by cisTits ➕follow (4) 💰tip ($0.37 in tips)
Comments 1 - 40 of 125 Next » Last »
Any other holes in this?
There's zoning laws and IRS laws as well as State income tax evasion, if I had to guess.
they will pay income tax in the state they officially have residence in.
But they'll have a CA dirver's license (if I understand you correctly), which could be very difficult as the state of California will definitely be gunning for you. They'll try to nail you down as a part-time resident. Would it be 1099 or W-2 income? Here's what the FTB says:
Part-year resident
In fact I was quite clear that you would.
EBGuy saysBut they'll have a CA dirver's license (if I understand you correctly), which could be very difficult as the state of California will definitely be gunning for you. They'll try to nail you down as a part-time resident. Would it be 1099 or W-2 income? Here's what the FTB says:
Part-year resident
So? I never said you wouldn't pay California income taxes. In fact I was quite clear that you would.
You were! As you can tell, my mind went elsewhere (and reading comprehension went out the window). Hmmm... might work (but CA income and capital gains taxes are not trivial).
What are the number?
How much do I save or come out ahead on if say, I make $200k permanent remote "living" in San Fran?
WineHorror1 says
What are the number?
How much do I save or come out ahead on if say, I make $200k permanent remote "living" in San Fran?
You don't remote in San Fran. Read what I wrote.
You're idea is to make your employer believe you live in a place like San Francisco or other high cost area, correct?
If I got all of that correct, what are the numbers on how I make out like a bandit?
How will you file your state and federal taxes? Will you pay taxes to both states? I'm not sure if you need to tell them what state you domicile in on federal taxes, but if so, what would you say?
Hircus saysHow will you file your state and federal taxes? Will you pay taxes to both states? I'm not sure if you need to tell them what state you domicile in on federal taxes, but if so, what would you say?
READ. I already explained all this. Twice now, I think.
i don’t see savings. pretty easy to rent a closet in an office building somewhere for an address.
might work better if you rent fictitious address in Florida to not pay CA taxes… at least savings.
Hircus saysNo you didnt.
Oh yes I fucking did. Or it should be obvious based upon what I wrote.
You said vaugaries about paying taxes to 1 or 2 states. You said nothing of my question about federal.
Dont be such a twat.
FortwayeAsFuckJoeBiden says
i don’t see savings. pretty easy to rent a closet in an office building somewhere for an address.
might work better if you rent fictitious address in Florida to not pay CA taxes… at least savings.
You don't get it. Just proved it by what you just typed.
You said nothing of my question about federal.
you asked, i answered, you complained… have it your way. don’t care
Note: That means you have to actually fucking read through this and familiarize yourself with the details. Don't post critiques that only prove that you didn't do so. I will rip you a new asshole if you do.
Would tracking your IP address (every remote worker is going to be working on a computer) give your working locationThe ADU has a little server room that hosts VPN software. ADU renters would get access to the VPN so it looks like you have a local IP address.
away to your boss/IT department? If so, would this kill the idea?
https://www.hcd.ca.gov/policy-research/accessorydwellingunits.shtml?source=patrick.net#adu
3) Yes or No? Would tracking your IP address (every remote worker is going to be working on a computer) give your working location
1) would you have to pay taxes to 2 different states?
Nobody would notice the continuous rotation of occupants or if you stuff 5 or 10 people in the ADU.
The ADU has a little server room that hosts VPN software. ADU renters would get access to the VPN so it looks like you have a local IP address
Aren't there laws regulating how many people can legally live in a unit of a certain size?
Sure, slumlords violate them all the time, but if we are talking "strictly above the board" model this would be one of the obstacles.
READ. I already explained all this. Twice now, I think.
You have not explained Jack SHIT
You put together a loosely hobble thought about using your shed out back and putting in a bunch of computers and a fast internet connection, and then renting those remote workstations out as physical locations
dishonest scofflaws to use around the country to evade local, state and Federal income taxes.
All we're trying to do is understand what we already read, do you want input or not? If
I would be bet that people are asking questions or making comments because it sounds like a workable idea. If the idea were to hold up, I'd be very interested in investing/partnering.
Note: That means you have to actually fucking read through this and familiarize yourself with the details. Don't post critiques that only prove that you didn't do so. I will rip you a new asshole if you do.
But otherwise...rip away:
Can't wait until someone figures out a way to get people to rent their ADUs out to a firm that then sublets it to 50+ remote workers. That way, they can all say they work in Palo Alto, etc, pay CA income taxes...the works. They have official residence status and get paid Cali wages. But the ADU won't be physically used except on a first-come-first-served basis for when any of those subletters have to actually show up for one of the times they have to be in town. And it is not like the neighbors will notice this and complain to authorities, like they occasionally do when they notice apartments have 8 people living in them. There will only be one or maybe two people staying at the ADU at any given time, as is legal to do.
I would pay $300/month for that. Esp if I moved to a no-income tax state.
$300/month for 50 subletters = $15,000/month for the ADU. I am surprised homeowners haven't set up an LLC to do just that with their ADUs.
Again, before some of you pick holes in nothing because you didn't pay attention to the above details (which are everything):
ADU owner 'rents out' his unit to an LLC/Corp entity. Esp an out-of-state one, preferably. That firm then sublets the flying fuck out of it to 50+ remote workers. Think of this as sort of like a remote worker AirBnB. It's like a timeshare, where if the subletters want to actually use it, then they have to reserve it and pay a cleaning fee, etc to use it for a short period of time. All reserved up so other subletters can't use it when they want to? Easy, they go to Motel 6 while in town. Early bird gets the fucking worm, assholes!
This way the unit is legally rented out to one tenant as far as what the homeowner is on the hook to report or care about, technically. Even if the homeowner owns the tenant legal entity.
I suppose that the State would figure out that 50+ people 'live' there because of what they report on their tax forms and driver licenses, etc. But apartments with 10+ people also show up in those records (migrants...both legal and illegal) and they don't give a fuck about that.
Any other holes in this?