patrick.net

Thanks, this looks really good.

I like this.
I hope over time people will realize that they were lied to and abused by assholes on all sides,

Damn! Fuckng brilliant! Thanks, Bd6r.

The US and the World appeared to need a vaccine developed and produced. We forked up serious Federal support and threw caution to the wind via Operation Warp Speed. The vaccine policies were coming from the healthcare authorities. In our haste, all safeguards were removed, which led via shoddy methodology to produce a product of questionable efficacy pushed on the public with oppressive tactics. The medium and long-term risks are unknown.
Ivermectin. Early treatment of the disease was completely neglected by policy. Frontline doctors trying to McGyver their way into solutions using Ivermectin and other drugs were shut down completely. Careers were destroyed. The public was duped by a massive media campaign and overt censorship. All this was to ensure that the vaccines and patent-protected antiviral drugs could be developed and sold. There are, however, darker and more sinister interpretations.
The lockdowns and social distancing policies came almost exclusively from the medical authorities paying no attention whatsoever to the socioeconomic and other health consequences.

Figure 1. The Covid-19 Venn Diagram

In short, we gave healthcare “authorities” autocratic control over every facet of our society. Rochelle Walensky, the Director of the CDC, went so far as to set policy on apartment evictions. How fucked up is that? We socialized the healthcare costs and privatized the profits. Where have I heard that one before? The Overton Window is now stuck wide open. The FDA and CDC won’t go quiescent, and many of us won’t trust them now. The next crisis will be sooner than you can imagine and be accompanied by calls for further largesse and lockdowns. It will seem so natural to comply. The new normal is in society’s DNA.

If you want to test a man’s character, give him power.

~ Abraham Lincoln

Who were the architects of this edifice? It is hard to say, but career bureaucrats Anthony Fauci and Deborah Birx were the spokespersons fully backed by a compliant media to keep The Narrative alive. So, let’s not beat around the bush: Fauci and Birx are self-important scientific illiterates. In his book, Stanford Professor of Medicine Scott Atlas tells of how Fauci never invoked a scientific argument or a scientific study—never. The irony that Fauci never “followed the science” makes my head hurt. Meanwhile, Birx routinely downloaded specious data off public internet sites without a clue about their veracity or the meaning. These two twits dominated the global pandemic response. I’m just starting Kennedy’s new tell-all book in which he tears The Most Trusted Assclown in America a new one.

Fuelmich's Nuremberg court filings are also good reads. That, Collum, and RFK Jr's book, are probably just about all you need to understand the state of the democide and pandemic fraud if you want to keep reading about things. I have a saturation point because I don't see much point in dragging the fraud and its fraudulent statistics over and over. We don't know what is real except the psychopathic intent.

Ceffer says

I have a saturation point because I don't see much point in dragging the fraud and its fraudulent statistics over and over.

Same here. What makes me depressed though is that Collum type thinking is in minority in science. When I tell these FACTS to many of my colleagues they run away without engaging in discussion, or tell me that I am crazy just like Collum! The only thing that would change their mind is probably getting very sick from vaxx.

@Bd6r According to Dr. DeSmet, the reason they run away is that they rightly calculate that it would cause them great anxiety to conclude that you are right. They don't want to risk feeling that uncomfortable. They would rather pretend it's all OK.

Maybe it is better not to tell them anything, but just ask them a question or two. People are much better about accepting conclusions they arrive at themselves.

Like, "Why is it forbidden for hospitals and doctors to give ivermectin for Wuhan Virus?"

And if they say it's ineffective, you could point them to the 100+ studies which show it helps, and ask if those are all wrong.

Or maybe just "Can you think of a motive to deny the efficacy of a really cheap treatment?"

I ask, and they still run away or try to rationalize the conclusion away. I have nearly given up.
Example: I send them studies that cloth masks dont work. Result: they look sheepish wearing mask in my presence, yet wear it despite no mandates in TX. Two or three went to wearing n95...so not the outcome I expected. May be 20!!!!pct dont wear masks. About vaxx I ask why would a 20 yr old student need one if his chance of dying from kung flu is lower than chance of being killed in car crash coming to school. I get complete radio silence in return.

Desmet also states that the ONLY way to snap these foolish ferrets out of their spell is to refocus the fear to something other than Trump or The Cooties Virus. He suggests that making them aware of the escalating Authoritarian trends, and making them understand that as the greater danger, is the only way out.
I am not optimistic, I think the notion of Total State Power will only excite them.

Bd6r says

I get complete radio silence in return.

Maybe they think that to agree with reality would be to admit that their whole world view is wrong and they would have to switch political "sides".

That would be very painful for them.

A very interesting tidbit from the article was the virus has 29 proteins that the body can recognize, while the vaccine (mRNA shots) makes you produce one protein.

It seems obvious that the natural immunity of a survivor would be vastly better than a person who has been vaccinated. (29 proteins vs 1)

Yes, I've read several articles which make this point.

In particular, you want your body to recognize the "nucleocapsid" proteins, which are the ones at the core of the virus, surrounding its RNA payload.

The vaxx completely fails at this.

Yes, it is a narrowly defined immunogen resulting in narrow and easily evaded immunity. And it puts specific selective pessure on the spike protein.

The Novavax vaccine, from that perspective, is no better. Yes, not gene therapy, and yes, a protein vaccine which can't be assimilated into your DNA via revers transcriptase, but still only the spike protein.

They are fast food "vaccines."

And one reason for the FUBAR is the low bar GIGO vaccine development technology, the neutralization assay. This is ancient technology, but why rock the boat when it gets shyte product onto the market? In this day and age when we can get a nice readout of the T cell repertoire, it seems that the vax industry prefers to live in the dark ages.

Patrick says

Yes, I've read several articles which make this point.

In particular, you want your body to recognize the "nucleocapsid" proteins, which are the ones at the core of the virus, surrounding its RNA payload.

The vaxx completely fails at this.

It is this reason that the vaccines not only fail, but likely cause harm. They train the immune system NOT to recognize the N proteins because they're focusing on spike.