« First « Previous Comments 389 - 428 of 699 Next » Last » Search these comments
Not at all when Trump won. The election denial from Democrats was very loud and persistent.
Either change the law or enforce the law.
Patrick says
Not at all when Trump won. The election denial from Democrats was very loud and persistent.
Oh right, that one... well we may have to agree to disagree on that one.
Wait DeficitHawk are saying that Democrats did not deny the 2016 election, loudly and persistently?
Would you like a ton of evidence that they did?
The vax is safe and effective. -- Yup, per the double blind studies
What does it take to really stop the shots and prosecute those responsible? I think we have to go back to the trial data. If the rate of serious adverse events was 1 in 800 in the Pfizer trial, then they would know that their product would cause material harm to millions of people once it was rolled out to so much of the world’s population. Pfizer almost certainly intentionally kept sample sizes very low, threw people out of the analysis, and of course unblinded the study two years before it was over, eliminating the placebo group.
A single death or serious adverse reaction in a clinical trial would need to be reported and extrapolated out to the entire target population this intervention is meant for. That is done to look for rare signals, but the damages can be calculated out. In the Pfizer children’s arm, for example, one 12 year old girl, Maddie de Garay, suffered disability and became wheelchair bound. Pfizer classified her injury as abdominal pain, because otherwise the rate of the jab causing permanent disability would have to be set to 1 in 1200 (the size of the study arm), which is insane for an illness posing statistically no risk to the age group. Pfizer would do anything to hide the bodies of those who might have died or been severely long term injured from the jabs. I speculated on that myself regarding a missing VAERS report many months ago...
The vax is safe and effective.
New World Odor™
@hugh_mankind
Nov 10
BMJ's editor Dr. Peter Doshi raises alarming questions About Safety Concerns
“Pfizer and Moderna trial data are both showing a clear signal of increased risk of serious adverse events among the vaccinated”
Do you really think Trump tried to use "force" on 9/11?
I DO honestly think that for some time that day, he waited to see what would happen in hopes that he could be made Emperor. I believe that was what was going on in his mind as he watched the riot go on and ignored please to intervene and stop the violence. I truly and honestly believe this.
I want avenues so that family wealth is not the determining factor for your income potential... But policies have gone way too far.. trying to push EVERYONE to go. And trying to say no one should have to pay for it, even not have to pay back their loans. It goes hand in hand with not respecting people who do useful trades that didnt go to college, a sort of elitism in the guise of promoting social mobility, trying to build a purely white collar economy.
2)The efficacy of the vaccine. It think it helps reduce death rate by a lot and infection rate by a little per double blind studies done, but its efficacy is lower on mutation variants and the mutation rate is fairly high, so the efficacy will go down with time or need constant updates like flu shots. Other people think the vaccine has virtually no benefit at all.
DeficitHawk says
I DO honestly think that for some time that day, he waited to see what would happen in hopes that he could be made Emperor. I believe that was what was going on in his mind as he watched the riot go on and ignored please to intervene and stop the violence. I truly and honestly believe this.
Either change the law or enforce the law.
Question for you: Why is it, that after almost 40 years of HIV/AIDS, and after Big Pharma and the U. S. Government has spent $HUNDREDS of BILLIONS in research and development, they have yet to come up with a safe and effective vaccine?
Please talk to a recent high school graduate, or dropout, that wasn't able to go to college, and who has to actually compete against illegal immigrants for the same job.
COVID is not this type of virus. Its more like a vanilla coronavirus.
DeficitHawk says
COVID is not this type of virus. Its more like a vanilla coronavirus.
If you read the DoD documents, what has been mis-labled covid, is really a spike protein bio-weapon.
I dont know... we are at extremely low unemployment, with our main economic problems being inflation caused by lack of sufficient workforce, COVID disruptions, and increasing fraction of retired people. I think increasing workforce of working age legal immigrants would be overall good for our economy.
My wife and in-laws are all strongly against illegals. It insults the effort they made to be here legally.
It's fucking hard work. Not something that lazy, benefit seeking people engage in.
link?
You are more inclined to distrust such institutions and disregard the results, and make extrapolations from personal experience.
Ivermectin is anti-bacterial, not anti-viral.
NuttBoxer says
Ivermectin is anti-bacterial, not anti-viral.
Sure about that? Even the government now admits Ivermectin has anti-Covid virus properties:
Ivermectin, a US Food and Drug Administration-approved anti-parasitic agent, was found to inhibit severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) replication in vitro.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33278625/
DeficitHawk says
ignored pleas to intervene and stop the violence
DeficitHawk
Even the government now admits Ivermectin has anti-Covid virus properties:
As far as my covid status I've improved nicely over even just the last 4 hours.
and draconian suppression of peaceful dissent, such as suspending the bank accounts of Canadian truckers
I personally deep dived and investigated the raw data for two articles he linked, but found only extremely misleading characterizations of data, which I debunked fact by fact here on this forum.
There is no shortage of complaints on this forum about people blocking freeways and roads during BLM protests. And those complaints are legit, obstructing freeway traffic is NOT lawful protest, it is illegal. When Canadian truckers do the same thing, those complaints are legit too.
How can you not see your hypocrisy?
Can you not see your hypocrisy DeficitHawk ?
You vaxxed your kids?
DeficitHawk says
There is no shortage of complaints on this forum about people blocking freeways and roads during BLM protests. And those complaints are legit, obstructing freeway traffic is NOT lawful protest, it is illegal. When Canadian truckers do the same thing, those complaints are legit too.
How can you not see your hypocrisy?
Woah, dude, BLM was literally murdering people and burning down neighborhoods and were bailed out by prominent Democrats, much less had to worry about having their bank accounts frozen.
The Canadian truckers were 100% peaceful and were beaten by police, arrested, and and had their bank accounts frozen. A national "state of emergency" was declared in Canada over completely peaceful protest.
Can you not see your hypocrisy DeficitHawk ?
« First « Previous Comments 389 - 428 of 699 Next » Last » Search these comments
By polite, I mean refraining from attacking the person in either direction, but sticking to points of argument instead. So no "You are a (whatever)" will not be allowed. The only appropriate use of "you" will be "Here you said..."
I just ran into an old guy in a cafe who pointed in the newspaper to the governor results in California, which added up to 110%. I said, "well, that's California" and so he accused me of being an "election denier". I asked if he'd seen "2000 Mules" and he said he hadn't "because it's been debunked". Uh, it's the same people who committed the election fraud who are claiming that "2000 Mules" was debunked.
Nor had he heard what was on Hunter's laptop, since he watches only corporate news.
I think I might have made a dent in his wall of denial, and I'd like to try with others.