patrick.net

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/bidens-vaccine-fiat-forges-fascist-pharma-corporate-state

Never in my lifetime has something occurred that was so egregiously opposed to Misesian concepts of liberalism and freedom. In fact, this is directly in line with perhaps the most opposite ideology to liberalism: fascism. Benito Mussolini said himself that “Fascism should more appropriately be called corporatism because it is a merger of state and corporate power.” In today’s political discourse, people abuse the word fascism and sometimes even cite this definition of corporatism while stretching it somewhat from the truth.

However, the state requiring that businesses require the vaccine from one of three large corporations that were propped up by the state is undoubtedly the merger of state and corporate power that Mussolini dreamed of. ...

Luckily, the solution to this was described by the great Tom Woods:

Nullification is the Jeffersonian idea that the states of the American Union must judge the constitutionality of the acts of their agent, the federal government, since no impartial arbiter between them exists.

Many businesses across the country will act in civil noncompliance, but that is simply not enough.

If one wants to see this end, states across the country will have to undoubtedly reject this. I am not here to make any criticisms of the vaccine. I still standby my initial piece that these bans on mom-and-pop shops wanting not to run the risk of interacting with unvaccinated individuals is a dangerous threat to liberty. However, I’d argue that any act of nullification at this point has little or nothing to do with the vaccine or the pandemic.

We are now facing one simple question: will we accept or reject a precedent for the merger of state and corporate power?

If we choose to reject it, then the governors of the free State of Florida as well as New York, the governors of Texas as well as California, all these governors alike must stand firm against this tragedy.

He finally gets the problem of politics, evil and dominion rather than altruistic science.

Buck Sexton
@BuckSexton
18h
Not a single word from Joe Biden about naturally acquired immunity, which the latest data shows is more durable than the vaccine, and an estimated 100 million Americans already have-

There is no scientific justification for the omission. It’s dishonest. They don’t care.

Patrick says

Luckily, the solution to this was described by the great Tom Woods:

Nullification is the Jeffersonian idea that the states of the American Union must judge the constitutionality of the acts of their agent, the federal government, since no impartial arbiter between them exists.

Many businesses across the country will act in civil noncompliance, but that is simply not enough.

If one wants to see this end, states across the country will have to undoubtedly reject this. I am not here to make any criticisms of the vaccine. I still standby my initial piece that these bans on mom-and-pop shops wanting not to run the risk of interacting with unvaccinated individuals is a dangerous threat to liberty. However, I’d argue that any act of nullification at this point has little or nothing to do with the vaccine or the pandemic.

We are now facing one simple question: will we accept or reject a precedent for the merger of state and corporate power?

If we choose t...

Jacksonize unconstitutional Judiciary Rules. That is, simply ignore them with a brief statement "This ruling contained no references to actual law, but rather philosophical remarks about consensus and science. Therefore, the Executive declares the ruling null and void and will continue as before."

https://www.churchmilitant.com/news/article/scientist-warns-of-noble-lie-to-promote-jab

In an extended interview with Church Militant’s Rome Correspondent Dr. Jules Gomes, renowned scientist Dr. Robert Malone explains his position on the COVID-19 vaccine, defending himself from false charges of being an ‘anti-vaxxer.’

Patrick says

Unknown at this time is where the allegiance of the military will fall. This may be influenced by the true spectrum of adverse events and effectiveness of these vaccine products in military populations, which will become more clear now that the mandates are being imposed.

How in hell would anyone know if the military and civilian populations are receiving the same jab?

Good point.

I do suspect that Pfizer is experimenting on the public with different versions, and placebos for some.

Patrick says

I do suspect that Pfizer is experimenting on the public with different versions, and placebos for some.

They clearly are or it just doesn't work. Either option is shitty.

Who is testing the consistency of these vaccines anyway? FDA gave EUA, but how do we know you're getting the proper dose? That's on the manufacturer. There's no way they can verify they're not putting too much or too little of this shit in you when you get the jab.

I'm also waiting to see if there's an uptick in cancer or other ailments long term. My risk profile is low for covid, so I'm not and won't be taking any of the vaccines anytime soon.

https://nitter.pussthecat.org/RWMaloneMD/status/1443210287788740608#m

Robert W Malone, MD
@RWMaloneMD
2h
and at this point, I believe that vaccines for those at high risk make sense. Universal vaccination does not. Mandates to receive a medical intervention are wrong. Lockdowns cause more harm than good. Physicians should be allowed to practice medicine without coersion.

Science and scientists must be free to discuss theories and data, without fear of "cancel culture". And Patients have fundamental rights to maintain the integrity of their bodies and to decide for themselves whether or not to accept a medical procedure or intervention.