patrick.net

https://troypoint.com/us-bill-s-686-the-restrict-act/

US Bill S. 686: The Restrict Act – 20 Years In Prison For VPN Use?

Bill text:

https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/senate-bill/686/text

https://palexander.substack.com/p/dr-naomi-wolf-and-mark-steyn-under

DR NAOMI WOLF and Mark Steyn under censorship attack by UK MEDIA REGULATOR...

As a journalist, I am appalled that Ofcom censured me for primary source evidence directly from Pfizer’s own internal documents released under court order, presented in reports compiled by 3500 medical and scientific experts, including oncologists, radiologists, medical fraud investigators, RNs, biological scientists, and a range of other physicians and clinicians.

The documents contain 1223 fatalities in three months. In two of the reports compiled by our experts, using the Pfizer documents themselves, half of the adverse events, which included fatalities, occurred within 48 hours of the injection.

When it came to unborn babies, the deaths in Pfizer’s own documents include scores of fetuses, some of which Pfizer identified as suffering from ‘transplacental’ exposure to the vaccine.

A baby died after drinking its vaccinated mother’s breast milk; vaccinated mothers’ breast milk was found by Pfizer in its own review to be contaminated and injurious to babies.

Given that Pfizer knew by Feb 2021 the many ways in which its mrna vaccine was killing adults, babies and fetuses, with adverse events ranging from 3 to 1 to 8 to 1 ratios affecting women, and yet did not inform the public, but rather launched intensive campaigns to urge people, including pregnant women, to take this dangerous product, of course it is a mass murder event.

https://slaynews.com/news/montana-first-state-completely-ban-tiktok/

Montana Becomes First State to Completely Ban TikTok

Not a fan of TikTok, but this is a clear violation of the First Amendment. If they get away with it, patrick.net will also be banned.

"The Texas dairy farm explosion that allegedly killed 20,000 cows is bunk."

What kind of an explosion was it?

"Investigators said an engine fire in the manure hauler caused the explosion.' https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/05/investigators-reveal-cause-texas-dairy-farm-explosion-that/

And get this, the driver of the the manure hauler was trying to put out the fire with a fire extinguisher right before the explosion. And he survived the explosion but 20,000 cows died!

They expect us to believe this nonsense?

To add insult to injury "A State Fire Marshal report... did not determine what caused the engine fire..."

This is in my thinking BS.

https://twitter.com/ClownWorld/status/1660624077269405697?ref_src=patrick.net

https://reclaimthenet.org/australia-covid-social-media-censorship

May 24, 2023
Australia Ordered Social Media To Censor Covid-Related Posts Over 4,000 Times, Censored Non-Australians And Memes
The revelations come after a freedom of information request and insight from the Twitter files.

Putin on the Traditional Notions of Mother, Father, Family and Gender.

From a Putin speech on May 24, 2023 at the Eurasian Economic Forum:

Putin addressed the Globalist demand against Traditional Notions of Mother, Father, Family and Gender...

The advocates of this attack believe that they are introducing humanity to a new and better consciousness. And this, says Putin, is not new. Russia went through the same experience after the 1917 Revolution when the Bolsheviks relying on Marx and Engels promised to change the culture and customs of the country.

See https://twitter.com/CitizenFreePres/status/1661916524943409152?ref_src=patrick.net Watch at least the first 3:30 Minutes. -- 7:22 Minutes long.

Oh, will people be fined for the continuous stream of anti-white hatred and villification?

https://boriquagato.substack.com/p/the-security-state-turns-inward

https://www.leefang.com/p/biden-justice-dept-intervened-to?publication_id=1239256&post_id=126299522&isFreemail=true

Biden Justice Dept. Intervened to Block Release of Social Media Censorship Docs
Newly obtained emails reveal an attempt to censor the censorship documents. ...

The federal government maintains what is known as the “state secrets privilege,” which permits the Department of Justice to block the release of any information that could undermine national security. There are, no doubt, cases in which the federal government’s stated national security concerns provide a legitimate reason for withholding a document from the public.

But there is abundant evidence that the federal government abuses this power to shield itself from scrutiny. Multiple administrations in the past have intervened in record release cases to prevent transparency using similar legal tactics.

https://www.wnd.com/2023/06/criminal-charges-now-urged-police-arrested-christian-preaching/

Criminal charges now urged for police who arrested Christian for preaching
'You do have a crime on your tapes. It's your officers'

Criminal charges have been dropped against a Christian man who preached the Gospel in public this month at an LGBT event in Pennsylvania, and now many are calling for charges and lawsuits to be filed against the police who made the arrest.

As WND reported, Damon Atkins was arrested June 3 by Sgt. Bradly T. McClure on disorderly conduct charges after voicing biblical opposition to the Pride event in Reading, Pennsylvania.

