patrick.net

Last Straw: NIAID Must Be Shut Down

At a recent roundtable meeting called "Federal Health Agencies and the COVID Cartel: What Are They Hiding?" hosted by Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wisc.), Dr. Risch explained more about how the bioweapons industry has been working in secret for at least the past 70 years to unleash hell on the world.

"This work and the WIV (Wuhan Institute of Virology in China) leak was what I consider to be the fruit of our bioweapons industry that has been performing secretive and nefarious biological weapons development for the last 70 years," Dr. Risch stated at the roundtable.

"The recognition of the possible accidental or intentional unleashing of an infectious agent capable of killing large numbers of humanity led to the bioweapons treaty of 1975 that President Ford signed. The treaty prohibits the development of offensive bioweapons however, the one loophole in the treaty is that small quantities of offensive bioweapons are allowed to be developed in order to do research on vaccine countermeasures."

According to Dr. Risch, said loophole was then exploited by the U.S. bioweapons industry, which ultimately led to COVID, then Operation Warp speed, then the rest of the nightmare known as the "pandemic."

"My hypothesis, what I believe, is that both the virus origin cover-up and the forced vaccination of the entire planet were orchestrated to protect the integrity of the bioweapons industry," Dr. Risch stated. ...

"Without a successful vaccine to show for itself in the time of a pandemic crisis, especially one caused by a leak from a bioweapons industry source itself, it would be clear to everyone that the rationale for the industry’s existence was a fraud in the first place," Dr. Risch contends.

"And so, the COVID vaccines themselves supplied the defense against the charge that the bioweapons industry was not actually dual-use, but offensive only, violating the 1975 treaty."

...it is still a hanging crime to mandate the injection of anything, ever.

Hanged and shitting his pants while he jerks around would be enough.

"the reality is that both Fauci and Bourla will retire as free men in taxpayer supporter splendor."

The pharmaceutical kingpin was defending his company over reports that Pfizer’s “best days” are now in the past since the Covid pandemic was over.

“I truly think that the best days of Pfizer are ahead of us, because Covid was for me was like a rehearsal.”

He then continued to boast that Pfizer can now rapidly roll out mRNA shots in response to the next “main disease.”

One of the most prominent law professors in the world has just declared that “everyone involved” in pushing Covid mRNA shots onto the public committed “crimes against humanity.”

During a new interview, Dr. Francis Boyle asserted that the “frankenshots” were part of a plan to conduct “medical experimentation” on humanity.

Boyle, a bioweapons expert, wrote the 1989 Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act which was passed by Congress and signed into U.S. law in 1990 by President H. W. Bush.

He warns that COVID-19 was developed in a lab as “an offensive biological weapon” and argues that those who pushed the mRNA injections “clearly violated the Nuremberg Code.”

Speaking during an interview with Media Blackout’s Maria Zeee, Boyle declared that vax pushers are guilty of “murder” for causing deaths through vaccine injuries.

“Everyone involved in the development of COVID-19 as an offensive biological warfare weapon and also everyone involved in the manufacture of these COVID-19 ‘frankenshots’ clearly violated the Nuremberg Code on medical experimentation,” Boyle said.

“It was a Nuremberg crime and a crime against humanity.”

Boyle also responded to the Kansas lawsuit against Pfizer.

He described the case as “promising.”

However, he laments that the case is a civil lawsuit, not a criminal one.

Boyle believes that the perpetrators are guilty of “murder and conspiracy to commit murder.”

He emphasized that under common law Anglo-American principles of criminal law, which he taught for eight years, those involved are undoubtedly guilty.

Other crimes include “not only murder but also mayhem and assault and battery,” he says.

No politician dares to say “safe and effective” anymore in the UK Parliament. Why? Because it now seems that they can see the writing on the wall.

MP Andrew Bridgen revealed to Liz Gunn that his relentless efforts to highlight excess deaths have shattered the “safe and effective” narrative. Now, vaccine pushers are staring down a grim potential reality: “If they say ‘safe and effective’ now, I think they’re putting five to ten years on their sentence when we get them in court,” Bridgen said.

As a result, politicians have made a dramatic pivot. Instead of claiming the shots are “safe and effective,” they now refer to them as “the best solution.” This shift in language is a clear sign that the reckoning for the jabs is imminent, and officials are now scrambling to evade accountability.

Australian Government Has Been Hiding Deadly Covid Shot Side Effects since 2021

In early 2021, Australia’s Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) became aware that mRNA lipid nanoparticles from Covid injections would spread to vital organs.

The TGA is Australia’s equivalent of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

The agency found traces of the mRNA lipid nanoparticles in the brain, liver, and ovaries of those who had received the shots. ...

However, the agency decided to hide the discovery from the public over fears that informing citizens of the risks would promote vaccine hesitancy.

This information was obtained via a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request and exposed by a British researcher.

The data, made public by a whistleblower, shows that a TGA report published in January 2021 admitted that vaccine particles do not remain at the injection site as claimed by government health officials around the world.

Instead, the particles disperse throughout the body. ...

These findings were part of the “Nonclinical Evaluation of BNT162b2 [mRNA] COVID-19 vaccine (COMIRNATY)” study. ...

As Slay News has reported, the spread of these nanoparticles around the body has been linked to soaring cases of autoimmune disease, turbo cancers, and other serious illnesses and deaths.

In addition, vaccination expert Dr. John Campbell expressed significant concern about the implications for female reproductive health.

Responding to the findings in Australia, Dr. Campbell warns:

“Of course, the ovaries store and mature the ovum (female reproductive cells), so I’m not gonna pretend I’m not a little concerned about this.

“I’m more than a little concerned actually.” ...

“How could the Australian health authorities know this back in 2021 and still approve this vaccine?” he questioned.

In other words, Bourla waited until right after Biden was “elected” to call Fauci and deliver the news about Pfizer’s “surely rigged” mRNA trial, according to Schachtel.

“In retrospect, the shots were nothing more than junk genetic material,” Schachtel further explained.

“No lives were lost in delaying the distribution of these failed science experiment mRNA injections.”

“Nonetheless, the operation succeeded in taking away a political victory for Trump and delivering it to Biden.

“At the time, the majority of the public was truly terrified of the Wuhan sniffles, with many voters tethering their vote to the candidate who they believed could best defeat a virus.” ...

He writes that Trump’s FDA commissioner Stephen Hahn “made it clear to the Trump administration that in terms of vaccine authorization, he and his agency would not be pressured into taking scientifically incorrect action.”

He adds that the “vaccine approvals would not be rushed just because the White House hoped that they would be approved before the election.”

However, Fauci conveniently fails to mention Hahn’s ties to Big Pharma.

Just one year later, Hahn would join Flagship Pioneering, the company that founded Moderna.

“It sure seems like Albert Bourla, the horse doctor who runs Pfizer, and Stephen Hahn, who remains at Flagship, know something that might be the subject of much-needed congressional hearings and law enforcement investigations,” Schachtel explains.

“It’s not like this would be the first time Pfizer and the gang have lied, committed massive fraud, and deceived the public …”

As it turns out, Pfizer and Moderna raked in a lot more dough after Biden was installed into the White House.

Their jab contracts with the federal government were renegotiated to become much more lucrative.

Trump and his people had previously agreed to pay Pfizer $19.50 per dose under Operation Warp Speed.

After Biden was installed, his administration would agree to $30.48 per dose instead.

This unexplained price hike represents a 56 percent increase.

Dr Ugur Sahin, the CEO of BioNTech, the company that worked with Pfizer to develop the world’s first Covid vaccine, admitted on camera that he also refused the jab.

In near-fully vaccinated New Zealand, Jacinda Ardern’s Ministry of Health granted vaccine exemptions to political elites while hypocritically rolling out the world’s most draconian vaccine mandates and insisting the public be vaccinated.

A Pfizer employee also blew the whistle and admitted the Big Pharma giant provided a “special batch” of the Covid vaccine for senior staff and elite VIPs during the roll out in 2021.

He said that “informed consent” and autonomous decision over one’s own body was the “basic dogma” in medical ethics during the past decades.

The bishop noted that the Congregation (now Dicastery) for the Doctrine of the Faith under Cardinal Luis Ladaria had declared that there must not be forced Covid injections.

“Nevertheless, the Pope imposed [a shot mandate] on all employees in the Vatican as head of state,” Eleganti stated.

“Otherwise, they would have lost their jobs or been given another one.

“So, for me, that was clearly an injustice.”

The real problem is that medical advances have ensured that far too many leadership positions remain clogged up by greybeards in their sixties and seventies—men who ostensibly retain all rational faculties but have grown soft, out of touch, and (most damningly) far too risk averse to lead a dynamic, vital, and agile civilization.

This is obviously why the government felt entitled to ruin everyone’s life for two years during Covid. All of society give undue weight to the interests of old people and it literally didn’t matter how many young folks lost their jobs or suffered from major depression or gained forty pounds, because it was deemed absolutely essential that we shut down civilization to give grandma a few extra years.

New York City Committees on Oversight and Investigations & Civil Service and Labor
Gale A. Brewer, Chair
September 9, 2022
https://councilnyc.viebit.com/player.php?hash=U2mDNKAEkDJA
Source:
https://legistar.council.nyc.gov/Calendar.aspx

LAURA HOFMANN [via Zoom]: First of all, I want to work. In January 2022 I was fired from my job of 10 years following an unpaid involuntary leave of absence due to the covid vaccine mandates and my firmly held religious beliefs.

I was tossed aside like human garbage after being a dedicated worker of ten years. The unfair treatment negated the decades of volunteer community work that I have done alongside my former employer and in the Greenpoint community on multiple environmental waterfront parks and housing issues.

I've testified many, many times before New York City Council regarding those issues. Never would I have ever thought that I would be testifying about my right to work, my freedom of religion, or having control over what to put in my body. But here I am.

My income and my ability to get another job were taken away, and it was needless since I've had natural antibodies since March 2020, following being sick with covid.

Given my community-based knowledge about environmentally linked diseases and knowledge about my own auto-immune diseases, I knew it was a strong possibility that these antibodies would serve to protect me from covid in the future. And now the CDC is finally catching up, acknowledging what many people already knew.

What hurts the most is that I truly loved my job, my coworkers, my clients. And I'm still friends with many of my coworkers and clients who sought me out on social media. I worked as a housing counselor in a respected not-for-profit community organization under contract with HBD [Housing Preservation and Development] as a housing counselor, housing counseling agency.

As an essential worker, I worked both in the office and remotely serving clients during the heart of the pandemic. I made wellness calls to seniors in an effort to prevent them from feeling isolated. The same organization that did this work, that—

MALE VOICE: Your time has expired.

LAURA HOFMANN: —hired me, for who I am, and isolated me, a senior with medical issues.

GALE A. BREWER: If you could wrap up, thank you.

LAURA HOFMANN: Basically, the mandates have severely harmed me and harmed the way that I interact with community. I refuse to even eat out in establishments that did not push back against the mandates.

GALE A. BREWER: Thank you.

LAURA HOFMANN: And it's to the point where I myself, after fighting environmental issues in these communities for decades, I'm thinking about moving out of New York myself.

New York City Committees on Oversight and Investigations & Civil Service and Labor
Gale A. Brewer, Chair
September 9, 2022
https://councilnyc.viebit.com/player.php?hash=U2mDNKAEkDJA
https://legistar.council.nyc.gov/Calendar.aspx

GABRIEL DALMAU: Hi, my name is Gabriel Dalmau. I worked for the Department of Sanitation for about five years. I remember feeling proud when I first got the job. I'm a welder. Welding on garbage trucks is not glamorous at all. A lot of the city jobs that we take and that we do are not glamorous, but we show up every day, even during a pandemic. Nurses, firefighters, teachers, EMTs, police, you name it, we were there, we were good enough then, we should be good enough now.

In April of 2020 my mother Cynthia, God bless her soul, she passed away, I took my four days bereavement, and I went back to work. I went back to work every single day during the pandemic, when my mother passed away, took my four days, I went back to work. It's not because I'm an outstanding employee or anything like that, it's because it's my job, that's what I chose to do, and I said, I'd rather be at work keeping my mind busy and doing something at least for the city in my own little small way to help out rather than be at home going crazy.

We're not where we were before. These things don't make sense. The mandates don't make sense. People are hurting out there, people are losing their jobs, their homes.

All the people that we call on when we're in trouble, police, firefighters, EMTs, nurses, schoolteachers, all those people that were good enough then, but they're not good enough now? How does that make any sense?

All I got to say is that, end the mandates, it's unconstitutional, it's illegal, and it's just downright not human the way that we've been treating people.

We got treated like yesterday's newspaper, we got treated like the trash, that we help to take out all the time. And the same with a whole bunch of other people in this city, this great city that we love that we all signed up to take care of, that we're all a part of, we need to be less divisive and more inclusive and get everybody back to what they do best because you cannot replace the amount of experience that these people have with new hires. It just doesn't work that way.

Democrat President Joe Biden’s former White House COVID-19 Response Coordinator Dr. Ashish Jha has admitted that vaccine mandates were a mistake.

In a new interview with former CNN anchor Chris Cuomo, Dr. Jha confessed that forcing people to take Covid mRNA injections was “harmful” to members of the public and damaged trust in government.

“In the long run [vaccine mandates] bred a lot of distrust and were harmful as well,” said Jha, who now serves as the Dean of the Brown University School of Public Health.

Jha suggested vaccine mandates would be “very, very narrow” if another pandemic were to emerge.

The former top Biden White House official said he often reminds his friends in public health that the track record for mandates in their field “is not a glorious history.”

“In general, you don’t want to use mandates unless you absolutely have to,” Jha stated.

“And, I say that as somebody who supported vaccine mandates early on.

💉🔬 Sometimes, small developments signal massive changes. One such signal unexpectedly appeared last week in a ‘study’ (a “Perspective”) that popped up in the prestigious New England Journal of Medicine, succinctly titled “Funding Postauthorization Vaccine-Safety Science.”

The Perspective’s unremarkable premise was that governments should not only require minimal safety testing from vaccine manufacturers for initial approval, but agencies should also continue tracking vaccines’ real-life performance after approval. The authors strongly argued we need to figure out the real-world, long-term risks from vaccines, however rare they might (or might not) be, and which for whatever reason might not have shown up in the drugs’ initial approval studies.

In other words, they argued we should keep checking vaccines after authorizing them, instead of drinking a few more espresso martinis and singing “safe and effective” at the karaoke booth until the bar closes.

While you might think that is just common sense, you are not an expert. Experts, unlike you dummies, have no need for common sense. They have grants.

Even though that infuriating admission was ultimately unsurprising, there were two quite remarkable things about the Perspective. The first was that the vaccine-tracking suggestion appeared in a mainstream medical journal at all, causing pharma sales reps to start polishing their resumes. The concept wasn’t new, but it was new that the NEJM agreed to publish what until ten minutes ago was an ugly anti-vaxxer conspiracy theory.

But second, and even more remarkable, is who joined the Perspective. One of the main authors was Dr. Stanley Plotkin, M.D..

Dr. Plotkin has, over the course of his long career, been so influential in expanding the vaccine industry that he is called, and I am not making this up, the “Godfather of Vaccines.” He’ll make you a vaccine offer you can’t refuse.

Like other bureaucratic cockroaches of our acquaintance, Plotkin has worked inside and outside government, won any number of jab awards, published innumerable supportive papers and books on vaccine science, and “pioneered” the use of fetal cells in vaccine development. So.

But now, suddenly and unexpectedly, for the first time in his long and storied career, Dr. Plotkin is calling for more research into vaccine injuries. Why? Why now? You may not be surprised to learn the article offered the pandemic as an explanation:

“The widespread vaccine hesitancy observed during the Covid-19 pandemic suggests that the public is no longer satisfied with the traditional safety goal of simply detecting and quantifying the associated risks after a vaccine has been authorized for use.”

You don’t say. Before we continue, chalk up yet another unpredicted pandemic win for the anti-vaccine movement. Anyway, Plotkin and his co-authors admitted that times have changed:

“The public also wants public health authorities to mitigate and prevent rare but serious adverse events – which no longer seem rare when vaccines are given to millions or billions of people.”
In other words, people are getting completely fed up with the philosophy of “you have to break a few people to make a vaccine omelet.” Saving five million people from “serious covid” (allegedly) cannot justify killing one million people with heart attacks, blood clots, strokes, and turbo cancers.

Doctors like Stanley Plotkin love utilitarian ethics. But sane people reject trading lives for outcomes if you can make the numbers work.

Even more surprising, Dr. Plotkin has apparently had an epiphany: it is now critical to track vaccine injuries and figure out whether and how vaccines are hurting people:

“It is critical to examine adverse events following immunization (AEFIs) that have not been detected in clinical trials, to ascertain whether they are causally or coincidentally related to vaccination. When they are caused by vaccines (vaccine adverse reactions), the risk attributable to vaccination and the biologic mechanism must be ascertained.”
Touching on my PREP Act lawsuit, the authors recognized that people with jab injuries are being gaslit and get no help from anybody. Pushing aside, for the moment, the sacred goal of selling more vaccines, Plotkin and his confederates admitted that injured people need compensation for their injuries.

“Identifying the biologic mechanisms of adverse reactions — how and in whom they occur — is critical for developing safer vaccines, preventing adverse reactions by expanding contraindications, and equitably compensating vaccinees for true adverse reactions.”
It would be hard to understate the importance of achieving true compensation for vaccine injuries. After all, compensation for injuries is the bedrock of our tort system, which does a pretty good job keeping unsafe products off the market, for the simple reason that paying for people’s injuries cuts into profits.

For too long, vaccine manufacturers have hidden behind the “unavoidably unsafe” banner. But if victims start being fairly compensated —even by the government, as Plotkin suggested— we will immediately get vastly improved visibility into vaccine injuries.

If you give people financial incentives to report their injuries, they will do it in droves. And if you give lawyers incentives to prove how vaccines injured their clients, the lawyers will do the work the scientists have been unable to perform. It would amount to a level of visibility into vaccine injuries that we’ve always needed but never had.

In other words, Plotkin’s new Perspective signals a massive schism opening between medical science and big pharma. That growing gulf arose only because of the pandemic’s unaccountable excesses. I guess the vaccine scientists don’t want to be left holding the bag.

Ex-CDC Director: Public health did not want to report side effects because people would not get vaccinated.

The vaccines “don't prevent infection. They do have side effects...they should have never been mandated”.

Ex-CDC Director Redfield: Again, I think Senator, what you're getting at, which I'm 100% agreeing with you, is I think there was not appropriate transparency from the beginning about the potential side effects of these vaccines. And I do think there was inappropriate decisions by some to try to under report any side effects because they argued that would make the public less likely to get vaccinated. I do think one of the greatest mistakes that was made, of course, was mandating these vaccines. They should have never been mandated. It should have been open to personal choice. They don't prevent infection. They do have side effects. I'm going to clinic this afternoon.

Senator Johnson: But again, again, I appreciate your admitting side effects, but you have to admit the people, the agencies, the marks. You know, the Dr. Marks, the Dr. Woodcock, they're still by and large denying this, right? They're saying, well, they're mild, they're rare, and they're mild. They're not rare, and they're severe to death.

Redfield: The FDA should release all of the safety data they have. I was very disappointed to hear that they were planning to hold on to that until 2026. That really creates a sense of total lack of trust in our public health agencies towards vaccination. It's counterproductive.

Senator Johnson: So Mr. Chairman, I'm not getting cooperation out of the Chairman of the Perm Subcommittee Investigation to issue subpoenas to get this information. You have not yet issued a subpoena to get the final 50 pages unredacted. I would suggest we do that. Again, as important as the cover-up of the origin story is, there's a lot more that's being covered up. The public has a right to know. We pay for these agencies. We pay their salaries. We fund these studies. and they're not giving them to us. So again, I would ask you, again, appreciate this here, and this is important, there are many aspects of our miserably failed response to COVID that needs to be uncovered, not the least of which is the sabotage of early treatment, which I didn't have time to get into. ...

Redfield: It has a very strong pro inflammatory response which is problematic. Again, I think Senator, what you're getting at, which I'm 100% agreeing with you is I think there was not appropriate transparency from the beginning about the potential side effects of these vaccines. And I do think there was inappropriate decisions by some to try to under report any side effects because they argued that would make the public less likely to get vaccinated. I do think one of the greatest mistakes that was made, of course, was mandating that these vaccines, they should have never been mandated. It should have been open to personal choice. They don't prevent infection. They do have side effects.

We, dissidents, tried to tell the people all this stuff in 2021, but Public Health agencies hid it from the people and censored those who spoke out:

They knew modRNA would be distributed all over the body, concentrating in the ovaries, and the adrenal glands, and crossing the blood-brain barrier.

Public health did not want to report side effects because people would not get vaccinated.

The vaccines “don't prevent infection. They do have side effects...they should have never been mandated”.

So, who is going to jail for this greatest crime in history with 5+ billion people jabbed with a toxic substance?

Somehow, during the Covid-19 pandemic, the whole Constitutional system of checks and balances on power was largely disregarded. All of a sudden, a network of 3-letter agencies was calling the shots. The overreaching Executive branch called for a nationwide lockdown, and later for vaccine mandates. CISA decided if your job was essential or not. The CDC decided whether or not landlords could evict tenants. The FDA inserted itself between doctors and their patients, telling doctors not to use certain already approved meds to treat Covid, and pharmacists not to fill certain prescriptions. OSHA required you to wear a mask on public transportation and airplanes. NIH agencies and health departments shut down churches, schools, businesses, and civic, cultural, and sports clubs. They issued directives on how many people could gather in your home, and whether or not you could be with loved ones in hospitals and care centers. The NSC directed a Covid response that was militant, and unconcerned with individual rights. It went on and on and on, as we were bullied, browbeaten, and manipulated by Executive branch bureaucrats and other unelected officials inserting themselves into every aspect of our lives. The Judiciary and Legislative branches largely stood by or even supported what was happening.

For four years, unthinkable crimes against humanity have taken place, their stories documented by C.H.B.M.P. Covid Humanity Betrayal Memory Project, stands as evidence of ongoing atrocity, compiled a list of the most prevalent characteristics associated with deadly covid hospital protocols. CHBMP is committed to shedding light on these issues, raising awareness, putting an end to these harmful practices, tirelessly seeking justice for the countless victims and their devastated families.

Isolation of victim: Victim denied access to family, friends, advocate, Rabbi, Pastor, Priest, Clergy, etc.

Strict adherence to EUA protocols: Only option allowed to victims are hospital “protocol” drugs; Remdesivir/Veklury, Baricitinib/Olumiant, Tocilizumab/Actemra. Often forced on victim when refused.

Denied alternative treatments: Denied requests (often ridiculed) for treatments such as Vitamins, Ivermectin, Budesonide, Hydroxychloroquine, etc. False statements made that they are not “FDA Approved” or do not work.

Denied informed consent: No informed consent provided regarding medications, treatments, intubation, or procedures.

Gaslighting: Gaslighting by Hospital Staff. Victim and family constantly told the victim will die because they are unvaccinated/if they refuse to be vaccinated or if they don’t comply with hospital protocol or ventilation. Constantly told their loved one “was a very sick man” or “a very sick woman”.

Removal of communication devices: Call lights, glasses, cell phone, communication devices removed from patients’ possession or placed out of reach.

Dehumanization: Methodical dehumanization of victim. Often described as “being treated like an animal”.

Pervasive sense of wrongdoing: Family members, friends, and often the victim all had a feeling “something was wrong”.

Vaccination discrimination: Discrimination based on vaccine status. Mocking, verbal and physical abuse for being unvaccinated.

Rapid oxygen increase: Oxygen supplementation increased quickly causing lung complications and damage, leading to mechanical ventilation.

Refusal to communicate: Doctors, nurses, hospital administration refusing to communicate with family or advocates.

Dehydration and starvation: Denial of food, water, or any nutrition. Given diuretics or laxatives.

Restraint abuse: Physical restraint and/or chemical restraints used. Failure to follow legal requirements around the use of restraints. Ventilation used as restraint or as a method of behavior control.

Bathroom denial: Denial of bathroom use. Forced onto a catheter and/or rectal tube.

Non-emergency ventilation: Victim and family told it is just to “give the lungs a rest”.

DNR pressure or shenanigans: Pressured to sign DNR. Ignored or falsified DNR.

Palliative care pressure: Victim and family pressured into palliative care, comfort care or hospice. Family denied participation in the Palliative Care Consult Meeting. Palliative care ordered without consent.

Isolated even in death: Denied access to dying victim. Denied access to view the body after death. Denial of Last Rites.

Police/Security involvement: Police/Security used to keep victim isolated. Families threatened with arrest.

Refusal of transfer: Refusal to change doctors or make hospital transfer.

Infections and injuries: Sepsis, MRSA or Hospital-Acquired Infection. Pressure sores, skin tears, necrosis.

Neglect: Neglect and lack of basic care, general hygiene or grooming, bathing, linen changes.

Nighttime emergencies: Family woken up and pressured to make instant life and death choices with little information. Staff attempting to “scare them” or “confuse them”.

Perception of malevolence: Victim states or feels like hospital staff is torturing them or going to kill them.

Unqualified staff: Treatment by foreign, travel, FEMA, or unqualified Medical Staff.

DUE TO INTENTIONAL SCARE BY THE CENSORSHIP TEAM FAUCI, DEBORAH BIRX, CDC RACHEL WALENSKY, FAUCI PROFITS FROM SHOTS, HOSPITALS MURDERED “UNVACCINATED” TO STOP COVID, SAVE THE WORLD FROM DIRTY SELFISH UNVAXXED

A Brave German Soldier Imprisoned in 2024 for Refusing Covid Vaccinations

Jan Reiners, the modern day hero

Jan Reiners was an exemplary servicemember who served Germany for 12 years.

His problems started in 2021 when Bundeswehr’s careerist generals rushed to mandate Covid vaccine for the troops:

In November 2021, the then Minister of Defense Annegret Kramp-Karrenbauer had the Corona vaccination requirement/toleration requirement introduced. The FAZ newspaper reported that "vaccination refusal in the troops is now endangering service operations" and that the "Bundeswehr is the first institution in Germany to introduce a general vaccination requirement."

This is the picture of the above-mentioned Defense minister:




The soldiers were not given any time to think about this requirement:

Reiners remembers it well: "That was loudly announced to us at the assembly point. They said: Corona vaccination is now mandatory. To all soldiers who have not yet been vaccinated against Corona: If you are not vaccinated by 1 p.m., we will accuse you of disobeying orders. That means three years in prison. Get out of here!"

How can anyone develop “informed consent” when rushed under such orders? Please tell me.

The order was illegal and contravened German law:

“The order for Covid vaccination is inadmissible” - Reiner's lawyer Edgar Siemund, an expert in military law and retired reserve lieutenant, says, "the order for Covid vaccination is inadmissible." Three areas of responsibility overlap here. Specifically, it concerns the relationship of responsibility between superiors and soldiers, between doctors and soldiers/patients, and between doctors and employers. Let us first consider the responsibility between superiors and soldiers. Paragraph 17a (2) of the Soldiers Act states: "The soldier must only tolerate medical measures against his will if they 1. serve to prevent or combat communicable diseases or 2. serve to determine his fitness for service or employment." The vaccination did not protect against transmission of the virus at any time. But that's not all. The relevant regulation here is not the law mentioned, but the Bundeswehr's central service regulation A-840/8, explains Siemund. It is precisely this that regulates the authority of superiors when it comes to vaccinations and prophylactic measures. "There is nothing in this service regulation that says that an order to vaccinate can be given."

Despite all that, the brave soldier Jan Reiners refused the illegal order and was made a scapegoat for it. He lost his Army position and his income:

Today, the former Lance Corporal lives on citizen's income . "They took everything away from me," he says. "German army driver's license, military service ID, I was no longer allowed to go to the barracks just like that, I was treated like a serious criminal."

Jan Reiners, a German Hero

Jan Reiners, a soldier with a long service history, is a hero: he refused an illegal order. All he wanted was to reject the poison, remain a healthy, battle-ready soldier, and stay ready to defend his country. Instead, he was discharged and, after exhausting his appeals, is now going to prison for 40 days. After that, his incarceration will continue as he gets six more months for refusing to pay an illegal fine...

P.S. If anyone in Germany knows how to send Pvt. Reiners money, please let me know. I cannot think of a better way to spend my paid subscriber’s fees than to help that brave man.