3
0

Remember, The oligarchy are using cancel culture to control us.


 invite response                
2022 Jan 6, 10:58am   477 views  17 comments

by Patrick   ➕follow (55)   💰tip   ignore  

https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/resiliency-surviving-in-the-age-of?source=patrick.net





Cancel culture refers to the popular practice of withdrawing support for ( canceling) public figures and companies after they have done or said something considered objectionable or offensive. Cancel culture is generally discussed as being performed on social media in the form of group shaming.

On Joe Rogan last week, I spoke of Mass Formation and how the hypnotized are fully bought into the idea that vaccine mandates for a leaky vaccine with poor efficacy against Omicron was a mass formation hypnotic event. This idea went viral on the internet and the topic of “mass formation” skyrocketed in the search engines. This is when google decided to manually edit the search results. The pasted image from an article (below) tells the story:

On Joe Rogan last week, I spoke of Mass Formation and how the hypnotized are fully bought into the idea that vaccine mandates for a leaky vaccine with poor efficacy against Omicron was a mass formation hypnotic event. This idea went viral on the internet and the topic of “mass formation” skyrocketed in the search engines. This is when google decided to manually edit the search results. The pasted image from an article (below) tells the story:




The question is why are the oligarchs so scared of me? Of Peter? Of physicians who advocate for early treatment? Of you? Let’s face it, it is because our combined efforts to stop the illegal mandates, to stop the jabbing of children with experimental vaccines and to stop the propaganda and censorship is having an impact. It is because we are all realizing how the Internet is being controlled to influence us in how we think.

So what can people do to limit the censorship in their own lives and to help build a less censored Internet? An Internet that does not exude quite so much propaganda?

FULL STOP -GET OFF GOOGLE!

Stop using google as your search engine. There are so many good search engines available now. I use Duck, Duck GO - but there are many others. The advantages are that the results are not politically motivated. ...

But worse than the ad issue, is that now we have evidence that Google is manipulating the searches for their own political machinations. What happened with the “mass formation” example above shows that google searches have become nothing more than a propaganda arm for the US government and the oligarchs.

While you are at it, consider dumping Google mail. Many people have migrated to Proton mail because is it fully encrypted and your emails are not scanned to bias your searches. I do maintain legacy google email addresses, because this is how many people know how to get hold of me but eventually, I will terminate these too. These days I use proton mail as my main account as much as possible.

FULL STOP - GET OFF OF YOUTUBE whenever possible. Youtube is censoring COVID-19 related content to fall in line with Faucism. That means if the messaging is at all different from what the FDA or CDC or NIAID promotes - as directed by King Biden and Consigliere Fauci, the videos are removed and the creator blocked after three “strikes” of uploading such videos This absolute has created both a situation of censorship for the user, but also self-censorship by the creators of content. So, let’s all work to build alternative platforms for our videos.

I know, some videos we have to watch via youtube. But as much as possible, use alternatives like Vimeo, Rumble and Bitchute.

Finally, a shout out to Signal.

Comments 1 - 17 of 17        Search these comments

1   🎂 Tenpoundbass   2022 Jan 6, 11:05am  

The Cancel Culture has lost their platform. It depended on Everyone being on Twitter, Facebook, Youtube. Without everyone it turns into an echo chamber.
An echo chamber will cancel itself.
2   richwicks   2022 Jan 6, 1:11pm  

Tenpoundbass says
The Cancel Culture has lost their platform. It depended on Everyone being on Twitter, Facebook, Youtube.


Yep.

This is how the Internet was designed to work. It pissed me off so damned much that people were whining about the censorship of these asshole companies, instead of just leaving them which is what we USED to do 20 years ago when they pulled this shit.

It's a lot slower than it used to be (it's taken years to get the whining pussies to leave), but it seems they are finally starting to do it.

Google, Facebook and Twitter are going to be as relevant as Yahoo! is in under a decade. Mind you, they aren't EVER going bankrupt, they will just become irrelevant.

Eventually the NEW companies are going to fuck over their users though - then people will finally learn "don't trust corporations". There's already the infrastructure for a distributed Internet, but man, it's not at ALL ready.

Web pages will just be portals to content stored locally on your machine. Viral content will scale up. Instead of just grabbing a file from a server, you'll be getting it from everybody else that has previously downloaded it in the last hour or day or so. 2^32 = 4 billion, it's exponential. Say everybody on the planet tries to get a 1 GB file, and it takes 1 second for a computer to upload as much data as it has downloaded (as it's being viewed). It will take 32 seconds for everybody on the planet to be able to access that same block of data. 33 if there are 8 billion viewers. 34 if there are 16 billion..

The only thing sites like youtube, odysee, rumble, etc will do is provide a pointer to your data. They won't store or serve the data itself.
3   GNL   2022 Jan 6, 1:16pm  

richwicks says
Tenpoundbass says
The Cancel Culture has lost their platform. It depended on Everyone being on Twitter, Facebook, Youtube.


Yep.

This is how the Internet was designed to work. It pissed me off so damned much that people were whining about the censorship of these asshole companies, instead of just leaving them which is what we USED to do 20 years ago when they pulled this shit.

It's a lot slower than it used to be (it's taken years to get the whining pussies to leave), but it seems they are finally starting to do it.

Google, Facebook and Twitter are going to be as relevant as Yahoo! is in under a decade. Mind you, they aren't EVER going bankrupt, they will just become irrelevant.

Eventually the NEW companies are going to fuck over their users though - then people will finally learn "don't trust corporations". There's already the infrastructure for a distributed Intern...

Well, what are we waiting for. Let's not talk about it...let's do it.
4   richwicks   2022 Jan 6, 1:30pm  

WineHorror1 says
Well, what are we waiting for. Let's not talk about it...let's do it.


It's basically done - it's just bit-torrent.

What I'm looking into is NAT traversal so you don't have to fiddle with your router which nearly nobody will do or know how to do - there's also the problem of using DHT which is how you find out what computers have what file. DHT isn't efficient.

I'm messing around with IPFS and reading how that works - it's well documented and explained: https://docs.ipfs.io/?source=patrick.net - it's got a bunch of tutorials. It's also using DHT (I think) which is why this is so slow:

https://ipfs.io/ipfs/QmTaT7iwYRgoSRWF6y3fJiofshTfZxsHMCy2K6vSUYRaJt?source=patrick.net

And if you have the Brave web browser, this might work:

ipfs://QmTaT7iwYRgoSRWF6y3fJiofshTfZxsHMCy2K6vSUYRaJt/

But once it gets going (connects) it works pretty well. The first one is going through a portal - i.e. it's picking up data from my machine, then moving it to server, then being sent to your computer. The second one MIGHT directly connect to my machine, or pick it up from another machine that has previously accessed it.

DHT needs to be a fallback, but the primary should be a central server, I think. The problem is that 128 GB is a LOT of storage, and it's $20 bucks now, so "centralized" might just be a bunch of hobbyists in a few years, if it's not now.

The other problem with IPFS is that if I add a file under that directory, the ID to access it changes. This can be mitigated with some sort of DNS replacement that is built into IPFS, but I've not gotten to that part of the tutorial yet.
5   GNL   2022 Jan 6, 2:01pm  

richwicks says
WineHorror1 says
Well, what are we waiting for. Let's not talk about it...let's do it.


It's basically done - it's just bit-torrent.

What I'm looking into is NAT traversal so you don't have to fiddle with your router which nearly nobody will do or know how to do - there's also the problem of using DHT which is how you find out what computers have what file. DHT isn't efficient.

I'm messing around with IPFS and reading how that works - it's well documented and explained: https://docs.ipfs.io/?source=patrick.net - it's got a bunch of tutorials. It's also using DHT (I think) which is why this is so slow:

https://ipfs.io/ipfs/QmTaT7iwYRgoSRWF6y3fJiofshTfZxsHMCy2K6vSUY...?source=patrick.net
I would say, if I can't click some buttons, it's not ready. At least in the times we live in anyway, no?
6   richwicks   2022 Jan 6, 2:03pm  

WineHorror1 says
I would say, if I can't click some buttons, it's not ready. At least in the times we live in anyway, no?


Oh, it's FAR from ready.

You should be able to click the links but it may take a LONG time for it to respond much less load. I'm trying on a few remote machines, and it's a bit spotty. Nowhere near prime time yet. The idea is sound, but... doesn't come close to working yet.

It will be working in a year or two I'll bet. I predict there's going to be more and more BS censorship, and pressure on SMALL companies. There will have to be a solution otherwise we're going to be buying everything from Amazon and Walmart, and nothing else.
7   richwicks   2022 Jan 6, 2:10pm  

HunterTits says
You might want to read https://www.amazon.com/dp/B01GMX5CQ0?source=patrick.net @richwicks Author creates a world with a distributed internet just like that or similar.


