2
0

The ruthless corruption, fraud, and lies––it’s all being done to assure indemnity for Pfizer


 invite response                
2022 Feb 5, 7:50pm   298 views  3 comments

by Patrick   ➕follow (55)   💰tip   ignore  

https://tobyrogers.substack.com/p/thinking-points-feb-5-2022?source=patrick.net


Steven DiMattei


Following my earlier thread, I’ve had a revelation I’d like to share

Thesis: Everything is being done for the sole purpose of getting Comirnaty on
the child immunization schedule so that under NCVIA Pfizer has no legal
liability. The prolongation of the pandemic,

the extension after extension of Emergency Use Authorization, the forced
mandates, especially the aggressive attacks on our children and forthcoming
babies, the ruthless corruption, fraud, and lies––it’s all being done to assure
indemnity for Pfizer.

Or look at this from another angle. What if we were to declare the pandemic
over tomorrow, and end the Emergency Use Authorization? What would happen?
Note: this would immediately end Pfizer’s legal indemnity per the PREP Act and
at that moment wouldn’t they be legally liable

for every death, adverse effect, or harm caused by the vaccines? Lawsuits would
be flying. Thus, they cannot have that scenario arise, at all costs¬¬––even
harm and death to children I’m sure these criminals have weighed. It all must
keep going until 7/2024 when Comirnaty’s

post-approval pediatric studies are finished (the studies have already been
approved regardless of harm and deaths to children, oh the criminality) and
their bio-toxin is on the child immunization schedule. . It all makes sense to
me now.

Pierre Korry kept us focused in Senator Johnson’s conference on the pervasive
corruption of the pharmaceutical complex, but the Why of it all was not
answered. I think this explains it. Pfizer cannot not have Comirnaty on the
child schedule for fear of legal repercussions, and

thus the pandemic and the EUA cannot end until that goal is met and thus why
the aggressive and perverted push to vaccinate children at an alarmingly unsafe
rate. This must be the hidden agenda that is keeping mandates, EUA, and
children vaccine trials going despite the fact

that Covid seems to be abating.

Maybe I’ll write this up as a small op-ed.

So, did they release Omicron to keep the pandemic going since they need EUA to
last till 7/2024 according to the BLA? Thoughts?


Lots of people have figured this out now — RFK Jr., Steven DiMattei, me, nearly everyone in the medical freedom movement.

Makes me wonder about Republican elected officials though. This is the largest criminal act in the U.S. since slavery and Republican elected officials are doing… '“thoughts and prayers” again!? Reminds me of the saying, “with friends like this…”

Comments 1 - 3 of 3        Search these comments

1   Patrick   2022 Feb 6, 5:09pm  

https://www.thecentersquare.com/content/tncms/live/?source=patrick.net


Judge blocks schools from enforcing Pritzker's mask, vaccine mandates, refers to policies as 'type of evil'
Gov. Pritzker to appeal

(The Center Square) – Students attending one of the 145 schools across Illinois who are part of a sweeping lawsuit won’t have to wear a mask if they don’t want to, unless they’re given due process. Same goes for certain school staff who don’t want to take weekly COVID-19 tests for not being vaccinated. They must also have due process.

In a 30-page ruling late Friday, Sangamon County Circuit Court Judge Raylene Grischow “deemed null and void” the governor’s emergency rules through the Illinois Department of Public Health concerning COVID-19 mitigations for schools.

“The arbitrary method as to contact tracing and masking in general continue to raise fair questions as to the legality of the Executive Orders in light of violations of healthy children’s substantive due process rights,” Grischow wrote. “Statutory rights have attempted to be bypassed through the issuance of Executive Orders and Emergency Rules … This type of evil is exactly what the law was intended to constrain.”

Schools impacted by litigation brought by more than 700 parents and dozens of school staff are temporarily restrained from enforcing Gov. J.B. Pritzker’s COVID-19 mask and vaccine mandates. After the ruling, Pritzker said the state will appeal.

Pritzker’s mandates for masks and exclusion policies in schools and vaccines or testing for teachers have been in place since last fall.

Despite COVID-19 metrics “going in the right direction,” Pritzker on Friday still wouldn’t say when he’ll lift the mask mandates.

"I believe that we should remove masks as soon as we possibly can," Pritzker said before Grischow’s ruling. "I'm constantly listening to the doctors and scientists and encouraging them, 'when can we do this, what's the right time, what's the right way to do it.' And so, very hopeful we can make an announcement about that."

The Illinois Attorney General’s office didn't immediately respond to the order when asked for comment. The office is defending Pritzker's administration against the lawsuit.

The Pritzker administration and school district defendants are temporarily restrained from enforcing the executive orders, the judge said. School districts are restrained from requiring masks if a person objects, “except during the terms of lawful order of quarantine issued from their respective health department, in accordance with the IDPH Act.”

Attorney Thomas DeVore argued on behalf of parents and their students and school staff that in order for an individual to be required to comply with a public health measure like masking, vaccines or testing, or to be excluded from school, they must be given due process by law.

"I can only hope this might be the time for the Governor to lift what the Court has found to be illegal mandates and let the good people of this state get back to their lives," DeVore told The Center Square after the ruling.

Districts are also restrained from requiring staff who are unvaccinated from submitting to weekly COVID-19 tests “in order to occupy the school building without first providing them due process.”

Grischow’s order also restricts schools from refusing admittance to their buildings for teachers and students if they are deemed a “close contact” of a confirmed probable COVID-19 case “without providing due process.”

Earlier in the day Friday, Grischow denied motions in the separate cases for there to be class status. That means, the temporary restraining order only impacts the plaintiffs and the school districts part of the lawsuit.
2   HeadSet   2022 Feb 6, 5:34pm  

Patrick says
Earlier in the day Friday, Grischow denied motions in the separate cases for there to be class status. That means, the temporary restraining order only impacts the plaintiffs and the school districts part of the lawsuit.


Weak....
3   Patrick   2022 Feb 7, 5:13pm  

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/pfizer-fda-lose-bid-delay-release-covid-vaccine-safety-data/?source=patrick.net


02/07/22

COVID › NEWS

Pfizer, FDA Lose Bid to Further Delay Release of COVID Vaccine Safety Data
A federal judge last week rejected a bid by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and Pfizer to delay the court-ordered release of nearly 400,000 pages of documents pertaining to the approval of Pfizer’s COVID vaccine.

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions