« First « Previous Comments 66 - 86 of 86 Search these comments
How One Trump January 6 Charge Could End Up Criminalizing Left-Wing Protest
The unusual application of an Enron-era accounting law could open up a prosecutorial Pandora's Box of criminalizing a wide range of protest.
Could the push for accountability over the U.S. Capitol riot on Jan. 6, 2021, end up sending left-wing activists to prison for decades?
In addition to straightforward charges of assaulting police officers and violent entry, federal prosecutors are trying to lock up former President Donald Trump and other Jan. 6 defendants for violating an obscure criminal statute –penal code 18 U.S.C. 1512(c)(2) – never used before in a similar context.
The charge under this statutory provision makes it a crime to “corruptly” obstruct, influence, or impede any official government proceeding, and carries a maximum sentence of up to 20 years in prison. ...
Disruption of government proceedings is an activist tactic that is widely revered among left-wing movements.
Consider the following examples:
Extinction Rebellion, a group that uses confrontational tactics to demand action on climate change, superglued themselves to doorways in Congress, blocking lawmakers and staff from attending evening votes.
Left-wing demonstrators attempted to stop the confirmation of Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh through a variety of delaying tactics. Activist groups openly planned actions designed to disrupt the committee hearings with protests, by "standing up, vocalizing our dissent, being arrested and forcibly removed.”
In 2016, Democrats staged a sit-in on the floor of the House of Representatives to demand a vote on gun control legislation. The sit-in ground the legislative chamber to a halt for an entire day.
These protests were prosecuted lightly. The vast majority of the more than 200 people arrested during the Kavanaugh protests were charged with a misdemeanor of disorderly conduct, crowding, or obstructing, which carries no prison time and a fine of $35 or $50. ...
But were these actions altogether different from the kind of “obstruction of an official proceeding” charges leveled against Jan. 6 participants and now Trump?
Bank of America Cancels Account of Conservative Christian Charity
Memphis-based non-profit Indigenous Advance Ministries (IAM) provides necessities to Ugandan orphans had its account shut down by Bank of America.
The organization has filed a complaint to the Tennessee Attorney-General’s office over concerns its accounts were shut down because Bank of America disagrees with its “religious views.”
IAM, which claims to have had a banking relationship with BofA since 2015, supports pro-life and anti-same-sex relationship values, according to its website.
BofA firmly denies it “debanked” the body over these views but has refused to explain why the account was canceled.
The bank told the Daily Mail that “religious beliefs are not a factor in any account-closing decision.”
However, campaigners are calling for greater transparency over how firms decide which accounts to shut down.
The cancellation of IAM’s account comes as cases of political and religious “debanking” appear to be on the rise.
The term “debanking” hit headlines across the globe last month after UK politician Nigel Farage – a close ally of President Donald Trump who pioneered the country’s Brexit movement – fell victim to the trend.
Canada has “debanked” hundreds of Canadian citizens in the past five years, a new report has revealed.
Since 2018, a major debanking wave has swept across Canada, affecting over 800 citizens so far.
The number includes hundreds of brave citizens who had risen up against the far-left government as part of the Freedom Convoy protests.
The data was unearthed through an access-to-information request by Blacklock’s Reporter.
The information unveiled a disturbing pattern where 837 individuals had their bank accounts shut down over a span of five years.
Most of those people to were debanked had disented from the Canadian government’s official agenda.
It must be made a very serious crime for any bank to shut down customer accounts for political reasons.
Germany latest country to float chilling plans to freeze dissenting citizens’ bank accounts
In further evidence that the traditional financial system is gradually being weaponised to punish those who express dissenting but hitherto perfectly lawful views, the German government has announced a plan to target the bank accounts of people who donate money to groups and causes deemed by the state and its functionaries to constitute “right wing extremists”.
As reported by Modernity, German Interior Minister Nancy Faeser recently announced a raft of measures that critics say are a direct attempt to chill free expression, and reign in the popularity of the right wing opposition Party, Alternative for Germany (AfD).
One such measure is to freeze the bank accounts of those found to have donated money to any group the government declares to be “far-right”.
Until today, I didn't realize that individuals are now being assigned ESG scores that some institutions use to decide whether they will do business with a person.
I obviously knew about ESG scores that huge investment firms are using to force corporations to conform to ideological demands. I knew that in some cases, prominent individuals or troublemakers have been blackballed by banks and other firms. And, of course, I know that some companies that sell politically incorrect items are getting deplatformed by PayPal and even web providers.
But I didn't know that an industry has sprung up to analyze individuals' purchases, carbon footprint, and other characteristics to inform banks and other businesses regarding whether they should do business with you.
Paying attention yet?
Personal ESG scores are a social credit system of tyranny based on ESG fraud and arbitrary power.
"Buying a gun, alcohol, or even clothing will all effect your overall ESG score. Not only will your purchases matter, but who you purchase from." pic.twitter.com/uDj0PFUb5u
— James Lindsay, full varsity (@ConceptualJames) March 28, 2024
It is a full-scale social credit system being built out. Only it isn't the government per se doing this, but rather companies that aggregate information about you and sell it to actors who want to isolate dissenters from their ideological commitments.
Bank of America has shut down the account of an independent conservative reporter without any prior warning or explanation.
Journalist Christina Urso, also known as Radix Verum, says Bank of America abruptly de-banked her and left her without any funds.
Urso took to social media to voice her concerns and frustrations about the termination of her account.
“I have been with them for years,” Urso wrote in a post on X.
Urso believes her account’s termination was related to her reporting and documentary about the alleged 2020 kidnapping attempt of on Michigan’s Democrat Gov. Gretchen Whitmer.
The film is titled “Kidnap and Kill: An FBI Terror Plot.”
“They won’t tell me why,” she said.
“They won’t allow me access to my bank account or to the funds.”
Urso said Bank of America has informed her to be on the lookout for a “check in the mail” with her final balance.
Customers with Bank of America are sounding the alarm after realizing the balances on their accounts have been wiped to zero.
Other customers are reporting they are blocked from “accessing their accounts and balance information,” according to CBS News.
The news comes amid reports of widespread outages at the bank.
Bank of America confirmed to CBS that “some clients” are dealing with a “glitch.”
The issue is preventing them from being able to access “their accounts and balance information,” according to the outlet.
In a statement, Bank of America said:
“Some clients are experiencing an issue accessing their accounts and balance information today.
Former First Lady Melania Trump has revealed that she had her bank account shut down and her business contracts canceled over her “political affiliation.”
During a new interview with Fox News anchor Maria Bartiromo, Melania Trump revealed she has been the victim of a “canceling project.” ...
“The bank suddenly informed me they will not be able to do business with me anymore,” she revealed.
" https://slaynews.com/news/melania-trump-debanked-political-affiliation/
“The bank suddenly informed me they will not be able to do business with me anymore,” she revealed."
Billionaire tech investor Marc Andreessen has accused the Biden-harris administration of leading a campaign to pressure financial institutions to “debank” customers who opposed the Democrats’ agenda.
Andreessen made the allegations during an interview with Joe Rogan on his massive podcast.
The Silicon Valley venture capitalist the Biden admin of weaponizing executive agencies to pressure financial institutions to “debank” companies and individuals who are critical of the Democrats.
“Debanking” is when a person or business has their account shut down and blocked by a financial system.
“The First Amendment says the government cannot censor American citizens,” Andreessen began.
“And so, what they do is if you want to censor American citizens in the government, if you’re smart, you don’t do that.
“What you do is you fund an outside organization and then you have them do it.” ...
“But what if you’re politically on the Left?” Rogan asked.
“That’s fine,” Andreesen replied.
“So, no one on the Left gets debanked?” Rogan asked incredulously.
“I haven’t heard of a single instance of anyone on the Left getting debanked,” Andreessen answered.
“You get kicked out of your bank account.
“You get kicked out of the — you can’t do credit card transactions.”
“This is where the government and the companies get intertwined,” he continued.
“And back to your fascism point, which is there’s a constitutional amendment that says the government can’t restrict your speech, but there’s no constitutional amendment that says the government can’t debank you, right?
« First « Previous Comments 66 - 86 of 86 Search these comments
Not to mention the Canadian banks who confiscated accounts from the peaceful truckers who did not want to be injected with the very dangerous and utterly ineffective mRNA gene-altering experiment.