Now they're complaining about (boo hoo) penises among vags in bathrooms, trannies utterly dominating women's sports. WTF bitches - isn't this what you wanted?

I think this is what feminists claimed women wanted.

The reality is nobody hates women more, than feminists.

If you want the absolutely worst possible advice about women - ask a feminist. Try it. See what they say but be certain you ignore it. Nobody in the world knows less about women than a 3rd generation (or god forbid, 4th generation) feminist. Either they know nothing, or their are actively trying to subvert them. Given the age of many 3rd wave feminists, I think they just hate women with a passion.

richwicks says

If you want the absolutely worst possible advice about women - ask a feminist.

This is true.

If you want reality, read all of https://heartiste.org/

Patrick says

The difference is that once women got a little power, they used it poorly.

This makes sense to me. A woman’s first priority is to promote her own genetic heritage at the cost of all others. Mothers will actively recruit sex/marriage partners for their sons and will raise children their daughters need help with. Moms are generally fine with their sons having many sex partners and have a secret desire to see them spread their seed far and wide. It’s the selfish gene at work and there’s little to no brakes on that train.

Men, on the other hand, can’t directly have children so they are forced to form partnerships with other men to raise and care for the women and children of the tribe. (Keep in mind that humans are tribal creatures and only recently have begun to move beyond this). The men, therefore, have to make decisions that look out for the interests of all the members of the tribe, not just their own progeny. Exceptions occur, but for the most part, you have to keep the other men happy or you can’t rely on them to help you in your quest to make the tribe prosper. Men rely on other men a LOT because there is a very hard limit on what one man can do alone, but adding more men to the partnership increases the capacity of the tribe exponentially. If the tribe is successful enough, it could even become a nation or a kingdom. And it should have a leader, chief, or king whose primary goal is to increase the power and wealth of the people he governs.

Most females are unsuited to this role because their biological imperatives are entirely selfish.

Shaman says

A woman’s first priority is to promote her own genetic heritage at the cost of all others. Mothers will actively recruit sex/marriage partners for their sons and will raise children their daughters need help with. Moms are generally fine with their sons having many sex partners and have a secret desire to see them spread their seed far and wide. It’s the selfish gene at work and there’s little to no brakes on that train.

Men, on the other hand, can’t directly have children so they are forced to form partnerships with other men to raise and care for the women and children of the tribe. (Keep in mind that humans are tribal creatures and only recently have begun to move beyond this). The men, therefore, have to make decisions that look out for the interests of all the members of the tribe, not just their own progeny. Exceptions occur, but for the most part, you have to keep the other men happy or you can’t rely on them to help you in your quest to make the tribe prosper. Me...

This is a great point. In the presence of uncertainty and incomplete information (with regard to lineage), tribal men knew that at least one of them was the father of somebody, so that would conceivably motivate tribal cooperation. Tribal women, on the other hand, were the proto Lady MacBeths, scheming behind the scenes on behalf of their selfish genes (and because this rhymes, I get a gold star).

https://notthebee.com/article/a-man-who-raped-his-elderly-mother-will-now-be-housed-with-women-because-hes-come-out-as-transgender

YouTuber who allegedly raped own mother to be jailed with women because of "female" self-identification