Comments 1 - 5 of 5        Search these comments

1   NDrLoR   2022 Jul 4, 1:49pm  

Sounds like a plan!
2   Ceffer   2022 Jul 4, 1:54pm  

Another 'stating the obvious' decision? That governors and Soros Fecal Impaction SOS can't legislate election policy? Has to go through the State legislative channels. Wouldn't this upend Pennsylvania and the other elections where policy was improperly ceded to governor and SOS?
3   Undoctored   2022 Jul 4, 5:44pm  

This conservative-majority court has had plenty of time to institute a “power grab” or more accurately, to smack down the power grabs by Democrats and bureaucrats taken over the past two years. At the rate they’re going it’ll be another 50 years before they address the constitutional violations of the 2020 presidential election, not to mention all the tyrannical “public health” orders Federal and otherwise.
4   Patrick   2022 Jul 4, 7:09pm  

It's funny that the author quotes the Constitution and then worries that the Constitution might actually be obeyed:


The Elections Clause in Article I of the Constitution states that "the Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof." ...

It's entirely possible that the courts have the votes to endorse a theory which would hand state legislators unfettered control over election administration
5   Ceffer   2022 Jul 4, 7:47pm  

They would basically be invalidating the 2020 election on basic legal grounds, without even addressing the fraudulent count.

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions