« First « Previous Comments 818 - 857 of 886 Next » Last » Search these comments
Texas Lawmaker Pushes for Prescription-Free Ivermectin in New Bill: HB 3175
Rep. Wes Virdell introduces bill to make ivermectin available without a prescription, granting pharmacists legal immunity.
Overwhelming popular opposition can defeat socialism, as in the former USSR.
Dunno.
@LawSelfDefense
I don't know why nobody is listening to me on this, but I'll say it again LOUDER:
Impeachment is too high a bar, you NEED 67 Senators, and you don't HAVE 67 Senators.
But federal judges can also be removed from the bench for failing to
"serve during good Behavior," an Article III Section 1 condition of
employment under the Constitution.
Most of these activists judges are violating their own Judicial Branch
Code of Conduct for United States Judges in various ways, and are
therefore violating the Constitution's "serve during good Behavior"
clause, and can be fired for cause.
That's a SIMPLE MAJORITY in the House and Senate--and you DO have THAT.
8:35 PM • Feb 25, 2025 - 110.8K Views
Republican lawmakers in Georgia have introduced new legislation that seeks to ban hospitals and doctors from discriminating against patients who have not received Covid “vaccines.”
The bold legislative effort seeks to outlaw discrimination against unvaccinated organ transplant recipients, taking direct aim at policies that prioritize Covid vaccination in life-or-death medical decisions.
The legislation, House Bill 522, prohibits hospitals and transplant centers from denying or delaying organ transplants based solely on a patient’s refusal to receive a Covid “vaccine.” ...
Under the proposed law, a person’s “vaccine” history would be added alongside disability status to Georgia’s existing anti-discrimination protections for transplant recipients.
This means that unvaccinated patients cannot be removed from organ waiting lists, pushed further down the queue, or barred from receiving a life-saving transplant purely because of their refusal to comply with vaccination protocols.
Said simply, causing harm and disease massively increases the size of the market for pharmaceutical products so that’s Big Pharma’s business model today.
If one actually cares about health, finding new uses for existing drugs that are no longer protected by patents is BY FAR the best use of research time and money.
Research into nutrition and non-pharmaceutical interventions also produces infinitely better outcomes for the public than biochemical research.
But there are almost no profits in these approaches.
Assemblymen Carl DeMaio (R-San Diego) and Bill Essayli (R-Riverside) announced Tuesday their intention to support the qualification of and passage of a Voter ID Initiative in California in the 2026 election.
A coalition of elected officials and campaign committees have also announced support, and released polling showing overwhelming bipartisan support for a Voter ID Initiative in California – with a super-majority of Republicans and Independents and a majority of even Democratic voters supporting the initiative.
National, regional or local polling always shows that a Voter ID requirement is popular with a majority of voters – as high as 8 in 10 voters, according to mainstream polling firm Gallup.
A poll conducted by Gallup in October 2024 found that 84% of Americans favor requiring all voters to provide photo identification at their polling place in order to vote. The poll also found that 83% of Americans favor requiring people who are registering to vote for the first time to provide proof of citizenship. ...
a majority of even Democratic voters supporting the initiative.
https://corbettreport.com/creating-parallel-societies/
From the depths of the scamdemic to the craziness of the trade wars, we've seen the economic destruction and disruption of our daily lives that can be caused by authoritarians who presume to rule over the world. But the society they are crafting is not the society we have to live in. Join James for this edition of #SolutionsWatch where he explores the concept of parallel societies and the steps that can be taken to create the building blocks for such societies to come about.
Idaho Medical Freedom Bill S1023 passed legislative vote!
Now awaiting ID governor signature.
Leslie Manookian of the Health Freedom Fund deserves credit and congratulations on the passage of this important bill. Our work is far from over, there are several more bills in progress in Idaho and other states.
What's S1023 All About?
S1023 modifies CHAPTER 5, TITLE 73, IDAHO CODE to be more generalized. Instead of focusing on "coronavirus" only, it applies to all "medical interventions."
This bill renames the "Coronavirus Stop Act" to the "Idaho Medical Freedom Act." It prohibits all forced medical interventions. It prohibits discrimination and other negative actions against anyone who refuses medical interventions.
Read the Bill: https://legislature.idaho.gov/sessioninfo/2025/legislation/S1023/
What S1023 Does (in a Nutshell)...
Removes the sections defining "Coronavirus" and "Coronavirus vaccination."
Adds definitions for "Medical intervention" and "School."
Prohibits MEDICAL MANDATES (not just coronavirus vaccination).
Changes references from "coronavirus vaccination" to the more general "medical intervention."
In Practical Terms, S1023...
Prevents businesses from requiring medical interventions (like vaccines) for service.
Stops schools from mandating medical procedures for students and employees.
Ensures that you can work, attend school, and participate in society without being forced into unwanted medical treatments.
Why We Need S1023...
After all the draconian human-rights trampling countermeasures that governmental and non-governmental organizations took during the COVID era, personal and medical rights must be codified into law so they cannot be taken away again.
Many people died or were permanently injured because medical freedom rights were denied and a one-size-fits-all solution was imposed upon them.
They were not given a choice.
They were fed a narrative dictated by government and organizations such as the WHO.
They were not allowed to hear dissenting views.
They were denied medical treatments.
They were forced to take experimental treatments without adequate informed consent.
They were isolated in hospitals, where they often died alone.
They lost their jobs.
They lost their benefits.
They were denied access to daily living venues such as schools, grocery stores, and other locations.
They could not go to school without taking mandated (and often harmful) medical treatments.
People literally were treated like prisoners, though they had committed no crimes.
Some of the above has not stopped yet! But people are finally waking up. They know what was done to them and their loved ones. They do not want it to happen again when the next group of “experts” is unleashed to handle a public health “emergency.” People have the right to know the truth, to be fully informed, and to make their own decisions about what happens to their bodies.
This bill MUST pass if we are to ensure personal and medical freedom for all citizens of Idaho. Say “YES” to S1023 as loudly as legislative decorum allows!
I had a meme recently about a woman who wanted to have babies who were never known to the government.
I kind of like this idea, just having no government registration or documentation whatsoever. Government wouldn't even know you exist.
Would be a problem if you wanted to get a job or a driver's license or passport though.
« First « Previous Comments 818 - 857 of 886 Next » Last » Search these comments
What else?