But once prosecutors examined the video, Berks County authorities announced the dismissal of the charges against Atkins. ...

Comments posted on the district attorney's own Facebook page include:

"That sergeant lied on his arrest affidavit after blatantly violating Damon Atkins' constitutional rights. He should be charged locally (by your office) and/or federally (by the DOJ's Civil Rights Division). Regardless of criminal prosecution, I hope Damon Atkins makes an example for others by filing a Section 1983 suit in federal court against the city and police department."

"When are you bringing charges against the little tubby officer with an overexaggerated sense of self-importance and apparently a massive chip on his shoulder, and the two 'females' that felt that harassing and manhandling a citizen on public property ... after 60 seconds of 'existing' (doing nothing wrong)? When are these (hopefully soon to be ex-)cops going to be educated that their views and opinions don't trump the law, and since they're law enforcement, and can't seem to handle themselves or follow the law ... they're going to be given 'opportunities' to find other employment? This is inexecusable ...we all know it." ...

Officers who clearly violate basic Constitutional rights should be immediately fired at the very least, and hopefully also prosecuted for betraying their oath of office.

Patrick says

Criminal charges now urged for police who arrested Christian for preaching
'You do have a crime on your tapes. It's your officers'

"Urged?" By who? Nothing will happen to this cop.

Patrick says

Officers who clearly violate basic Constitutional rights should be immediately fired at the very least, and hopefully also prosecuted for betraying their oath of office.

Its a civil rights matter, and I don't expect DOJ to help investigate this. It can first be labeled as a false arrest.

If this involved the feds, then a Bivens Action would apply.

.

https://www.eugyppius.com/p/the-ominous-new-mood-of-the-american?publication_id=268621&post_id=128748416&isFreemail=true

All Western countries have a twofold political discourse, bifurcated into what I’d call formal and informal spheres. The formal sphere consists of the major press and broadcast media, where content is heavily influenced by corporate advertising; and of the establishment political parties and their politicians. This sphere is an arena for staged debates, for the performance of acceptable opinion and for the forging of broad political consensus on all matters which the establishment considers important. The formal sphere still makes sporadic efforts to cast itself as the whole discourse, but especially since the rise of the internet it’s hard to deny the existence of a vast informal discourse, sustained largely on social media, in smaller independent press venues and by outside political candidates. In Germany, this informal sphere, which consists of the populist AfD party and all media to the right of Axel Springer, is considered fundamentally illegitimate if not directly illegal. American political culture, which is genuinely influenced by speech protections more robust than those in Europe, requires a different approach. Before 2016, the American informal sphere was largely unmoderated, apparently because the establishment considered it politically unimportant. After the populist backlash of that crucial year, social media became the object of unusual fear and scrutiny, while steps were taken behind the scenes to neuter its political influence. ...

Tucker Carlson, who served as a crucial juncture between the two spheres and brought many arguments from informal into formal discourse, has been removed, all the better to seal the one arena off from the other and limit the range of ideas and arguments at play in mainstream American politics.

In sum, we’re seeing the consolidation of what elites hope will be the new, post-Trump American political and media system – one which will be more firmly controlled and robust to populist interference. Social media censorship is obviously very bad, but it’s also a sign that what you’re saying has some hope of making a difference.

https://twitter.com/ClownWorld/status/1671460771811979264

https://boriquagato.substack.com/p/settling-in-to-the-reputation-economy

they are still unearthing new forms of embedded censorship on twitter even now. it’s the literal core of the software and embedded at who knows how many levels. the whole system appears to have been built not so much for information sharing as for informational suppression. facebook is an an engine of ideological manipulation. google buries search results and amplifies others for ideological and political ends.

this is not distortion, manipulation has become the signal. and you can see why. this passel of pernicious plunderers will not be able to withstand even rudimentary scrutiny. they are in deep, deep trouble if information gets free. and they know it. ...

and they are getting increasingly desperate because the worm here is turning, memes and messages are spreading in manners they do not like, and this is not only destroying the totalitarian power of their cultures of cancellation but inverting them. “experts” are being annihilated by “amateurs” and those who seek to dictate are finding themselves dictated to instead.

and this is a very good thing.

we the people have become “we the market” and are escaping the baleful glare of the gaslights with which so many have for so long been blinded. we are coming once more to know our own minds through the simple expedient of losing our fear to speak and realizing the the pervasive puppetshow of purported public opinion was a hoax, a fugazi fellowship of false narrative that never actually existed. and this is killing the B2C information economy because none of the folks who have firehosed phony zeitgeist at an unsuspecting public are trusted anymore. ...

all the value has moved to interpretation and curation.

but AI is also the solution to this as it can cut through the noise and find signal.

this is why they so desperately want to control it: if you are allowed access to the vast engines of interpretive power, what might you learn? what might you create? perhaps most important, who might you cut out of the value chain?