Haha, I've heard of it.

I don't spend much time reading fiction any more, but I might give it a shot.

We will HAVE to move to a distributed internet. We could have done it in 2005, BUT if we made it people would be like "why would you use that? Piracy? For child porn? To sell drugs?" - and really, that's how it would have been mostly used.

People had to see what corrupt companies would do before a distributed internet could be made available, and it will be used not only in the best ways, the most innocuous ways, but also the worst ways. People were hoping that AMERICAN companies wouldn't betray the country. Well, they did.
8   richwicks   2022 Jan 6, 2:24pm  

HunterTits says
Children are abducted right off the street by child prostitution traffickers. So we should ban cars and roads because that is what were used to snatch them and (later) move them from client to client?


No.

If a system was made available to the public in which they could easily share ANY data they wanted without ANY oversight with encryption so it was IMPOSSIBLE to eavesdrop on it, even when law enforcement had VERY GOOD REASON to believe (highly) illegal data was being shared - it would have been banned, and the public would have supported it at that time. The REPUBLICANS would be championing its abolishment, and "terrorism" would have been brought up, and soccer moms would screaming and crying about "terrorists" having secret communication plus the child pornographers.

That's what would have happened it if was made available in 2005.

I'm fucking glad it didn't come out then. If it did and you were a "republican conservative" then, it's HIGHLY likely you'd be attacking me for promoting this technology at that time.

Now that the majority of people now realize that the "war on terror" was a scam, and that our government produces propaganda and engages in censorship, NOW this technology can be made widely available. Public support is needed.

HunterTits says
Same for drug dealing? How many people dive up to the neighborhood seller under the overpass to conduct said biz, eh?


Nobody sane cares about drug dealing. People who want drugs will get them. Now that Ross Ulbricht is in prison FOR LIFE, "conservatives" might be rethinking their support for draconian measures. All he did was make a website. Well, every website will have the same ability to be the Silk Road.
9   AmericanKulak   2022 Jan 6, 4:22pm  

Drug Users are garbage who really fuck up a neighborhood and commit crimes. This is now proven by Hillsborough County, FL and SFBA.

They must either be hanged for 2nd possession, or forcibly removed upon a positive drug tests to Islands or Isolated areas to a Mad Max situation, with all drugs imported into the area taxed at 33% to maintain the open air prison borders. They're going to die anyway, so fuck 'em, at least they'll die without stealing or breaking into non-drug users cars.

Free to smoke crack and do meth in the thunderdome, just not in a nice town. Unless they can make one, which likely won't happen. If they do, it's because a few went cold turkey, built a fence, and smashing druggies heads with maces at any gateways to keep them out.

SFBA is basically what happens with no enforcement of drug laws, massive petty crime, broken quality of life, broken windows, shit on the street, crazy/drug addled users making trouble for everybody. Most heavy drug users are on Medicaid and Government largess.

Prior to "Harmless Drug Users" in the 60s, the only troublesome population were some alcoholic hobos who flopped at the YMCA and pushed brooms around in the day time to make a few bucks for their booze and the flophouse. Even they wore Blazers and Leather Shoes. Methheads are total garbage that smash windows and loot and rape each other and the surrounding area.

Everything claimed about the 50s from Mass Media is a lousy dirty lie made by neurotic, anti-social, mentally ill beatniks and hippies, whose ideal policies can now be seen in SFBA, Philly, and Austin, and indeed with LGBTQ+ and no-fault divorce across the whole country. These Policies are proven failures. Ask people who were teens or older in the 50s, they will tell you how amazing it was. Trust people's actual experience over Hollywood/Sociologist Fantasy.
10   Patrick   2022 Jan 6, 7:56pm  

richwicks says
The only thing sites like youtube, odysee, rumble, etc will do is provide a pointer to your data. They won't store or serve the data itself.



The problem is that most people don't have good upload bandwidth.

If they did, then it would be quite possible for everyone to be hosting content.

Also, most routers and most phones block all incoming connections.

Fix those two problems, and the tech giants will have a giant problem. But I think the ISPs and phone carriers are actively conspiring to limit upload bandwidth.
11   richwicks   2022 Jan 7, 8:17am  

Patrick says
The problem is that most people don't have good upload bandwidth.

