patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,191,725 comments by 13,863 users - AmericanKulak, Ceffer, Onvacation online now
The guy that wins the 2028 Presidential race will be the first Congressional Republican that calls for a Congressional hearing on George Soros
invite response
2023 Mar 26, 7:23am 239 views 4 comments
Comments 1 - 4 of 4 Search these comments
1
clambo
2023 Mar 26, 9:26am
DEPORT Soros after 1. waterboarding him 2. taking all of his USA assets from him 3. revoking his green card or whatever he has.
3
Tenpoundbass
2023 Mar 27, 10:17am
Tenpoundbass
2023 Mar 27, 10:17am
richwicks says
There's his son that needs to be left broke and penniless unless the World needs or wants another 50 to 60 years of the Soros Family great genes.
Soros is 92. He'll be dead by then or 97.
There's his son that needs to be left broke and penniless unless the World needs or wants another 50 to 60 years of the Soros Family great genes.
4
richwicks
2023 Mar 28, 2:34am
richwicks
2023 Mar 28, 2:34am
Tenpoundbass says
Soros is just a front man. He's a construct. Somebody from the intelligence agencies had a quiet talk with him probably 50 years ago and asked "hey, you want to be fabulously rich? Well, you can be, but you're working for us."
How does a man make money on shorting a country's currency? Soros made his FORTUNE there. He had to borrow a ton of money, buy on margin, and the pound collapsed. He works probably for the banking families. None of the NGOs he has are actually run by him, they are also named to be the opposite of what they do, he's magically immune from any prosecution. He's above the law entirely.
He's a cutout. You can't have the Rothschilds or whomever doing this directly. Why do you think these guys are working at 92? Don't you think he'd like to retire? But he sold his soul, and his kids' soul.
There's a few self made billionaires, probably, but damned few. I used to wonder why the government kept buying the shitty IBM PC for all their work, when Mac and Amiga were available. They had GUIs in 84 and 85 respectively. Atari ST was 85 as well, Acorn Archimedes 1987. All had graphical user interfaces, Windows 3.1 (the first usable Windows, but very VERY buggy) was 1992. It wasn't that difficult to port from DOS to the other machine, in fact, Mac and Amiga (I know) had x86 cards you could get and you could run a legitimate PC. Amiga and (and I believe Acorn) were very Unix like, meaning porting code was not that hard from Unix, and Unix was "the professional's machine" back then. "Serious" people used Unix.
So why did the WORST machine, that was more than 5 years later on having a much more unstable solution "win"? It wasn't even the cheapest solution, probably the Amiga or Acorn was (Acorn was British) - these were advanced machines for the time. The Amiga 500 I got, was $1,200. With a monitor, mouse, and of course keyboard (integrated keyboard). PC's were more expensive. I had access to all the same software, Lotus 1-2-3, Quattro, even MS Word was on it.
It's not a merit based system. This I know for certain at this point. If it doesn't make any sense, it's because there's a lie. It wasn't superior marketing.
We all got it hammered into our heads "this is a capitalist system" - no it's not. Hasn't been for decades. Government has been picking winners and losers for quite some time, and by "government", I mean the banking cartels. This is true for many companies I'm certain.
This is why our "business leaders" are probably so fucking awful, I mean, as human beings.
I have wondered all my life about "how this all works", pretty confident I finally know. Why are the top companies so willing to work with the government? They are the government.
richwicks says
Soros is 92. He'll be dead by then or 97.
There's his son that needs to be left broke and penniless unless the World needs or wants another 50 to 60 years of the Soros Family great genes.
Soros is just a front man. He's a construct. Somebody from the intelligence agencies had a quiet talk with him probably 50 years ago and asked "hey, you want to be fabulously rich? Well, you can be, but you're working for us."
How does a man make money on shorting a country's currency? Soros made his FORTUNE there. He had to borrow a ton of money, buy on margin, and the pound collapsed. He works probably for the banking families. None of the NGOs he has are actually run by him, they are also named to be the opposite of what they do, he's magically immune from any prosecution. He's above the law entirely.
He's a cutout. You can't have the Rothschilds or whomever doing this directly. Why do you think these guys are working at 92? Don't you think he'd like to retire? But he sold his soul, and his kids' soul.
There's a few self made billionaires, probably, but damned few. I used to wonder why the government kept buying the shitty IBM PC for all their work, when Mac and Amiga were available. They had GUIs in 84 and 85 respectively. Atari ST was 85 as well, Acorn Archimedes 1987. All had graphical user interfaces, Windows 3.1 (the first usable Windows, but very VERY buggy) was 1992. It wasn't that difficult to port from DOS to the other machine, in fact, Mac and Amiga (I know) had x86 cards you could get and you could run a legitimate PC. Amiga and (and I believe Acorn) were very Unix like, meaning porting code was not that hard from Unix, and Unix was "the professional's machine" back then. "Serious" people used Unix.
So why did the WORST machine, that was more than 5 years later on having a much more unstable solution "win"? It wasn't even the cheapest solution, probably the Amiga or Acorn was (Acorn was British) - these were advanced machines for the time. The Amiga 500 I got, was $1,200. With a monitor, mouse, and of course keyboard (integrated keyboard). PC's were more expensive. I had access to all the same software, Lotus 1-2-3, Quattro, even MS Word was on it.
It's not a merit based system. This I know for certain at this point. If it doesn't make any sense, it's because there's a lie. It wasn't superior marketing.
We all got it hammered into our heads "this is a capitalist system" - no it's not. Hasn't been for decades. Government has been picking winners and losers for quite some time, and by "government", I mean the banking cartels. This is true for many companies I'm certain.
This is why our "business leaders" are probably so fucking awful, I mean, as human beings.
I have wondered all my life about "how this all works", pretty confident I finally know. Why are the top companies so willing to work with the government? They are the government.
That would be proof to me, that those two are more than just old reruns of Trey Gowdy and Jason Chaffetz.