7
0

Historic Decision Against Mandatory Vaccination by Italian Court


 invite response                
2022 Jul 23, 2:23pm   132 views  3 comments

by Patrick   ➕follow (55)   💰tip   ignore  

https://childrenshealthdefense.eu/eu-issues/historic-decision-by-italian-court/


On July 6th, 2022, the court of Florence has approved a sentence annulling the measure taken by the Order of Psychologists of Tuscany against one of its members, the reason being: ‘the suspension of the exercise of the profession risks compromising primary individual rights such as the right to a livelihood and the right to work’.

The judge ruled that the psychologist doesn’t need to be vaccinated in order to do his job by establishing that:

these substances don’t prevent infection and transmission. Therefore, in front of the Italian law, there can not be an obligation.
She also recognises that these substances provokes severe adverse events.
Therefore, it even less legitimate to force anybody to be injected.
The judge put the dignity of the human being at the centre and referred twice to the period of Nazism and Fascism. Mandatory vaccination is possible if there is informed consent. For Covid injections, she explained that an informed consent is not possible as we don’t know the ingredients and the mechanisms of these substances because of industrial and alleged military secret.
This interim decision is grounded in serious conclusion: there is no right to suspend a citizen from the right to work based of this illegal request of vaccination with these experimental substances.

With this historic court decision, “the Risk to human genome is now legally established” Renate Holzeisen, Italian attorney engaged in the defense of the Human Rights, said in an interview for an Italian radio.

“This could be a milestone” said Reiner Fuellmich during the Corona Committee 113, interviewing Renate Holzeisen.

No obligation as the official data show that these experimental substances don’t prevent infection and transmission amongst people treated with 3 or more Covid shots.
First of all, the judge declares that based on the datas published by the Ministry of Health, AIFA (Italian Medicines Agency) and the SSN (Italian Health Services), it is very clear that these substances (aka Covid vaccines), defined several times by the judge as “experimental”, don’t prevent infection from the virus. For a mandatory vaccination, the substances should be proven to work.

Therefore, as they don’t work, in front of the Italian law, there can not be an obligation.

Doctor leading the intensive care in Verona has declared in television that all Covid patients in intensive care are people treated with 3 Covid shots.

Nobody can be forced to be injected as these substances provoke severe adverse events and this is based on official public data regarding adverse events.
In the court decision, the judge also recognises that these substances cause very serious side effects that can even lead to death, and also refers to the risk of genetic mutation.

Comments 1 - 3 of 3        Search these comments

1   GNL   2022 Jul 23, 3:43pm  

So many things in here that do not make sense to me...

"these substances don’t prevent infection and transmission. Therefore, in front of the Italian law, there can not be an obligation.
She also recognises that these substances provokes severe adverse events.
Therefore, it even less legitimate to force anybody to be injected."

...WTF? Less legitimate? Fuck that.

"Mandatory vaccination is possible if there is informed consent."

I must not know what informed consent means. I always figured that a person could refuse. Otherwise you are being forced to consent or that it is mandatory for a person to consent. How does that work?
2   HeadSet   2022 Jul 23, 7:08pm  

WineHorror1 says

I must not know what informed consent means. I always figured that a person could refuse. Otherwise you are being forced to consent or that it is mandatory for a person to consent. How does that work?

It must work like "I am informing you that you will lose your job if you do not consent to the jab."
3   Ceffer   2022 Jul 23, 7:42pm  

They apply the triage that should have been used from the outset before usurping authority to use contagion to override basic rights. The Globalist psychopaths thought that virtue signaling and the blitzkrieg of corrupt officials would suffice. The courts, of course, sometimes try to pick up the pieces after the damage has already been done.

Courts matter not if there is merely selective enforcement, or no enforcement, as exists with our own Executive and Legislative. There is no consequence for violating the law or the Constitution.

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions