please check out the anti-mandate news »

« prev   random   next »

7
0

Dr. Malone: Authoritarian Messaging Must Stop

By Patrick follow Patrick   2021 Jul 31, 10:46pm 708 views   41 comments   watch   nsfw   quote   share    




original link

« First    « Previous    Comments 2 - 41 of 41    Last »

2   Patrick   ignore (1)   2021 Aug 1, 12:15am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

Right, he probably has not had to deal much with that level of criminality.
3   SumatraBosch   ignore (9)   2021 Aug 1, 1:53am     ↓ dislike (2)   quote   flag      

The world must ask Trump exactly what is permissible to think or say or buy from Him! before we take a chance on thinking, saying or buying something that is unprofitable to Him!
4   Bd6r   ignore (1)   2021 Aug 1, 8:55am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

SumatraBosch says
The world must ask Trump exactly what is permissible to think or say or buy from Him! before we take a chance on thinking, saying or buying something that is unprofitable to Him!

why don't you replace trump with Fauci there, then it will be 95% of existing reality
5   MisdemeanorRebellionNoCoupForYou   ignore (0)   2021 Aug 1, 9:10am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

War Room is a must listen, at least one or two epsiodes a week. Everything from the Ape Army to COVID to the Steal.
6   Patrick   ignore (1)   2021 Aug 1, 10:42am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

Right, @SumatraBosch you are so far from reality on this one that you should be embarrassed.
9   Patrick   ignore (1)   2021 Aug 1, 12:08pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

SumatraBosch says
The world must ask Trump exactly what is permissible to think or say or buy from Him! before we take a chance on thinking, saying or buying something that is unprofitable to Him!




11   Ceffer   ignore (6)   2021 Aug 1, 5:57pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

Patrick says




There, fixed it.
14   Patrick   ignore (1)   2021 Aug 5, 6:36pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

https://www.washingtontimes.com/multimedia/audio/biden-teams-misguided-and-deadly-covid-19-vaccine-/


Audio Clip: Biden team’s misguided and deadly COVID-19 vaccine strategy
The Biden administration’s strategy to universally vaccinate in the middle of the pandemic is bad science and badly needs a reboot. By Dr. Robert Malone and Peter Navarro
15   Patrick   ignore (1)   2021 Aug 7, 5:51pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

Continuing to push universal vaccination is reasonably likely to drive development of a "supervirus" variant that will be completely resistant to spike antigen-driven vaccine immune responses. Universal vaccination- bad policy based on naive understanding of viral evolution.

Robert W Malone, MD
@RWMaloneMD
7h
They need to stop just reacting based on naive biases and to start actually thinking about long term tactics and strategy that benefits world health (and well established medical ethics principles).
16   Patrick   ignore (1)   2021 Aug 7, 6:10pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      


original link


The inventor of the mRNA technology currently used worldwide for the pandemic, Dr. Robert W. Malone joins David Gornoski for an intriguing conversation on the public health institutions' reaction to the pandemic; Dr. Malone's long experience in dealing with outbreaks; the products that have been rolled out to deal with the virus and whether these can be effective against newer strains; why the Pfizer product is failing in Israel; whether Biden and Fauci are correct in pointing out how certain people are the cause of rising cases; and more.

Follow Dr. Malone on Twitter here: https://twitter.com/RWMaloneMD

For more content by David Gornoski visit https://aneighborschoice.com
20   Patrick   ignore (1)   2021 Aug 12, 11:43am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

Robert W Malone, MD
@RWMaloneMD
1h
CDC list of excipients included in all US vaccines - except three. Guess which ones are missing?

https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/downloads/appendices/B/excipient-table-2.pdf

4:48 PM · Aug 12, 2021



Robert W Malone, MD
@RWMaloneMD
1h
Many thanks to @fredbass33 for posting the official Pfizer ingredient list. No Graphene listed. So, if it is there, it is an adulterant. I suspect that lipid/mRNA aggregates formed after being left out at RT are being misinterpreted as graphene, but I could well be wrong.

Fred Bass
@fredbass33
1h
Replying to @RWMaloneMD
Pfizer: https://www.fda.gov/media/144414/download

5:12 PM · Aug 12, 2021


https://twitter.com/RWMaloneMD/status/1425867712648056842#m
21   Patrick   ignore (1)   2021 Aug 20, 11:18am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2021/aug/5/biden-teams-misguided-and-deadly-covid-19-vaccine-/


Vaccine inventor questions mandatory shot push, Biden’s Covid-19 strategy
Vaccination 'arms race' could prove dangerous to the American public

The Biden administration’s strategy to universally vaccinate in the middle of the pandemic is bad science and badly needs a reboot.

This strategy will likely prolong the most dangerous phase of the worst pandemic since 1918 and almost assuredly cause more harm than good – even as it undermines faith in the entire public health system.

Four flawed assumptions drive the Biden strategy. The first is that universal vaccination can eradicate the virus and secure economic recovery by achieving herd immunity throughout the country (and the world). However, the virus is now so deeply embedded in the world population that, unlike polio and smallpox, eradication is unachievable. SARS-CoV-2 and its myriad mutations will likely continually circulate, much like the common cold and influenza.

The second assumption is that the vaccines are (near) perfectly effective. However, our currently available vaccines are quite “leaky.” While good at preventing severe disease and death, they only reduce, not eliminate, the risk of infection, replication, and transmission. As a slide deck from the Centers for Disease Control has revealed, even 100% acceptance of the current leaky vaccines combined with strict mask compliance will not stop the highly contagious Delta variant from spreading.

The third assumption is that the vaccines are safe. Yet scientists, physicians, and public health officials now recognize risks that are rare but by no means trivial. Known side effects include serious cardiac and thrombotic conditions, menstrual cycle disruptions, Bell’s Palsy, Guillain Barre syndrome, and anaphylaxis.

AUDIO: Dr. Robert Malone and Peter Navarro

Unknown side effects which virologists fear may emerge include existential reproductive risks, additional autoimmune conditions, and various forms of disease enhancement, i.e., the vaccines can make people more vulnerable to reinfection by SARS-CoV-2 or reactivation of latent viral infections and associated diseases such as shingles. With good reason, the FDA has yet to approve the vaccines now administered under Emergency Use Authorization.

The failure of the fourth “durability” assumption is the most alarming and perplexing. It now appears our current vaccines are likely to offer a mere 180-day window of protection – a decided lack of durability underscored by scientific evidence from Israel and confirmed by Pfizer, the Department of Health and Human Services, and other countries.

Here, we are already being warned of the need for universal “booster” shots at six-month intervals for the foreseeable future. The obvious broader point that militates for individual vaccine choice is that repeated vaccinations, each with a small risk, can add up to a big risk.
29   WineHorror1   ignore (2)   2021 Aug 23, 10:31am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

Patrick says


original link

Well, Dr. Malone says do not take the horse Ivermectin paste.
30   Patrick   ignore (1)   2021 Aug 23, 11:06am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

Only because there is human Ivermectin available.

He took the human Ivermectin.

I'd prefer not to take horse Ivermectin, but will do it if they don't make human Ivermectin easily available again.

Actually, I should try ordering the human kind from https://www.alldaychemist.com/ivecop-12-mg.html
31   richwicks   ignore (3)   2021 Aug 23, 12:03pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

Patrick says
I'd prefer not to take horse Ivermectin, but will do it if they don't make human Ivermectin easily available again.


They are entirely equivalent. It's not like they make ivermectin for humans in one place and ivermectin for animals somewhere else.

I had a phD vet I knew. My cousin had recently moved here, and she made me take care of her damned cats for two weeks. When I brought the cats to her new place, one of them tried to escape. I caught it in mid air and it bit hard. I told my friend about this because it was a great catch, predatory instinct kicked in surprised even me.

She put me on antibiotics for dogs and said if the wound festered, just go to a doctor but it ought to be fine. Entirely illegal, but I'll tell you what, it worked!

Every single drug that makes it to humans, except these "vaccines", go through animal, then human trials.
32   richwicks   ignore (3)   2021 Aug 23, 12:56pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

Ceffer says
Although it is starting to dawn on him, even Malone does not want to admit the enormity of the evil that he is dealing with. It is strange seeing these well intentioned scientists and doctors who believe that reversing these trends is merely a matter of promulgating reason, sense, morality and ethics when those qualities have nothing to do with the strategies of the Pandemic authors and in fact are viewed as tools/weaknesses to manipulate them and use against them.


It was quite a struggle for me to realize how really evil the people at the top are and it will be a struggle for him.

Just consider, George W. Bush knowingly lied about a weapons of mass destruction program, KNOWING that this lie would be discovered at some point, and murdered between 100,000 and 1,000,000 Iraqis over it. Do you think he has any regret or shame over that? Obama brought slavery back to Libya and left it in civil war.

That Obama and Bush did this, knowing what the outcomes would be - people don't believe it. I know why the US is at war with Syria - it's HIGHLY likely that either the Ghouta chemical attacks never happened, or were STAGED by a western intelligence agency to make the case for war there. I have tons of evidence, but good luck getting somebody to realize just how evil our government. They probably used chemical weapons to kill a bunch of innocent people just so they had an excuse to go to war with Syria. You think they wouldn't do that to us?

It's hard to wrap your head around. The government is entirely, sociopathic.
33   Ceffer   ignore (6)   2021 Aug 23, 2:15pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

It wouldn't be considered responsible for any scientist or medical personnel to recommend a vet medicine to human beings, even if they thought it might be effective and safe. There is still the crumbling assumption that doctors are acting in the public interest rather than just caving in to economics and fear for their jobs and licenses.
34   Karloff   ignore (0)   2021 Aug 23, 4:31pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

Other than dosage, an active ingredient is an active ingredient. My wife has this hang-up about a couple of over-the-counter analgesics where she swears the name-brand product works better than the no-name brand, despite them having the same drug and same dosage. It's all in her head.

Solution: Buy the no-name brand and pour the pills into the name-brand bottle.
35   just_passing_through   ignore (8)   2021 Aug 23, 8:24pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

Karloff says
It's all in her head.


Not always. Sometimes the brand name formulation works better.

Edit: If you can even find a brand name. I tried a couple of years ago and couldn't. I asked the pharmacist and they carry NO, that's right ZERO brand name medications. I had him clarify and he stood by that. I suspect there has to be SOME though, those that don't have generics yet. Most are made in China now and I noticed when things really started to switch prices didn't drop. That is until near the end of Trumps term when he dictated that US customers can't be charged more than the cheapest any other country pays. Then they dropped like a rock, for me at least.

So I was trying to get off of China meds a couple of years ago after I was poisoned:

https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/tainted-drugs-ex-fda-inspector-warns-dangers-u-s-meds-n1002971

I now have a 1/7000 greater chance of getting cancer. If I recall the contam was equivalent to eating a few hundred thousand hot dogs.
37   Patrick   ignore (1)   2021 Aug 24, 10:13am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

https://www.rwmalonemd.com/news/df5rfxefeymh8y3bbta3fsbjx6ppnp


Published in the Washington Times,
By Dr. Robert Malone and Peter Navarro - - Thursday, August 5, 2021

The Biden administration’s strategy to universally vaccinate in the middle of the pandemic is bad science and badly needs a reboot.

This strategy will likely prolong the most dangerous phase of the worst pandemic since 1918 and almost assuredly cause more harm than good – even as it undermines faith in the entire public health system.

Four flawed assumptions drive the Biden strategy. The first is that universal vaccination can eradicate the virus and secure economic recovery by achieving herd immunity throughout the country (and the world). However, the virus is now so deeply embedded in the world population that, unlike polio and smallpox, eradication is unachievable. SARS-CoV-2 and its myriad mutations will likely continually circulate, much like the common cold and influenza.

The second assumption is that the vaccines are (near) perfectly effective. However, our currently available vaccines are quite “leaky.” While good at preventing severe disease and death, they only reduce, not eliminate, the risk of infection, replication, and transmission. As a slide deck from the Centers for Disease Control has revealed, even 100% acceptance of the current leaky vaccines combined with strict mask compliance will not stop the highly contagious Delta variant from spreading.

The third assumption is that the vaccines are safe. Yet scientists, physicians, and public health officials now recognize risks that are rare but by no means trivial. Known side effects include serious cardiac and thrombotic conditions, menstrual cycle disruptions, Bell’s Palsy, Guillain Barre syndrome, and anaphylaxis.

Unknown side effects which virologists fear may emerge include existential reproductive risks, additional autoimmune conditions, and various forms of disease enhancement, i.e., the vaccines can make people more vulnerable to reinfection by SARS-CoV-2 or reactivation of latent viral infections and associated diseases such as shingles. With good reason, the FDA has yet to approve the vaccines now administered under Emergency Use Authorization.

The failure of the fourth “durability” assumption is the most alarming and perplexing. It now appears our current vaccines are likely to offer a mere 180-day window of protection – a decided lack of durability underscored by scientific evidence from Israel and confirmed by Pfizer, the Department of Health and Human Services, and other countries.

Here, we are already being warned of the need for universal “booster” shots at six-month intervals for the foreseeable future. The obvious broader point that militates for individual vaccine choice is that repeated vaccinations, each with a small risk, can add up to a big risk.

It’s an arms race with the virus.

The most important reason why a universal vaccination strategy is imprudent tracks to the collective risk associated with how the virus responds when replicating in vaccinated individuals. Here, basic virology and evolutionary genetics tell us the goal of any virus is to infect and replicate in as many people as possible. A virus can’t efficiently spread if, like with Ebola, it quickly kills its hosts.

The clear historical tendency for viruses crossing over from one species to another is to evolve in a way that makes them both more infectious and less pathogenic over time. However, a universal vaccination policy deployed in the middle of a pandemic can turn this normal Darwinian taming process into a dangerous vaccine arms race.

The essence of this arms race is this: The more people you vaccinate, the greater the number of vaccine-resistant mutations you are likely to get, the less durable the vaccines will become, ever more powerful vaccines will have to be developed, and individuals will be exposed to more and more risk.

Science tells us here that today’s vaccines, which use novel gene therapy technologies, generate powerful antigens that direct the immune system to attack specific components of the virus. Thus, when the virus infects a person with a “leaky” vaccination, the viral progeny will be selected to escape or resist the effects of the vaccine.

If the entire population has been trained via a universal vaccination strategy to have the same basic immune response, then once a viral escape mutant is selected, it will rapidly spread through the entire population – whether vaccinated or not.

A far more optimal strategy is to vaccinate only the most vulnerable. This will limit the amount of vaccine-resistant mutations and thereby slow, if not halt, the current vaccine arms race.

Fortunately, those most vulnerable represent a relatively small number; and these cohorts have already achieved high levels of vaccine acceptance. They include senior citizens, for whom the risk of serious disease or death increases exponentially with age, and those with significant comorbidities such as obesity, lung, and heart disease.

For much of the rest of the population, there’s nothing to fear but fear of the virus itself. This is particularly true if we have lawful outpatient access to a growing arsenal of scientifically proven prophylactics and therapeutics.

For example, there has been much controversy over ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine. Yet, with the emergence of a growing body of scientific evidence, we can be assured these two medicines are safe and effective in prophylaxis and early treatment when administered under a physician’s supervision. Numerous other useful treatments range from famotidine/celecoxib, fluvoxamine, and apixaban to various anti-inflammatory steroids, Vitamin D, and zinc.

The broader goal when administering these agents is to moderate symptoms and take death off the table, particularly for the unvaccinated. Unlike vaccines, these agents are generally not dependent on specific viral properties or mutations but instead mitigate or treat the inflammatory symptoms of the disease itself. (Pfizer is now actively marketing its own antiviral therapeutic – tacit admission Pfizer’s own vaccine is incapable of eradicating the virus.)

We are not “anti-vax.” One of us (Dr. Malone) invented the core mRNA technology being used by Pfizer and Moderna to produce their vaccines and has spent his entire professional career developing and advancing novel vaccine technologies, vaccines, and other medical countermeasures. The other (Mr. Navarro) played a key role at the Trump White House in jumpstarting Operation Warp Speed and ensuring timely delivery of the vaccines.

We are simply saying that just because you have a big vaccine hammer, it is not necessarily wise to use it for every nail. The American people deserve better than a universal vaccination strategy under the flag of bad science and enforced through authoritarian measures.

• Dr. Robert Malone is the discoverer of in-vitro and in-vivo RNA transfection and the inventor of mRNA vaccines while he was at the Salk Institute in 1988. Peter Navarro served in the Trump White House as the Defense Production Act Policy Coordinator.

For the article link, here:
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2021/aug/5/biden-teams-misguided-and-deadly-covid-19-vaccine-/
39   Patrick   ignore (1)   2021 Aug 28, 10:38am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

https://twitter.com/RWMaloneMD/status/1431624623045685256#m


Robert W Malone, MD
@RWMaloneMD
2h
To those that think I am posting due to my political bias. News 4 you - it is because of my upbringing. I was taught to not lie. And I got fed up with the lies, misrepresentations, obfuscation, censorship, and imbicilic factchecking. I actually donated to the Biden campaign.

And I am not the only one that made a mistake that I regret in this case. I am confident that there are many others. We all make mistakes, including myself. I should not have taken Moderna after having been infected in late Feb 2020. That was also a mistake.
41   Patrick   ignore (1)   2021 Sep 3, 10:26am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

https://www.theepochtimes.com/dr-robert-malone-mrna-vaccine-inventor-on-latest-covid-19-data-booster-shots-and-the-shattered-scientific-consensus_3979206.html


Dr. Robert Malone, mRNA Vaccine Inventor, on Latest COVID-19 Data, Booster Shots, and the Shattered Scientific ‘Consensus’ (Part 1)
“We need to confront the data [and] not try to cover stuff up or hide risks,” says mRNA vaccine pioneer Dr. Robert Malone.

What does the most recent research say about the efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines? In this two-part episode, we sit down again with Dr. Malone for a comprehensive look at the vaccines, booster shots, repurposed drugs like ivermectin, and the ethics of vaccine mandates.

The second part of this episode will be released on Saturday, Sept. 4, at 7 p.m. ET.

Below is a list of references mentioned or related to the discussion in this episode...

« First    « Previous    Comments 2 - 41 of 41    Last »


about   best comments   contact   one year ago   suggestions