5
0

LEAKED GRANT PROPOSAL DETAILS HIGH-RISK CORONAVIRUS RESEARCH - CONSPIRACY FACTists VINDICATED


 invite response                
2022 Jan 11, 9:55am   508 views  11 comments

by Bd6r   ➕follow (2)   💰tip   ignore  

Something for y'all conspiracy FACTSists (as opposed to theorists) out there.

Before you read it, remember 2020 and how Trump and others were shouted down about Chinese lab leak theory. I am convinced now, based on facts below, that it was not only a lab leak, it was leak of a virus made in lab with US (NIH) and Chinese funding. The next question is, was it released on purpose or by accident, and if on purpose, then why.

https://theintercept.com/2021/09/23/coronavirus-research-grant-darpa/?source=patrick.net

A GRANT PROPOSAL written by the U.S.-based nonprofit the EcoHealth Alliance and submitted in 2018 to the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, or DARPA, provides evidence that the group was working — or at least planning to work — on several risky areas of research. Among the scientific tasks the group described in its proposal, which was rejected by DARPA, was the creation of full-length infectious clones of bat SARS-related coronaviruses and the insertion of a tiny part of the virus known as a “proteolytic cleavage site” into bat coronaviruses. Of particular interest was a type of cleavage site able to interact with furin, an enzyme expressed in human cells.

Since the genetic code of the coronavirus that caused the pandemic was first sequenced, scientists have puzzled over the “furin cleavage site.” This strange feature on the spike protein of the virus had never been seen in SARS-related betacoronaviruses, the class to which SARS-CoV-2, the coronavirus that causes the respiratory illness Covid-19, belongs.

The furin cleavage site enables the virus to more efficiently bind to and release its genetic material into a human cell and is one of the reasons that the virus is so easily transmissible and harmful. But scientists are divided over how this particular site wound up in the virus, and the cleavage site became a major focus of the heated debate over the origins of the pandemic.

Many who believe that the virus that caused the pandemic emerged from a laboratory have pointed out that it is unlikely that the particular sequence of amino acids that make up the furin cleavage site would have occurred naturally.

Comments 1 - 11 of 11        Search these comments

1   Ceffer   2022 Jan 11, 10:09am  

The chain of custody was elucidated in early 2020. I remember reading about it, including the artificiality of the virus as it stood at the time, DARPA origins, etc. etc.. Of course, the floor of public discourse belongs to those who lie most fervently, scream the loudest, the longest, and have the monolithic MSM on their side. What's old is new again. Buried, then resurrected. It must be Easter.
2   Bd6r   2022 Jan 11, 10:14am  

Ceffer says
The chain of custody was elucidated in early 2020. I remember reading about it, including the artificiality of the virus as it stood at the time, DARPA origins, etc. etc.. Of course, the floor of public discourse belongs to those who lie most fervently, scream the loudest, the longest, and have the monolithic MSM on their side. What's old is new again. Buried, then resurrected. It must be Easter.

Yeah, that was one of the early "conspiracy theories" which, with the leaked DARPA grant application, is now a conspiracy fact. Although, this conspiracy "theory" could have been moved into conspiracy "fact" territory in early 2020 if clueless and/or corrupt journos would have read a 2015 paper in a not-so-obscure Nature Medicine: https://www.nature.com/articles/nm.3985.pdf?source=patrick.net
3   Patrick   2022 Jan 11, 10:25am  

I think that it was always obvious that Wuhan Virus came out of the Wuhan Institute of Virology, but the forces arrayed against this logical conclusion were immense.

Not just the corporate media, Pfizer, and government forces, but also the psychological difficulty of admitting that US taxpayer funding created this virus in China, and that Trump was right about the lab. To admit that Trump was right about anything at all is very hard for most Democrats. He was right about HCQ as well, but the truth of that will probably take quite a bit longer to come out.

I'm still quite pissed at Trump for promoting the obviously ineffective and dangerous vaxx.

The big remaining question is whether the virus was created by Fauci specifically to sell the vaxx. I think it was. The motive is obvious, and the speed with which the vaxx came out is extremely suspicious. Peter Daszak could prove this to be true, but he would have to admit guilt, so I don't think he will. I would not be surprised if he suddenly had a fatal accident anyway.
4   Bd6r   2022 Jan 11, 10:31am  

Patrick says
The big remaining question is whether the virus was created by Fauci specifically to sell the vaxx.

Virus might have been a failed attempt at a live vaxx.
5   NuttBoxer   2022 Jan 11, 10:31am  

Bd6r says
Something for y'all conspiracy FACTSists (as opposed to theorists) out there.


Conspiracist's is a more accurate term. Dropping "theory" means it's factual.
6   Bd6r   2022 Jan 11, 10:33am  

NuttBoxer says
Conspiracist's is a more accurate term. Dropping "theory" means it's factual.

I am annoying my colleagues by telling them that covid conspiracy THEORISTS have now been proven to be conspiracy FACT-ISTS. As usual, they run away.

A year ago I was called a conspiracy theorist because I said that kung flu was possibly made in lab.
7   Patrick   2022 Jan 11, 10:46am  

Yes, my own mother-in-law mocked me for suggesting that the virus came from the lab adjacent to the initial outbreak. But she seems to get her news from CNN.

Perhaps the virus was created as a bio-weapon, and after it was released or escaped, Fauci simply saw the opportunity to funnel money to Pfizer etc by pushing the vaxx and disparaging early treatment. That's also possible.
8   Patrick   2022 Jan 11, 7:53pm  

https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/tidal-wave-of-documents-on-gain-of?source=patrick.net


Tidal Wave of Documents on Gain-of-Function and the Leak of the Virus
Stuff is starting to get interesting (and undeniable)

There is so much news hitting the streets that is that is being censored by main stream media and social media today, that it is overwhelming easy comprehension.

Let’s start with the letter to sent to Secretary of the HHS, Xavier Becerra from Representatives Jim Jordan (Ranking Member, Committee on the Judiciary) and James Comer (Ranking Member, Committee on Oversight and Reform). Here is the opening excerpt:




... Now, I have all sorts of questions about this. My first and foremost question is why would the researchers chose a chimera that attaches to human ACE2 receptors as the target?


https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/house-republicans-release-damning-fauci-emails-suggesting-concealed-knowledge-lab-leak?source=patrick.net

Sounds like a decision has been made to throw Fauci and Collins under the bus to protect the other mass murderers like Bourla.
10   Bd6r   2022 Jan 12, 8:25am  

Patrick says
Sounds like a decision has been made to throw Fauci and Collins under the bus to protect the other mass murderers like Bourla.

Fact that Collins pre-emptively resigned tells that this was brewing for quite a while. However, usually liars who are high enough in bureaucracy chain get a slap on the wrist. Alternatively, they die from Clintonicide. Lets hope it will be the second outcome.

What should happen here is prison time for Fauxci and Collins, no Fed grants ever for all signatories of Fauxci-prepared letters, and disbandment of NIAID as a minimum and NIH as maximum. That will never, ever happen.
11   NuttBoxer   2022 Jan 12, 8:54am  

I remember looking into this when it all started about two years ago. There was evidence it came out of Wuhan, that the lab was backed by international interests, including the NIH. So why wasn't it investigated then(we know why). Seems to me if you intentionally engineer a disease, then release it, you are criminally liable. Whether the release was intentional or not is irrelevant to anything other than the sentencing. Manslaughter is not intentional, but you still go to jail.

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions