Comments 1 - 6 of 6 Search these comments
Prominent French scientist will not face disciplinary action after denouncing gov’t COVID response
The French medical regulatory body dismissed disciplinary proceedings against outspoken COVID critic Professor Christian Perronne, arguing that the tropical disease specialist not only had the right to express himself, but that he had an obligation to do so. ...
One of France’s most prominent infectious and tropical disease specialists, Professor Christian Perronne, was vindicated on Friday by a regional Disciplinary Chamber of the “Ordre des Médecins” (National Council of the Order of Physicians, CNOM), which had brought proceedings against him because of his “dissident” public statements and writings about the COVID crisis, treatment of the disease, and the so-called COVID vaccine.
Perronne has authored three books about the COVID crisis in which he explained that the French government made all the wrong decisions and, by his reckoning, was thereby responsible for 25,000 unnecessary deaths during the first wave of infections.
It matters that Tony Nikolic put a stake in the ground showing that the courts knew:
the vaccines did not reduce transmission
infection rates were higher in the vaccinated
the evidence to justify lockdowns, masks and vaccines did not exist
the TGA lied that they had a lawyer in the court to hide the fact that Pfizer’s barrister was acting on their behalf
deaths had been reported from administration of the COVID vaccines
the main expert witness for the government received $65m in government grants and had never treated a COVID patient ...
What matters is what we know.
Work out what you know and the rest is irrelevant, because there is enough there to make a case for mass arrests of people in government who conspired to a democide.
This is what we know:
More people died in April 2020 and January 2021 than would normally have died
In some countries the overall death rate was normal for 2020 which means the impact of the “pandemic” was either minor or a “pull forward” effect
Labs performed PCR tests for a strand of RNA, and in some people that was positive
These PCR tests were more likely to be positive at the time that there were deaths
The primers for these PCR tests were commercial (except in NSW in 2020) and therefore we do not know what they were testing
The primers for the first PCR tests in China1 were wrong and therefore could not have tested for “SARS-CoV-2” ...
The protocols for managing post-viral pneumonia were changed in April 2020 to remove antibiotics
If you are an elderly person with a post-viral pneumonia and you are denied antibiotics, you will most likely die
The overwhelming majority of deaths in China were patients who were treated in Wuhan under Wuhan protocols. Mainland China had a near zero fatality rate from a disease that was supposedly novel and supposedly originated there.
The same disease outside of Wuhan (Hubei) had a 7.5x lower risk of death2 than the disease occurring in Wuhan (Hubei). This is not possible by chance
China - the supposed epicentre of the “novel untreatable coronavirus” had the lowest COVID mortality rate per million population in the world in 2020 and 2021. This is not possible with the story as presented.
On the basis of the “novel coronavirus pandemic with a high fatality rate” the whole world (everywhere but China) was subjected to:
Lockdowns (that didn’t work)
Mask mandates (that didn’t work)
Forced vaccinations with experimental gene therapy vaccines (that didn’t work and caused more deaths then the pandemic ever could have)
On the basis of the “pandemic” arising from China, which did not affect China in any appreciable way, the world’s economies were shut down and you are still living with the consequences.
For some people the forced vaccine mandates and government interference with medical treatment resulted in death. That is the reality. The removal of antibiotics from standard post-viral pneumonia was done in lockstep around the world. How could this have happened? By MAGIC: A consortium driven by the University of Liverpool and WHO.
Those COVID deaths did not need to happen. The people affiliated with Andrew Owen of MAGIC were exposed by Tess Lawrie as admitting to undue financial influence in rejecting ivermectin as a therapeutic. But ivermectin was just a part of the problem, because the ivermectin protocols came with antibiotics (doxycycline or azithromycin) which is what prevented the bacterial penumonia.
So what actually happened?
The following is my assessment of the situation taking into account the above known facts. You are welcome to disagree and the comments are open. I encourage you to attempt to rebut this.
There was never a pandemic of any lethal virus. The sequences made by Baric, Daszak, Shi and their buddies in virology labs around the world are viral sequences of RNA, but they are synthetic. They can be effectively distributed via clones (lab based production of RNA sequences) rather than letting an unstable real-life RNA coronavirus loose on the world, which would likely regress and flop as a bioweapon. What they proposed (a scary novel lethal coronavirus causing a pandemic) is nigh on impossible, but the scare was real.
In order to persuade people of a lethal pandemic virus, the CCP (who dictate medical protocols) in Wuhan allowed the release of a viral clone that caused disease leading to bacterial pneumonia. They then either withheld antibiotic treatment from cases in Wuhan only (killing people), or only reported the cases that had failed to respond to antibiotics (producing a selection bias in reports). Either way, this produced an artificially inflated death rate amongst cases in Wuhan that was not replicated in the rest of China. Thus the fear of the pandemic was born.
Once cases of viral infection (which might just have been circulating coronaviruses, because the PCR tests were not specific enough to detect “COVID” only) were seen in other countries, propaganda was mobilised (seeded by the CCP and lapped up by the West via Tony Fauci) to make sure that antibiotics normally used in post-viral pneumonia were not used in “post-COVID” pneumonia. There was no medical reason for this, only political. The political reasoning was to ensure that the populations were scared enough of the scary virus to accept lockdowns, masks and then experimental vaccines. None of those should have happened because they were not in the pandemic plans created prior to 2020. Remember too, that none of the Chinese lockdowns were real. All of it was propaganda.
Twitter avatar for @MichaelPSenger
Michael P Senger
@MichaelPSenger
When you take a step back and look at the entire world shutting down, masking up, tossing away human rights in lockstep after China supposedly beat a super-virus with fake videos of residents falling dead by locking down one city, the lockdown fraud looks embarrassingly obvious.
3:25 PM ∙ May 5, 2021
2,565
Likes
844
Retweets
The masks were propaganda to keep the fear alive. The lockdowns were designed to neutralise non-Chinese economies, such that the only economy that grew in 2020 was China’s. Once those two pillars of the fake pandemic had been implemented, the pathway was laid for the introduction of the “emergency” vaccines, for which the mRNA gene therapy technology was ready to be used.
Instead of pushing back against the CCP propaganda, the West continued down the same fake pathway. They ignored the fact that mainland China refused mRNA vaccines. They mobilised people like Gideon Meyerowitz-Katz whose lab is openly affiliated with the Chinese CDC4, to push the lockdown, mask and vaccine propaganda.
In doing so, the world fell in line with the global dictats supplied via the MAGIC app protocols which told doctors not to use antibiotics in post-COVID pneumonia. And in doing that, the world’s doctors collaborated - knowingly or unknowingly - in a worldwide Iatrocide that was likely entirely preventable.
The protocols touted by Zelenko and Kory were simple. Hydroxychloroquine or ivermectin (which are anti-inflammatory or anti-viral in the early phase), zinc (which is anti-viral) and doxycycline or azithromycin (which prevents or treats the secondary pneumonia, the cause of death in the majority of cases of “COVID”). Some of the safest drugs on the planet. Yet we weren’t allowed to use them, because the WHO, Fauci and Andrew Owen said so. And then the government stepped in to restrict their prescription.
The hydroxychloroquine or ivermectin may not even have been that important. Most likely, all it needed was the “#3tablets” of azithromycin which represents a course of treatment for community acquired pneumonia. Less than a dollar in many countries. If you had a negative “COVID test” you would be given those tablets. If you had a positive test, you weren’t allowed them. An elderly person with an untreated post-COVID pneumonia was set on a pathway to death.
One dollar. 3 tablets. That was the price the WHO set as too high to treat your elderly relatives.
original link