please check out the anti-mandate news »

« prev   random   next »

2
0

Concerned Mother Wants to Air TV Ad on Pfizer’s Dangerous Vaxx After Daughter Is Severely and Permanently Damaged — But Comcast Refuses Ad at Last Minute

By Patrick follow Patrick   2021 Oct 24, 3:51pm 227 views   9 comments   watch   nsfw   quote   share      


https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/10/concerned-mother-wants-air-tv-ad-pfizers-dangerous-vaccine-daughter-severely-permanently-damaged-comcast-refuses-ad-last-minute/


13-year-old Maddie de Garay volunteered for the Pfizer vaccine clinical trials. According to her parents, she volunteered to help, but did not expect that she would suffer significant Pfizer vaccine-related injuries.

Maddie’s mother wants to warn other parents that the COVID vaccine is not safe.
But Comcast pulled the mother’s ad telling Maddie’s story.

Comcast is complicit in the deadly conspiracy.

Maddie’s mom wants to warn other parents that the C-19 Vac was not safe for her daughter in the Pfizer trial. They hid this from us.

Comcast pulled the ad at the last minute. See the ad. Hear more of Maddie’s story. Pray for Maddie. Spread the word.

👉https://t.co/hvrFKeKNz3

— Covid Memo (@CovidMemo) October 24, 2021

Maddie’s mother will be testifying at the FDA’s VRBPAC Meeting on Pfizer Data on October 26th.

Here is the ad Maddie’s mother wants to air on national TV that is being blocked.

Maddie’s mother will be testifying at the FDA’s VRBPAC Meeting on Pfizer Data on October 26th.

The public can submit public comments to the FDA for its VRBPAC meeting on Pfizer Data taking place 10/26 for Children ages 5-11. A link to submit a public comment can be found here:

https://www.regulations.gov/search?filter=FDA-2021-N-1088
1   RC2006   ignore (2)   2021 Oct 24, 4:05pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Bought to you by Pfizer.
2   Automan Empire   ignore (1)   2021 Oct 24, 4:54pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Well, we're doing what we can keeping the story moving toward virality.
3   HunterTits   ignore (4)   2021 Oct 25, 12:42pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Hate to be a Devil's Advocate Dick here but:

They VOLUNTEERED for CLINICAL trials. They thus knew or should have known the risks. They have to sign reams of papers acknowledging that. At least the parents should have.

13 year olds can not legally volunteer for shit like this,. Not w/o parental consent. So that makes this entire article suspect on the BS meter.
4   komputodo   ignore (3)   2021 Oct 25, 1:41pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

HunterTits says
They VOLUNTEERED for CLINICAL trials. They thus knew or should have known the risks. They have to sign reams of papers acknowledging that. At least the parents should have.

But you are forgetting that they are MORONS.
5   Automan Empire   ignore (1)   2021 Oct 25, 4:47pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

HunterTits says
They VOLUNTEERED for CLINICAL trials. They thus knew or should have known the risks.



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ESzxGYDkwG8 (relevant 11 second movie clip)
6   HeadSet   ignore (3)   2021 Oct 26, 5:55am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

HunterTits says
Hate to be a Devil's Advocate Dick here but:

They VOLUNTEERED for CLINICAL trials. They thus knew or should have known the risks. They have to sign reams of papers acknowledging that. At least the parents should have.

13 year olds can not legally volunteer for shit like this,. Not w/o parental consent. So that makes this entire article suspect on the BS meter.

That bit about volunteering would be relevant when it comes to suing the company. Seeing that the jab is dangerous and wanting to get the word out is a different issue.
7   HunterTits   ignore (4)   2021 Oct 26, 6:40am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

HeadSet says
That bit about volunteering would be relevant when it comes to suing the company. Seeing that the jab is dangerous and wanting to get the word out is a different issue.


Not really. Clinical trials are not the same thing.
8   Patrick   ignore (1)   2021 Oct 27, 11:37pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

https://aaronsiri.substack.com/p/fda-buries-data-on-seriously-injured


FDA Buries Data on Seriously Injured Child in Pfizer’s Covid-19 Clinical Trial
The FDA should not authorize the Pfizer jab for younger children until it conducts a proper trial

Aaron Siri
Oct 22

When Stephanie and Patrick de Garay enrolled their 12-year-old child Maddie and her two brothers in Pfizer’s Covid-19 clinical trial, they believed they were doing the right thing.