AI poses dire threats to the credentialed classes. lawyers, doctors, lower level and possibly soon higher level coders. lots of people with expensive educations, credentials and licensure that grants guild privilege (and assures guild level profit protection) ...

consumer sovereignty is a decisive force and we the people may vote with these, our wallets and in so doing we may bring this to heel.

we are nothing like powerless, we are only being gaslit into thinking that we are.

and as we find our footing and seek to support those who earn our trust and shun those who violate it, we have flipped cancel culture upon its misbegotten head. ...

people are sick and tired of being lied to, spun, and manipulated.

the age of honesty and honor is coming.

because we will make it so.

vote with your dollars and vote with your attention.

support those who earn your trust and who trust you in return. spurn those taking you for granted or for fools or for dupes.

consumer sovereignty is the tool by which societal sovereignty may be retaken.

Patrick says

" https://twitter.com/ClownWorld/status/1671460771811979264 "

From the link...

Student kicked out of class for stating a fact. 'There are only two genders.' In fact, every human being has a biological mother and father!

In this school evidently the inmates are running the asylum.

The_Deplorable says

Patrick says
" https://twitter.com/ClownWorld/status/1671460771811979264 "

From the link...

Student kicked out of class for stating a fact. 'There are only two genders.' In fact, every human being has a biological mother and father!

In this school evidently the inmates are running the asylum.

It's somewhat unclear from the video, but it appears that the student has a website/blog where he declared that there is only male and female. The cuck teacher called the student and his website out in class, and the student then tried to defend himself, at which point he was kicked out. The Student kept asking "Can I go and revise it?" and the cuck said no. At this point the student claimed that the teacher was wasting 30 mins of his time, when he could just go someplace else and be productive.

stereotomy says

'There are only two genders.'

To be absolutely correct, there are only two sexes, male and female--gender refers to language.

Student told by judge that he has no freedom of speech to state the obvious (that there are only two sexes) but:

Some of the language from the school supports the view. For instance, the student handbook says at one point that all aspects of education “must be fully open and available to members of both sexes” and at another point says that sexual harassment is defined as … “written materials or pictures derogatory to either gender.”

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/wearing-shirt-saying-there-are-only-two-genders-not-protected-speech-rules-obama

London may have been built by Britons but it has been conquered by foreigners. Even the mayor Khan says that London is not an English city, but an international city.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12242691/Dylan-Mulvaney-calls-social-media-CENSOR-malicious-lies-gender-transition-therapy.html

He's right.

There are no conservative organizations that silence the opposition.

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2023/07/02/bidens-bogus-job-chart-was-fact-checked-on-twitter-where-did-it-go-n2625227

Biden's Propaganda Job Creation Chart Was Fact-Checked, And Then the Note Disappeared

Patrick says

"Biden's Propaganda Job Creation Chart Was Fact-Checked..."

and proved to be a lie!

People returning to their old jobs after the pandemic are not new jobs.

https://merylnass.substack.com/p/missouri-v-biden-is-such-an-important

Judge Delivers Major Blow to Biden Admin in Social Media Censorship Case
https://www.theepochtimes.com/judge-delivers-major-blow-to-biden-admin-in-social-media-censorship-case_5373891.html?utm_source=share-btn-copylink

A federal judge has made a historic ruling by partially granting an injunction that blocks various Biden administration officials and government agencies like the Justice Department and the FBI from working with big tech firms to censor posts on social media.

The injunction came in response to a censorship-by-proxy lawsuit brought by attorneys general in Louisiana and Missouri, who have accused Biden administration officials and various government agencies of pressuring social media companies to suspend accounts or take down posts.

The judge, Terry A. Doughty, wrote in the July 4 judgment (pdf) that various government agencies, including the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Agency (CISA), the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), the U.S. Department of State, the Department of Justice (DOJ), and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) are prohibited from taking a range of actions with regards to social media companies.

Specifically, the agencies and their staff members are prohibited from meeting or contacting by phone, email, text message or “engaging in any communication of any kind with social-media companies urging, encouraging, pressuring, or inducing in any manner for removal, deletion, suppression, or reduction of content containing protected free speech,” per the injunction.

The agencies are also barred from flagging content on posts on social media platforms and forwarding them to the companies with requests for action such as removing or otherwise suppressing their reach.

Encouraging or otherwise egging on social media companies to change their guidelines for the removal, suppression, or reduction of content that contains protected free speech by the government is also not allowed.

