patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,093,279 comments by 12,539 users - HeadSet, RC2006 online now
Trump not guilty of Rape, but guilty of sexual harassment in Looney Left Woman case
invite response
2023 May 9, 12:42pm 344 views 22 comments
by AmericanKulak ➕follow (8) 💰tip ($0.34 in tips) ignore
« First « Previous Comments 2 - 22 of 22
2
Tenpoundbass
2023 May 9, 12:52pm
Tenpoundbass
2023 May 9, 12:52pm
They slandered Trump with Bill Clinton's rape on Juanita Broderick. .
4
RayAmerica
2023 May 9, 1:21pm
RayAmerica
2023 May 9, 1:21pm
Trump Rape Accuser’s 2012 Facebook Post Jokes about Having Sex w/ Him
'Would you have sex with Donald Trump for $17,000?'
(But, but, but, she was sooooo traumatized by Trump that it ruined her life)
(Jacob Bruns, Headline USA) Former President Donald Trump’s rape accuser, E. Jean Carroll, has a disturbing history of sexual posts on Facebook, particularly regarding Trump himself, the National Pulse reported.
Among Carroll’s recently discovered posts is one that jocularly asked a hypothetical question about having sex with the former president.
“Would you have sex with Donald Trump for $17,000?” she asked in 2012, roughly 16 years after she claims to have endured such a trauma herself.
“(Even if you could A) give the money to Charity? B) Close your eyes? And he’s not allowed to speak?)” she added.
https://headlineusa.com/trump-rape-accuser-2012-joke-sex/
'Would you have sex with Donald Trump for $17,000?'
(But, but, but, she was sooooo traumatized by Trump that it ruined her life)
(Jacob Bruns, Headline USA) Former President Donald Trump’s rape accuser, E. Jean Carroll, has a disturbing history of sexual posts on Facebook, particularly regarding Trump himself, the National Pulse reported.
Among Carroll’s recently discovered posts is one that jocularly asked a hypothetical question about having sex with the former president.
“Would you have sex with Donald Trump for $17,000?” she asked in 2012, roughly 16 years after she claims to have endured such a trauma herself.
“(Even if you could A) give the money to Charity? B) Close your eyes? And he’s not allowed to speak?)” she added.
https://headlineusa.com/trump-rape-accuser-2012-joke-sex/
7
Onvacation
2023 May 9, 2:21pm
Onvacation
2023 May 9, 2:21pm
Carroll says
Obviously a whore negotiating price.
“Would you have sex with Donald Trump for $17,000?”
Obviously a whore negotiating price.
8
komputodo
2023 May 9, 2:56pm
komputodo
2023 May 9, 2:56pm
Onvacation says
you mean STATUE OF LIMITATIONS?
https://www.tiktok.com/@sandronyc/video/7208014854160944426
Statute of limitations???
you mean STATUE OF LIMITATIONS?
https://www.tiktok.com/@sandronyc/video/7208014854160944426
9
Ceffer
2023 May 9, 3:33pm
Ceffer
2023 May 9, 3:33pm
AmericanKulak says
Yup, just their masturbation and headline fantasy. Crooked judge did their job.
Will be overturned on appeal. The Left is jerking off right now.
Yup, just their masturbation and headline fantasy. Crooked judge did their job.
11
REpro
2023 May 9, 6:29pm
REpro
2023 May 9, 6:29pm
Medieval time justice:
Not guilty? No problem.
We will torture you to the point until you confess.
Not guilty? No problem.
We will torture you to the point until you confess.
14
clambo
2023 May 10, 5:01am
Trump was railroaded again by some unfuckable hag.
1996? Give me a break.
I was remembering Carnal Knowledge and Jack Nicholson having a slideshow of girls he had gotten.
He showed one and said "I can't remember her name."
This is all absolute bullshit because the Democrats fear Trump so much.
Edit: she didn't know the year it was supposed to have happened.
1996? Give me a break.
I was remembering Carnal Knowledge and Jack Nicholson having a slideshow of girls he had gotten.
He showed one and said "I can't remember her name."
This is all absolute bullshit because the Democrats fear Trump so much.
Edit: she didn't know the year it was supposed to have happened.
15
FortwayeAsFuckJoeBiden
2023 May 10, 6:47am
i’m even more convinced that our legal system is a joke, and sham.
16
richwicks
2023 May 10, 7:51am
richwicks
2023 May 10, 7:51am
FortwayeAsFuckJoeBiden says
Oh pshaw, you're being too negative. Our legal system isn't a sham, or a joke.
i’m even more convinced that our legal system is a joke, and sham.
Oh pshaw, you're being too negative. Our legal system isn't a sham, or a joke.
18
HeadSet
2023 May 10, 1:00pm
HeadSet
2023 May 10, 1:00pm
rocketjoe79 says
I thought they could only prosecute with the laws in place at the time. Silly me.
Also, they changed the law specifically to prosecute Trump.
I thought they could only prosecute with the laws in place at the time. Silly me.
19
RayAmerica
2023 May 10, 1:26pm
RayAmerica
2023 May 10, 1:26pm
Internationalist elitist that wears the Magic Underwear of his Lucifer Cult speaks:
Romney reacts to Trump verdict: 'He just is not suited to be president'
https://www.politico.com/video/2023/05/09/rommey-reacts-to-trump-verdict-he-just-is-not-suited-to-be-president-909502
Recall the two POTUS elections of Obama; the 'choice' was between him and the Neo-Con globalist and Israeli lackey John McCain and then the elitist, RINO, East Coast Establishment Romney. This is the way it is with most POTUS elections. In most cases, whoever wins is going to do the work of the Establishment. Trump (and Andrew Jackson of 1824) are the rare exceptions, precisely why they were opposed so vehemently by the people that are really pulling the levers from behind the curtain.
Romney reacts to Trump verdict: 'He just is not suited to be president'
https://www.politico.com/video/2023/05/09/rommey-reacts-to-trump-verdict-he-just-is-not-suited-to-be-president-909502
Recall the two POTUS elections of Obama; the 'choice' was between him and the Neo-Con globalist and Israeli lackey John McCain and then the elitist, RINO, East Coast Establishment Romney. This is the way it is with most POTUS elections. In most cases, whoever wins is going to do the work of the Establishment. Trump (and Andrew Jackson of 1824) are the rare exceptions, precisely why they were opposed so vehemently by the people that are really pulling the levers from behind the curtain.
20
KgK one
2023 May 10, 9:02pm
Women need to stop fake accusing for rape n sexual harassment. Reduces seriousness of real ones.
How the fk can you really distinguish asking girl out n harassment. Each girl is different , hope they agree on rules n don't fk over men's lives.
Marriage rate is low, it will be even.lower if this keeps happening
How the fk can you really distinguish asking girl out n harassment. Each girl is different , hope they agree on rules n don't fk over men's lives.
Marriage rate is low, it will be even.lower if this keeps happening
21
richwicks
2023 May 11, 12:54am
richwicks
2023 May 11, 12:54am
HeadSet says
They didn't retroactively change the law. If Trump broke the law (and I doubt he did), he broke the law at that time. They modified the law to extend the statue of limitations, they've done this repeatedly to convict child rapists before. Nobody complained about that, and they shouldn't.
rocketjoe79 says
Also, they changed the law specifically to prosecute Trump.
I thought they could only prosecute with the laws in place at the time. Silly me.
They didn't retroactively change the law. If Trump broke the law (and I doubt he did), he broke the law at that time. They modified the law to extend the statue of limitations, they've done this repeatedly to convict child rapists before. Nobody complained about that, and they shouldn't.
22
Onvacation
2023 May 17, 11:52am
Onvacation
2023 May 17, 11:52am
She had no evidence, no witnesses, and no proof that Trump assaulted her. She does, however, think rape is sexy.
If they answered no on the rape question, they could then decide if Trump subjected her to lesser forms of assault involving sexual contact without her consent or forcible touching to degrade her or gratify his sexual desire. If they answered yes on either of those questions, they will decide if damages are appropriate.
On defamation claims stemming from a statement Trump made on social media last October, Kaplan said jurors needed to be guided by a higher legal standard — clear and convincing evidence.
He said they would have to agree it was “highly probable” that Trump’s statement was false and was made maliciously with deliberate intent to injure or out of hatred or ill will with reckless disregard for Carroll’s rights.
https://apnews.com/article/trump-rape-carroll-trial-fe68259a4b98bb3947d42af9ec83d7db
Will be overturned on appeal. The Left is jerking off right now.