That decision has turned into a nightmare. Maddie, a previously healthy, energetic, full of life child, was within 24 hours of her second dose reduced to crippling, scream-inducing pain that landed her in the emergency room where she described feeling like someone was “ripping [her] heart out though [her] neck.”
9   Patrick   ignore (1)   2021 Oct 31, 8:42pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

https://boriquagato.substack.com/p/pfizer-ceo-on-vaccine-hesitancy/comments


(propaganda video of satanic Pfizer CEO blaming the unvaxxed)

if must be fear. it’s always fear. if you won’t get the jab, it’s because you’re chicken.

so we must threaten them with the health of their loved ones if they do not comply.

the whole set of talking points is kind of masterful if you unplug the part of your brain than handles morality. it’s one of those little chocolate cakes some french chef must have made in a uranium centrifuge: it’s the size of a matchbox and weighs more than a manhole cover.

if the fallacy density of his seemingly simple statements got any higher, it would risk tearing a hole in the universe. you need like 12 years at evil marketing school to craft a statement like that.


this would be a grotesque enough set of false framing, no true scotsman, gaslighting, straw manning, and outright emotional manipulation even if the vaccines stopped the spread of covid.

but clearly, they do not. at all.

so in the face of that “data” the “facts” become plain: this is pure emotional manipulation.

he’s teaching you how to use dishonest psyop tactics as a form of big pharma MLM and framing the literal abandonment of rationality as “facts and data.” it enables and validates the complaint and weaponizes them as a self-aggrandized guilt trip marketing vector against the rest.

“if you loved me, you’d get vaxxed!”

you just got hired as an unpaid sales intern.

at least they learned from getting busted last time and having to pay out big!

unfortunately, what they learned was “let’s not get caught next time.”

alas, despite this “expansive corporate integrity agreement” they seem to be the same old pfizer only now they were smart enough to be sure they banned doctors from speaking against them, sold them straight to governments, and got full, blanket lability waivers for these products that no one could possibly be hesitant about if they knew the facts.

because that’s what you always do when the data and facts are on your side, right?


pfizer CEO on vaccine hesitancy
el gato malo 10 hr ago
197
“vaccine hesitancy is NEVER based on facts and data.”
well, i’m glad we cleared THAT up…
(video playable)

Twitter avatar for @Kukicat7
Wittgenstein
@Kukicat7
Pfizer's chief executive Albert Bourla on how to speak to vaccine hesitant....
October 31st 2021

8 Retweets20 Likes
if must be fear. it’s always fear. if you won’t get the jab, it’s because you’re chicken.

so we must threaten them with the health of their loved ones if they do not comply.

the whole set of talking points is kind of masterful if you unplug the part of your brain than handles morality. it’s one of those little chocolate cakes some french chef must have made in a uranium centrifuge: it’s the size of a matchbox and weighs more than a manhole cover.

if the fallacy density of his seemingly simple statements got any higher, it would risk tearing a hole in the universe. you need like 12 years at evil marketing school to craft a statement like that.


this would be a grotesque enough set of false framing, no true scotsman, gaslighting, straw manning, and outright emotional manipulation even if the vaccines stopped the spread of covid.

but clearly, they do not. at all.

so in the face of that “data” the “facts” become plain: this is pure emotional manipulation.

he’s teaching you how to use dishonest psyop tactics as a form of big pharma MLM and framing the literal abandonment of rationality as “facts and data.” it enables and validates the complaint and weaponizes them as a self-aggrandized guilt trip marketing vector against the rest.

“if you loved me, you’d get vaxxed!”

you just got hired as an unpaid sales intern.

at least they learned from getting busted last time and having to pay out big!

unfortunately, what they learned was “let’s not get caught next time.”


alas, despite this “expansive corporate integrity agreement” they seem to be the same old pfizer only now they were smart enough to be sure they banned doctors from speaking against them, sold them straight to governments, and got full, blanket lability waivers for these products that no one could possibly be hesitant about if they knew the facts.

because that’s what you always do when the data and facts are on your side, right?


i know a lot of folks in biotech and most are fine people. lots of small companies work on lots of really important science. it’s where all the actual innovation is taking place. big pharma is another beast altogether. these are marketing and manipulation experts. they lie, bribe, cheat, and rig markets. they capture regulators in a revolving door of sinecure and employment opportunities.

they play dirty enough to make a congolese cobalt miner break down and weep.

they are not your friends.

and they do not have you best interests at heart.





about   best comments   contact   one year ago   suggestions