At least two years too late.

https://thepostmillennial.com/breaking-judge-orders-biden-admin-to-stop-efforts-to-censor-social-media-companies

"The evidence produced thus far depicts an almost dystopian scenario," wrote Judge Doughty. "During the COVID-19 pandemic, a period perhaps best characterized by widespread doubt and uncertainty, the United States Government seems to have assumed a role similar to an Orwellian 'Ministry of Truth.’"

https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/long-vax-wednesday-july-5-2023-c?publication_id=463409&post_id=133202592&isFreemail=true

⚖️ The Missouri v. Biden case delivered another magnificent win yesterday when the judge entered a most remarkable blockbuster order — entered on Independence Day, when federal courts are closed. Make of that what you will.

Here’s how the state-affiliated Washington Post headlined the story:



Haha, the sub-headline explained the decision will “upend years of efforts to enhance coordination between government and social media companies.” As if that were a bad thing. At least they’re admitting it happened now.

The decision will upend years of efforts all right — efforts to censor Americans on social media.

To remind you, I have often called Missouri v. Biden the most important civil rights case in our generation, our version of Brown v. Board of Education or something. In the case, several State Attorneys General sued the Biden Administration and a long list of deplorable Administration officials over their systematic social media censorship.

The case has already uncovered tons of significant details explaining exactly how the censorship scheme worked, such as through Facebook’s private web portal giving government censors the convenient ability to put folks in directly social media jail, do not pass “Go,” without having to bother reporting anything. Discovery in the case also revealed the massive extent of cooperation between social media companies and government actors involving dozens of agencies and hundreds or thousands of federal employees.

But yesterday, the government’s gravy train derailed in Louisiana, spilling hazardous “misinformation” all over the tracks.

After spending a year wisely developing the evidence, the States’ attorneys had moved for an injunction against the government’s censorship machine. Litigation ensued, and yesterday the judge entered its remarkable order granting the injunction and forbidding the government from working with social media companies except in three limited cases (national security, criminal matters and deliberate elections interference).

In his 155-page opinion, the judge wrote that the State attorneys general had “produced evidence of a massive effort by Defendants, from the White House to federal agencies, to suppress speech based on its content.”

Effective immediately, the government and social media companies may no longer enforce information litmus tests on anything other than those limited areas, such as in the case of scientific orthodoxy. They can no longer be official arbiters of what is deemed “information” or “disinformation” related to, say, a pandemic virus. The order also forbids the government from working with so-called “academic groups” that have been colluding with federal officials to suppress conservative speech.

So, of course The Washington Post thinks it’s the worst thing ever. It quoted cherry-picked Stanford Law School assistant professor, Evelyn Douek, who darkly warned, “The injunction is strikingly broad and clearly intended to chill any kind of contact between government actors and social media platforms.”

Silly professor. The Constitution forbids the GOVERNMENT from chilling CITIZEN’S speech, not the other way around. Read it again.

There’s obviously a lot in the 155-page order, and to be honest I haven’t finished reading it yet. I can’t imagine how long it took the judge to write this book-length judgement. But it was clear from the get-go, from the other Supreme Court cases he cited, that the judge was not impressed with the government’s argument they are protecting the public from the bad ideas of stay-at-home moms and school board critics...

This is an only preliminary injunction, and will end when the case ends. But it’s still important. In order to grant an injunction, the Court must find that the plaintiffs are substantially likely to win the case. So in that sense, the Court is strongly hinting that, based on what he’s seen so far, he is likely to find that the Biden Administration violated Americans’ First Amendment guarantees.

https://twitter.com/ClownWorld/status/1676556437299036161

Yesterday, Judge Terry Doughty of the Western District of Louisiana issued a preliminary injunction that - in essence - tells the White House and much of the executive branch to stop bothering social media companies over opinions and reporting and other content they carry.

Judge Doughty’s ruling doesn’t violate the federal government’s own First Amendemnt rights to speak.

It doesn’t say the White House can’t use Facebook or Twitter. it doesn’t say the White House can’t express its own views on vaccines or Russia or other issues as forcefully as it likes. It doesn’t say that law enforcement agencies can’t go after child pornography or terrorist threats on social media.

What it says is government must end its aggressive and growing censorship and quasi-censorship complex - and whose reach and power Judge Doughty details in the 155-page memorandum supporting the injunction.

What is says is that if speech is legal and protected by the First Amendment, social media platforms have the right to carry it, and the federal government must stop telling them not to do so. ...




... This genius of this vision it that is simple, clear, easy to understand, and obviously should apply equally whether Democrats or Republicans are in power.

Maybe I’m too hopeful, but I think that within a few months public opinion even on the left will have shifted hard against these unconstitutional efforts. I’m hopeful we will shake our heads over the fact that senior federal and law enforcement officials ever thought they could tell social media companies what opinions to carry.

I’m hopeful we will look at this censorship episode like World War 2 interment camps for Japanese-Americans - as a terrible, unconstitutional, never-to-be-repeated mistake.

And if we do, the power and clarity of Judge Doughty’s opinion will deserve a lot of the credit.