If they did, then it would be quite possible for everyone to be hosting content.


They don't have to have good upload bandwidth.

OK, let's say the bandwidth is limited to a MERE 10 KB/s - and you have to send 2 GB to 2 people. How long does that take?

(1024*1024*1024*2*2) / (10*1024) = 419,430 seconds = 116 hours or about 5 days

Now if EVERYBODY on the planet had the same restrictions, it takes SLIGHTLY longer than that for everybody on the planet to receive the file because receivers can transmit packets as soon as they receive them. About a week for the entire planet to get it.

Bandwidth isn't the problem, it's finding out who has what parts of the file available to upload and NAT traversal. THAT'S the problem. There's also going to be people that want to receive a file, but not transmit it again, that can be dealt with.

Patrick says
Also, most routers and most phones block all incoming connections.


That's where NAT traversal comes in. For low latency, you HAVE to use UDP because TCP is ack/nack - with UDP you just send the packet and pray to god it gets there, although you can build an ack/nak on top of that. TCP the packet isn't at the destination until it's confirmed that it was received - this adds latency.

Patrick says
Fix those two problems, and the tech giants will have a giant problem. But I think the ISPs and phone carriers are actively conspiring to limit upload bandwidth.


No doubt they are.

The slowest I've EVER had for an Internet connection was an upload speed of around 30 KB/s - it's painful, but if I wanted to send a film to a friend, they could get it overnight. That was in 2000. 30 KB/s seems ridiculously slow now but it's usable. You can do remote desktop with it quite painlessly.

Here - check out your bandwidth:

https://www.speedtest.net/?source=patrick.net

I bet at WORST you will get 128 KB/s upload. That's a megabyte every 8 seconds. You probably have a typical 1 MB/s at least, but I won't be surprised if was 8 times that. At 1 MB/s you can stream 1080p video from your computer to wherever you are on the planet - anything beyond that, it's really gravy. On a 5 MB/s download line, it's HARDLY any different than a 100 MB/s download line, because the server becomes the limitation. 5 MB/s down and 1 MB/s up is pretty standard now.

If you care to know, I can show you how to set that up but you pretty much know how to do it.

1) setup a web server on a computer (a raspberry pi will do)
2) put a password on it
3) open up for 80 and 443 on your router to forward traffic on those ports to your pi
4) use Let's Encrypt to get an HTTPS certificate
5) setup a cron job to renew your certificate once a month, once a week at most.

Voila - you can now be in Bermuda and access any data sitting on your webserver.
12   Patrick   2022 Jan 29, 9:14pm  

https://greenwald.substack.com/p/the-pressure-campaign-on-spotify?source=patrick.net


The Pressure Campaign on Spotify to Remove Joe Rogan Reveals the Religion of Liberals: Censorship
All factions, at certain points, succumb to the impulse to censor. But for the Democratic Party's liberal adherents, silencing their adversaries has become their primary project.
13   GNL   2022 Jan 29, 9:25pm  

richwicks says

I bet at WORST you will get 128 KB/s upload.

The link you provided tests download speeds. How do I test upload speeds?
14   Karloff   2022 Jan 30, 1:19am  

speedtest.net will also show your upload speeds.
15   Shaman   2022 Jan 30, 7:07am  

Leftists are the Fourth Reich, literally the Nazis of our generation. Anyone identifying with them should be shunned from polite society or community with decent people.
16   WookieMan   2022 Jan 30, 7:28am  

It's working.... Literally just had a lifelong friend get covid. She's wearing a mask inside her own home. And this is in hill billy IL where we haven't worn masks.

My mind is blown. I was going to text the group we're all in, but don't want to stir the shit. I'm starting to realize that facts and data aren't acknowledged unless you're a doctor that has your same stance. I'm really astonished how dumb my own friends are with multiple degrees and shit.

We have a perfect group of people to study. Kids. They survive covid. Take the masks off at school and see if cases go up or down. Our district tracks every case. The people in charge are afraid they've be wrong. Emperor has no clothes. It's as clear as can be vaccines don't work. If we can find out mask don't work with a relative control group, we can be done with all this shit in two weeks if vaccines and masks don't work.
17   Ceffer   2022 Jan 30, 8:36am  

Vaccines work perfectly well as fear totems instruments of mass murder, which is the only thing that matters. You think a bunch of democidal psychopaths who regard themselves as exempt from consequences and you as useless eater cattle are going to do something good for you?

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions