Second, Newsom is chief executive of California, which would be the fifth largest economy on earth if it were a sovereign nation. It has an enlightened state legislature that is not subject to filibusters or the unsavory tactics of certain players in the U.S. Senate.
1) What does the CA legislature have anything to do with Newsom or his electability? 2) The fact that the CA legislature doesn't have a filibuster or 'unsavory characters' (read: Sinema and Manchin, both Dems) that Newsom had to not deal with actually disqualifies him to be in the WH, since he will have to deal with both should he actually be POTUS.
California, which stands among the least egalitarian states in the nation and suffers the overall highest poverty rate in the country, according to the US Census Bureau. Inequality here now surpasses that of Mexico, and is closer to that of the Central American banana republics of Guatemala and Honduras than it is to developed countries such as Canada and Norway. California also suffers the widest gap between middle and upper-middle-income earners of any state.
And libruls here in TX want that to come to our Great State.
https://thehill.com/opinion/3566546-budowsky-gavin-newsom-democrats-and-post-trump-america/
Here is my favorite:
1) What does the CA legislature have anything to do with Newsom or his electability?
2) The fact that the CA legislature doesn't have a filibuster or 'unsavory characters' (read: Sinema and Manchin, both Dems) that Newsom had to not deal with actually disqualifies him to be in the WH, since he will have to deal with both should he actually be POTUS.