2021 Sep 24, 10:29am
2,023 views 129 comments
« First « Previous Comments 90 - 129 of 129 Last »
FDA trying to hide data showing Pfizer’s covid “vaccine” is seriously injuring childrenWednesday, October 27, 2021
NEW YORK, NY—In a moment celebrated by all hard-working lobbyists, Pfizer announced that the COVID-19 vaccine will reduce average daily child COVID deaths from almost zero all the way down to almost zero.“These are phenomenal results. Our internal studies have proven a microscopic benefit to an even more microscopic risk to children,” stated Dee Pimbly, head of Pfizer’s Department of Propaganda to a crowd of journalists who have not allowed their own children to bask in the warm glow of sunlight, or interact with other children for almost no reason whatsoever.FDA officials praised Pfizer for fighting a virus that is the leading killer of children after cancer, vehicular accidents, suicide, heart disease, drowning, suffocation, the flu, meteors from space, and slipping on a banana peel. Experts say the vaccine will probably kill more kids than it saves, but it's ok because science. When asked about any safety concerns, an FDA official replied, “We’re excited to start giving it to them so we can find out.”
The epidemic of allegedly unexplained teenage deaths continues to shock us all.According to the UK Government’s own figures, published by The Exposé child deaths are 52% higher than the five year average since the jabbing started. And yet, officially, these are all unexplained. There is an epidemic of coincidental deaths. Perfectly healthy children are suddenly dropping dead. This is something incredibly rare. Tragically, now it is becoming common.And still the authorities deny the link…
Newsweek presented balanced arguments for and against vaccinating kids and for some reason the Twitter blue checks got reaaaaalllly mad about it
If I had kids, they already wouldn’t have been attending public school, and this should be the mail in the coffin for anyone who’s been on the fence.
This article examines issues related to COVID-19 inoculations for children. The bulk of the official COVID-19-attributed deaths per capita occur in the elderly with high comorbidities, and the COVID-19 attributed deathsper capita are negligible in children. The bulk of the normalized post-inoculation deaths also occur in the elderlywith high comorbidities, while the normalized post-inoculation deaths are small, but not negligible, in children.Clinical trials for these inoculations were very short-term (a few months), had samples not representative of thetotal population, and for adolescents/children, had poor predictive power because of their small size. Further,the clinical trials did not address changes in biomarkers that could serve as early warning indicators of elevatedpredisposition to serious diseases. Most importantly, the clinical trials did not address long-term effects that, ifserious, would be borne by children/adolescents for potentially decades.A novel best-case scenario cost-benefit analysis showed very conservatively that there are five times the numberof deaths attributable to each inoculation vs those attributable to COVID-19 in the most vulnerable 65+ demographic.The risk of death from COVID-19 decreases drastically as age decreases, and the longer-term effectsof the inoculations on lower age groups will increase their risk-benefit ratio, perhaps substantially.
To reach such a conclusion the following assumptions must have been made:Natural immunity in those children who have been infected does not existThere is no such thing as hospital transmission to children who are already sick for another reasonChildren with co-morbidities are at no greater risk than children who are healthyVaccination can prevent the vast majority of intensive care admissionsThere is no vaccine waning in childrenThese assumptions are so extreme that presenting the data in this way to create a case for vaccinating healthy children amounts to negligence if not outright fraud.
I see that El Gato Malo engaged in a similar set of calculations back in September when Pfizer first released its “results.” He faced the same challenges as I did — namely, there is no usable data from Pfizer and so one has to pull from others sources. He builds a steel man case (the most generous possible defense of the Pfizer product) and yet his results are still in line with mine (my numbers are higher though because I use a lower estimate of vaccine effectiveness and correct for VAERS underreporting). So again, even under the most generous assumptions, the Pfizer mRNA shot fails any honest risk benefit assessment in connection with children 5 to 11.
Reposting here. From latest vax data as of 9/5/2021This is insanity! I keep feeling like I am living in a dystopian movie.
This is truly disturbing.It doesn't matter that the drug is experimental for children. It doesn't matter that children are at almost no risk from Covid.They have to get the jab in order to satisfy the will of CNN's totally legit doctor Sanjay Gupta.The message is that kids need to get the vaccine to slow the spread of Covid.Why are adults forcing kids to get this jab in order to protect themselves? There's no reason for it.This is propaganda and it is just plain wrong.
This is the number of under 12 vaxxed so far or the number of deaths of under 12 vaxxed?
This is propaganda and it is just plain wrong.
U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, introduced legislation that would prohibit the federal government and any entity at the federal, state, and local level that receives federal funding—including school districts—from requiring COVID-19 vaccines for minors.“Parents should have the right to decide what is best for their children in consultation with their family doctor,” he said. “My view on the COVID-19 vaccine has remained clear: no mandates of any kind.“President [Joe] Biden and his administration have repeatedly ignored medical privacy rights and personal liberty by pushing unlawful and burdensome vaccine mandates on American businesses, and now they are preparing to push a mandate on kids by pressuring parents—all without taking into account relative risk or the benefits of natural immunity.”The bill would prohibit the federal government and any recipient of federal funding from the Department of Health and Human Services and/or the CDC at the state, local, tribal, or territorial level from requiring any individual aged 18 or younger to get a COVID-19 vaccine.It also would prohibit any school district or educational entity from imposing a mandate requiring any students age 18 or younger to receive a COVID-19 vaccine. If any school district were to impose a mandate, it would lose eligibility to receive Title IV, Part A and Title II, Part A funding.The bill also would require parental consent for the administration of a COVID-19 vaccine to a minor and apply to all COVID-19 vaccines that have been authorized for use under Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) or, if fully approved, were first approved under EUA.
McConaughey comes out against vaccine mandates for kids
But these two accomplished doctors should make you think: Why would they stand in front of 800 people and unabashedly say to not vaccinate children? Here’s why:As Dr. John Littell of Ocala and one of the organizers of the summit told us: “because no one knows the long-term effects these vaccines will have on children.”What’s more, these are doctors and researchers who have hands-on evidence that early-treatment regimens are effectively preventing hospitalizations and saving lives.Read what they say. Do more research. Had you attended the summit, you couldn’t help but be convinced and persuaded. ...
https://ground.news/article/mcconaughey-comes-out-against-vaccine-mandates-for-kids_71269b McConaughey comes out against vaccine mandates for kids
We will kill 117 kids to save one child from dying from COVID in the 5 to 11 age rangeThat's according to a risk-benefit analysis done by risk-benefit expert Dr. Toby Rogers. His analysis has been viewed by over 22,000 readers. No mistakes were found. Nothing but praise.
At least two California children were left sick after a clinic administered the wrong dose of the coronavirus vaccine to 14 kids.
Mark Twain Union Elementary School District opposes COVID-19 vaccine mandate for its students in unanimous voteby Marie-Elena Schembri Nov 5, 2021
We are killing our kids. Does anyone care?Kids that would have never died from COVID are now dying after getting the vaccine. Will it ever end?Steve Kirsch8 min ago 1Dr. Toby Rogers did a risk-benefit analysis showing we’ll kill 117 kids for every kid we save from COVID with the vaccines aged 5 to 11. That ratio doesn’t really change if they change the dose… it means fewer kids saved and fewer kids killed, but the ratio remains about the same. We will kill a lot more kids than we will ever save with these vaccines.What Toby predicted is now coming true.We can’t show it is 117 to 1, but we can show for sure we are killing more kids than we are saving.With COVID, only children with pretty severe health problems would die. We don’t know of a single kid, 5 to 11, who died from COVID who didn’t have some pretty serious health issues before they got COVID.Those days are now gone. The vaccines rolled out for these kids starting on November 7. It is now just 12 days later and we are now killing perfectly healthy kids.I just got this text:That’s hardly an isolated incident.These deaths simply are never ever going to reported in the NY Times or on CNN. So you’re never going to hear about them except from alternate media sources.Here’s another.First time in her 14-year career: seeing an 8 year old with myocarditisI saw this Tweet from one of my followers. First time in her 14 year career she has ever seen an 8 year old child with myocarditis. Welcome to the “new normal.”So how we handle this? Our government will ignore the deaths as “anecdotes” and push even harder to vaccinate every child in sight. In just 10 days, they’ve vaccinated 10% of our kids.It’s really tragic. I’m 65 years old and I’ve never seen anything like this.All my calls to members of Congress I know go unreturned: Anna Eshoo, Ro Khanna, Bill Foster, John Garamendi, Jackie Speier, Zoe Lofgren, to name a few. None of them care enough to return any of my calls. They are all convinced the vaccines are safe and effective and will do nothing to stop this. They refuse to listen to anything unless it supports “narrative.” If you aren’t on board, you’re evil and will not be listened to.The only people in Congress who can see the truth are Ron Johnson and Thomas Massie. Everyone else is pro-vaccine AFAIK.The data clearly says the vaccines is unsafe, but nobody has time to look at the data themselves. If most of the doctors say it is safe, then it must be safe, no matter how many kids die.I made a short presentation which summarizes how dangerous the vaccines are, but nobody wants to look at it.It’s a great presentation. If you have an open mind, you will find it extremely compelling. If you don’t have an open mind, you’ll just say, “Was it peer reviewed? If not, I’m not going to look at it” even though it refers to peer-reviewed studies.They’d all prefer to keep their head in the sand to avoid the cognitive dissonance.They all believe COVID is more dangerous than the vaccine still. This isn’t based on actual numbers. It is based on their belief system. So even though we have evidence like this showing the vaccines are massively more dangerous than the virus,it just does not “register” with people since it is contrary to what they were told. So it gets ignored as a fabrication or as an anecdote.Someday they will figure this out. I hope it is soon.Please forward this article and promote it on your social networks. They will probably terminate your account(s) for doing this, but isn’t it worth it to save one life?
Did even a single child die from COVID-19 in YOUR state?More than half of all states have reported NO COVID-19 pediatric deaths.Justin Hart11 hr ago We give SO MUCH ENERGY to the concerns over children and COVID-19 but we need to come back to this reality: the risk to kids is very, very low. How low? Only 22 states have even reported COVID-19 deaths among children ages 0 to 17. Note that certain states have reported fewer than 10 deaths for children and those are suppressed at the national level for privacy and even statistical reasons.
Efrat Fenigson@efenigsonNov 19Dr. Boaz Lev, Head of Israel Management Team of Epidemics (MTE) - unaware of the Vaers deaths reports?Mind the body language when confronted with truthful facts. This is a snippet from the discussion held this week at the Knesset (Parliament) about vaxxing kids (5-11 yo).
It’s too hard to ignore all the vaccine injured kids showing up in the ER nowadays.I just heard a story from a friend who went to the lab for a stress echocardiagram.In the waiting room with her are 4 kids aged 7 to 10 years old with their moms. She talked to the moms. The kids were all suffering from tachycardia (heart rate that beats way too fast) and waiting to be tested.Two important things you need to know:All the kids were recently vaccinated.Kids that age NEVER get tachycardia (i.e., the medical experts I’ve talked to have never seen it before in their careers).There are close to 10,000 adverse event types elevated by the COVID vaccines. Here’s a list of the adverse events most elevated compared to “normal.” In the #2 position: heart rate, elevated by nearly 8,000 times normal.
« First « Previous Comments 90 - 129 of 129 Last »